Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What's the distance between the rails in the real world?

8029 views
60 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:10 AM
Paul3 wrote:

<"You have to consider where Mark is coming from. Both he and I have been on the 'net for years talking model trains, starting with newsgroups. And the "standard gauge/Roman Chariot" myth has come up so many times that it's practically a running gag over on rec.models.railroad. It gets to the point that we think everyone has heard it & knows how guage is measured, and that after the first rebuttal is given and *still* folks are arguing, it gets frustrating.">

You're not wrong Paul,it's frustrating all right. I have no doubt that the Roman chariot rubbish will continue to do the rounds, even though there's not one iota of evidence to back it up...

Cheers,

Mark.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:08 AM
selector wrote:

<"Mark's delivery can be excoriating (a combination, we have agreed, of personality and cultural differences), but you can generally take what he asserts to the bank.">

Mate, thanks for the compliment! But I'd like to be the first to point out that I've been wrong on many occasions...

<"I have been spanked a couple of times...">

Fwoar!!! :-)

Seriously, no offence meant, and none taken, I hope?

Mark.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:07 AM
GearDrivenSteam wrote:

<"That's a pretty nasty post. For someone like me who didn't know where the measurement was taken from, I assumed it was from the rail center. Instead of being ugly about it, you could have presented your point in a positive way.">

Meaning what? My post wasn't addressed to you specifically, nor did it insult or denigrate you specifically, so I don't know why you've decided to take offence at it. At any rate, I reserve the right to be "ugly" towards those who keep posting this sort of nonsense.

<"Not everyone knows all that stuff.">

Granted, not everyone does. But when there are repeated posts that correctly describe how gauge is measured, and why, there is no excuse for not knowing, is there?

All the best,

Mark.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:05 AM
tomikawaTT wrote:

<"Just scanned through the link I posted above, and found something very interesting.

Seems that an Italian law passed in 1879 specified that only three track gauges would be legal in that country: 750mm, 1000mm and 1500mm - measured at the center of the rails!">

Yes Chuck, very interesting! That would go a long way towards explaining the numerous 950mm gauge light railways in Italy and their former colonies and possessions.

Cheers,

Mark.

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:04 AM

james saunders wrote:

<"I thought it was 3' 6" from inside to inside...or is that just here?">

Here being Queensland, right? What about NSW, Victoria, SA, WA, the Northern Territory, the ACT, and Tasmania? Every state and territory in Australia has had, or has 3'6' gauge railways. And, as Chuck notes, New Zealand, Japan, Africa, as well as many other countries.

Cheers,

Mark.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:02 AM
james saunders wrote:

<"didn't know it was so popular, we have 3 gauges in Qld..

1067mm - QR network
1485mm - interstate standard gauge from Brisbane port south
610mm - the sugarcan train network

someone didn't know what they were doing way back">

Why do you reckon that? The reasons for choosing 1067mm as the gauge for the infant QGR system were perfectly valid at the time. The colony had a pressing need for rail transport, but not much money.

The standard gauge extension to Yeerongpilly was a logical contination of the NSWGR network, and provided a strategic transport link on the east coast during WW2.

As for the cane network being 610mm, there was no requirement for interchange with the QGR system, and rollingstock and track in that gauge was readily available from suppliers like Hudsons and Decauville.

I'd say various "someones" knew exactly what they were doing!

Cheers,

Mark.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Monday, August 21, 2006 7:20 PM
didn't know it was so popular, we have 3 gauges in Qld..

1067mm  - QR network
1485mm - interstate standard gauge from Brisbane port south
610mm - the sugarcan train network

someone didn't know what they were doing way back Wink [;)]

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, August 21, 2006 3:30 PM

 james saunders wrote:
 I thought it was 3' 6" from inside to inside...or is that just here?

There, here (I model a 1067mm gauge prototype) and a lot of other places, notably in Japan and Africa - which is why it's widely referred to as "Cape gauge."

Of course your neighbors to the Southeast (aka NZ) use it, too.

Quick test to see if the Brits got there before the French - is the track gauge 1m or 1067mm?  No mater which, it's still measured from the inside faces of the railheads.

Chuck

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Sunday, August 20, 2006 10:38 PM
 I thought it was 3' 6" from inside to inside...or is that just here?

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Sunday, August 20, 2006 10:30 PM
I agree.  Mark's delivery can be excoriating (a combination, we have agreed, of personality and cultural differences), but you can generally take what he asserts to the bank.  I have been spanked a couple of times. Ashamed [*^_^*]  I take him as a gate-keeper, of sorts, and that is okay by me.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Sunday, August 20, 2006 2:54 PM
If it wasn't directed towards me, then I recant my reply. I wasn't aware of anyone trolling.
It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Sunday, August 20, 2006 1:38 PM

GearDrivenSteam,
You have to consider where Mark is coming from.  Both he and I have been on the 'net for years talking model trains, starting with newsgroups.  And the "standard gauge/Roman Chariot" myth has come up so many times that it's practically a running gag over on rec.models.railroad.  It gets to the point that we think everyone has heard it & knows how guage is measured, and that after the first rebuttle is given and *still* folks are arguing, it gets frustrating.

Mark's post really isn't that nasty.  "Complete and utter nonsense" isn't that bad a description of what's been going on here by a certain poster (not you).  That person is trolling for replies, and is therefore a Troll.  As the saying goes, "Please don't feed the Trolls."  They crave attention like a 4-year-old craves a lollypop.

Mark is just less tolerant of "cow manure" than others, and tends to call people on it.  I'm glad he does because if he didn't, people would be getting bad info constantly.

Paul A. Cutler III
*************
Weather Or No Go New Haven
*************

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Sunday, August 20, 2006 2:30 AM
 GearDrivenSteam wrote:
 

...For someone like me who didn't know where the measurement was taken from, I assumed it was from the rail center...



Hi Robert:

There are several problems with defining the rail gauge as a center to center distance.  (This assumes that we are starting at the very beginning of railroading, and can therefore define things, rather than adhere to an already established standard.)

The first problem is that the center to center distance isn't relevant to our purpose.  In keeping the wheels on the rails, you're concerned with two things:

prevent the wheels from falling into the gap between both rails, and
prevent the wheels from climbing either of the rails.

(We're ignoring turnouts, since such consideration would unnecessarily complicate the discussion.)

The center to center distance won't NECESSARILY achieve either of those two goals.  Because, as has been stated in other posts, the railhead may not be the same width.  Different weights of rail had more or less proportional cross sections, so a heavier grade rail would have a wider railhead.  If you define the track gauge as a center to center distance, the actual distance between the two rails will VARY when you use different rail weights, which is not a desirable thing.

It's the distance BETWEEN the rails, which in combination with the wheel gauge and a few other factors, keeps the wheels on the tracks.  We're using the term wheel gauge in the sense of the drawing shown here:

http://www.sdrm.org/faqs/gauge/track-lg.gif

If you use "wheel gauge" as a search term these days, you turn up a lot of references  to devices  which measure  wheel  profile, ie,  mechanical or optical gauges to measure  a wheel's _profile_.   That's one of the problems with trying to search for something  that  was originally recommended by the ARA in October of  1896.

Anyway, back to the problem of track gauge as a center to center definition.  If you had defined track gauge as being between the _centers_ of the two rails, you really complicate things for your track workers.  This is your second problem.  With track gauge defined this way, in order to comply with your standard, they've got to measure three things, not one.  They've got to find the center point of each of the rails.  So they've got to measure the width of each railhead, divide by two, and make a reference mark or something, at the centers of each rail.  Then they've got to measure the distance between those two marks, and that would be the track gauge at that point, which you compare to your standard value.  Pretty complicated procedure, as mentioned by selector earlier.

So if you define track gauge as center to center, you wind up with a "standard" which is hard to measure, variable, and not necessarily relevant to your main purpose.  All of which would argue against setting up your standard that way.

All of this has either been implied or stated previously, but I thought, in view of your last post, that it might be good to summarize things in one spot.

-Ed

 

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Sunday, August 20, 2006 12:58 AM

"I supppose it depends on how many times people post complete and utter nonsense - that track gauge is measured from the centre of the rail head. Or that other bonehead favourite, the standard gauge/Roman Chariot myth.

(I can never understand why people repeatedly post on subjects they clearly know absolutely nothing about.)

Cheers,

Mark. "

 

That's a pretty nasty post. For someone like me who didn't know where the measurement was taken from, I assumed it was from the rail center. Instead of being ugly about it, you could have presented your point in a positive way. Not everyone knows all that stuff.

It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Saturday, August 19, 2006 10:50 PM

Just scanned through the link I posted above, and found something very interesting.

Seems that an Italian law passed in 1879 specified that only three track gauges would be legal in that country: 750mm, 1000mm and 1500mm - measured at the center of the rails!

Depend on a bunch of technologically challenged politicians to screw things up!

Chuck (who models 1067mm gauge prototypes on 16.5mm gauge track - measured between the inside faces of the railheads in both cases)

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:15 AM
Well said Smiffy!
That dos it for me, my copy of Kemps Engineering Year Book for 1915 shows roughly the same dimensions as applied to British Standard Bull Head Rail set in cast steel chairs.
This system allowed the rail to be turned laterally and longtitudinally many times in order to even out wear, the need to grind the head never happened with this type, however as this was labour intensive (also CWR is not possible) flat bottom rail is now the norm on main lines here in the UK.

John Baker

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:53 AM
 reklein wrote:

What I meant was that ole R.T. was fishing for controversy by baiting us with the inside to outside gauge thing and everybody bit. Fish are caught by the lips and are often torn by the hooks. A plug is a wooden lure used primarily for bass or on the coaast certain types of salmon will hit such a lure.

P.S. I always thought gauge waas inside to inside and don't quite understand the controversy .For a buch of detail nuts such as modelrailroaders are want to be has someone gone out and actually put a tape on the tracks in various locations? Think I'll do that today.

So you are saying that rtpoteet is a pain in the patoot?

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Lewiston ID
  • 1,710 posts
Posted by reklein on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:39 AM

What I meant was that ole R.T. was fishing for controversy by baiting us with the inside to outside gauge thing and everybody bit. Fish are caught by the lips and are often torn by the hooks. A plug is a wooden lure used primarily for bass or on the coaast certain types of salmon will hit such a lure.

P.S. I always thought gauge waas inside to inside and don't quite understand the controversy .For a buch of detail nuts such as modelrailroaders are want to be has someone gone out and actually put a tape on the tracks in various locations? Think I'll do that today.

In Lewiston Idaho,where they filmed Breakheart pass.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 8:15 AM
I supppose it depends on how many times people post complete and utter nonsense - that track gauge is measured from the centre of the rail head. Or that other bonehead favourite, the standard gauge/Roman Chariot myth.

(I can never understand why people repeatedly post on subjects they clearly know absolutely nothing about.)

Cheers,

Mark.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 8:07 AM

I am going ahead and going to add to "How many times can the same bit of information be posted in response to the OP's question?". I suppose that the below drawing should be it, but it won't.

I do wan't to quote the source of the drawing:

The Railroad: What It Is, What It Does by John Armstrong
A book long used as a reference by professional railroaders, which includes the diagram shown by the San Diego Railroad Museum

I do realize this was posted in another response earlier in this thread.

Smitty
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:08 AM
Don't be daft!
It's the distance BETWEEN the rails (inner face to inner face at 90deg to the running surface), a platelayer friend informs me that in actual fact the UK true gauge is 4ft-8 3/4inches.
As a qualified draughtsman of the old school all distances between cylindrical objects and holes are centre to centre, rarely tangential.

John Baker

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:47 AM
modlerbob wrote:

<" In the 1:1 scale world the 4'-81/2" distance is from center of rail to center of rail, at least on the engineering drawings I work from. ">

Sounds like utter BS to me. What engineering drawings are you claiming show the gauge from centre to centre? Care to post an example?

Mark.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Sydney, Australia
  • 1,939 posts
Posted by marknewton on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:35 AM
GearDrivenSteam wrote:

<"I've always thought that the measurement was taken from the center of the top of the rails. Seems like that would make the most sense.">

Does it? Why? What you're saying makes no sense at all. Think about it for a moment - where do the flanges ride? Between the gauge faces or on top of the rails?

Mark.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:58 PM

 reklein wrote:
I think everybody just got their lips ripped on ole R.T.'s plugWink [;)]

 

Please explain this.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Lewiston ID
  • 1,710 posts
Posted by reklein on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 11:32 PM
I think everybody just got their lips ripped on ole R.T.'s plugWink [;)]
In Lewiston Idaho,where they filmed Breakheart pass.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Buffalo NY USA
  • 452 posts
Posted by edkowal on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:53 PM
If you can control your laughter, you might consider the following references:

UNESCO referring to the Trans-Asian Railway
http://www.unescap.org/ttdw/common/TIS/TAR/break_of_gauge.asp

The San Diego Railroad Museum
http://www.sdrm.org/faqs/gauge/

The Railroad: What It Is, What It Does by John Armstrong
A book long used as a reference by professional railroaders, which includes the diagram shown by the San Diego Railroad Museum

The glossary on the Trains.com website itself
http://www.trains.com/trn/glossary/default.aspx?list=4&fl=t

The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development) glossary
http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=3915

and the beginner's guide to DTG (Digital Track Gauge) available at the following site
http://www.graw.com/angielski/dtg-1435-en.htm
By clicking on the image of the beginner's guide on the linked page above, you can download a guide to using the Graw Company's state of the art, digital track gauge.  Look at page two of this guide and take note of what surfaces are being measured when you measure track gauge with this device.

I hope these additional resources are equally funny.

-Ed

Five out of four people have trouble with fractions. -Anonymous
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead. -Benjamin Franklin
"You don't have to be Jeeves to love butlers, but it helps." (Followers of Levi's Real Jewish Rye will get this one) -Ed K
 "A potted watch never boils." -Ed Kowal
If it's not fun, why do it ? -Ben & Jerry

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Cherry Valley, Ma
  • 3,674 posts
Posted by grayfox1119 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:34 PM
All THIS just because poor Electrolove asked ONE SIMPLE question!! Electrolove, you see why you get things done in Sweden and it takes us an entire committee of 10,000 to answer one question? LOL
Dick If you do what you always did, you'll get what you always got!! Learn from the mistakes of others, trust me........you can't live long enough to make all the mistakes yourself, I tried !! Picture album at :http://www.railimages.com/gallery/dickjubinville Picture album at:http://community.webshots.com/user/dickj19 local weather www.weatherlink.com/user/grayfox1119
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,899 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:17 PM

Somebody's off his medication again... 

rtpoteet1, what are you, twelve?

Paul A. Cutler III
*************
Weather Or No Go New Haven
*************

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 15, 2006 9:10 PM
HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!