Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Who can continue to pay for this hobby? Locked

19850 views
282 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Atlanta, GA
  • 72 posts
Posted by Tommy0218 on Friday, August 25, 2006 8:31 AM
 claycts wrote:
 Safety Valve wrote:

 Driline wrote:
ummm...what was the question again?Smile [:)]

HOW AM I TO PAY FOR ALL THESE TRAINS AUGH!

LOL.

Lets see, (1) Silver Streak Kit $29.95, (1) Atlas RS3 $69.99, (1) Ambriod Kiy $19.95, (1) Mantua Camelback $79.00 and (1) Prescision Brass Big Boy $2,695.00.

Wife who understands and pays for all of the above "PRICELESS"

I bought her this: Krysti, wife, is in the pink

She liked it!!!

What was this thread about? Confused [%-)]

George,

I can appreciate your taste for wanting the finer things in life. I own and operate 2 catering companies in Atlanta, GA and Ft. Lauderdale, FL areas and I currently have over 250 model steam loco's in my personal collection so I can understand your burning desire to flaunt things, however there also comes a time when we all need to be humble.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:28 PM
    One of my Friends Bought a train set for $700 and it only included an engine and 5  cars.  YES THAT IS ALL. As for me I would rather put more in the layout than the train.  He isn't putting muchin for a layout though.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:24 PM
 Safety Valve wrote:

 Driline wrote:
ummm...what was the question again?Smile [:)]

HOW AM I TO PAY FOR ALL THESE TRAINS AUGH!

LOL.

Lets see, (1) Silver Streak Kit $29.95, (1) Atlas RS3 $69.99, (1) Ambriod Kiy $19.95, (1) Mantua Camelback $79.00 and (1) Prescision Brass Big Boy $2,695.00.

Wife who understands and pays for all of the above "PRICELESS"

I bought her this: Krysti, wife, is in the pink

She liked it!!!

What was this thread about? Confused [%-)]

Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 24, 2006 10:06 PM

 Driline wrote:
ummm...what was the question again?Smile [:)]

HOW AM I TO PAY FOR ALL THESE TRAINS AUGH!

LOL.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bettendorf Iowa
  • 2,173 posts
Posted by Driline on Thursday, August 24, 2006 5:31 PM
ummm...what was the question again?Smile [:)]
Modeling the Davenport Rock Island & Northwestern 1995 in HO
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:53 PM
 andrechapelon wrote:

I lose my DSL for over a week and come back to find this topic near the top of the list.

Kinda reminds me of the Monty Python Dead Parrot sketch. http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/monty-python-parrot.html

But why should I care? I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day.......

Andre

 



Finally! Something interesting in this thread.............Shock [:O]  The basic subject for 14 + pages has been, "Ain't it awful".  I think I go work on the layout. 

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:24 PM

I lose my DSL for over a week and come back to find this topic near the top of the list.

Kinda reminds me of the Monty Python Dead Parrot sketch. http://www.davidpbrown.co.uk/jokes/monty-python-parrot.html

But why should I care? I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day.......

Andre

 

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 5 posts
Posted by goldenturtle on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 5:09 PM

 I just got back into this hobby after a 18 year rest. Yes, I am amazed at the increase in prices. I am more amazed at the cottage industry producing good quality buildings, detail parts, rolling stock, etc.....I am also amazed at the quality of the new models... I just bought Bachmann's 3 truck shay it's sweeeet. and the biggest thing I see now is digital control and sound. Yeah, this can be an expensive hobby ( so was this computer I'm typing on!) but regular plastic modeling is also pricey. Thats what I was building during my hiatis from railroading, You can drop a hundered bucks on a single model aircraft or afv. THEN go and buy aftermarket detail parts for it. You can very easly make even a $25.00 model plane cost 4 -5 times that amount with detail parts and decals etc...  I t all bols down to what you enjoy and what you are willing to spend your money on . Dont get me started on what I've spent on my car modifying it!

 Sorry, sometimes I tend to ramble but its just some of my .02 worth!

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • 84 posts
Posted by sansouci on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 4:08 PM

Maybe the ecnomics of a brick and mortar LHS have changed dramatically with alternative hobbies (computers and computer games) and the internet to provide another distribution channel. There must be alternative channels or how would the Walthers and Lionels, etc., of the world make "big" profits.I doubt it is very profitable to run a niche business. We might be better off as consumers if Wal-Mart or Target or Costco had a train dep't. to depress the gross margins. But the proof is in the decline of the LHS that it ain't all that wonderful. Last month, Marklin was sold by the family to a British based investment firm which included the assumption of about $40 million in debt and a small payment to the family. This is one of the premier and highest priced lines of HO and Z-scale trains. Even they have been relocating production to Hungary and China. And the participation of Germans, Austrians, Swiss in the model train hobby is more extensive than in the US (Possibly because their children can see a lot of prototype trains rather than us US-based geezers just remembering them.)

Last point-how much is that basement or garage worth on your house that you've stuffed full of plywood, track, rolling stock. My house was $35,000 in 1948 and $1.5mm now That's 6.75% compounded rate of return. That's real inflation. So if you want to complain about the cost of the hobby, you also ought to complain about the increased cost of putting it somewhere.

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Atlanta, GA
  • 72 posts
Posted by Tommy0218 on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:25 PM
 Safety Valve wrote:
Now it's on life support this thread is. I wonder how many will fight to keep this alive much more than it has already been.
On Life support - then it's time to pull the plug Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:23 PM
Now it's on life support this thread is. I wonder how many will fight to keep this alive much more than it has already been.
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Atlanta, GA
  • 72 posts
Posted by Tommy0218 on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:15 PM
 claycts wrote:

PLEASE, PLEASE stick a fork in this, it is DONE!!!

I am starting a thread on the Ferrari forum about who can afford $1.25Mil for an Enzio. Not me, I bought a Testarossa instead.

Think it will get the same PLAY TIME.?

Exact same difference in BOTH questions. Who can afford it? Anybody who wants to!

Claycts,

I completely agree !! I cannot see the point in beating a "DEAD HORSE" further into the ground Dead [xx(]

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:46 PM

PLEASE, PLEASE stick a fork in this, it is DONE!!!

I am starting a thread on the Ferrari forum about who can afford $1.25Mil for an Enzio. Not me, I bought a Testarossa instead.

Think it will get the same PLAY TIME.?

Exact same difference in BOTH questions. Who can afford it? Anybody who wants to!

Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 1,377 posts
Posted by SOU Fan on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:04 PM
 Brunton wrote:

Boy, has this been beat to death, or what?

Zzz [zzz]

Yes it has been beat to death.

Look at this, BLI enignes with sound for $129.99, even I can afford that.

http://trainworld.com/broadwayltd/BROADWAYBLOWOUTS.htm

dekruif

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:58 AM
 Brunton wrote:

Boy, has this been beat to death, or what?

Zzz [zzz]

 

Mark,That is so true..The dang-est part as they speak there is a super sale going on at M.B.Kleins that has prices anybody can afford..However..I'll  bit a cup of coffee this topic will ramble on and on and on about how unfordable this hobby is...Sigh [sigh]Laugh [(-D]

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:51 AM
 Brunton wrote:

Boy, has this been beat to death, or what?

Zzz [zzz]

Yes, and how many times since you and I have been on this forum at the same time.  I'm beginning to think that the polls were more tolerable.  (gag)

Bob, if you're reading this, I took exception to a post of yours about 16 months ago where you raked someone for repetition or for an inane poll.  I think I may have to ask you for some pepper.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:37 AM
 Brunton wrote:

Boy, has this been beat to death, or what?

Zzz [zzz]

 

I agree, This was one of the most beaten threads out there. I hate to continue it but I know MANY  small manufacturers that are mom and pop operations that would really be sad to read this thread.

JL Innovative, Hunter Scenery, Sodders enterprises, ML Designs to name a few are all wonderfull companies that stuggle to compete with the "big guys" , produce quality products, and offer awesome customer service! Making huge profits? Making a living is more like it.

SO THE NEXT TIME YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT WALTHERS PRICES, HOW ABOUT SURFING THE WEB AND SUPPORT THE SMALL COMPANIES!

David

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 6:14 AM

Boy, has this been beat to death, or what?

Zzz [zzz]

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Detroit
  • 48 posts
Posted by BigOzzy86 on Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:46 AM

One reason I took back to this hobby (MR) was the costs.....  New RC Cars are well over $500 to get out the door and probably average another $50 a month or so in new replacement parts (things break when they go 45mph into parking beams) and track fees. 

 I pay only $25 a month in club dues.... this provides me with unlimited use of the club owned layout with a whole arsenal of engines and rolling stock to use and configure as I wish.   I have also taken back into purchasing blue box kits / accurail kits / bowser kits for making long trains that I want to be able to see and run. (Average of $30 a month in kits)

In two years of being back in this hobby, I have spent $165 on one Proto 2000 engine with sound and DCC as well as $100 on its companion engine without sound.

I think that these costs are reasonable.

P.S.  If you think something is too much... just wait awhile the price will come down.  I.E. the Proto 2000 GP38-2's were all over $100 a year and a half ago.  Most places are hard pressed to be giving them away at $65 now.

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 88 posts
Posted by f14aplusfl on Monday, August 21, 2006 10:16 PM

Kits, cars, locomotives make great presents.... so from many people you could conceivably get 1 or 2 locomotives, a few cars, or kits. So next time someone asks you what you want for ____ event tell them, modeling supplies. So you might repaint it, surely you'll add more details, but weren't you going to do that anyway? So you save on the locomotive... spend the same cash on details for two or three, or something else.

But also you don't have to model a gigantic basement/room filled giant "class one" railroad. How about a short line? Or maybe a regional? Or even a branch line of that class one you want to model? What about keeping it simple? Also if you look at the Model Railroader Layout and Planning Contest, they're using the average sized room for a model train layout.... 9 by 11 ft. Granted to some it’s not a lot of space but if you're creative, you can do a lot with it.

The simple truth is yes prices for everything has gone up partly cause of inflation. People blame rising economies like the People's Republic of China, India, etc...(mainly Red China) for rising costs. But if you are creative and think outside the traditional avenues for the same dollar you can go far. Unfortunately it’s easier to blame people than it is to figure out ways of getting the job done.

Florida East Coast Railway - Flagler System "Speedway to America's Playground" Roads bad, Trains better.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: North Carolina
  • 1,905 posts
Posted by csxns on Monday, August 21, 2006 8:05 PM
I guess i am ok paying for this hobby i just ordered some Rail Yard models.

Russell

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: AIKEN S.C. & Orange Park Fl.
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by claycts on Monday, August 21, 2006 8:01 PM
 brothaslide wrote:
 Safety Valve wrote:
 claycts wrote:

Reality Check!!

If Iran fires Nukes, non of this matters!

IF Iran fires nukes, all the more reason to enjoy trains in our last 30 minutes from doomsday.

Ye forget, Some of us recall the NIKE missile batteries back in the 60's. Living 30 minutes from the end of the world. (Travel time of a Ballistic Missile from Moscow to USA.)

If Iran did pop a nuke and broke things; killed people we probably will respond. The real problem is USSR and China. What will they do? Dont tell me anything about the UN. They have proven themselves to be pacifist paper loving peaceniks who are unable to do anything effective other than sitting around a large room and pass resolutions.



There is a book called, "Atomic Iran" by Dr. Jerome R. Corsi which discusses a scenario of a suitcase nuke being detonated in New York City - Very scary!  It's a no win situation for everyone involved.

As a person old enough to remember Korea (not MASH), Vietnam (classic example of screw-ups) I must sit back and read this thread falling back on the comment of a reality check.

If there was this kind of passion in the UN or in Washington then maybe things would be better. Me I am enjoying the latter years of life and can afford this hobby or any hobby I wish. That is called planing for you future.

This has been a very amusing thread that took on a life of it's own. Aren't you all glad we do not have to pay for time on this forum!!!

Play nice, I am going to run some trains!

Take Care George Pavlisko Driving Race cars and working on HO trains More fun than I can stand!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 21, 2006 6:10 PM
 fwright wrote:

I've been doing a little thinking about this thread, and the previous one about the hobby dying, and the current thread about project railroads.  CNJ may be on to something, but the not the way he intended.

In the '50s, the objective of the MR project railroads (before the days of readily available scale train sets), was to show armchair model railroaders that they were capable of building a small table layout with a modicum of skills, money, and time.  The project layouts gave suggestions as to what track to use, how to lay it, wiring diagrams, suggestions for relatively easy loco and car kits, and scenery how-tos.  All aimed at helping a beginner get started (or an armchair mr get off their duff) in the hobby.  The implication is that there were (or at least thought to be) a fair percentage of readers who had never built a layout (armchair modelers).  Another obvious implication is that MR (as it still does) sees growing the hobby as good for its business.

Fast forward to today.  A dad (could be a teenager just as easily) goes into an LHS and buys an HO or N train set for about $100-$150.  He sees himself playing trains with his kids, and even if the kids don't care for it after a while, he'll still enjoy it.  The set contains a reasonable locomotive (it runs out of the box), a few cars, some track with built-in roadbed, and a minimal power pack.  He sets it up at home and it works - reasonably.  The train goes around the circle.

Now he wants to expand a little, maybe get 2 trains running on a 4x8.  Lumber for his table - probably $50-$75.  He gets told you want quality in that 2nd engine, don't settle for anything less than Kato or Atlas or P2K.  $100+ for that second loco.  A few RTR cars at $15 each - God help him if he wants passenger cars.  Don't forget the addtional track - another $100 (we're keeping to a simple plan).  Need another power pack, too, and it has to be a step up.  A few plastic building kits at $25 each, and all of a sudden his investment goes from $150 to at least $650.  In his eyes, his costs went up by more than a factor of 4, but he only got a second train out of it.  No wonder he is in sticker shock, especially when the wife finds out.  Ain't going to be any expansion beyond that table top for quite a while!  And because he built his layout in a month (pretty easy RTR, you know) and burned through all that money in the same time frame, things are not very interesting any more, either.

What has happened is the the armchair and mr wannabes of the past now have as CNJ put it "train set layouts".  There are far more of them than there used to be.  At the high end, because of RTR and decent manufactured turnouts, basement-size layouts are now practical for those with $$.  This has spurred the manufacturers to go up-scale, too.

In the meantime, what hasn't happened is a methodology and practical ways for the train set modeler to become in CNJ's eyes "a real model railroader".  It Mr. Train Set gets lucky, he finds a truly helpful LHS or club, or stumbles across a friendly online forum where he/she doesn't get made fun of.  But most LHSs hide the kits on shelves in the back in closed boxes.  The RTR is out front and visible.  RTR solves the nasty (and expensive!)problem of returns and service for both the LHS and manufacturer when a newb get in over his head with a kit.  And if Mr. Train Set doesn't find some reassurance, assistance, and ways to stay within the budget he drops out. 

Interestingly enough, MR of the '50s and '60s used to be full of these types of articles - dollar models, kitchen table locos, encouraging pictures of average and incomplete efforts in the photos section.  I know in my case (before Internet), MR did serve as the bridge to make the climb from train set to more.  It was a Jack Work article in Apr '63 that gave me the courage to handlay my track.  An MR editorial about $$/hr encouraged me to use my limited budget on kits.  A '66 MR article encouraged me enough to finally try making some plaster scenery.

Now, project layouts are fewer and less applicable to Mr. Train Set.  Layout visits seem to consume most of the magazine, and prototype plans and articles about scratchbuilding are very rare.  Kit-bashing outside of structures is non-existent.  When was the last time you saw an article on modifying a Labelle or other wooden kit?  Or about sources for detail parts for various eras of locomotives and cars?  How about teaching DC wiring for that majority that still use DC?

While there is a lot of truth to the saying about only publishing what mr's write about, there is also a visible agenda at MR to promote the high end of the hobby.  Look at what gets reviewed - high end locos and RTR cars and DCC, and precious little else.  This contributes to the sticker shock that started this thread.  When was the last time an ordinary car kit (like a BB) was reviewed so that a newb could understand what they were getting (or not getting) if they purchased one?  Or using a review of a craftsman kit to explain the differences between it and a BB?  I look in my '60s back issues and I see reviews of trucks, detail parts, structure kits (not limited run!), and loco and car kits in addition to the then high end such as brass locos and cars (which were also limited run).  How about a review of an ordinary S or other minoirty scale/gauge item occasionally?

enough of my ranting, returning to my hole

Fred Wright

in foggy, coastal Oregon where it's always 1900

Behold! A story of the Hobby that has many truths!Bow [bow]

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, August 21, 2006 2:36 PM

Fred,There's a lot of iron clad truth in your words for all to read.Sadly I doubt if  everybody will fully understand what you are saying but,its in MR for all to see and read.

Forget DC..He/She will need nothing less then DCC to run a train around a simple loop per MR..Look at the current simple loop layout project.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Monday, August 21, 2006 1:44 PM

I've been doing a little thinking about this thread, and the previous one about the hobby dying, and the current thread about project railroads.  CNJ may be on to something, but the not the way he intended.

In the '50s, the objective of the MR project railroads (before the days of readily available scale train sets), was to show armchair model railroaders that they were capable of building a small table layout with a modicum of skills, money, and time.  The project layouts gave suggestions as to what track to use, how to lay it, wiring diagrams, suggestions for relatively easy loco and car kits, and scenery how-tos.  All aimed at helping a beginner get started (or an armchair mr get off their duff) in the hobby.  The implication is that there were (or at least thought to be) a fair percentage of readers who had never built a layout (armchair modelers).  Another obvious implication is that MR (as it still does) sees growing the hobby as good for its business.

Fast forward to today.  A dad (could be a teenager just as easily) goes into an LHS and buys an HO or N train set for about $100-$150.  He sees himself playing trains with his kids, and even if the kids don't care for it after a while, he'll still enjoy it.  The set contains a reasonable locomotive (it runs out of the box), a few cars, some track with built-in roadbed, and a minimal power pack.  He sets it up at home and it works - reasonably.  The train goes around the circle.

Now he wants to expand a little, maybe get 2 trains running on a 4x8.  Lumber for his table - probably $50-$75.  He gets told you want quality in that 2nd engine, don't settle for anything less than Kato or Atlas or P2K.  $100+ for that second loco.  A few RTR cars at $15 each - God help him if he wants passenger cars.  Don't forget the addtional track - another $100 (we're keeping to a simple plan).  Need another power pack, too, and it has to be a step up.  A few plastic building kits at $25 each, and all of a sudden his investment goes from $150 to at least $650.  In his eyes, his costs went up by more than a factor of 4, but he only got a second train out of it.  No wonder he is in sticker shock, especially when the wife finds out.  Ain't going to be any expansion beyond that table top for quite a while!  And because he built his layout in a month (pretty easy RTR, you know) and burned through all that money in the same time frame, things are not very interesting any more, either.

What has happened is the the armchair and mr wannabes of the past now have as CNJ put it "train set layouts".  There are far more of them than there used to be.  At the high end, because of RTR and decent manufactured turnouts, basement-size layouts are now practical for those with $$.  This has spurred the manufacturers to go up-scale, too.

In the meantime, what hasn't happened is a methodology and practical ways for the train set modeler to become in CNJ's eyes "a real model railroader".  It Mr. Train Set gets lucky, he finds a truly helpful LHS or club, or stumbles across a friendly online forum where he/she doesn't get made fun of.  But most LHSs hide the kits on shelves in the back in closed boxes.  The RTR is out front and visible.  RTR solves the nasty (and expensive!)problem of returns and service for both the LHS and manufacturer when a newb get in over his head with a kit.  And if Mr. Train Set doesn't find some reassurance, assistance, and ways to stay within the budget he drops out. 

Interestingly enough, MR of the '50s and '60s used to be full of these types of articles - dollar models, kitchen table locos, encouraging pictures of average and incomplete efforts in the photos section.  I know in my case (before Internet), MR did serve as the bridge to make the climb from train set to more.  It was a Jack Work article in Apr '63 that gave me the courage to handlay my track.  An MR editorial about $$/hr encouraged me to use my limited budget on kits.  A '66 MR article encouraged me enough to finally try making some plaster scenery.

Now, project layouts are fewer and less applicable to Mr. Train Set.  Layout visits seem to consume most of the magazine, and prototype plans and articles about scratchbuilding are very rare.  Kit-bashing outside of structures is non-existent.  When was the last time you saw an article on modifying a Labelle or other wooden kit?  Or about sources for detail parts for various eras of locomotives and cars?  How about teaching DC wiring for that majority that still use DC?

While there is a lot of truth to the saying about only publishing what mr's write about, there is also a visible agenda at MR to promote the high end of the hobby.  Look at what gets reviewed - high end locos and RTR cars and DCC, and precious little else.  This contributes to the sticker shock that started this thread.  When was the last time an ordinary car kit (like a BB) was reviewed so that a newb could understand what they were getting (or not getting) if they purchased one?  Or using a review of a craftsman kit to explain the differences between it and a BB?  I look in my '60s back issues and I see reviews of trucks, detail parts, structure kits (not limited run!), and loco and car kits in addition to the then high end such as brass locos and cars (which were also limited run).  How about a review of an ordinary S or other minoirty scale/gauge item occasionally?

enough of my ranting, returning to my hole

Fred Wright

in foggy, coastal Oregon where it's always 1900

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 21, 2006 12:45 PM
Jumping in kinda late to the topic - been away for a couple of weeks.  I agree, it can be expensive.  I about puked when I spent a cool grand on enough stuff to have my 8' x 12' L running (not scenicked).  Then I REALLY about puked when I spent a cool GRAND on a GALLON (one...uno...odeen) of paint for my street rod (the other hobby).  It's all relative, I guess.  Model railroading is cheap compared to taking a $2k car, spending $15k, and having a car worth...who knows, but certainly not $17k, lol.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 2,742 posts
Posted by Dave Vollmer on Monday, August 21, 2006 11:54 AM

Maybe if model railroading were more popular in Iran, we wouldn't have this problem.  After all, if the Iranians put all their money into model trains, they couldn't afford nukes.  They'd have forums where they'd ramble on about "Who can continue to pay for this nuclear program?" and then argue about how much cheaper enriched uranium was back in their day.  And then somebody would say "It's not a REAL nuclear weapon unless it has a boosted primary," and others would say "No, as long as you had fun making it, it doesn't matter if it has a big yield or not..."

And then someone would drag that thread off topic...Mischief [:-,]

Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Southern California
  • 743 posts
Posted by brothaslide on Monday, August 21, 2006 11:42 AM
 Safety Valve wrote:
 claycts wrote:

Reality Check!!

If Iran fires Nukes, non of this matters!

IF Iran fires nukes, all the more reason to enjoy trains in our last 30 minutes from doomsday.

Ye forget, Some of us recall the NIKE missile batteries back in the 60's. Living 30 minutes from the end of the world. (Travel time of a Ballistic Missile from Moscow to USA.)

If Iran did pop a nuke and broke things; killed people we probably will respond. The real problem is USSR and China. What will they do? Dont tell me anything about the UN. They have proven themselves to be pacifist paper loving peaceniks who are unable to do anything effective other than sitting around a large room and pass resolutions.



There is a book called, "Atomic Iran" by Dr. Jerome R. Corsi which discusses a scenario of a suitcase nuke being detonated in New York City - Very scary!  It's a no win situation for everyone involved.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, August 21, 2006 11:42 AM

selector,I am among the the millions that  worked union jobs 80% of my working career.That means I made a good living so no complaints there.

Now,I am medically retired and still make good money sitting at home doing what I love to do model railroading and railfaning locally. No complaints here.
I buy at on line discount and buy as I please and just maybe actually need..No complaints there.

I am a very happy guy.

However..I recall when wives didn't have to work just to help make car payments,house payments food and other important stuff including pop by the cases...Now add the vanity things that we really don't need to live but,feel we must have them just to keep up with the Smiths and Jones(that includes MR in some cases)..I see my friends in that life struggle daily.

Looking back I see my Dad only bought the locomotives and cars he needed to model the PRR..Today,I have my Short line,a collection of C&O and NS units and several short line engines plus CSX and CR units..Why? Simply because I liked them and bought them..Just like every model railroader today buying beyond what we actually need to have and some times kits never get built and some locomotive and car spend their life sitting in a glass case.

Vanity of vanities saith the preacher all is vanity..Ecclesiastes 12:8

And so it is.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!