And thank you, John, for the compliment.
Wayne
jwar wrote:Joe...Thank you too Sir for your kind info years ago on the above helix. Using yours and others on this forum I have had "Zero problems" with it...well ...other then one train catching the other LOL. Thanks for sharing, love to look at your work as well as Drwaynes. ...John
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
Doctowayne...Thank you for your kind words
Joe...Thank you too Sir for your kind info years ago on the above helix. Using yours and others on this forum I have had "Zero problems" with it...well ...other then one train catching the other LOL. Thanks for sharing, love to look at your work as well as Drwaynes.
To make it easier and cut time building my bridge I built three jigs, 1 bent, 1 truss, 1 X member, along with a good cutting plan to save waste. My Grandfather use to tell me, SON....before you start a job, get the wind work done LOL.Planning is about 2/3 of the task if you never done one before....The up side to that statement, is now I can tell my grandkids...John
Nice looking bridge, John, and instantly recognizeable.
Dave ...You dont have to buy one out of the box. If your inclined too, you could scrach build any combination of bridges to fit your layout and space.
I started with kits and found that it was more interesting to scrach build. Here is my rendition of Westers Pacific's Keddie bridge, rear span is a kit, front span is scrach and rail are kit-bashed, its not compleat and have a way to go yet.
Gook luck in your search....John.
I combined the Central Valley truss bridge with some Micro Engineering deck girders and a couple of modified Atlas through girders. The piers and abutments are cast in Durabond 90 patching plaster. Sorry I haven't got any newer photos, or one that shows the whole bridge.
The bridge is layed out on a slight "S" curve, and is about 4 1/2' long. While I model the '30s, the C.V. truss should offer plenty of clearance for doublestacks, and likewise for the M.E. through girder bridges, although the latter might cause some restrictions if built on a curve. If that's the case, substituting the deck girder bridges in their place should rectify the problem. As for bi-level commuter cars, the vertical clearance on the C.V. truss, from the head of the rail to the bottom of the lowest crossmember, is 21'9''.
Has anyone tried combining either the double track through girders or the single track trusses from these two makers end on as part of a string of bridges? If so; how did you get on and how do they look?
Are both makes of truss good for Double Stack traffic? ...or Bi-level commuter cars?
TIA