Your scale

[Anonymous]

I model Z and N with current interest about the same but Z is winning more and more every day.

Larry D
San Antonio

[Anonymous]

I model Z and N with current interest about the same but Z is winning more and more every day.

Larry D
San Antonio

[clinchfieldfan]

I model O scale all the way, too old and shaky, eye sight too poor to go with anything smaller. The third rail is a little distracting but the new atlas O track properly ballasted and detailed looks good. The selection is really beginning to expand and the detail on the products has come a long way. The digital control and sound systems are awesome.

[clinchfieldfan]

I model O scale all the way, too old and shaky, eye sight too poor to go with anything smaller. The third rail is a little distracting but the new atlas O track properly ballasted and detailed looks good. The selection is really beginning to expand and the detail on the products has come a long way. The digital control and sound systems are awesome.

[Anonymous]

HO!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

HO!!!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

I model the New York Central in HO scale 50's era steam to 1st generation Diesels

[Anonymous]

I model the New York Central in HO scale 50's era steam to 1st generation Diesels

[Anonymous]

ho is the scale i use i can see the parts easily when building the cars, houses; easy to change things or add things and easy to paint without straining the eyes did not get to vote but glad to see ho is still upthere

[Anonymous]

ho is the scale i use i can see the parts easily when building the cars, houses; easy to change things or add things and easy to paint without straining the eyes did not get to vote but glad to see ho is still upthere

[Anonymous]

I had "O" growing up then I bought my boys an HO set .I put it away in 1983 and run across it last year.I didnt have the room for it so I am doing N scale . But I found a unpassable deal on a new K-Line Steamer and Passenger set in "O". Aw the found memorys as I set the train up for a trial run on the den floor .As a child I used to lay my head on the floor close to the track and watch the train go by, the same as I did that day . The things that I remembered , I would have spent 10 times the amount.
Thanks
Dan
Dan

[Anonymous]

I had "O" growing up then I bought my boys an HO set .I put it away in 1983 and run across it last year.I didnt have the room for it so I am doing N scale . But I found a unpassable deal on a new K-Line Steamer and Passenger set in "O". Aw the found memorys as I set the train up for a trial run on the den floor .As a child I used to lay my head on the floor close to the track and watch the train go by, the same as I did that day . The things that I remembered , I would have spent 10 times the amount.
Thanks
Dan
Dan

[Anonymous]

O Highrail. three rail but scale three rail.

[Anonymous]

O Highrail. three rail but scale three rail.

[fndbke]

QUOTE: Originally posted by John Harding

O, 3 rail hi rail. Yep one of those guys. ... Just wanted to say that I suspect a great many hi railers subscribe to MR and look forward to reading it each month.

Agreed - I also subscribe to MR even though I model O (and subscribe to the O speciality mags). MR is a great publication.

I have plenty of room for O (30' by 18'), and can double that some day. But even that much room seems confining for O. I also envy HO for their large selection, especially structures. Interesting that N scalers share that envy!

[fndbke]

QUOTE: Originally posted by John Harding

O, 3 rail hi rail. Yep one of those guys. ... Just wanted to say that I suspect a great many hi railers subscribe to MR and look forward to reading it each month.

Agreed - I also subscribe to MR even though I model O (and subscribe to the O speciality mags). MR is a great publication.

I have plenty of room for O (30' by 18'), and can double that some day. But even that much room seems confining for O. I also envy HO for their large selection, especially structures. Interesting that N scalers share that envy!

[IRONROOSTER]

QUOTE: Originally posted by kzuters

I didn't get a chance to vote on this one but I'm so glad that N is edging up to within 2% of Horribly Oversized - contrary to what the site owners claim!!!! Hurray for Normal scale - the best amongst equals.

Kim

Actually Z stands for Zilch
N - Nothing
HO - How Ordinary
O - Oversized
G - Gross
S - Superb, Super, Supreme[:)]

If I had the room I'd run them all.
EnjoyPaul

[IRONROOSTER]

QUOTE: Originally posted by kzuters

I didn't get a chance to vote on this one but I'm so glad that N is edging up to within 2% of Horribly Oversized - contrary to what the site owners claim!!!! Hurray for Normal scale - the best amongst equals.

Kim

Actually Z stands for Zilch
N - Nothing
HO - How Ordinary
O - Oversized
G - Gross
S - Superb, Super, Supreme[:)]

If I had the room I'd run them all.
EnjoyPaul

[Anonymous]

N scale only, is there any other?

[Anonymous]

N scale only, is there any other?

[rf16a]

HO Scale.[:D][:)][8D]

[rf16a]

HO Scale.[:D][:)][8D]

[Anonymous]

I started in S back in the 50's. Went to european HO in the 70's and am presently involved mostly with G scale. Still have all of my trains from all the years and as others I know am planning a layout when the kids move out, if they ever do. My G scale is a traveling show with a car load of track and rolling stock that I take to train shows and many public service shows at nursing homes, childrens hospitals etc. They all seems to enjoy the G the best even though the S has an actual modular layout that moves from show to show also. It is a great hobby and as my wife would say, way of life for a retiree as I am gone running trains a lot of the time. I belong to 4 different railroad clubs and keep fairly busy with meetings, monthly runs and show runs etc. Get a hobby like this and live a whole lot longer because you don't have time to worry about getting sick, so you don't.

[Anonymous]

I started in S back in the 50's. Went to european HO in the 70's and am presently involved mostly with G scale. Still have all of my trains from all the years and as others I know am planning a layout when the kids move out, if they ever do. My G scale is a traveling show with a car load of track and rolling stock that I take to train shows and many public service shows at nursing homes, childrens hospitals etc. They all seems to enjoy the G the best even though the S has an actual modular layout that moves from show to show also. It is a great hobby and as my wife would say, way of life for a retiree as I am gone running trains a lot of the time. I belong to 4 different railroad clubs and keep fairly busy with meetings, monthly runs and show runs etc. Get a hobby like this and live a whole lot longer because you don't have time to worry about getting sick, so you don't.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by kzuters

I didn't get a chance to vote on this one but I'm so glad that N is edging up to within 2% of Horribly Oversized - contrary to what the site owners claim!!!! Hurray for Normal scale - the best amongst equals.

Kim

I wouldn't take that number to the bank. How often did _you_vote?

John

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by kzuters

I didn't get a chance to vote on this one but I'm so glad that N is edging up to within 2% of Horribly Oversized - contrary to what the site owners claim!!!! Hurray for Normal scale - the best amongst equals.

Kim

I wouldn't take that number to the bank. How often did _you_vote?

John

[Anonymous]

O, 3 rail hi rail. Yep one of those guys. I realize putting this on the Model Railroader Forum is probably bad manners. Sorry. No offense intended. I'm not out to get any verbal brickbats tossed at me. Just wanted to say that I suspect a great many hi railers subscribe to MR and look forward to reading it each month. Even though there are specialty 3 rail publications out there, none really appeal to me the way MR does. I've gotten more ideas and tips from MR than anywhere else. In fact, My 3 rail layout is based to a degree on Bill Aldridge's New Haven HO pike featured in MR some time ago. Truth is, if I didn't have so much invested in 3 rail I'd probably look at S. HO is too small for me. That's it. I'll go back where i belong. John Harding

[Anonymous]

O, 3 rail hi rail. Yep one of those guys. I realize putting this on the Model Railroader Forum is probably bad manners. Sorry. No offense intended. I'm not out to get any verbal brickbats tossed at me. Just wanted to say that I suspect a great many hi railers subscribe to MR and look forward to reading it each month. Even though there are specialty 3 rail publications out there, none really appeal to me the way MR does. I've gotten more ideas and tips from MR than anywhere else. In fact, My 3 rail layout is based to a degree on Bill Aldridge's New Haven HO pike featured in MR some time ago. Truth is, if I didn't have so much invested in 3 rail I'd probably look at S. HO is too small for me. That's it. I'll go back where i belong. John Harding

[BentnoseWillie]

QUOTE: I didn't get a chance to vote on this one but I'm so glad that N is edging up to within 2% of Horribly Oversized - contrary to what the site owners claim!!!!

Actually, I think it's the NMRA and the MRIA who claim that, based on sales.

Online, N scalers seem to be of equal number to HO scalers. Among modellers I know, the average age of N scalers is lower than for HO scalers, so I'd guess that this plays into online representation, since by and large, the net is populated by the younger set.

Not that N scale isn't a good medium, just that HO does still outnumber N. Given a chance, we'd all model in 12" to the foot anyway...[;)]