Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Canandaigua Southern

3818 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Niue
  • 735 posts
Posted by thirdrail1 on Monday, April 16, 2001 9:43 AM
The Indiana Railroad was a "real" railroad, too, and standard gauge to boot that had 60 ft. radius curves or 8 1/4" in HO - but it was an interurban trolley line. The radius I used is from CSXT's Requirements for Industrial Siding Construction - sharper than that and CSXT won't serve it.
"The public be ***ed, it's the Pennsylvania Railroad I'm competing with." - W.K.Vanderbilt
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 76 posts
Posted by sumpter250 on Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:59 PM
Gregg,
The Uintah railway,while a three foot guage railroad, was a 'real' railroad. They had a 66 degree curve! That is 15" radius in HO scale. Oh for the luxury of space to build an HO layout with 48" minimum radius curves! I do concur that the CS in HO, in the same space would be spectacular!
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Niue
  • 735 posts
Posted by thirdrail1 on Saturday, April 14, 2001 2:22 PM
I have always felt John Armstrong's Canandaigua Southern would be an even more spectacular railroad if build in HO in the same space it now occupies. Remember, the absolute minimum radius on a real railroad, used only on industrial spurs, is the equivalent of 48 inch radius in HO scale!
"The public be ***ed, it's the Pennsylvania Railroad I'm competing with." - W.K.Vanderbilt
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Canandaigua Southern
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 13, 2001 10:14 PM
I would like some suggestions on how to convert the CS from O to HO. I am aware that the aisles must not be changed. How small an area can I get this layout into and still keep the integrity of the plan?
I know that converting from O to HO [or some other ratios] was covered in a previous issue of MR but I am unable to find that advice.
Thanx for any suggestions.
Graham.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!