Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Change of direction?

818 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, March 20, 2006 11:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tstage

Randy,

Will you just moving locally, or farther?

Tom


Locally. maybe someplace I can finally get high speed internet.

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Crosby, Texas
  • 3,660 posts
Posted by cwclark on Monday, March 20, 2006 11:07 AM
I still like a double main but i built it a bit differently...one of the mains has no stopping points to switch rolling stock around while the other main has all industries, spurs, and sidings..that way i can run one or two trains on the same main while the other one is strictly for road switching or running a train non-stop...chuck

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,247 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, March 20, 2006 10:56 AM
Randy,

Will you just moving locally, or farther?

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, March 20, 2006 10:36 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SpaceMouse

Does you father-in-law get a chart or does he get to negotiate onto your chart?


Yeah I knew that would come back to bite me... However, we are looking at selling and moving, so things might change drastically. In that case, I would be starting over and it would most likely be MY railroad - if he wants to come over and bring his stuff to run, he's welcome.

I really am committed to a Northeast prototype though - the problem being for the most part they were all double tracked, and in some cases triple (sections of the LV) and even FOUR (PRR). Time for a "what if" maybe - what if they never double-tracked the East Penn (or other sections of the Reading, for that matter). Good case for an extensive CTC installation by the early 50's.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, March 20, 2006 8:59 AM
Why not model (at least) two single lines ...
almost side by side
crossing at a diamond (or by bridge)
you don't have to stick to one level or join levels
Lines don't have to have equal value/ weight of traffic
... you can even provide more features for the lesser line (maybe a regional) to do all your switching, train stops etc there and just run through trains on the bigger line (which can be a loop with staging tracks)
If you cross at Grade you can pull up trains on the second line in (maybe the Class 1) to wait for trains with right-of-way on the first line (even a shortline). This can add all sorts of interest.
have fun :-)
  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Almost Heaven...West Virginia
  • 793 posts
Posted by beegle55 on Monday, March 20, 2006 8:23 AM
Just model your own railroad. Think up a good plan and have fun with it. It doesn't have to be modeled off of any particular rail line. I have never went with a particular rail line because I live in W.V and its limited to what you can select. Good luck!
Head of operations at the Bald Mountain Railroad, a proud division of CSXT since 2002!
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, March 20, 2006 7:34 AM
Does you father-in-law get a chart or does he get to negotiate onto your chart?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Gahanna, Ohio
  • 1,987 posts
Posted by jbinkley60 on Monday, March 20, 2006 4:15 AM
My trackplan is a combination of a double line but is also two single lines. The tracks cross inside of a mountain. Also they aren't perfectly parallel throughout the plan. Thus they will diverge either veritally or horizontally but come back together in spot. As for prototype modeling, mine ends at the locomotives and rolling stock. Although I model NS, the trackplan is purely mine. I figure that with 12'x12' (~1000' x 1000' in real footage) I am not going to really be able to do much in the way of true protoypical modeling on the trackplan side.

Engineer Jeff NS Nut
Visit my layout at: http://www.thebinks.com/trains/

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, March 20, 2006 3:15 AM
Sounds like, "Choose your prototype with care, you might discover it isn't what you really want to model."

Guilty as charged.

So, rather than going to a different prototype, I moved to a different time line in an alternate universe where I, not the prototype's locating engineers, could decide what kind of layout I wanted. I still model my basic prototype, but the resulting layout combines features in a single scene that are, in fact, scattered along a hundred kilometers of railroad. The turntable's prototype was 500 kilometers away, and the branchline (modeled as a separate railroad, which it wasn't) was grafted on from 700 kilometers away in the opposite direction.

The point? It's your railroad. Dream it, plan it, build it - your way!

Chuck
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Change of direction?
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:10 PM
I think I need to make a chart like in the latest Model Railroad Planning. Why? Because I keep coming back to liking a single-track railroad rather than double. The problem is I have a significant investment in locos and rolling stock to do my Reading East Penn-based layout. Does the single track desire overwhelm the other factors? Is there a good alternative branch? I had long ago considered a freelanced line that somewhat paralleled the North Penn Railroad - the Reading's Bethlehem Branch, but traffic on there was completely different from what I have been buying rolling stock to support. That does open the option for a proto-freelance approach and make up my own branch.
Yes, a chart is definitely needed here, before I proceed any further with design and building.

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!