hey

[Texas Zepher]

You didn't specify what the design goals for operation were, but with N-scale I would think you could do a whole lot better than either of those. Check out the one laststands posted in the previous message to get some ideas.

[Anonymous]

had essentially the sme idea... and didn't have the room for anything bigger except went with 30" width instead of the 24 you've chosen....it's up and working. Would really suggest you go with a little more width if possible....

here's the plan
http://photobucket.com/albums/b371/waahuu/?action=view¤t=spindlerridgeplan.jpg

Other pics are at
http://photobucket.com/albums/b371/waahuu

[Itsed65]

Sure, with the extra foot of length I didn't use you could move the turnouts down a bit and lessen some angles. I was just curious how it would look and threw it together quick like. Heck I am still trying to figure out MY trackplan :-)

[trainboyH16-44]

It doesn't look quite right, maybe lessen the angle of the lowest spurs?

[Itsed65]

Ok, so I got curious and threw this into xtra cad on a whim, and while tight, it is totally doable using 9.5 inch radius and # 4 atlas turnouts. I was suprised actually. I am still getting used to how small you can go in n scale I guess


Obvioulsy, the plan could be tweaked here and there for scenery and what not, but it is workable.

EDIT: I just noticed that I didn't even go 10 feet (doh!) long, so it would fit even better. [B)]

[Anonymous]

I can fit On30 on 2' wide. Why can't he do N scale? If he's using critters and 2 axle small rolling stock, he could go to 8" wide using GN15. It's his railroad. He can build it in a pizza box if he wants. I've seen some really cool ones in small boxes like that.

[trainboyH16-44]

Ah, N scale! That would make sense!
I think the sidings could stand a bit of an extension. Not much room for car storage, maybe 1 a siding.

[rolleiman]

I was under the impression this was N scale.. Why couldn't he fit it in his space??

Jeff

[Itsed65]

Are you sure you can fit all that in 24" wide? I would use a different CAD program to make sure. Xtra Cad is free and comes pre loaded with Arnold, Atlas and Kato track and turnout parameters built in as well as flex track options. http://www.sillub.com/


Looks awful tight to me is all. If it works, I would go for the one on the right. As posted before, it would make more challenging switching.

[Anonymous]

I like the one wit the ladder on the spur instead of the runaround. That way, you have one less runaround to use, and it could be more of a challenge for operations.

[trainboyH16-44]

Definitely tra***hese two plans. Unless you are modeling a very industrial line, with 2 axle engines... And in your topic, could you make it more obvious what you want?
Plus, with two plans like this, it's really up to you, and your individual taste.

[trainfreek92]

i do not think trains can turn like that but...... I say get a new track plan

[Anonymous]

oh the 2 sidings on the bottom make a small ladder yard

[1shado1]

QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman

QUOTE: Originally posted by 1shado1

QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman

Is this going to be up against a wall or is it going to be free standing??

Jeff

It's only 2 feet wide, so reach wouldn't be a problem.

Jeff

Reach wasn't the reason I was asking.. I was going to suggest a Divider backdrop running along the middle to make it more of a true walkaround.. As far as the two plans go, second one. I like yards..

Jeff

That's an idea (I'm not thinking)!
I also agree: more yard space=better

Jeff

[Anonymous]

thanks

[rolleiman]

QUOTE: Originally posted by 1shado1

QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman

Is this going to be up against a wall or is it going to be free standing??

Jeff

It's only 2 feet wide, so reach wouldn't be a problem.

Jeff

Reach wasn't the reason I was asking.. I was going to suggest a Divider backdrop running along the middle to make it more of a true walkaround.. As far as the two plans go, second one. I like yards..

Jeff

[loathar]

The one on the right makes more sence, but why would you have a by-pass siding on a siding?(same feature in both plans)[2c]

[1shado1]

QUOTE: Originally posted by pavariangoo

hey check this out please and give me a bit of advise on which plan is better

many thanks and for more info read the topic on the site

thanks

pavariangoo

They look virtually identical to me, except for the additional yard trackage toward the upper right. How can you pick a "best" when it's 2 of the same?
I'd pick the one on the right if I had to choose.[:D]

Jeff

[1shado1]

QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman

Is this going to be up against a wall or is it going to be free standing??

Jeff

It's only 2 feet wide, so reach wouldn't be a problem.

Jeff

[Anonymous]

umm . could you please clarfiy your question? it will be along the wall and window but not mounted to it.

why do you ask?

pava

[Anonymous]

it will be on sawhorses. not on the wall

pavar

[rolleiman]

Is this going to be up against a wall or is it going to be free standing??

Jeff

[Anonymous]

heh sorry i guess itd help if i put the link in =)

http://www.the-gauge.com/showthread.php?p=171947#post171947

[1shado1]

QUOTE: Originally posted by rolleiman

Hey Back!! Check What out??

Jeff

The temporary loss of brain function?[:D]
(been there, done that)

Jeff

[rolleiman]

Hey Back!! Check What out??

Jeff

[Anonymous]

hey check this out please and give me a bit of advise on which plan is better

many thanks and for more info read the topic on the site

thanks

pavariangoo