QUOTE: Originally posted by fiatfan I don't know if any one has tried this but I read in another forum about using real helper service with DCC. No slaving units together, you had to work with the front end power but the engines were controlled separately.
Life is simple - eat, drink, play with trains!
Go Big Red!
PA&ERR "If you think you are doing something stupid, you're probably right!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher QUOTE: Originally posted by n2mopac Longer runs would receive more money than shorter ones (you could use play money or Monopoly money for this) and bonuses would be paid for completing one's assignment on schedule. Shouldn't the more complicated runs pay more. A though passenger runs a long way but is nothing to operate compared to a local assigned to the switching puzzle town.
QUOTE: Originally posted by n2mopac Longer runs would receive more money than shorter ones (you could use play money or Monopoly money for this) and bonuses would be paid for completing one's assignment on schedule.
Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado.
Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy
Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings
Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296
Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/
QUOTE: Originally posted by jrbernier The part about an MOW gang with a special, temporary speed restriction in an unexpected spot on the layout? The track forman would be fired for not protecting his work crew. A train order or at least a track bulletin would be required to be issued to all trains before they enter an area with a working track crew. Work equipment just does not get 'on the track' without authorization. Jim Bernier Jim Bernier
Modeling BNSF and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin