Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

A unique op session idea!

977 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Wednesday, September 28, 2005 7:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by fiatfan

I don't know if any one has tried this but I read in another forum about using real helper service with DCC. No slaving units together, you had to work with the front end power but the engines were controlled separately.

That was actually one of my favorite assignments on our club layout since 1984. Helper duty. I even made a special loco for it. I took the spring out of the front Kadee coupler. Unfortunately we reduced the grade over Summit so helpers aren't needed nearly as much as they used to be.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,400 posts
Posted by fiatfan on Wednesday, September 28, 2005 5:23 PM
I don't know if any one has tried this but I read in another forum about using real helper service with DCC. No slaving units together, you had to work with the front end power but the engines were controlled separately.

Tom

Life is simple - eat, drink, play with trains!

Go Big Red!

PA&ERR "If you think you are doing something stupid, you're probably right!"

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: El Dorado Springs, MO
  • 1,519 posts
Posted by n2mopac on Wednesday, September 28, 2005 10:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Texas Zepher

QUOTE: Originally posted by n2mopac
Longer runs would receive more money than shorter ones (you could use play money or Monopoly money for this) and bonuses would be paid for completing one's assignment on schedule.

Shouldn't the more complicated runs pay more. A though passenger runs a long way but is nothing to operate compared to a local assigned to the switching puzzle town.


Good point. I'll make a note.

Ron

Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado. 

Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy

Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings

 

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 1:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by n2mopac
Longer runs would receive more money than shorter ones (you could use play money or Monopoly money for this) and bonuses would be paid for completing one's assignment on schedule.

Shouldn't the more complicated runs pay more. A though passenger runs a long way but is nothing to operate compared to a local assigned to the switching puzzle town.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:45 PM
Sounds fun, and I would be in the red all evening long! (Rear enders caused by me going too slowly)
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: El Dorado Springs, MO
  • 1,519 posts
Posted by n2mopac on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jrbernier

The part about an MOW gang with a special, temporary speed restriction in an unexpected spot on the layout? The track forman would be fired for not protecting his work crew. A train order or at least a track bulletin would be required to be issued to all trains before they enter an area with a working track crew. Work equipment just does not get 'on the track' without authorization.

Jim Bernier

Jim Bernier


You are certainly correct. When I said "unexpected," I meant at a location where it was not during the previous operating session, not a place where a train would run upon it unexpectedly. Thanks for helping me clarify that.

Ron

Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado. 

Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy

Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,845 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:01 AM
The part about an MOW gang with a special, temporary speed restriction in an unexpected spot on the layout? The track forman would be fired for not protecting his work crew. A train order or at least a track bulletin would be required to be issued to all trains before they enter an area with a working track crew. Work equipment just does not get 'on the track' without authorization.

Jim Bernier

Jim Bernier

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: El Dorado Springs, MO
  • 1,519 posts
A unique op session idea!
Posted by n2mopac on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:02 AM
I came up with an interesting idea for a different type of operating session last night. I had read about a club layout that actually charges its members a dime each time they break one of the club's operating rules. I love developing my rulebook for operators to follow. I was thinking, what if we held an operating session where each operator got paid for each route they ran. Names would be drawn for the first trains of the night for fairness, and each operator when finished with an assignment would simply receive the next train in order. Longer runs would receive more money than shorter ones (you could use play money or Monopoly money for this) and bonuses would be paid for completing one's assignment on schedule. I use draw card "detectors" in two places on the layout which would through a chance kink into the schedule. Then, to make it more interesting, fines would be assessed for non observance of ops rules (speed restrictions, handling of hazardous materials, observinc propority, proper communication with dispatcher, etc.) Derailments due to mishandling would be assessed too. I would even probably throuw in a MOW gang with a special, temporary speed restriction in an unexpected spot on the layout. The goal would be to see who netted the most fake cash by the end of the evening. I havn't worked all of the kinks out of this idea yet, but I thought ya'all could weight in with your ideas as well. This may turn out to be something many want to try onece in a while to change things up a little.

Ron

Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado. 

Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy

Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!