Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

The perfect layout

2174 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Nashville TN
  • 1,306 posts
Posted by Wdlgln005 on Saturday, August 27, 2005 4:42 PM
A 4x8 will be perfect for a nice Nscale layout. I'd update the time to the 50's so you can get some GP's, F"s & other transition era equipment.
The best layouts are a twice around with a bridge for the crossing. Check out the origonal Gorre & Daphetid trackplan. The trip to the top leads to a branchline where you can put a coal mine or a lumber loader, to bring down to the lower level. Leave space for 1 track to go to the edge & make a "connection" to another module or the outside world.



Glenn Woodle
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Friday, August 26, 2005 9:25 PM
Okay. The thing is, I've got 1920s and 40s era steamers as well as early 50s era streamliner passenger trains (that are my absolute favorites). Then I have diesels from the mid 1970s and modern diesels of today.
Ondrek suggested that I could go with my "landscape only" layout, but change out the automobiles to match the era of train I'm running. But I'd still like to at least put in a hamburger joint and/or gas station out in the middle of no where like it might have been on route 66 back in the day.

I've got a friend that has two fronts to some of his buildings, like his depot, which he has done up for the 30s thru 50s on one side, and 60s thru 80s on the other. All he has to do is turn it around for the era he wants. I always kind of admired that, and may just steal his idea.

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 2:29 PM
Pull off what I did - bite the bullet and sell your exsisting rolling stock for what you want. It's not worth it to be stuck with a beautiful model of something that was a compromise. Best decision I ever made.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Ozark Mountains
  • 1,167 posts
Posted by dragenrider on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:56 AM
If you don't have much space, run older (1920's) equipment. The cars are shorter and the trains have to go further to make a full trip. It also means you can have shorter sidings and passing tracks. This will allow you to do more in a small space.

The Cedar Branch & Western--The Hillbilly Line!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:49 AM
The perfect layout is one that belongs to someone else and that you have access to.

The same formula as the perfect boat.

Bob DeWoody
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Vermont
  • 540 posts
Posted by ondrek on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:45 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer

I've been thinking about building a new layout. The problem is, I only have room for a 4 X 8 at the most. Once built, I'm not sure what era to go with because I've got engines and rolling stock from the 1920s up until now.

Any suggestions ?.

Tracklayer [:)]

build your 4x8....make your buildings....dont worry about the time line....most buildings are still around from 1900's anyhow...so make your layout make your buildings....its the CARS on the roads that really date a layout.....and those are easy to change....when you are in the 1920's have cars for that erra on road, 1970's...put those erra cars on the roads.

thats what i plan on doing.
I can only have a 4x8 and I will have different erra engines too. my layout is simpler than most others though. but ist not a just landscape layout. i think you might get board with that.

Kevin


Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,247 posts
Posted by tstage on Friday, August 26, 2005 11:26 AM
CARRfan,

Ha, I thought so. [:D] I've used Solidworks from time to time to try and design my around-the-wall layout at home. I've only done the trackwork in sketch mode so the track is represented as just a flat, 2D line. (Once I nail down the design, I can then start creating 3D objects.) Solidworks sure is great for trying out different sized radii for curves. I can't tell you how often I use the offset command to create quick and accurate spacing in my yards and between mainlines.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Friday, August 26, 2005 10:56 AM
And it may be worth noting (once again) that the actual "footprint" of the 4X8 is much larger than 4'X8' after one allows for the necessary aisles. A lot of interesting alternatives can reside in the space required for a generic 4X8. It sometimes pays to consider the overall footprint required, not only the table dimensions.

There are a few ideas on my website at:
http://www.modelrail.us/id28.html

Regards,

Byron
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 10:43 AM
I forget which issue, but sometime in the past couple of years Model Railroader featured a track plan for a double deck 4 by 8. It was Jersey Central in the eastern Pennsylvania anthracite region.

Another clever track 4 by 8 plan is the Turtle Creek Central featured a few years back. You can operate it as a point to point or as a continuous run. I based my layout on the Turtle Creek but with a few significant modifications.

With a little creativity a 4 by 8 can be a whole lot more than an oval or figure 8 with spurs.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 26, 2005 10:38 AM
The man knows his CAD packages [8D]

Sometimes I feel like I live inside solidworks! Particularly if it's making its way into a hobby now too!
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,247 posts
Posted by tstage on Friday, August 26, 2005 10:29 AM
CARRfan,

Did you use SolidWorks to design your pictured layout above? It has that inmistakable sky blue background.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Friday, August 26, 2005 12:22 AM
I'm listening to any and all ideas at this point, and have even thought about building an under table loop so the train will seem to disappear into the tunnel, but not come out for a while because it's going around a loop on the lower table, then back up again. This always seems to freak people out because they're expecting the train to reappear in just a second or two. But then again, rather than have it come out of the tunnel it went in that everyone would be expecting it to come out of, have it come out of the one on the other end of the layout. I don't know. I'm kicking around all kinds of ideas.

Keep em coming. I need all the suggestions I can get.

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 11:48 PM
I like multiple deck ideas. Some of them, at least. Having a second deck that mirrors the shape of the first, just ain't realistic worth snot in my book. How bout this: Go with your 4x8. Then, for the second deck, why not go with something more narrow? maybe 2x8? You could even design it into the first deck, so that it could be something like a switchback, going up the side of a mountain. This could work especially well if one side of the layout would be against a wall.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:20 PM
Here's a layout I'm in the process of designing...

It's 2.5ft x 8ft with a non-scenicked and removable return loop.

I'm going to build it in the garage.

Something like this could just as easily go into a spare bedroom, and as you can see, the runaround loop takes up very little space if it's on just a few inch wide shelf around the room.

Continuous running without the look of "roundy-roundy".

In fact, you could even hide the return loop behind books or something.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CARRfan

How about a 2ft or 18inch wide shelf switching layout in an L-shape.

Do that with 2 18inch wide by 8ft long segments, and may give you a lot more operating potential than a roundy-roundy 4 x 8...


Nope. No more roundy-roundy for me anymore. This time I'd like something with some real personality. I'd like at least two or three tracks with a side track or two that I can kill the power on after I run a train or engine off the main line onto it. I also wanted it all lit up and lively, but since I'm not going to be able to have any buildings or houses, that's no longer in the plan. ([:(])
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by DrummingTrainfan

Have you thought about multiple decks? That would allow you to have two different layouts that could be two different eras, or one bigger one connected with a helix.


Now that's an original idea... I may just give that some thought.

I've also thought about building a layout that's just land scaping only, and not have any buildings or anything so I could run any train I wanted (?).

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:55 PM
How about a 2ft or 18inch wide shelf switching layout in an L-shape.

Do that with 2 18inch wide by 8ft long segments, and may give you a lot more operating potential than a roundy-roundy 4 x 8...
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:39 PM
Have you thought about multiple decks? That would allow you to have two different layouts that could be two different eras, or one bigger one connected with a helix.
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
The perfect layout
Posted by Tracklayer on Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:36 PM
I've been thinking about building a new layout. The problem is, I only have room for a 4 X 8 at the most. Once built, I'm not sure what era to go with because I've got engines and rolling stock from the 1920s up until now.

Any suggestions ?.

Tracklayer [:)]

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!