Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Do abanded lines look good on a layout?

1546 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: CSXT/B&O Flora IL
  • 1,937 posts
Posted by waltersrails on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 9:44 PM
Thanks for the replys. I'm starting on a small abanded line. now on my layout i will have pics soon on my website http://ztrainman.tripod.com/ more help if u have any Thanks.
I like NS but CSX has the B&O.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Sunday, July 31, 2005 11:04 PM
If done well, absolutely! I am putting a short span of abandoned line including a switch where I had ripped out a section of track that created an S curve causing derailments (especially with larger steam locos). Rather than rip out all the scenery, I boarded up the tunnel and put down some code 70 track on hand laid ties that are partially taken out. I think the effect will be very good when it is finished. The story behind it was that a few years earlier there was a tunnel cave-in and the tunnel had to be relocated a few hundred feet to the west. Some day I will post some photos of the area. [:D]

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Sunday, July 31, 2005 9:20 PM
an abandoned line could also be no rails or track, but the telltale signs of a long extended hump on the ground. It could be a long abandoned interurban line or early RR that didnt last. It might be just some odd bridge your pike goes over with the abandoned line underneath, short but sweet.
But if your like me...you don't want any abandoned lines!!!

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Sunday, July 31, 2005 9:10 PM
One of the common situations modelers have to face is that they get to the corner of the room, and need to put in a 90 degree turn-- which was rarely done on the prototype without some justification.

One justification is a crossing of two lines at right angles, a diamond with a curve interchanging between the two lines. This could be done with the layout oval taking the curve, and the two supposedly crossing mainlines running into the background just beyond the diamond-- dummy tracks.

But suppose two arms of the crossing lines were kept and the crossing and lines beyond abandoned. Then one would have a justification for that right angle curve and for the alinement that doesn't go anyplace. It would be interesting modeled as torn up track, with only remnants of the rail line.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • 627 posts
Posted by exPalaceDog on Sunday, July 31, 2005 3:26 PM
Short pieces on abandoned lines often end up as spurs suitable for storing unneeded cars and other such functions.

Consider a scene from the OC&T at Titusville, Pa. The old Pennsy main line crosses route 27 and extends for maybe a hundred feet. The stub is used to store one of the lines unneeded coaches.

Have fun

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Sunday, July 31, 2005 11:18 AM
thanks so much, and i think for short little abondonments, ill go buy some real wooden ties and lay them down! Thanks,

Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 31, 2005 11:00 AM
paint rails dark brown with a touch of orange. Old rails usually go darker with age,I've seen them almost black after many years of sitting there.Also paint some ties,light gray.almost white and pale tan,before you put down track take out a few ties and spread the rest of ties,cut some shorter and split some ends if you can,this makes it look negleted, add plenty of weeds and such even all fallen tree branch and other junk as people tend to throw stuff away at these spots,(pallets, tires ,etc). Through the fifties,sixties and seventies, railroads abandoned and usually , quickly tore out everything,now state and local governments step in and sometimes preserve the right of way for future concerns,so more tracks are just left there.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: New Brighton, Minnesota
  • 1,493 posts
Posted by wctransfer on Sunday, July 31, 2005 10:22 AM
I always love these type of topics. I like timbowa's idea. Where i go railfanning, they still have the right of way, and track still in the road. Sadly , they are beggining to rip it up, but i have a question. How do you make rail look nice and rusty for abondon lines? And for those that dont have much space, make a track in the yard that is abondon.

Alec
Check out my pics! [url="http://wctransfer.rrpicturearchives.net/"] http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=8714
  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 129 posts
Posted by rtstasiak on Sunday, July 31, 2005 9:57 AM
Abandoned track is everywhere in the Northeast US. On my model railroad, I use overgrown right-of-way to hide turnback curves and other necessary nasties. I also use HOn3 ties, narrow roadbed, and steep grades to save space for active lines and other scenery.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:26 PM
If you have the room, but remember most roads wanted any assets left to turn into cash,especially if whole road went belly up (the O&W for instance),so rails,frogs turnouts and sometimes bridges were salvaged or cut up for scrap. A small junction would work, just leave cinder roadbed and lots of weeds,as even ballast was scraped up and reused or sold.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • 130 posts
Posted by bn7026 on Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:56 PM

This is a diorama I kept from my last layout. One of the lower tracks is an abandoned line.. the ties are there and the rails are still in the road crossing.

Tim
Modelling Burlington Northern in Perth, Western Australia NCE DCC user since 1999
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:55 AM
If you have the space yes and IMHO it leads to believability in ones layout especially if they model a freelance railroad since it sets the mood for your freelance railroad's past history..I would not over do it but,would use a hint of long abandon trackage such as (say) a length of flex track that looks like its isolated from the main line where the switch use to be,painted rust,lots of weeds and earth covered rotten ties..I would have this section of track disappear behind a hill or under a highway bridge..
I remember reading in one magazine(MR or RMC) years ago where a guy used a tunnel portal and boarded or bricked up the entrance to show abandon trackage. .

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Eastern Ohio
  • 615 posts
Posted by cnw4001 on Saturday, July 30, 2005 10:21 AM
As has been noted, how much space do you have and how much realism do you want in that space.

Not only abandoned lines add to the visual impact but junkyads and buildings in various states of decay also add realism.

Not everyone has the skill to model this stuff.

Even more interesting was a module which I saw at the recent National Train Show during the NMRA convention in Cincinnati. It depicted a tornado complete with the clouds and moving sprral of the tornado itself.

Dale
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • 130 posts
Posted by bn7026 on Saturday, July 30, 2005 9:59 AM
THere was a show layout a few years ago in South Australia if I recall correctly which represented an abandoned railway.
The only activity to be seen was a work train at one one. From the magazine report I read it was well recieved and may have won some prizes.

Tim.
Modelling Burlington Northern in Perth, Western Australia NCE DCC user since 1999
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Dallas, GA
  • 2,643 posts
Posted by TrainFreak409 on Friday, July 29, 2005 5:13 PM
When I was little, maybe about 7 years old or so, my Mom took me to a modular layout display, and on one of the models, an abandoned wye. It was cool, the mainline was in great condition, but then the ballast spreads, and splits off to a really crummy area, with old ties marking every here and there. There was even a little brief description of the Wye. It doesn't just add realism, it adds facts too, depending on how you do it.

Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Friday, July 29, 2005 5:07 PM
Recently removed diamond, signal heads turned, overgrown right of way; you got me thinkin' now. Sounds really cool. The gears are really starting to turn as I think of all the possibilities with this. Thanks!![^]

Smitty
Smitty
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
  • 7,214 posts
Posted by siberianmo on Friday, July 29, 2005 5:00 PM
Many of the model railroads that I've put together over the years reflect the images contained within my mnd's eye - so to speak. An abandoned right-of-way reflects what we see all the time while riding the rails. It doesn't have to be anything more than an industry siding, lost in time, and even without the industry itself. A couple of rusted and weathered box cars - there it is! [tup]

This has given me an idea for one of my pikes! Thanx ......
Happy Railroading! Siberianmo
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:42 AM
I would say yes. For extra interest you could make it a different gauge and have a road crossing with rails in the road. Another consideration, depending on your era, is the ties may not have been salvaged, sometimes not even the rail.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:33 AM
They can add a great deal of visual interest, especially if--say--you're modeling the 'original' line that runs near the 'improved' one. Out west, both Santa Fe and Rio Grande did a great deal of rebuilding and improving of their main lines, reducing grades and curveatures, and leaving the embankments of the original lines. In the 1920's, when Rio Grande modernized their line along the Arkansas River, not only did the roadbed of the original main line cross and re-cross the new trackage, but also the abandoned roadbed of the Colorado Midland was mixed in at points along the river. It makes for some VERY interesting topography.
Tom [:D]
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 1,774 posts
Posted by Dr. John on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:31 AM
They certainly can add an air of realism as well as a point of interest. Abandoned junctions take up little space and are easy to model. You can determine if you want it to look recently abandoned (track still in place, but rusty and weed-grown, maybe with a boarded up tower or empty signal masts) or just give a hint of the former line with some roadbed and a few rotten ties. You could even create a rails to trails path with a paved walkway with joggers and people on bikes.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:31 AM
I think it could definately add some realisim. Maybe even an abandoned locomitive and or rolling stock. That would be cool. I agree with the other posts about not wasting usable space, though. then again, if you're using that space to model abandoned stuff......is it really a waste? I guess it all boils down to what YOU want to do. It's my opinion though, that it would be cool.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:26 AM
[#ditto]

What are you trying to convey?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:24 AM
A number of factors apply here:
1. If you are modeling any time after the 1940's it could add historical significance
2. Do you have the space you can afford to do that?
3. What are you trying to convey with an abandoned line?
4. Are you modeling an specific prototype and qa specific location where it is pertinent?
My opinion? Sure but not at the cost of reduced operation or industries.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: CSXT/B&O Flora IL
  • 1,937 posts
Do abanded lines look good on a layout?
Posted by waltersrails on Friday, July 29, 2005 10:19 AM
I want your theory. Thanks.
I like NS but CSX has the B&O.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!