Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Wye? Because the turntable won't fit!

1819 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Monday, June 20, 2005 6:54 PM
I gave up and sold my Walthers 90' as scrap for $20 and bought a Diamond Scale. It is indeed a monster and I hope I can find room for it on my new layout.
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Monday, June 20, 2005 4:55 AM
Thanks, Crandell!

Now I know what to keep an eye out for, and how to fix it. Your experience will be very helpful!!
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Southeast U.S.A.
  • 851 posts
Posted by rexhea on Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:23 AM
To me, the ideal plan would be to have a wye for the yard lead going to the classification yard and a turntable. Without this combination, there is always one direction where the loco will still have to back out of the yard when continuing on the mainline. I believe it was a John Armstrong book I saw this in.

Yeah, I know...lots of space and money, but I still wish I had designed my main yard with this combo. [:(]

REX [:)]
Rex "Blue Creek & Warrior Railways" http://www.railimages.com/gallery/rexheacock
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Saturday, June 18, 2005 8:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jimrice4449

As a space saving move using a wye instead of a TT doesn't make sense. If you can fit in awe a TT will fit. If the wye can be incorporated into the overall track plan it cuts down on expenses. All other things considered, the prototype would go with a wye instead of a TT in a situation where there's only 1 or 2 engines to service but that's due to $$$ not space considerations


Jim,
This may be true... In the real world. But believe me when I say, the wye fits,
the Walthers 130' TT doesn't. Let me rephrase that, the TT would fit, but after
adding a roundhouse and all the spur tracks, I would have to operate my
trains from the hallway.[:)] Dave
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: North Idaho
  • 1,311 posts
Posted by jimrice4449 on Friday, June 17, 2005 11:03 PM
As a space saving move using a wye instead of a TT doesn't make sense. If you can fit in awe a TT will fit. If the wye can be incorporated into the overall track plan it cuts down on expenses. All other things considered, the prototype would go with a wye instead of a TT in a situation where there's only 1 or 2 engines to service but that's due to $$$ not space considerations
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Southeast U.S.A.
  • 851 posts
Posted by rexhea on Friday, June 17, 2005 10:13 PM
The "Wye" is a good idea Dave. I have one for my passenger trains where I can turn the whole thing around at once. Much better than running over to the turntable or cheating by hand.
I noticed in your photo album a picture of the speaker installation in a P2k FA1. I have an AB unit with the DSD150 decoder in the B (very weak sound). WIll you email me some pictures of that installation? I need to make some adjustments.

"ROLL TIDE"

REX
Rex "Blue Creek & Warrior Railways" http://www.railimages.com/gallery/rexheacock
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, June 17, 2005 8:03 PM
I rue the thought of starting a 'dream' layout anytime in the future because this one was so darned costly. I thought I could build one with a few hundred dollars, but a few thousand was more like it. However, if...IF..I ever do get the bug, and the cash, I will definitely invest in a big, indexed turntable. I'll know not to mix brands with the House, too. Of course, I can recycle the current roundhouse if I get the bigger table.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Friday, June 17, 2005 3:48 PM
Crandell,
I also had major issues with the Walthers 90' TT. As a result, it now sits in a
closet! I am glad to see that you were able to correct the problems with yours.
I guess I could dig mine out and see if I could get it working correctly. But,
this would not solve the problem of turning the Allegheny or the E6 A/B.
The turntable is just too short.

The bright side of the whole thing is that I don't see this layout as my "dream layout".
I'm sure one day this layout will join my prior three in layout Heaven. Unless I drop
dead tomorrow, I WILL build a layout big enough for a 130' turntable[:P]. Dave
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Friday, June 17, 2005 3:15 PM
Crandell, How about a few pics of the mechanicals please that would be great.

Oh you've done that already!! It's a bit different to mine but thanks anyway, back to the drawing board.


I did think about bending the tracks but I needed the space so cut the front of the the house off.


Ken.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, June 17, 2005 3:09 PM
Okay, Mark. First, a disclaimer: because I built everything in a whirlwind in a short time, I cannot claim to have followed the instructions to the letter, so I might have left out, or changed, a step in the TT's construction. IOW, I may have been the source of error.

That said, I found that I had to shim the motor (I am asuming you'll motorize?) so that it would mesh reasonably well with the large black gear attached to the bridge spindel. I folded over some paper, or light cardboard, and wedged that between the motor and gear housing and the long side of the motor, itself. I didn't overtighten the little screws, either, in case the whole system was going to reject the shim catastrophically.

Then, I found that the bridge, and therefore its big gear, wobbled excessively, and the shim was not the whole cure. So, I cut plastic, or thin styrene left over from a plastic model, and glued two rectangular pieces between the nether side of the pit and the big metal washer that would otherewise be against the pit, uppermost on the spindle. I placed a piece on either side of the spindle. See pic below.



That cured the wobbles. To this day, it works well.

Another problem (sigh): the pit isn't round....at least, in my case. So, even with everything motoring as it should, the bridge binds at places. Test yours in place to ensure that you don't have that problem. Test with a heavy loco. Both directions, complete revolutions. If you're good, then good for you! If not, get out your Dremel, and a burr wheel, and grind away. Go light, because that pit wall is only a mm thick, or so.

Lastly, I found that the wipers, the brass ones that provide power to the bridge rails, were not dependable from revolution-to-revolution. They shifted, or the metal rings were not aligned so well and forced them to shift over time. Sound locos were hit and miss as the bridge turned. So, I did two things. I wrapped one of them with insulating tape nearest the retaining screw so that no shorts would ever occur if one of the wipers came loose. Next, I ground the wipers in a bit, on the top and bottom edges, so that they fit more reliably onto their respective metal rings. By doing so, the result was a wiper that was noticeably 'pinched' right where it runs against the ring, with a proper-sized tab at the open end. Otherwise, the wider wipers can ride up on the adjoining plastic spacers, and ...well, it gets very aggravating.

Oh, and I screwed a plastic spacer/retainer onto the very centre bottom face of the spindle to ensure that the bottom wiper stayed in place.

I'm sweating just thinking about all this. I sure hope I have helped if you encounter my troubles, but I hope, sincerely, that you don't.
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Wyoming, where men are men, and sheep are nervous!
  • 3,392 posts
Posted by Pruitt on Friday, June 17, 2005 5:11 AM
Okay, Crandell, spill the beans, please!

I just bought one of the Walthers 90-foot turntables and will start assembling it soon. I've heard that the mechanisms are cranky and hard to get functioning smoothly. What did you do? I'd much rather follow your lead than blaze my own trail, and I'm sure there are some others would would benefit from your work, too. I'm all ears (or eyes, as the case may be)!
[?][?][?]
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, June 17, 2005 12:07 AM
Ken, I bent the tracks. My Atlas Round House didn't match the 90" Walthers table. However, that little problem was the least of my worries. Getting the motor to turn the bridge reliably, now THERE was a problem. I am happy to report that it now works like a charm.
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:58 PM
I had the same problem as Jay, I got a 98' turntable from Heljan.
And a roundhouse from Atlas. I had to shorten the front of the roundhouse to make it fit the turntable ( or bend the tracks )



Ken.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:08 PM
I see I'm not the only one with an old bag hanging on the benchwork to throw scraps in...

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:44 PM
I am happy you found a solution, and nobody said you had to live with that solution for ever. If you eventually decide on a smaller one, or find a way to shoehorn that other monster in, then do it!

I like what I see.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:00 PM
ahh but those big steam locos would have looked great on a turntable [:(]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:56 PM
makes sense to me. i used a turntable becuase i couldn't mkae a wye fit. Im the exact opposite of you dave
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:54 PM
Sounds like a plan to me. I like it!
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Wye? Because the turntable won't fit!
Posted by dave9999 on Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:43 PM
I had planned on ordering the new Walthers 130' turntable, but
after numerous attempts at finding the perfect spot for it,
I decided on a wye. I had the oppurtunity to see one of these turntables
the other day and they are huge. So I went to the LHS and bought
the track I would need to build a wye. I also added a few tracks for
parking some of my locos when not in use.

Anyway, now I can turn my locos and I saved a bundle by not buying the
turntable... which means I have more $$ to spend on other things. A
new loco comes to mind!![:p] Dave

Here's a picture. Can't wait to do the scenery.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!