Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Which do you prefer the most, trains of the past or present ?...

3113 views
34 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Which do you prefer the most, trains of the past or present ?...
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:13 PM
Though I'm the one that came up with this poll and topic, it would be awfully hard for me to have to choose just one, but if I did, I'd have to say trains of the past... I really like the old steam engines and the simpler times they ran in.

trainluver1
  • Member since
    May 2014
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by trolleyboy on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:21 PM
I like the deisels of the past. More elegant and less big and brutal than today's techni-toasters. Rob
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:21 PM
What about diesels from the past? Dave

Edit: Rob, you beat me by five seconds[8D]. Dave
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,199 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:22 PM
I prefer steam, but I have 2 early diesel switchers (sw1, sw9) along with a GG1 to go with a 2-6-0 kit and a 2-8-0 kit for the standard gauge. The narrow gauge has a Forney and 3 2-8-0 kits and a shay kit.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Barranquilla, Colombia
  • 327 posts
Posted by RedLeader on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:45 PM
There are steamers of the present too. China, Eastern Europe, India, Malasya, Africa and some countries in South America still use them.

Have anyone ever built a layout of the future? That'll be interesting. I had a friend that once had the idea to model a layout based on the future of the 1930's. It would look like the movie metropoly and have these super streamlined steamers running on sleak designed concrete viaducts and huge zeppelins will be docked atop of the pinacles of 200 stories "art decco" skycrapers.

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:14 PM
You should have included diesels of the past.Most of the good stuff has been replaced by today's techno diesels.Most of the interesting units dissapeared in the 1970s with a few lasting into the 80s.Most of the GE Dash 9s,and AC units have basicly the same carbody,and the only relief is sometimes seeing an SD 70 or the SD70 ACE,which has a different (and fugly) carbody.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:29 PM
Present definitly. I love the colorful paint schemes of rr's like BNSF and CSX.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 1,619 posts
Posted by West Coast S on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:32 PM
Give me steam prior to 1930 and all associated with it.
SP the way it was in S scale
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

Trainluver,

I didn't vote. If I may suggest that you modify your poll.

The trains of the past were also diesel powered! The E-units made their debut before WWII. My favorite being the E7. There were the Alco DL109s, Alco PAs, Baldwin "Baby Face" units, the Zephyrs,.................diesels everywhere!

Also, don't forget that a number of trains were hauled by electrics, like the Milwuakee Roads Boxcabs, Pennsy's P5s and GG1s, New Haven EP4 and EP5, New York Central's P motors and S motors.

Just a thought!

Peace out.



For those of you that have mentioned that I left out diesels of the past must have missed the enclosed following the two choices. One says steamers and the other says diesels. That's the only two choices I intended to offer.

trainluver1
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Dover, DE
  • 1,313 posts
Posted by hminky on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:42 PM
Give me Big Stacks,Wooden cars and Iron men, the 1870's.



Model the 1870's at:

http://www.pacificcoastairlinerr.com/1879/why/

Just a thought[:D]
Harold
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,321 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 6:55 PM
I marvel at the sophistication and nostalgia associated with the 1910-1940 era steamers. Some, like the tiny 0-6-0, were built in weights from 40-over 100 tons (what a range!), while the FEF's, Texan/Selkirk 2-10-4's, and all of the articulated engines (yes, Aggro's SP is included) were leviathans that must have required rail straighteners pulled after the tender. But, if you have never done so, seek out a simple little steamer and have a good long look at all of the pipes, valves, gears, rods, stays, bolts, access plates, and so on. How did those things ever work well enough to make any money for their patrons?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:07 PM
I'm leaning heavily toward old steam, but have way to much modern equipment to just give up on the french fry grease burning locomotives of the future (don't laugh, it's just around the corner!).
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1

For those of you that have mentioned that I left out diesels of the past must have missed the enclosed following the two choices. One says steamers and the other says diesels. That's the only two choices I intended to offer.

trainluver1


Well, if that's the case then I would choose steam over diesel everyday and twice
on Sunday. I have early diesels because they fit my era, but if pinned down and
forced to choose between the two... steamers win. Dave
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Eastern Massachusetts
  • 1,681 posts
Posted by railroadyoshi on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:03 PM
Though the big guys of the 21st century are extravagent, you see the same style locomotive in every train.

I prefer early generation diesels through the late 1970's, even though I wasn't born until 1992.
-Siddharth
Yoshi "Grammar? Whom Cares?" http://yfcorp.googlepages.com-Railfanning
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Pacific NW
  • 733 posts
Posted by JohnT14808 on Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trolleyboy

I like the deisels of the past. More elegant and less big and brutal than today's techni-toasters. Rob


'Techni-toasters'??!? [:D] Where does that name originate from, Rob?? That's the first I've heard of that one!! Give me STEAM, baby!!! Especially the 1880s to 1905 era..a wonderful time to model.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 1:17 AM
1930's steam Allllllllllllll the way & "modern" steam (roamers & non-museum owned engines). The diesels & electrics of the 40's & 50's also are cool.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 1:19 AM
By the way whats up with those ugly SD-90's
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 1:47 AM
I like the big steam of the 1920-40 era, and though I don't have any diesels on my Yuba River Sub, I am fond of the early E's, F's and Alco PA's, and the later Rio Grande Tunnel Motors and even if they weren't very successful, those Baldwin Centipedes just knock my socks off! But by and large, give me the indivuality of big steam--today's techno-diesels all look alike. How do you tell them apart--louvers? Number of fans? Cab size? Heck, I don't know. Don't much care, either, LOL!
Tom [:P][:P]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,633 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:31 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1


For those of you that have mentioned that I left out diesels of the past must have missed the enclosed following the two choices. One says steamers and the other says diesels.

trainluver1


o.k.............

that's a 10-4, on that

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:45 AM
I chose present, since I've always liked being able to model what I can see in everyday life. (I do have some 'past' diesels as well though.) If I'd been lucky enough to actually see steamers in normal revenue service, Id probably have been a steam modeler like the majority.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 8:52 AM
I didn't vote, because I'd have to say I like both.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 10:39 AM
I'm with those who prefer diesels of the past (1960s-1980s)
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,321 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 12:14 PM
I have already responded, but I have been thinking about the results so far, and they seem to be what I'd expect.

In twenty-five years, though, I'd bet those who prefer steam will be very much in the minority, say in the order of 15%. Steam will have no particular relevance for those who join our ranks over the next quarter century, so those absolute numbers will slowly.....um....die off.

In case my point is lost, it means that those 'better' streamers that we purchase now, and preserve, will possibly become quite valuable to the minority who might appreciate them. That minority is going to be demographically older, and often more capable of paying higher prices for truly valuable locos.

Just a thought..
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 1:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by JohnT14808


'Techni-toasters'??!? [:D] Where does that name originate from, Rob?? That's the first I've heard of that one!! Give me STEAM, baby!!! Especially the 1880s to 1905 era..a wonderful time to model.



The article in 1999 (either Great Model Railroads or Model Railroad Planning) which described Gary Hoover's Missouri, Kansas & Quincy referred to the newer units as "Techno-toasters" (as opposed to Techni-toasters--pretty much same difference) so I guess that makes it a six year old reference.

Cheers ;o)

Ed
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Southeast U.S.A.
  • 851 posts
Posted by rexhea on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:09 PM
I model the transition period where I have both steamers and diesel. But, you can't beat the history and romance of the steamers. Growing up in the 40s and 50s, it was always exciting to see a steamer chuffing and blowing its whistle, but very sad when the whistle was replaced by a horn. [:(]

REX [:)]
Rex "Blue Creek & Warrior Railways" http://www.railimages.com/gallery/rexheacock
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,201 posts
Posted by tstage on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:17 PM
I like trains of the past - steam AND diesel.

Crandell, I'm going to have to beg to differ with you. Albeit, the number of steamer fans may dwindle but I think there will always be a steam contingency amongst modelers and railfans. However, if tthe higer powers-to-be should ever outlaw the running of live steamers in the future because of environmental reasons, that may indeed strike a serious blow to the remaining number of fans over time. I would hope that wouldn't be the case...

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 933 posts
Posted by aloco on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 3:40 PM
I like diesel locomotives that were built from the late 1930s on up to the end of the 1950s. Those were the days when locomotive builders were more stylish with their body designs.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 5:24 PM
[bow]I like them all so I try to stick to the 30's through the 60's.I also rember the days when I was a kid and my Grandma used to hall me with her on the OLD P.E in southren calif.([;)] old as dirt here)

JIM
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Along the Murphy Branch
  • 1,410 posts
Posted by dave9999 on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 5:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dave9999

Originally posted by trainluver1

For those of you that have mentioned that I left out diesels of the past must have missed the enclosed following the two choices. One says steamers and the other says diesels. That's the only two choices I intended to offer.

trainluver1


After reading this again, maybe the question should have read: "Do you prefer steam or
diesel". Most people who model the "past" model diesels as well as steam. They overlaped
for many years. So narrowing the past down to steam only really doesn't work. Dave
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Wednesday, June 1, 2005 5:53 PM
OLD SCHOOL!

1930s to late steam and a few of the first generation of dieseals.

Trainluvr, I actually was torn between modeling the present day and transition era during the '90s. But the influx of quality plastic steam after 2000 made the decision easier. I still have a few UP hood units and modern freight cars in the collection.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!