Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Is THIS Camelback period correct to 1890's?

683 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, February 21, 2005 12:00 PM
Great Site--got lost and had to remember I was at work.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Eriediamond on Monday, February 21, 2005 11:18 AM
howmus, Thanks for the info,I appreciate it. Thanks, Ken
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Finger Lakes
  • 10,198 posts
Posted by howmus on Monday, February 21, 2005 11:06 AM
SpaceMouse, the fallen flags site listed by Eriediamond is a great site. Also try this one: http://www.northeast.railfan.net/steam.html

My [2c] worth.

Ray Seneca Lake, Ontario, and Western R.R. (S.L.O.&W.) in HO

We'll get there sooner or later! 

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Eriediamond on Monday, February 21, 2005 10:50 AM
SpaceMouse, check out www.rr-fallenflags.org. Ken
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Monday, February 21, 2005 10:45 AM
There are several shortcomings in the model if one wishes to represent the 1890's. Among them, the headlight probably should be replaced, the steamchest is incorrect, the model lacks the proper valve-gear for a typical mainline camelback of this period, there needs to be a footplate between the engine and tender and, foremost, the cab is far too low and narrow to be realistic (compare it with the size of a plastic figure). Although supposedly representing an NYO&W Mogul camelback, this IHC model resembles it only in general terms and dimensions (I have the NPP brass version in my collection to compare with). If you can overlook these faults, the engine is probably a passable representation of this sort of locomotive and does run quite well.

Unfortunately, nothing else is currently available (pleeeease BLI!) in the way of camelback road engines at realistic prices. The Mantua road engine camelbacks were more accurate (again except for valve gear) but represented only a handful of locomotives from one railroad accurately. More diverse and much better looking examples (although admittedly poorer runners) were made in the 1960's in then inexpensive brass, plus ones of zamac or a combination of zamac & brass.

CNJ831
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 1,132 posts
Posted by jrbarney on Monday, February 21, 2005 10:14 AM
There's an undated, but nice plan, drawn by one C. Ness, for a somewhat similar Erie Camelback in the January 1960 RMC:

DL&W and Erie 2-6-0 Camelbacks Railroad Model Craftsman, January 1960, page 57 ( 2-6-0, CAMELBACK, DL&W, ERIE, STEAM, ENGINE, LOCOMOTIVE, PROTOTYPE, RMC )

Models of Camelbacks were popular in the 1960s because their wider fireboxes provided more room for a motor in HO.
Bob
NMRA Life 0543
"Time flies like an arrow - fruit flies like a banana." "In wine there is wisdom. In beer there is strength. In water there is bacteria." --German proverb
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, February 21, 2005 9:53 AM
Well let me add that the only anachronism is the valve gear. 1890's engines normally used slide valves and Stephenson valve gear (the cylinders are asingle round shape with a box on top).
The engine recycles the mechanism and tender from their SP prototype 2-6-0.

The cylinders are the wrong shape and the tender is a bit too long, but otherwise its pretty good for a 1890's engine. Search E-Bay for camelbacks or 2-6-0's and you can occaisionally find a brass version of this engine to see what one would really look like.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, February 21, 2005 9:48 AM
Yes. Its a NYO&W engine.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Is THIS Camelback period correct to 1890's?
Posted by SpaceMouse on Monday, February 21, 2005 9:34 AM
I know that the 2-6-0 Camelback came into use in 1877, but this seems to be a later model. Would this specific Camelback fit into the 1890s?

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!