Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Athearn Streamline Passenger Cars

7251 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 229 posts
Athearn Streamline Passenger Cars
Posted by RicZ on Sunday, April 4, 2021 9:20 PM

i am trying to add body-mounted Kadee couplers to my old blue box streamline passenger cars.  Can anyone tell me if I need to add a spacer to the body to mount the Kadees at the proper height?

I did not need a spacer with the standard passenger cars, but there seems to be a difference with the streamline ones.  Thanks in advance for any help.

RicZ

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,437 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Monday, April 5, 2021 5:04 AM

If you are referring to the old blue box kit passenger cars, a KD will fit right in without any adjustments.  OK, that was my experience with consists of heavyweights and streamline cars - but your experience may vary.

Only way to be sure is with a KD coupler height gauge - a worthy investment IMO.

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,852 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Monday, April 5, 2021 5:23 AM

RicZ

i am trying to add body-mounted Kadee couplers to my old blue box streamline passenger cars.  Can anyone tell me if I need to add a spacer to the body to mount the Kadees at the proper height?

I did not need a spacer with the standard passenger cars, but there seems to be a difference with the streamline ones.  Thanks in advance for any help.

RicZ

 

You need a spacer, this company makes them:

http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html

Not sure how you body mounted on the heavyweight cars without a spacer and got the correct height?

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: AU
  • 708 posts
Posted by xdford on Monday, April 5, 2021 5:28 AM

Hi there,

Body mount couplers might very much limit the radius curve your Streamline cars can handle especially if they are close coupled and your curves are even medium say 24-28".  You will have few performance issues with truck mounted couplers because passenger cars are most often pulled unlike freight cars which can be switched and pushed and pulled over multiple track formations. 

My recommendation is to keep your couplers as truck mounts.

Cheers from Australia

Trevor

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: AU
  • 708 posts
Posted by xdford on Monday, April 5, 2021 6:20 AM

Sorry... somehow managed to post twice...  been having gremlins lately!

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,229 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Monday, April 5, 2021 12:57 PM

 

These are a possible option, too:

 

https://www.kadee.com/ho-scale-couplers-c-272_230_231/451-ho-scale-extended-swing-gearbox-whisker-metal-couplers-medium-932-centerset-shank-p-359.htm

 You still may have to build up (down) the floor to provide the proper coupler height and a smooth surface for the swing.

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Kyoto, JPN
  • 243 posts
Posted by BN7150 on Monday, April 5, 2021 3:07 PM

I used 0.060" (1.5mm) and 0.040"(1mm) styrene plates laminated as a spacer. The coupler was cut out the upper and lower shelves of #118 and shows it as a type H tightlock automatic coupler for passenger cars. This is recommended by Kadee (official site). These cars operate on my railroad tracks, including #6 turnouts.

 

Kotaro Kuriu

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,334 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, April 5, 2021 4:22 PM

I have some Rivarossi coaches.  They came with swing-mounted coupler boxes which allow the cars to operate on 18 inch radius curves.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,852 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Monday, April 5, 2021 4:37 PM

I use the coupler pads I recommended above, with #36 Kadee couplers, on Athearn and ConCor 72' cars.

This is a long shank coupler with a wide swing.

I also use American Limited diaphragms and set the coupler back for close coupling.

 

 

 

 

Personally I have large radius curves, 36" minimum, but these cars will run fine down to about 28-30 inch radius.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,632 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, April 5, 2021 7:16 PM

Sheldon,

Thanks for posting that link!

I checked it and, while I no longer own Athearn passenger cars, I still have a group of Rivarossi Budds that are equipped with the stock Talgo trucks. JB makes a mount that will work quite nicely for the Rivs!

ATLANTIC CENTRAL

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

You need a spacer, this company makes them:

http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html

Not sure how you body mounted on the heavyweight cars without a spacer and got the correct height?

Sheldon

 

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,852 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Monday, April 5, 2021 7:22 PM

AntonioFP45

Sheldon,

Thanks for posting that link!

I checked it and, while I no longer own Athearn passenger cars, I still have a group of Rivarossi Budds that are equipped with the stock Talgo trucks. JB makes a mount that will work quite nicely for the Rivs!

 

 
ATLANTIC CENTRAL

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

You need a spacer, this company makes them:

http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html

Not sure how you body mounted on the heavyweight cars without a spacer and got the correct height?

Sheldon

 

 

 

 

You are most welcome, happy to help.

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    August 2015
  • 409 posts
Posted by Autonerd on Monday, April 5, 2021 11:34 PM

ATLANTIC CENTRAL
You need a spacer, this company makes them: http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html

I've been chasing down Jay Bee coupler pads on eBay for months!!!! I have no idea the company still existed and was still making them! The Internets have failed me, Atlantic, but you have not. I am so glad you posted this. Now i have no excuse not to finish my Amtrak rainbow era train.

Yes, btw, to the OP: These things work perfectly. You can make spacers but for what they cost, I think these little JB pads are worth the cost for the time they save.

Aaron

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,016 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 5:53 AM

Autonerd
 
ATLANTIC CENTRAL
You need a spacer, this company makes them: http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html 

I've been chasing down Jay Bee coupler pads on eBay for months!!!! I have no idea the company still existed and was still making them! 

That was my understanding as well. I have used Jay Bee coupler pads on several ocassions in the past. When I could no longer find them, I made my own from styrene sheet.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,852 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:52 AM

richhotrain

 

 
Autonerd
 
ATLANTIC CENTRAL
You need a spacer, this company makes them: http://jbwheelsets.com/coupler_mount.html 

I've been chasing down Jay Bee coupler pads on eBay for months!!!! I have no idea the company still existed and was still making them! 

 

 

That was my understanding as well. I have used Jay Bee coupler pads on several ocassions in the past. When I could no longer find them, I made my own from styrene sheet.

 

Rich

 

Like a lot of small companies in this business, it appears they are only selling direct these days. 

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 2,670 posts
Posted by snjroy on Wednesday, April 7, 2021 8:49 AM

mobilman44

Only way to be sure is with a KD coupler height gauge - a worthy investment IMO.

 

Allow me to insist on this one: The KD gauge is an absolute necessity! If you rely on other cars to adjust the height of your coupler, you might get an entire set of cars at the wrong height. This can have tremendous implications on operations, including uncoupling operations and avoidance of derailments due to sagging underpins.

Ed: thank you for posting the Kadee special extended coupler with the spring, I will look for that. Seems to be the a good solution for layouts with tighter curves...

Simon 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,632 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, May 23, 2021 7:31 PM

I think I mentioned on a related post that a number of HO passenger car modelers have been recommending to go with "Whisker" type shelf couplers.

From what I've read, the KD shelf couplers perform well on trackage that is not level, so the chances of unintended uncouplings decrease considerably.

I operate my rolling stock on a friends layout and he has a few "dips" on his layout's main line. Thankfully he's gradually making the needed adjustments.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    May 2014
  • From: Pennsylvania
  • 1,152 posts
Posted by Trainman440 on Sunday, May 23, 2021 10:08 PM

Using shelf couplers instead of fixing trackwork is like adding traction tires instead of weight to an unbalanced/light loco, and is also like adding keep alive capacitors instead of adding pickups to dead wheels; all being bandaid solutions. 

That being said, I am personally guilty of the latter, Im too lazy to add pickups to brass engines :(

Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modeling the Santa Fe & Pennsylvania in HO

Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLb3FRqukolAtnD1khrb6lQ

Instagram (where I share projects!): https://www.instagram.com/trainman440

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Monday, May 24, 2021 9:10 AM

Lastspikemike
Kadee suggests that using shelf couplers will not compensate for rough track.

Why, why, why, do you continue to do this?

The real statement from Sam on the Kadee website (click to make it readable):

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    May 2014
  • From: Pennsylvania
  • 1,152 posts
Posted by Trainman440 on Monday, May 24, 2021 10:42 AM

Lastspikemike

Why, why do you continue to do this? Why, why,why, why?

https://www.kadee.com/ho-scale-couplers-c-274_276_284/119-ho-scale-se-shelf-whisker-metal-couplers-with-gearboxes-medium-932-centerset-shank-p-289.htm

You really should develop improved reading skills, or possibly improved comprehension skills.

Scroll down to the "However" referring to derailment  and the exact statement about not compensating for rough trackage, even in quotes although from where they are quoting is unclear. The relevant passage is right before Kadee touts their uncoupling devices and tool.

Here Kadee expressly disclaims the use of these shelf couplers to compensate for rough track instead of fixing it:

https://www.kadee.com/coupler.htm

I'll stop if you stop. You were doing really well there for a while, even recently deleting a personal attack type post. You can do it. 

 

The exact quote Mike is referring to is: 

"However note, there are certain limitations to shelf couplers that will cause derailments. "Couplers are not designed to compensate for rough trackage". Although they may help in certain areas, do not expect them to alleviate the problems with poor modular connections, dips, bumps, gaps, sharp grade changes, or any other rough track work. "

I read this more as "although it will help prevent unintentional uncoupling in certain cases, they aren't guaranteed to always work, and should not be a suitable work around to bad track."

IMHO, it sounds more like a way to cover their butts in the fine print in case someone complains how their shelf couplers still uncoupled. But I do think the couplers were intented (advertized) to lessen the chances of uncoupling. 

Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modeling the Santa Fe & Pennsylvania in HO

Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLb3FRqukolAtnD1khrb6lQ

Instagram (where I share projects!): https://www.instagram.com/trainman440

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,632 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, May 24, 2021 8:25 PM

Hey guys,

PLEASE.......it was not my wish to see a blowtorch match between fellow modelers.

I understand and appreciate the comments regarding the importance of good trackwork. No argument there.  However, as stated, I sometimes operate my passenger equipment on a friend's layout who, unfortunately,  has a few dips on his track work.  He's slowly working to redo those sections. 

In the meantime, I've been reading posts from modelers stating that the KD "whisker" couplers perform better than the traditional KD's with the bronze-"spring-in-the-box" set up.  When I discovered that the "shelfs" are availabe in whisker form, it seemed like a win-win scenario.  Wink

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, May 24, 2021 9:06 PM

I have used the Kadee scale shelf couplers on my Athearn streamline and heavy weight passenger cars for several years without a single problem.

I went with the shelf couplers because any jerky operation on my 3½% grades regular couplers would cause an occasional uncoupling and an embarrassing string of cars to roll at a pretty good clip down hill.  

I use the stock Athearn talgo trucks and with the exception of the intermittent uncoupling the regular Kadee couplers work great, even backing into my yard through #4 Atlas turnouts with S curves.

All my passenger trucks have the Athearn metal wheel sets and are slightly over weight.

I have been slowly replacing all my larger Kadee couplers with scale size shelf couplers because they look much better.

Incidentally the shelf couplers work great over the Kadee uncoupling magnets, actually better than the regular couplers.

Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951



My Model Railroad    
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
Aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 1,134 posts
Posted by PC101 on Monday, May 24, 2021 10:44 PM

What I can add about "Shelf couplers'' is that if I pick up two cars that are coupled together, I can twist the two cars all I want, within reason, and they will not come apart. I need to use a uncoupling tool of some type. Looks like I use them on many, if not all of my Auto Racks and Flex-Van Mark III and Mark IV. The Mark III and IV cars do have different wheel base's. The trucks are closer to the ends on the Mk-III and set in from the ends more on the Mk-IV.

I'm still looking at my Passenger cars for any with Shelf couplers.     

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!