SeeYou190I knew I could not possibly be the only one. Thank you for your response.
Mike
My father gave me a Lionel train for Christmas 1945 (027, 2-6-2) and I was hooked on trains. The first real train I saw was the UP City of Los Angles in December 21, 1949, my Mother, brother and me were passengers on it from Salt Lake City to Los Angels. We were snow bound at Donner Pass for 19 hrs before the track was cleared by a snow blower from Roseville. We finally arrived in El Paso on the Southern Pacific Golden State December 23, 1949.After living in El Paso for several years and watching the SP Steam AC-9s going north daily I became hooked on steam locomotives. The size of an AC-9 and the tremendous power with the wheels slipping on the 1.2% grade was simply amazing to a teenager. It would sometimes take four or five attempts before the locomotives got moving. I was amazed and always counted the freight cars, normally over 80.I modeled steam and only steam from the early 50s until we moved to Bakersfield in the mid 80s. I cutover to HO scale in 1951 after reading an article about John Allen’s Gorre & Daphetid. I bought a couple of diesel switchers for my new layout (1989) in the early 90s, GP7 & SD7. I really disliked the E series locomotives, most likely because they were not steam. As time went by I adjusted to the E series and now the E7 is my favorite diesel.My layout era is the transition era, early to mid 1950s. I have never run a diesel powered freight on my layout, only passenger service. My SP articulateds and GS-4s are for freight and heavy weight passenger service. Mel My Model Railroad http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/ Bakersfield, California I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
Judging by the posts in this thread, it would seem there are a lot of different reasons for individuals to be romanced by steam.
For me, it's the poetry of not only the motion of the engine workings, but the details of what it took for a steam engine to function. Everything surrounding the steam engine is magic, not only the motion of the components of the engine itself, but also of the support it took. That includes things like turntables, roundhouses, coaling towers, water towers, and on and on. Oh, and don't forget long spouted oil cans.
My experience is similar to Mister Beasley's. When I got back into the hobby as a young adult in the late 1970s, my intention was to model the first generation diesels I remembered from when I was kid. Then I bought my first steamer more or less on an impulse. It was a Rivarossi Mikado lettered for the UP. It was probably a generic model the same as they made for other roads but that didn't matter to me. When I saw the rods working the driver wheels like a find watch I was hooked on steam. Within a few years I had added a Big Boy, two Challengers, two Northerns and several smaller steamers to my roster. At the same time I bought my first house and built a fairly large freelanced transition era layout in half my basement, an 11x30 foot section. I moved into my current home almost 20 years ago and have since built a completely fictional eastern railroad but have held onto the giant steamers from my UP layout. I really can't run them on on my code 83 track because of the pizza cutter flanges Rivarossi used to put on their wheels but I can't part with them either. I have a fairly large steam roster of 18 steamers and a similar number of diesels. The addition of sound has made the steamers even more appealing.
PS I only recall one time seeing a steam locomotive in a revenue run. I think the year was 1956 and our family was driving from Omaha to Chicago on a summer vacation. It was probably somewhere in Iowa and we looked out to the right and saw a short train in the distance being pulled by a steamer. I'm guessing we were on US 30 at the time because we crossed the Mississippi at Dubuque. I've never researched to see what railroad it was that might have still been running steam in that time and place.
Before the steam engine, it was all muscle power. Mostly horses involved in land transportation, but oxen and human power as well.
The steam engine was the first harnessing of forces of nature through a mechanical apparatus. The steam locomotive put those awesome forces on display through its mostly naked machinery. It also displayed mankind's mastery of those forces (well, usually mastery). And they were BIG. Not as big as steamships of course, but those engines were hidden way down in the bowels of the ships, where they couldn't be seen. The steam locomotive could be seen by anyone who cared to look.
Yes, diesels are more cost effective, by far. And much more efficient. But they're just boxcars that make noise (no offense to the diesel afficionados).
So for me it's steam. The only thing that conveys power like a steam locomotive is a space launch rocket. IMHO.
Mark P.
Website: http://www.thecbandqinwyoming.comVideos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mabrunton
This:
And this:
I guess I'm the opposite of several of you.
I grew up in the 1950s, and my father and I watched plenty of steam on the UP mainline and in the large yards in my hometown.
I watched steam locomotives, but I loved seeing the Union Pacific E9 pulling the passenger trains through town. I have all diesels on my layout.
Maybe someday I'll make a change.
York1 John
I asked my doctor if I gave up delicious food and all alcohol, would I live longer? He said, "No, but it will seem longer."
I grew up outside of New York City and my only childhood memories of trains were the electrified coaches of the Long Island Railroad and the NYC subway system. I didn't see a lot of diesels, even, until my teens, and forget about steam.
After building a new layout in my fifties, I was at my LHS and I saw a steam engine. I fell in love with the action around the drivers and the sound. I started converting to a dual era layout so I could logically run some steam. Some engines, some classic rolling stock and some older vehicles and I was there.
I still like diesel power mostly, but there is a real romance of steam which no modern railroad can match.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
Why the maintenence costs of course. Oh wait, that's what seduced railroads to retire them for diesels.
Rio Grande. The Action Road - Focus 1977-1983
Just enjoy!
Or this one - music in my ears!
Happy times!
Ulrich (aka The Tin Man)
"You´re never too old for a happy childhood!"
The history and romance of steam engines is also notable. The rails literally united (or divided) the nation. America became a mecca for hundreds of millions partly because of the rail system. Many other countries replicated our transportation network because of the iron horses.
I don't model the steam era, but like hearing the sounds alone!
I lke the detail, and the intricacity , actually seeing stuff move ...
and yes, i actually ran a steam traction engine , waaaay back, lol
SeeYou190Yes, OK, but I do not know what you are talking about.
Google "18 201 locomotive" for your answer.
And yes, you can still experience some of the working.
(I still advocate putting the restreamlined 05 back in steam, but I won't hold my breath!)
The rumble of a large bore diesel engine is hypnotic to my ears. I still love the motion, action, sense of teamwork, and all the facilities it takes just to have a small roster of steamers. The history and nostalgia is fascinating to me. To some they all look the same. Look closer and you will see that they are unique like us all.
The PRR had 598 I1s class 2-10-0 locomotives. Through the years you can see subtle and not so subtle changes. Some lasted even longer than some the first gen diesels and all the modern steamers. By the time the last fire was dropped those locomotives owed them nothing. The workhorse of mainline freight.
I guess I'm attracted to the unsung heroes of the railroad golden age.
Pete
Water Level Route I had planned on a layout filled with GP-38's and their bretheren. I was well enough along amassing a roster filled with them to make a believable railroad. Then I bought a 4-8-2
I knew I could not possibly be the only one. Thank you for your response.
Tinplate Toddleranyone who experienced a Pacific with 7ft. drivers pulling a heavy train out of the station knows what I am talking about!
Yes, OK, but I do not know what you are talking about.
Other than an odd excursion train, I have no memory or experience of steam actually working.
There is something else at work here.
-Kevin
Living the dream.
Tinplate ToddlerI grew up, when steam was still king on the mainlines and anyone who experienced a Pacific with 7ft. drivers pulling a heavy train out of the station knows what I am talking about!
That won't be anyone Stateside... there never were any. Hudsons yes, Atlantics certainly, but 80" was pretty much it for anyone not on life support in a nursing home to have seen running.
Of course there are certain lucky people (using family-friendly terminology) who got to see Hudsons with considerably MORE than 84" diameter drivers do what they were designed for. I can only wish to see something like that -- pix and movies wouldn't do it justice -- but there is still 18 201 flying the flag for extreme driver diameter, and that's really good enough for me.
Diesel engines are just effecient engines, nothing more, whereas steam engines are alive, using the elements of nature to move!
I grew up, when steam was still king on the mainlines and anyone who experienced a Pacific with 7ft. drivers pulling a heavy train out of the station knows what I am talking about!
While I can't give you the "why" for you, I've found myself in the same boat. I was born in the mid 70's and while I always thought steam locomotives were kind of neat, I had planned on a layout filled with GP-38's and their bretheren. I was well enough along amassing a roster filled with them to make a believable railroad. Then I bought a 4-8-2 that I thought would be neat to pull an excursion train around my layout to give me at least one passenger train and a bit of fun. It was all downhill from there. I've always held a fascination of history from the 1920's through the 1940's, but hadn't really put railroads into the picture. Once I did, it was all over. While I still have first generation diesels on my current layout, my love is for steam and is almost always what I use to run a train.
Maybe because they were so unique railroad to railroad whereas diesels are the same no matter what road you're looking at. Could be the action visible when moving and the noises and smells.
oldline1
I was a model railroader for decades before I back-dated the STRATTON AND GILLETTE to 1954 to include steam locomotives.
I was born in the late 1960s. The only steam locomotive I ever saw pulling a train was a GS-4 pulling the Freedom Train when I was 8 years old.
I was pretty active in the Florida Live Steamers when I was younger, but I really wanted an A/B set of 7 1/2" Gauge F units, not a coal fired steamer.
Diesel engines are my entire life, quite literally. Not locomotives, but large industrial high horsepower monsters.
So for some reason 20 years ago I just had to have steam locomotives, and moved the SGRR through a time-warp 14 years.
I love my steam collection, and the more I learn about the real things, I love them even more.
Why? Has this happened to anyone else?