riogrande5761It's true the whisker couplers don't work well in every kit coupler box - that's why it's good to have different kinds on hand.
.
I nearly always mount my Kadee couplers in Kadee coupler boxes. The only exceptions to this are a few flat cars and tank cars where the design of the car makes it impossible to use a Kadee box. I probably only have 10 or fewer cars with the original manufacturer's coupler boxes installed.
I get perfect performance like this. I do not take chances with wheels, couplers, or track.
The Kadee #242 snap together coupler box works flawlessly with whisker couplers, and is a simple breeze to use.
Kadee makes the "narrow" #262 coupler box specifically for whisker couplers, and that one has become the coupler mounting option of choice on the STRATTON AND GILLETTE.
-Kevin
Living the dream.
SPSOT fan I noticed a bit back that there is a right and wrong way to put a #5 in, but I don’t think it would seriously effect operations if the springs were in wrong. I don’t think I have actually ever put the springs in on the wrong side, but I have on numerous occasions put the entire coupler upside down so the trip pin was pointing up! I can confirm they will not work properly if you put them in that way!
I noticed a bit back that there is a right and wrong way to put a #5 in, but I don’t think it would seriously effect operations if the springs were in wrong.
I don’t think I have actually ever put the springs in on the wrong side, but I have on numerous occasions put the entire coupler upside down so the trip pin was pointing up! I can confirm they will not work properly if you put them in that way!
Me too! Glad I'm not the only one who has done that.
SROC99 Harrison, the box spring is designed to "only" to be installed "on top of the coupler". If you look closely at at the spring you will see a big difference in the spring arms. As mentioned, there's a strong and weak side to help with uncoupling and delayed action. Also, note the end of the shank on the #5 type of couplers have different angles that are not symmetrical and these match the different spring arm angles. This is why it's important to always have the spring on top. If the spring is installed on the bottom it may work OK but eventually there will be problems. Note that when the couplers are coupled and in operation this takes the centering spring out of the performance issue so the spring on the bottom has no affect. It's when the coupler has to be uncoupled and centered properley that problems will arise and the spring may wear out faster. Remember that this is all late 1950s technology which is still the most popular in our coupler line, presently even more than our whisker couplers. Sam Clarke R&D Kadee Quality Products
Harrison, the box spring is designed to "only" to be installed "on top of the coupler". If you look closely at at the spring you will see a big difference in the spring arms. As mentioned, there's a strong and weak side to help with uncoupling and delayed action. Also, note the end of the shank on the #5 type of couplers have different angles that are not symmetrical and these match the different spring arm angles. This is why it's important to always have the spring on top. If the spring is installed on the bottom it may work OK but eventually there will be problems. Note that when the couplers are coupled and in operation this takes the centering spring out of the performance issue so the spring on the bottom has no affect. It's when the coupler has to be uncoupled and centered properley that problems will arise and the spring may wear out faster. Remember that this is all late 1950s technology which is still the most popular in our coupler line, presently even more than our whisker couplers.
Sam Clarke R&D Kadee Quality Products
Kudos to you folks at Kadee. You have been producing top quality products for a very long time. When knock-off couplers came on the market I gave them a try but none worked as well as the originals. Whether I am adding a kit built or RTR car to my layout, I discard the couplers they came with and replace them with a KD. Your whisker couplers were a great innovation and now my coupler of choice although last year my LHS was out of the whisker couplers and I bought the good old #5 instead. It's a little more work but they still operate great.
It's true the whisker couplers don't work well in every kit coupler box - that's why it's good to have different kinds on hand.
Rio Grande. The Action Road - Focus 1977-1983
I prefer to mount whisker couplers in the #262 "narrow" coupler box. This box is just a bit longer also, and the whiskers do not stick out as far.
AutonerdI recommend using the whisker-style couplers where possible. Those brass spring plates will eventually wear out, or the sides will get bent during assembly, or something will happen and the couplers will stop centering. That never seems to happen with the whisker couplers, unless the little metal whisker spring somehow gets pulled out.
I have had a couple of situations where the whisker spring got caught between the couple box and the cover when I was installing them. You just have to inspect your work to avoid the problem.
Dave
I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!
Works both ways, but I recommend using the whisker-style couplers where possible. Those brass spring plates will eventually wear out, or the sides will get bent during assembly, or something will happen and the couplers will stop centering. That never seems to happen with the whisker couplers, unless the little metal whisker spring somehow gets pulled out.
I'm a car inspector at our club, and I see this failure mode (bent, broken or otherwise bad spring plate) on a regular basis.
I'm sure I have at least a few installed upside down, but I have no coupler problems with any of them. But, I am meticulous about my track and uncouplings are rare.
It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse.
I almost always assemble Kadee couplers in their own boxes and install the assembly onto the freight car.
Assembling them this way, it was easier to put the spring on the bottom, which I will never do again.
I always noticed the difference in the spring, and also that if you push the couplers, there is less force to once side than the other. But I guess I never put two and two together to realize it was the different cut of the spring that did this. Extremely clever bit of engineering. Remember, the first magna-matic couplers didn't have the delayed action, that came later. It's often explained as they didn't know how to make the magnet polarized down the middle to force the two couplers to opposite sides, but I think it had more to do with designing that little spring just right.
I've always put the spring on top, because that's how it said to do it, and it tends to be easier when there is a coupler pocket on the car - drop in spring, which stays there by itself, then hold the coupler in place and put the lid on (which often needs 3 hands, unless it's the type that screws on).
I suspect some of that clever engineering is there in the newer whisker couplers as well, though it doesn't much matter to me, I don't uses magnets or electromagnets, I use skewers so I can drop a car any where I need to.
--Randy
Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's
Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.
There you have it from the horses mouth, as they say. The link I posted earlier takes you to Kadee's own instructions, but Sam added some explanation.
It does appear that the whisker couplers are more symmetrical in nature and may not offer the same delay action as the older #5's do with the bronze spring mounted above the coupler. So if the delay action is important to you, stick with the versions that come with the bronze spring.
In a few cases I have mounted the spring below the coupler and it worked fine but most are mounted per Kadee instructions. I suppose worst case scenario according to Sam is I would evenually need to replace the bronze spring in a couple of my freight cars.
With the whisker couplers, that appear to be more popular these days, the bronze spring is removed from the equation. I use both whisker and traditional bronze spring type Kadee's, and use what works best depending on the kit.
The one change I have been making is I've stopped buying larger #5 style head Kadee's and am sticking with only the "scale head" 156 type couplers as I like the looks of them more.
SROC99 Also, note the end of the shank on the #5 type of couplers have different angles that are not symmetrical and these match the different spring arm angles. Sam Clarke R&D Kadee Quality Products
Also, note the end of the shank on the #5 type of couplers have different angles that are not symmetrical and these match the different spring arm angles.
SROC99Remember that this is all late 1950s technology which is still the most popular in our coupler line, presently even more than our whisker couplers.
I do not use #5 couplers much anymore, but I use a lot of the 20 series couplers, and they use the same centering springs as the #5s do.
The #5 is a rock-solid design. It does not surprise me that it still remains very popular.
SROC99Harrison, the box spring is designed to "only" to be installed "on top of the coupler". If you look closely at at the spring you will see a big difference in the spring arms. As mentioned, there's a strong and weak side to help with uncoupling and delayed action. Also, note the end of the shank on the #5 type of couplers have different angles that are not symmetrical and these match the different spring arm angles. This is why it's important to always have the spring on top. If the spring is installed on the bottom it may work OK but eventually there will be problems. Note that when the couplers are coupled and in operation this takes the centering spring out of the performance issue so the spring on the bottom has no affect. It's when the coupler has to be uncoupled and centered properley that problems will arise and the spring may wear out faster. Remember that this is all late 1950s technology which is still the most popular in our coupler line, presently even more than our whisker couplers. Sam Clarke R&D Kadee Quality Products
Sam,
Thank you for taking the time to respond!
I am so happy that someone from Kadee takes the time to respond and clear things up.
Thank you Sam.
Thanks for the offical verdict Sam!
Harrison
Homeschooler living In upstate NY a.k.a Northern NY.
Modeling the D&H in 1978.
Route of the famous "Montreal Limited"
My YouTube
rrinkersomeone backed in to a cut of Athearn hoppers too had and popped a coupler. I was standign right there so I gradded it to fix it, but I was also talking to a spectator, along with another club member who had been there significantly longer than me. And promptly put the coupler in upside-down. Doh! How come when I'm sitting by myself at my workbench, assembling kits, i NEVER put one in upside down?
That's because there is nobody there to be embarrased in front of! Why would Murphy waste his time when he can't embarrass you?!?
One great feature of most Kadee coupler boxes is that the cover is thinner than the box.
If you assemble the whole thing upside down in the box, you can use this feature to correct some slight coupler height issues.
This is mentioned in the 30 series intruction, but it works with other coupler boxes as well.
I never gave it much thought as to which is the right way. Almost always I am installing the couplers with the car turned upside down so naturally the first thing I do is put the brass centering spring in first which puts it on the top. I guess if you are using the KD coupler pockets and installing them on the car you could do it either way but I can't remember the last time I did that.
I'm glad to know I'm not the only one who occasionally puts the coupler on upside down with the pin pointing up.
hon30critter SPSOT fan I have on numerous occasions put the entire coupler upside down so the trip pin was pointing up! I can confirm they will not work properly if you put them in that way! Hi Isaac, Been there, done that! Why does it always happen with the coupler that was giving you the most difficulty in the first place?!? Dave
SPSOT fan I have on numerous occasions put the entire coupler upside down so the trip pin was pointing up! I can confirm they will not work properly if you put them in that way!
Hi Isaac,
Been there, done that! Why does it always happen with the coupler that was giving you the most difficulty in the first place?!?
Or it happens in front of other people. First club show I was at (and not the first club I was a member of, and FAR from my first time using Kadee couplers), someone backed in to a cut of Athearn hoppers too had and popped a coupler. I was standign right there so I gradded it to fix it, but I was also talking to a spectator, along with another club member who had been there significantly longer than me. And promptly put the coupler in upside-down. Doh! How come when I'm sitting by myself at my workbench, assembling kits, i NEVER put one in upside down?
I try to put the springs on top, but there have been some cases where it fit better below the coupler (like on some of my Athearn BB kits where the center pin faces up instead of down). I don't use the extra features of the couplers, so for me, it's never caused a problem.
_________________________________________________________________
SPSOT fanI have on numerous occasions put the entire coupler upside down so the trip pin was pointing up! I can confirm they will not work properly if you put them in that way!
yes, the spring goes above .. this is because the brass wears quicker than the plastic will, and adversely affect the operation over time ..
however, unless you operate a great deal, you can safely put the spring underneath ... it does fit there as well ..
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
I have done that to.
My understanding is the KD bronze spring is designed to allow the delayed coupling action (if you use that feature). If it isn't installed per KD instructions, that feature may not work properly.
Here is a link to the instructions:
https://www.kadee.com/instruc
If you click on the HO No. 5 instuctions, a PDF opens which include diagrams which show the bronze spring above the coupler in the box.
In some cases I have installed the spring under the coupler to give it a bit more height and the coupler worked fine, although the delay action may not work as well as it is supposed to.
Regards, Isaac
I model my railroad and you model yours! I model my way and you model yours!
hon30critterIf you look at the spring you will see that the two sides are different. My understanding is that the spring is designed to allow the coupler to move more easily in one direction to facilitate uncoupling. As was said, the spring does seem to work when reversed but I would question why you would do that when Kadee has specified that the spring should only be installed on top of the coupler. I know it may make the couplers easier to assemble, but if you are having trouble putting them together Kadee has a jig that holds the coupler while you assemble it. The easier solution is to buy Kadee #148 couplers. They have the centering spring built right in. They are much easier to work with. I don't use the #5s anymore, just #148s. There are versions with underset and overset shanks if you need them.
The easier solution is to buy Kadee #148 couplers. They have the centering spring built right in. They are much easier to work with. I don't use the #5s anymore, just #148s. There are versions with underset and overset shanks if you need them.
I was not aware of the design feature of the large brass spring. I, too, have gone to the easier to install #148 for most installations.
But it raises an interesting technical point. If the original (separate) centering device was designed weaker on the uncoupling side, did Kadee design this behavior into the #148, which has a whisker on each side?
EDIT: A different angle on the whisker edge on each side would accomplish that but not center the spring. What might work would be a slightly weaker whisker on the uncoupling side. That would require that the springs each just barely touch the sides of the coupler box when centered, so that the stronger spring did not push the couple off center. I suspect that sophistication was not included. The springs on each side seem the same, 0.12mm diameter and appear the same length. And the effective length is the same, as each spring touches its side of the box, the same distance from the pivot point.
Just a matter of interest.
Paul
Modeling HO with a transition era UP bent
BRAKIESome where modelers was happy and cheerful but,there was no joy at my work bench that day -----she showed me the instructions.
Basic survival rule for a long life: listen to your wife!