Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Replacement Trucks for an Old (!) Athearn BB F7B Dummy

4520 views
27 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 917 posts
Posted by Southgate on Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:44 PM

Lookin' good, John.  I'd suggest after all that work, paint the trucks a flat gray to bring out the detail, as it gets lost in the dark black plastic. Maybe a little weathering too.

(I meant to send this days ago, didn't click submit) Dan

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Friday, March 8, 2019 8:23 PM

Friends, 

I’ve changed the title of this thread to reflect what’s happened since I first posted it on March 1st as “Suggested Trucks for Athearn F7B (Dummy) Upgrade”.  Since then both Southgate and Mbinsewi have been very helpful with added research and PMs.  And Greymatter got me over the hump to post it.  Kudos to them at the outset.  This post will be the journey that developed when I wanted to replace the old zinc (?) originals with a pair having plastic sideframes with much better detail.  Are these originals cheesy or what?
 
  
Sorry, but as for me, they’ve just gotta go.  If you want them, send me a PM.  They roll quite nicely after all these years.  And just how many is that?  Would you believe 55?  I’ve been informed that this particular frame and metal truck combination dates way back to a Blue Box issue in 1964.  Therein is the rub: no detailed trucks seem to be available as a drop-in replacement using the old frame.  I originally asked what replacement trucks might be best.  But rather than spend a lot of time hearing of or finding something – and then waiting for the mailman – I decided to check the cast-off closet and shelves of my two LHSs.  Aha, the second one had an old BB GP-9 shell and frame with the appropriate Blomberg trucks.  I coughed up $5 and toted it out the door.  Only then did I remember that all along I had in storage my own dummy Geep with the same trucks!  I now had two pair of (formerly geared) Athearn trucks to fiddle with.

The first issue was creating new mounts to this old chassis frame.  The old king posts were rather fat castings that retained the old trucks by means of short rubber sleeves.  The diameter of the post was far larger than the hole in the proposed Athearn truck bolster as seen below: 

 

Away with the old posts, and replace them with 4-40 machine screws (which required that I bore out the bolster holes a tad):

 

 
But wait, note that the newer Athearn truck is also about 2.5 mm higher at the pivot surface than the old truck:
 
 
OK, so also remove the old pin shoulder and see what happens.  Well, the car still rides too high.  What to do?  Find someone who will mill that extra millimeter out of the frame?  Nah, they might charge for it.  Oh, and look here, there’s another problem: the brake gear is trapped behind the second set of drop steps, altogether restricting the swing of the truck!  (Look at what's profiled against the chassis frame behind the second set of rungs):
 

Arrggh – this is where my mind can hear guys start shouting: “Dude, just buy a newer B dummy somewhere and be done with it!”  Sorry, guys, now I’ve been bit by the fix-it bug.  And we know there’s only one cure for that – DIY.  Not only do I need to elevate the base of the new king post screw to accommodate the higher truck, I need to move the pivot point toward the end of the frame by 4 mm.  How to do this?  Hmm, look at that channel along the length of the upper portion of the old frame.  Why, it measures almost exactly an inch wide.  I’ll bet Home Depot has a thin stick of 1” aluminum bar stock that can be used.  And they do, it’s 1 x 1/8 x 36.  I lop off two 1 3/8” lengths, center a point 3 mm in from the end edge of each and drill and tap for that 4-40 screw that serves as the new king post.  Now I can position these two plates so that the new post screws are 107 mm apart, rather than the 99 mm between the original posts.  [Note: yeah, I’ve mixed metric and English systems here.  Just think of me as being momentarily beset by inclusiveness.]  Let’s see, gotta add a 4-40 nut to act as a new post shoulder (better than washers, which will fall off in any assembly/disassembly process).  And also file away the old post locations from the chassis frame to allow for swing of the lower shoulder of the Athearn gear housings: 

 
and
 
 
And, after setting a proper 107 mm spread for these post plates, screw them to the chassis floor with 2-56 screws.  CA is an alternative to screws, but you’ll have a hard time removing the plates later.  The lengthening of the wheelbase by 4 mm on each end will require that the back ends of the frame’s coupler footings will have to be filed away by 2 mm each, this to enable clearance for the trucks’ gear tower faces (you'll see that in later pics).  I found that some Kadee coupler pockets will accept shortening of their back ends to fit.
 
 
Okay, add the shell to the chassis, set it on the replacement trucks, and check the height of the roof line.  Aha!  It matches that of my Stewarts.  Nice.  But wait, there’s more.  Having raised the top of the frame’s “floor” above the new bolster, I’ve wiped out the gap that allows the “fingers” on the gear tower retainer clip to hold the entire assembly to the framework.

Can’t have the trucks falling away every time I pick it up.  And it’s too much of a hassle securing the trucks to their posts from underneath by means of a nut.  Well, let’s at least remove the fingers, which are now both an impediment and useless.  Maybe something else will present itself:

Well now, look at this!  There’s a little slot or gap underneath the top of the gear tower retainer clip: 

Hey, I think I have a bar of brass stock may fit in there from which I can make a retainer bar.  It will extend over the king post screw head to do the job of those discarded “fingers”.  Yup, here it is, a length of scrap that is 1/4 x 1/64 - and it fits exactly!  Lop off a couple of 1 1/16 inch lengths and also a couple of quarter inchers, the latter to serve as pads filling the gap above the tops of the screw heads. 

CA the pads on one end of the retainer bars (to keep them from sliding back into the tower clip during operations), then drill and tap for a 2-56 screw on the other end (to keep it from slipping the other direction).  Pop the trucks onto their posts and install the retainer bars in the gear tower clips.

And there’s your new chassis.

Much better looking than those old trucks, I’d venture:

For final touches, add some grabs and glazing, paint the fuel tanks, attach the shell to the chassis, and you’re good to go.

In support of truth in advertising, I must mention that the coupler height for my project needed adjustment.  I think that would have been necessary regardless of all the modifications to other parts of the chassis.  Not a big deal as I will nab and install a pair of Kadees with underset shanks.

Sorry for the extended presentation, folks, but I don’t have a blog on which to post it.  You may not have an identical issue calling out from your workbench, but perhaps there are a takeaway or two that you can employ elsewhere.  It was a good exercise of the noggin and some basic skills.  And I didn’t have to send off for anything, new or old.  I hate paying postage and then waiting – and waiting....

Please advise with any suggestions for improvement – and thanks for exercising your attention span. 

John

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Sunday, March 3, 2019 8:04 PM

Thanks, Mike.  Replied.

John

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 3, 2019 7:11 PM

Sent you a PM John.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Sunday, March 3, 2019 5:44 PM

mbinsewi

I guess I'm not getting the swing issue. 

Mike.

 
The swing issue is caused by the location of the king posts on the chassis.  It results in the business end of the forward brake cylinders and the shaft and through-frame lever being crunched up behind the drop steps that are second from the end.  Moving the truck slightly forward gets the offenders out from behind the steps - barely - and allows the truck to pivot.
 
John
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 3, 2019 5:25 PM

I guess I'm not getting the swing issue.  OK, well good luck, and nope, no window inserts.  Some place around here I have a couple sets of the Walthers Diesel dress up kits.  I think they came with the inserts.  You can still get those kits.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Sunday, March 3, 2019 5:09 PM

mbinsewi

I've got a set of the plastic trucks, from a "dummy" (I hate using that word) F7.  They are one piece, and they clip over the same bar on the frame that the power trucks fit on to.

It's just that they are one piece, hanger and cylinders are molded on.

If you can use them, I'll send them to you.

I'll get a picture up.

Mike.

EDIT:  Pictures:

I have this, which is a one piece plastic casting,

OR, I found these while getting the first one out,  these will fit right on your b unit, they have seperately applied hanger and cylinders, you can also add metal wheels to these, if you want. 

You'll need the axles and the little brass bearing blocks for using metal wheels.  

I have an FA & FB sitting on my bench, and these match.

Let me know if your interested.  No charge, I have plenty more.

Mike.

Mike,

 

Very gracious of you but I shall pass.  I have two pair of the ones in your second picture.  One pair from my excess motor- and gear-less Geep (note how I avoided use of the "D" word?), and a pair from the one that I bought yesterday out of the junk pile at one of my LHSs - before I remembered my own.  It is this kind that I'll be using.  And I won't have to wait for anything in the mail!

I've remeasured everything and I will avoid the dropstep/cylinder issue by moving the king posts 2mm toward the chassis ends.  That will fix the major swing restriction and enable me to match up the wheelbase with the Stewart/Kato B unit.  In the process I will also be able to take out the last excess milimeter that currently causes the unit to ride that much higher than my other Fs.

Off to Home Depot to pick up a piece of aluminum bar stock to adjust the king posts.

BTW, in you box of old goodies do you have any porthole inserts for old Athearn BB F7Bs? Whistling

John

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 3, 2019 3:40 PM

I've got a set of the plastic trucks, from a "dummy" (I hate using that word) F7.  They are one piece, and they clip over the same bar on the frame that the power trucks fit on to.

It's just that they are one piece, hanger and cylinders are molded on.

If you can use them, I'll send them to you.

I'll get a picture up.

Mike.

EDIT:  Pictures:

I have this, which is a one piece plastic casting,

OR, I found these while getting the first one out,  these will fit right on your b unit, they have seperately applied hanger and cylinders, you can also add metal wheels to these, if you want. 

You'll need the axles and the little brass bearing blocks for using metal wheels.  

I have an FA & FB sitting on my bench, and these match.

Let me know if your interested.  No charge, I have plenty more.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Sunday, March 3, 2019 3:10 PM

mbinsewi

I would think that you could take the truck from the GP and use it in the Fb.

Mike.

 
Mike,
 
So I thought.  But quickly discovered two initial issues.  First, the pivoting face on the Geep truck bolster is about 2.5mm higher than the one on the original cast truck.  Second, the casting of the side frames on the original is bad enough that the brake cylinders on the upper edge are merely raised lumps.  The separately affixed cylinders on the plastic upgrades stick out about 1.5mm more on each side, restricting the swing of the truck against the drop steps that hang below the body doors.  I'm currently woriking out adjustments for both issues.  That may require a shift of the king post a milimeter or two toward the coupler platforms.  And that might bring into play a restriction to the swing of the face of the gear riser.  We shall see what develops.  Gotta keep tellin' myself: "model railroading is . . . .".
 
Hmm
 
John
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 3, 2019 10:17 AM

I would think that you could take the truck from the GP and use it in the Fb.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Sunday, March 3, 2019 8:54 AM

OK, guys, thanks for keeping this thread alive.  Southgate notes that I launched the little project yesterday, I remembered that I had an old Athearn GP9 in storage that was a functional dummy as the motor had been removed.  Its power trucks have plastic Blombergs.  I hauled it out and first checked to see if the two chassis were the same length and I could adapt the Geep's to take the B unit shell.  That would have been simpler but no dice, it was too long.  Sorry for this "teaser": I'll be out of circulation on the forum for at least the next six hours.  I'll get back later today with the story (and photos) of how this developed.

John.

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • 716 posts
Posted by trwroute on Sunday, March 3, 2019 7:25 AM

The Kato truck pictured is from a Con Cor / Kato MP15.  The Stewart / F unit trucks are a perfect fit for the Athearn F frame.  I would use a pair of those.

Chuck - Modeling in HO scale and anything narrow gauge

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Sunday, March 3, 2019 7:04 AM

Southgate
The trucks on John's old locomotive are different from this Athearn truck, so it's not a direct comparison to his.

Thanks Dan.

I have the plastic version of what John has, and I was going to offer him a set of those, but there still a one piece casting, only in plastic and not the old metal.

Using the trucks that he is, would be the best way to go.  He could add metal wheels to that if he wanted to.

Mike.

  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 917 posts
Posted by Southgate on Saturday, March 2, 2019 11:28 PM

mbinsewi

John, I'd be interested in knowing how much of a difference there is between the Kato and the Athearn trucks, as far as the location of the pin from the frame to the truck, and what modifications you did to the frame.

Thanks,

Mike.

 

Mike, here's a side by side comparison of a later BB Athearn truck on the right, with the Kato on the left. The trucks on John's old locomotive are different from this Athearn truck, so it's not a direct comparison to his.

Note that the Kato truck's pivot is off center, I'd say about 3/16 of an inch. It has a nub that would snap into a hole on the frame, held in place by those protrusions on the worm gear cover. The bolster height is close to the same.

John found he had some Athearn BB Blombergs with plastic sideframes, and is going to try to use them, as per our last PM contact. Maybe he'll post progress here?  Dan

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Saturday, March 2, 2019 12:43 PM

riogrande5761

I would say the trucks only need replacing if the side frames are the old metal ones.  Replace with the plastic side frame version - those plastic Blomberg-B's were some of the best ever done.

 

Jim,While correct on the metal side frames the can be replace with the newer trucks..Athearn still list those Blomberg-B's  trucks with the modern frames.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Saturday, March 2, 2019 11:00 AM

John, I'd be interested in knowing how much of a difference there is between the Kato and the Athearn trucks, as far as the location of the pin from the frame to the truck, and what modifications you did to the frame.

Thanks,

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Friday, March 1, 2019 4:48 PM

Southgate

Attuvian;  You mention you would be willing to alter the mounting bolster on the F-7 frame if needed. If so, Kato's Blombergs are good looking trucks with separately applied swing hanger and brake cylinders. They mount differently than Athearn. They don't mount at the center of the truck, but are offset a bit. At worst you might need to make new bolsters from brass strip and attach to the frame. Under that wide body that would be hidden with no interference.

The reason I offer this suggestion, if you're willing to go to the effort, is that I can send you a pair of them that have had their gears removed for other projects. They'll be fine for dummy use and do have metal wheels. PM me your address if interested.

Dan

 
Dan,
 
PM sent.
 
John
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: North Dakota
  • 9,592 posts
Posted by BroadwayLion on Friday, March 1, 2019 4:28 PM

LION uses the -unit trucks on the B-units of him. Remove the gears and they work better than the provided B-Unit trucks.

 

ROAR

The Route of the Broadway Lion The Largest Subway Layout in North Dakota.

Here there be cats.                                LIONS with CAMERAS

  • Member since
    April 2013
  • 917 posts
Posted by Southgate on Friday, March 1, 2019 3:27 PM

Attuvian;  You mention you would be willing to alter the mounting bolster on the F-7 frame if needed. If so, Kato's Blombergs are good looking trucks with separately applied swing hanger and brake cylinders. They mount differently than Athearn. They don't mount at the center of the truck, but are offset a bit. At worst you might need to make new bolsters from brass strip and attach to the frame. Under that wide body that would be hidden with no interference.

The reason I offer this suggestion, if you're willing to go to the effort, is that I can send you a pair of them that have had their gears removed for other projects. They'll be fine for dummy use and do have metal wheels. PM me your address if interested.

You can see what they look like if you go on ebay and look for Kato Blomberg trucks HO.

Dan

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Friday, March 1, 2019 3:26 PM

mbinsewi
 Attuvian
The existing trucks for this Athearn BB are the old cast (white?) metal jobs. In two halves, screwed together with a couple of round head 2-56s at the bolster pivot point. Detail reflects that kind of casting, with a fair amount of flash in or totally covering some of the openings. Wheels are plastic with metal axles.

OK, well, you won't find plastic trucks that are contructed the same way, with 2 pieces bolted together.

As I mentioned, the later plastic version is all one piece, but I'm sure the detailing is much better.

Mike.

 

 
Thanks, Mike and guys.  My intial foray using Google came up with two interesting items: 1) the plastic Athearn sideframes seem to be considered the best that have been done, and 2) everything seems to be power trucks.  I'd consider just side frames but what to mount them to?   I'd also be willing to track down two excess power trucks and gutting the gearing from them, but that leaves what seems to be a major creative effort in mounting them to my dummy chassis.  Should Plan B be simply to secure a junker chassis and trucks, gut the gearing, then pop my shell on that?
 
John
  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Friday, March 1, 2019 12:35 PM

Attuvian
The existing trucks for this Athearn BB are the old cast (white?) metal jobs. In two halves, screwed together with a couple of round head 2-56s at the bolster pivot point. Detail reflects that kind of casting, with a fair amount of flash in or totally covering some of the openings. Wheels are plastic with metal axles.

OK, well, you won't find plastic trucks that are contructed the same way, with 2 pieces bolted together.

As I mentioned, the later plastic version is all one piece, but I'm sure the detailing is much better.

Mike.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,892 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Friday, March 1, 2019 12:14 PM

I would say the trucks only need replacing if the side frames are the old metal ones.  Replace with the plastic side frame version - those plastic Blomberg-B's were some of the best ever done.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Posted by Attuvian on Friday, March 1, 2019 12:14 PM

The existing trucks for this Athearn BB are the old cast (white?) metal jobs. In two halves, screwed together with a couple of round head 2-56s at the bolster pivot point. Detail reflects that kind of casting, with a fair amount of flash in or totally covering some of the openings. Wheels are plastic with metal axles.

I'll get a picture up - after I get back from a trip to the dump. Too many mundane things interrupting the hobby!

Crying

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Friday, March 1, 2019 12:04 PM

I just looked at mine.  Mine are plastic, but it's a one piece casting, and I think the older metal trucks were the same.

The OP will have to find the truck of his liking, and figure out how he can mount it to the frame.

The frame will accept the powered trucks, you could take the gears out of a power truck, to eliminate some drag, and install that, the same way a powered unit goes together, then you'd have the option of removing just the side frames, and replace them with what you want, or a more detailed version of what's there.

Mike.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Friday, March 1, 2019 11:59 AM

I'm not an expert on it, but my understanding is that the Athearn two-axle plastic locomotive trucks on their F-units and GPs have always been considered very good reproductions of EMD Blomberg trucks. Many folks change the wheelsets out, but the truck sideframes should be good. You might need to ream out the opening for the axles a touch to make them roll better.

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, March 1, 2019 11:42 AM

Do the trucks on that thing have existing plastic side frames, or are they the cast metal type?

If you do train shows you can probably find an unpowered or broken A unit pretty cheaply and remove the trucks and gearing for use in you B unit.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, March 1, 2019 11:25 AM

The old Walthers diesel dress-up kit contained parts for one F7A and one F7B.  The B parts were grabs and porthole windows.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: Portland, Oregon
  • 658 posts
Replacement Trucks for an Old (!) Athearn BB F7B Dummy
Posted by Attuvian on Friday, March 1, 2019 10:27 AM

Hello, Troops:

I've got an old Blue Box F7B dummy that needs some updated trucks.  With some further body detailing, it's likely to be latched from time to time to some much nicer Genesis and upgraded Stewart/Kato F units.  The current visual disparity in the truck details with the Blombergs on those newer locos is rather glaring.

The B unit will remain a dummy as all the others are powered and I'd like to throw my time and money elsewhere.   Other than grabs, lift rings and whiskered Kadees it won't get anything else.  No electricals to worry about so I won't need any pickups on the new trucks.  It would be nice to be able to employ the existing pivots that are on the cast chassis but I'm prepared to remove them, then drill and tap replacement mounting holes as necessary.  I'm looking for black plastic/delrin and metal wheels if something like that is avaiable.  Got any suggestions? 

Thanks!

John 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!