Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Modeling an abandon line

639 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Modeling an abandon line
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:39 AM
On my layout, there are two tracks running side by side and cork than runs down the layout, but has no-track glued down. How could I make the track that runs next to the line that the Super Cheif uses 'abandon'. No trains use it, I just glued it there when I was building[:(] And how could I cover up that cork[?] thanks.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:52 AM
Ok, if i get this straight, you have a 2-track mainline setup, but you want to make it look like one of the tracks is abandoned and the other is used.

Prototypically, 2 lines next to each other, even if one is unused, are still kept relatively clean (no high weeds, ect). so in order to make the second line look unused, ballast it like normal, add some low grass along the middle of the rails, small amount on the side with the active rail and make the other side more grassy. and to make it look really unused, take the rail and paint it rust colored, top and sides.

If on the otherhand, the line you want to make unused is not an old double line, then you can add some tall grass and hide the rails some, maybe even bury them a bit lower in the ground (sediment buildups).

Your best bet is to go find examples of both in the real world, both types exists almost everywhere. I've got doubles where it's obvious one set of rails has not been used in ages, and I've also got single lines where it's obvious they haven't been used in decades, both within an hours drive of my house and in several locations.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Sunday, October 31, 2004 12:53 AM
I can think of several ways. First would be to just ballast it, then put in some weeds over the ballast--maybe even some small bushes, depending on how long a time frame you choose for it to be 'abandoned'. Might scatter some old, weathered ties along the embankment, also. Stuff they didn't pick up because it was too far gone to recycle. Another idea is to actually model the track, but weather it heavily, and make sure that if you have any roads that it crosses, that the crossing rails are paved over. And use a lot of weeds among the ties. Even leave out a length or two of rail in spots. I know here in Northern California, some foothill lines have been abandoned, but the rails have never been completely torn up. An abandoned line has its own fascination. Everyone wonders 'WHY?'
Have fun.
Tom
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Sunday, October 31, 2004 1:22 AM
I would suggest that if the line is not the one of the two mains place evenly spaced ties as though you were handlaying track but do not add the track and ballast as norma and liberaly spread the weeds.

ML

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Sunday, October 31, 2004 11:30 AM
If you are relative modern era (say 1970's +) Pave 6'-8' paint a white centerline and install bicycle signs[8D]. A bicyclist or two would add a fantacy[:o)] element to the scene[:D]

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Midwest
  • 718 posts
Posted by railman on Sunday, October 31, 2004 2:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by DSchmitt

If you are relative modern era (say 1970's +) Pave 6'-8' paint a white centerline and install bicycle signs[8D]. A bicyclist or two would add a fantacy[:o)] element to the scene[:D]


that, or just leave the embankments, and just the empty roadbed. Along the old BN line from Monticello to St. Cloud most of the bridges are there, road crossings are intact in places, but no rails or ties. Branches from nearby trees encroach on the ROW. This is on an old single track line.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Monday, November 1, 2004 12:58 PM
I was skimming my November issue of Railpace magazine when a picture of the Metro-North Beacon Line Fan-trip on page 24 reminded me of this - it shows a picture of the former double track ROW (only one track is in service) - the active track has the Fan Trip passing over it, NH painted Geneis heading up the Horizon coaches - the inactive track looks about the same condition in the foreground (ties about the same condition, rail about as rusty [the active track is used many for service and maintainence moves, so it's not that busy], ballest and ROW roughly in the same condition, except the inactive track has some a few patches of weeds here and there (mostly surrounding the rail) - then half-way up in the picture, the rail is lifted leaving behind the ties and a line of rusty tie plates following the former rail). The inactive track is hidden in the shadows after that, so I don't know if the ties were ever lifted further up, but I suspect not as used rail has much more scrap value than greyish, splintering ties. If your hobby shop carries Railpace it might be worth a quick look...

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!