Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

JUST stick a caboose on the end!!!!

2831 views
38 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
JUST stick a caboose on the end!!!!
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 18, 2004 8:26 PM
[:p] I dont know about you but i think a train just aint a train without a good old caboose on it, its so booring seeing a train these days with a blinking red light at the end, i mean whats up with that, i totally think that cabooses make the train, and i know that u wont see a train running on my layout without a caboose, what are your opinions, are ya for em, or against them????[?]
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Midwest
  • 718 posts
Posted by railman on Monday, October 18, 2004 8:27 PM
while I'll let the long winded argue the cost-benefits, the union rules, the changing dynamics, blah blah blah, I'll second your motion and say yeah, cabooses rule! They will forever roam on MY railroad, no matter the operating date!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Monday, October 18, 2004 8:28 PM
Cabeese are just fun. The only trains on my layout that will not have a caboose are those served by electric box motors--the crew ride in the box motor!
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs
  • 728 posts
Posted by FThunder11 on Monday, October 18, 2004 8:57 PM
I've seen a bunch of trains, and I never see the red light on the end.
Kevin Farlow Colorado Springs
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Monday, October 18, 2004 10:16 PM
Cabeese!!! And MORE cabeese!!! Actually, I'm safe, since I model the WWII-Korean War era, so if I don't have a caboose on the end of the train, it's either A: A passenger, or: B: It's gotten uncoupled and unbeknownst to me, is rolling back down the grade toward the yard.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Ma.
  • 5,199 posts
Posted by bogp40 on Monday, October 18, 2004 10:22 PM
I really enjoy modeling cabooses, I tend to model in trends. I'm about to go on my caboose kick again w/ B&O wagontops in resin from the BOHS company store. Never worked with resin before- any suggestions before I begin.
Bob K.

Modeling B&O- Chessie  Bob K.  www.ssmrc.org

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 6:56 AM
Love'm, wouldn't leave the yard without one! Like building wood kits of them or slam bashing one from a plastic kit. Northern Pacific, really terrific.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:16 AM
yea a caboose defines a train, I'm tired of seeing the red flags myself.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 736 posts
Posted by tomwatkins on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 8:22 AM
I like cabeeses! My freights won't leave home without one.
Have Fun,
Tom Watkins
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:05 AM
Modern trains and their FREDs suck. That's why I model 1945-1952. Cabooses are at least as important as the engines in a train, and have as much character!

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:06 AM
I love cabooses! Every freight train on my layout has a caboose on the end of it.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:09 AM
In fact I love cabeese so much that once a week I run a solid cabeese hop over the mountain from one yard to the other to alleviate a shortage. Like running a helper lash-up, but more cute and wobbly.
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Corpus Christi, Texas
  • 2,377 posts
Posted by leighant on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:18 AM
Where I grew up in east end of Houston in 1950s, the Houston Belt and Terminal switch jobs and transfer runs never had a caboose. I have since learned that HB&T once owned ONE caboose to shuttle crews between downtown passenger terminal and New South Yard out on what was once the edge of town. Most HB&T "runs" had no caboose. But "real trains" of the ATSF, MoPac and SP had cabooses.
So I tend to model cabooses on trunkline trains and out-in-the-country locals, but no caboose on transfer drops and local switching district jobs within the switching limits of the big city.

My old neighborhood, Magnolia Junction:
http://www.railimages.com/albums/kennethanthony/aat.jpg

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:21 AM
You get a yes over here..all of mine have em at the ends.

Jim
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Fayetteville, Ga.
  • 11 posts
Posted by deltamech on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:15 AM
I agree with all of you! A train just ain't a train without a caboose. All the trains on my railroad have one; even the log trains going into the woods end with a bobber.

Richard
Richard Morris Hog Mountain Railroad
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Trempealeau, Gods' Country, Wisconsin
  • 31 posts
Posted by RRRerun on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:55 AM
I have several cabooses on my roster. I model from the 1920's (from 0-4-0's up to the bigboys in the 50's) thru to the present with yard switchers up to the AC4400's. A hidden staging yard allows me to store the eras locos and rolling stock that are not appropriate, for the era that I choose to run on the layout at any particular time. I have put some FRED's on the modern era frieghts just to keep the cynics happy. To keep myself happy, I am not beyond putting a caboose at the end of a stack frieght or grain consist. I came up with and employe FRED's on the cabooses on some of those frieghts just to confuse and or agrivate the cynics. If they say anything, I just tell them it is a local frieght and local ordinances require cabooses. After all, I own the property and I make the laws and ordinances.
If you want good quality oats, you must pay a fair price. If you'll settle for oats that's already been through the horse, that comes a little cheaper
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:00 AM
Ohhh yeahhhhhhh. [:)]

Who BUT the railroads didn't like a caboose. I love them. You are soooo right, a train is just NOT a train without a caboose.

Give me some RS3s a nice long train and a caboose. Now that is what I call a TRAIN. [:D]
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:20 AM
I model the 80's and 90's, but that is one place where I don't give a hoot about realism. A freight without a caboose? Ridiculous!

[:)]
-Jerry
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Philadelphia PA
  • 76 posts
Posted by j1love on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:57 AM
Like some others on the forum, I model transition era RR. So realism dictates that EVERY non-passenger train gets a caboose. It really would not matter if I modeled any era.......Loco + freight cars + caboose = TRAIN!

Jim Davis Jr Pennsy, then, Pennsy now, Pennsy Forever!!!!!!!

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:03 PM
My stepdad's "home away from home" was a caboose for 22 years on the SP. He passed in 1948. ALL my freights have a caboose. It adds a few steps for the local at each setout/pickup point!
jc5729
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 101 posts
Posted by ozzy01 on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:22 PM
A train just isn't a train without a caboose. Even though I model late 80's - early 90's , I will have a caboose on the end of my train.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Louisville,Ky.
  • 5,077 posts
Posted by locomutt on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jhhtrainsplanes

Ohhh yeahhhhhhh. [:)]

Who BUT the railroads didn't like a caboose. I love them. You are soooo right, a train is just NOT a train without a caboose.

Give me some RS3s a nice long train and a caboose. Now that is what I call a TRAIN. [:D]



Come and visit Jim,
I'll give you a good lash-up(I didn't say lashing!)
2 RS-3s,3 GP-9s,a GE 44 tonner,and AT least 3 Cabeese.
Depending on when you come,I may have about 3 more ready.[:D]

Oh,and we can put a few freight cars in between[?][:D]

Being Crazy,keeps you from going "INSANE" !! "The light at the end of the tunnel,has been turned off due to budget cuts" NOT AFRAID A Vet., and PROUD OF IT!!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Robert Knapp

I really enjoy modeling cabooses, I tend to model in trends. I'm about to go on my caboose kick again w/ B&O wagontops in resin from the BOHS company store. Never worked with resin before- any suggestions before I begin.
Bob K.


Hi Rob,

I built caboose kit a bit like the one your thinking of a couple years ago. The Pacific Mountain models are excellent, as are the instructions. By now they should have the etched metal details. Those should be a bit easier to work with then the resin parts my kit had.

http://www.pacificmountain.ca/tips.htm

For tools:
61-80 drill bits and pin vise, or better yet a vari-speed dremel.
Kadee's 2-56 drill and tap set.
Tweezers.
Sanding sticks and sand paper.
X-acto knife.
Medium and thin CA, styrene cements DON'T work on resin.

My suggestion, do take time to gently wa***he kit before painting. I didn't wash mine, and the paint didn't adhere well at all. Which probably explains why it came off so beautifully when I tossed it into some paint stripper.

The second time I painted the model, it did much better.

Even though I used Scalecoat II caboose red that time, I wouldn't use it again, even though it worked really well, as it appears to be a bit to dark for freshly painted B&O cabeese.

Have fun,
Alvie
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:16 PM
One big thing that attracts me to modeling the '50s is cabeese on the end of freight trains. Their still cool to me.

Alvie.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:23 PM
I like seeing them, but cabooses (I hate the word "cabeese") are going to be on some locals on my layout, but (I know I'm going to be killed for saying this[:P]) EOT's will be on most trains.

I think I hear "were is the caboose" more often by non-railfans/model-railroaders than than any other RR related question these days.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:35 PM
Gotta have 'em! One of the biggest reasons wwhy the modern era has no interest for me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:40 PM
lol. im glad to hear everyone shares the same intrest as me!!!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:55 PM
Not a caboose in sight, but waycars all over my Q layout...

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 4:18 PM
Well, my layout's a branch line so all trains (even mainline run-through freights) have a caboose, except passenger services. Have to have somewhere for the crew to ride, and besides, it makes switching more interesting as you have less space to work in.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 19, 2004 4:49 PM
I watched the Allen Keller video on Doug Tagsold's Denver, Front Range & Western layout recently. Doug models fairly modern era, covered hoppers, BN, UP & DRGW but stated in the interview that he models close to modern, no newer than about the mid 80s because he doesn't want to run with cabooses. I agree.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!