Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Main line vs. spur height

1752 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Main line vs. spur height
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 20, 2002 6:52 PM
How much higher should the main line track be compared to the joining spur?
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,300 posts
Posted by Sperandeo on Monday, January 21, 2002 11:48 AM
Main tracks are often 10 to 12 inches higher than parallel passing sidings and yard tracks. Spur tracks that curve away from a main line can go up or down as needed to suit the terrain and the industry being served. There's really no typical difference in height of grade for spurs compared to main lines.

Best wishes,

Andy Sperandeo
MODEL RAILROADER Magazine

Andy Sperandeo MODEL RAILROADER Magazine

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Guelph, Ont.
  • 1,476 posts
Posted by BR60103 on Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:04 PM
You may want to make enough difference to be noticeable; don't make the drop more than your loco can take or so sharp that cars uncouple.
Spurs can drop quite a distance if the line is on an embankment. A long spur parallel to the main track may follow up and down the contours more than the level main line.
If you're in flat country, the drop may be about the height of the mainline ballast.
David the Platelayer

--David

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:13 PM
As a rule of thumb, I try to make the vertical transition from mainline to siding over a distance at least 1-1/2 times longer than my longest car or locomotive.

John Timm
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 25, 2002 10:33 AM
If you make the spur track different in terms of more weathering, more weeds, or thinner/different color ballast, it doesn't matter if there is any difference in height at all. This year's Great Model Railroads includes one of Ron Kuykendall's layouts, which has all of the track [Code 100] fastened directly to wooden slab doors, no roadbed, and it's still very effective. regards/mike
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:36 AM
An easy way to achieve the "lower " spur (assuming you are using roadbed) - is to not apply the road bed to the spur. The mainline will be elevated by the roadbed while the spur will be closer to "ground level" -subtle but noticeable difference.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 70 posts
Posted by gerryleone on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:58 PM
This is a great question, and here's what I don't understand about doing it on a model: If you want the the siding lowered 1 scale foot (~1/8") it would take 5 REAL feet of siding to get down to that level at a 2.5% grade, and another 5 REAL feet of siding to get back to mainline level. So you have a 10-foot siding that actually only gets 1 scale foot lower at one point and has some relatively steep grades.

Am I seeing this wrong?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:16 PM
I think that's 5 REAL inches not feet for a 1/8" drop :).
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 70 posts
Posted by gerryleone on Wednesday, January 30, 2002 10:48 PM
And THIS is why I flunked out of engineering.

(Nevermind, everyone.)

(Thanks, gibbs.)

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!