QUOTE: Originally posted by TEFFY Simon1966: I realize that the infared is cheaper then the radio control but the radio is so much better. If you can get out of your purchase or upgrade to the radio you'll be much better off. The infared is line of sight and if someone in standing in front of the receiver when your command is given, the command will not be received by the controller and the loco keeps doing what ever it was doing.
Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum
QUOTE: Originally posted by mykroft Between the Zephyr and the Prodigy, there is no contest. The Zephyr is a far superior system, supporting 4 digit addressing, expandability, computer interfaces, advanced consisting, RF and IR throttles, and so much more than the prodigy. If you want to compare to another low-end unit, look at the Atlas Master, the Prodigy is functional, but has little to no upgradability apart from supporting 4 throttles.
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by simon1966 I run a Zephyr and have run 4 trains at once. One controlled by the unit itself, 2 controlled by the Jump ports, and one controlled from my PC using a Locobuffer 2 serial to PC interface. The Jump ports are a great feature of the Zephyr. You can use 2 old DC power packs to control 2 more DCC equipped locomotives. I use and old dual controller MRC tech 2 for this feature. The great thing abiout the Zephyr is how you can add to it and build a very comprehensive DCC control system in the future. I was able to get one of the DT400 throttles cheap from e-bay and have ordered an Infra red receiver so that I get wireless walk around capability. Will likely add another booster soon as well to provide more power as I bring a new section of the layout on line. Have fun,