Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Nnext Walthers "Name Traiin" in the series

11981 views
54 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 31 posts
Nnext Walthers "Name Traiin" in the series
Posted by DougNash on Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:14 AM

Walthers will finish the EL CAPITAN  in their "Name Traiins" series with the last Hi-Level coach in May of 2012.

What is your opinion of what the NEXT train they will produce in the series.???????

 (Please,no "fantasy ideas" or far out things only you would want, just your opinion on which train they have designed the tool work for and are comitted to putting into production next)

Thank you

Doug

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:29 AM

I'm wondering if it might not be the NP "North Coast Limited?"   They've already done the "Empire Builder" and the "Hiawatha", the North Coast sounds like a logical choice at least to me. 

If not that, I'd suggest either the RI/SP "Golden State Limited" or the SP "Sunset Limited."

Tom

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:43 AM

Well Doug,

Respectfully you're putting a "cap" on the type of feedback.  Hopefully I'll still be within your guidelines.

I may be mistaken but with a few exceptions, it seems that Walthers leans heavily towards western roads when producing a complete train.

I know for certain that a number of modelers have been asking Walthers for more eastern and southeastern trains (New Haven, Seaboard, ACL, Southern, L&N, ), but many of us realize that this may not be in Walthers short or intermediate term plans.    

So, just my opinion, if Walthers is going to produce another train, it may likely be another  western consist.

But, hopefully, the rumors of a metalized post WWII "Southern Crescent" are not just vaporware.

DougNash

What is your opinion of what the NEXT train they will produce in the series.???????

 (Please,no "fantasy ideas" or far out things only you would want, just your opinion on which train they have designed the tool work for and are comitted to putting into production next)

Thank you

Doug

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    June 2009
  • 40 posts
Posted by FreightTrainBlues on Thursday, January 5, 2012 7:31 AM

Of course that should be one of B&O's top trains, the Royal Blue, or the Cincinnattean. For the latter they'd need someone to (finally!!!) build those magnificent P7 Pacifics Stick out tongue


  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,434 posts
Posted by dknelson on Thursday, January 5, 2012 8:13 AM

The answer to that question is likely to be found when we get our first advance peak at the next HO catalog cover.

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 3,139 posts
Posted by chutton01 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 10:21 AM

From another thread, a list of Walthers Name trains so far:

2006 - The Super Chief - Santa Fe Railroad
2007 - The Empire Builder - Great Northern Railway - Big Sky Blue
2007a - The Empire Builder - Burlington Northern
2008 - Twin Cities Hiawatha - The Milwaukee Road
2008a -Twin Cities Hiawatha - The Milwaukee Road - UP colors
2009 - The 20th Century Limited - New York Central Railroad
2010 - City of Everywhere - Union Pacific Railroad
2011 - The Broadway Limited - Pennsylvania Railroad
2011a - The Super Chief - Santa Fe RR (Version B - metal plated finish, new "Regal" 4-4-2 sleeper)
2012Question - El Capitan - Santa Fe Railroad

http://www.walthers.com/exec/page/name_trains

So, are we due for a East Coast Name Train? Overdue for a South-east US Railroad Name train?

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,761 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Thursday, January 5, 2012 12:06 PM

Based on what they've done before, it would have to be:

– a major road. Not just Class 1, but a name even non-railroaders recognize.
– a road popular with model buyers.
– a road with a large geographic reach, to appeal to the greatest number of potential buyers.
– a line they haven't done before, or at least for a while.
– transition era. Probably diesel powered. Definitely streamlined.
– a train advertised in national magazines (and therefore, again, recognizable to non-railroaders).
– Northeastern, Midwestern, or Southwestern.

Based on that, I'd suggest the SP's Daylight or Lark, B&O Capitol Limited, the joint D&RGW/WP/CB&Q Zephyrs, or the Northern Pacific's North Coast Limited. Less likely but still possible: Rock Island Rockets and Illinois Central City of New Orleans.

Just my guesses. I claim no special knowledge of the matter.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Denver, CO
  • 3,576 posts
Posted by Motley on Thursday, January 5, 2012 12:16 PM

Great explinatin Steve, on how they decide what name trains to produce.

Here's me hoping for the D&RGW/CB&Q Zephyrs. Because I don't want to spend $900 for 6 cars BLI Zephyrs on ebay sellers who are crazy. LOL

Michael


CEO-
Mile-HI-Railroad
Prototype: D&RGW Moffat Line 1989

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Anaheim, CA Bayfield, CO
  • 1,829 posts
Posted by Southwest Chief on Thursday, January 5, 2012 12:44 PM

Looking at the list of trains they have already done the big omission of the "most" famous trains is the Cal Zephyr.

But would Walthers make a trainset that has already been done by another manufacturer?  Maybe, maybe not.

Maybe they'll do an Illinois Central train, like the Panama Limited or City of New Orleans.

I think they might make a Santa Fe Big Dome.  Then you could mix and match already built cars to make other Santa Fe trains.

Matt from Anaheim, CA and Bayfield, CO
Click Here for my model train photo website

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: eastern Nebraska
  • 219 posts
Posted by binder001 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:07 PM

I agree that a CB&Q Zephyr would be nice - maybe the Denver Zephyr.  Maybe Walthers will look at the demand for the BLI cars and decide to do the California Zephyr?  Well advertised, famous name, covers three class 1 RRs, several choices of motive power (all done by Walthers/Proto - one of the unmentioned criteria)

Of course I would still take another batch of UP Streamliner cars; the 12-4 "Western" sleepers, the 6-4-6 "National" sleepers, the "River" club-lounges, and more head-end equipment. 

I agree that he SE trains have been neglected, but I am not familiar enough on them to comment.

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:09 PM

Based on that, I'd suggest the SP's Daylight or Lark, B&O Capitol Limited, the joint D&RGW/WP/CB&Q Zephyrs, or the Northern Pacific's North Coast Limited. Less likely but still possible: Rock Island Rockets and Illinois Central City of New Orleans.

Probably not the "Daylight" (it's been done). The "Lark" would be a better choice or perhaps the "Shasta Daylight" (or "Cascade"). Maybe even the "Sunset Limited".

The California Zephyr's already been done by BLI, probably not a good idea to duplicate.

The North Coast Limited is probably on the short list. Neat train, too, especially in Loewy colors. Also ran on the CB&Q since the NP didn't go to Chicago.

Then there's the C&NW "Twin Cities 400" or the NYC "Empire State", the Seaboard "Orange Blossom Special", the ACL "Champion" or "Florida Special". B&O's "The Cincinnatian" would make a nice pike sized train behind either steam or diesel, although you'd need a streamlined P-7 for the steam version.

How's about Southern's "Crescent Limited" or the joint Frisco-MKT "Texas Special"?

What would really be cool is a train of mixed streamline and heavyweight cars like the Santa Fe "Grand Canyon" or the joint UP-SP-C&NW "Overland" of the late 40's/early 50's.

Andre

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,880 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:57 PM

Steven Otte
Based on that, I'd suggest the SP's Daylight or Lark, B&O Capitol Limited, the joint D&RGW/WP/CB&Q Zephyrs, or the Northern Pacific's North Coast Limited. Less likely but still possible: Rock Island Rockets and Illinois Central City of New Orleans.

Excellent analysis of the criteria for a likely candidate by Walthers.

As for the above suggestions... 

SP Daylight: don't we have two versions from MTH and BLI?

D&RGW/WP/CB&Q Zephyrs - the CZ has been done in multiple runs by BLI so I assume any future demand could be addressed by another run of BLI, especially in light of the speculators/scalpers trying to sell their passenger cars at double MRSP.  As far as trains like the Rio Grande Zephyr, BLI talked about doing it but must have judged demand not to be adequate because they have so far opted to not produce it.  They have the tooling but I"m not sure about removing the name boards.  I don't recall WP running its on post CZ train, nor CB&Q?

The RI and IC trains seem like good candiates, surely the City of NO is a storied train!

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 599 posts
Posted by Milepost 266.2 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:12 PM

Not really a passenger train modeler, but I would think they would want to do a name train that would make use of at least some of the available molds from previous runs.  

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:29 PM

B&O Washingtonian/Capital Limited would be good choices given the almost "starved for more equipment" B&O modelers

C&O George Washington (Modern blue/yellow scheme)  Although the George has been done by Bachmann with J-2 class 4-8-2 Heavy's with pullman green coaches.  

Walthers seems to hate anything C&O and/or steam, so I doubt it will happen.

 

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

Moderator
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 1,761 posts
Posted by Steven Otte on Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:32 PM

riogrande5761

SP Daylight: don't we have two versions from MTH and BLI?

Not in the diesel era. Modeling a version pulled by E7s would be a way to appeal to those who model later eras, without having to directly compete with MTH's steam-powered versions.

--
Steven Otte, Model Railroader senior associate editor
sotte@kalmbach.com

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Ft. Wayne Indiana Home of the Lake Division
  • 574 posts
Posted by Ibflattop on Thursday, January 5, 2012 2:44 PM

Hows about the Wabash Cannonball 5-6 cars for a medium pike.     Kevin

Home of the NS Lake Division.....(but NKP and Wabash rule!!!!!!!! ) :-) NMRA # 103172 Ham callsign KC9QZW
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, January 5, 2012 4:26 PM

Ibflattop

Hows about the Wabash Cannonball 5-6 cars for a medium pike.     Kevin

You beat me too it.   I was going to suggest this too.  Who doesn't want a Canonball?  That might even have appeal to newbies just getting started.  Put a loco & 4 -5 cars into a "set" for next year's Christmas rush.

Right now I am running my Wabash E7 on the front of the City of St. Louis with grey UP cars behind.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • 8,880 posts
Posted by riogrande5761 on Thursday, January 5, 2012 5:55 PM

Steven Otte

 riogrande5761:

SP Daylight: don't we have two versions from MTH and BLI?

 

Not in the diesel era. Modeling a version pulled by E7s would be a way to appeal to those who model later eras, without having to directly compete with MTH's steam-powered versions.

Isn't one of the trains circa 1941 while the other is early 1950's?  Either way, didn't these trains get pulled by diesels?  I realize steam/diesel transition ran from the late 1930's to the mid-1950's, most major RR's having retired steam by about 1955/56 approx.

Rio Grande.  The Action Road  - Focus 1977-1983

  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: Minneapolis, MN
  • 122 posts
Posted by ChevelleSSguy on Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:58 PM

CNW 400.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
Posted by jmbjmb on Thursday, January 5, 2012 7:09 PM

Count me as another vote for Crescent with a green & gold Pacific up front.  Those things were just gosh darn good looking.

Even though I couldn't run it on my layout, that's a set I'd buy just to display as a Christmas present for my wife.  Even though she's not a model railroader, she loves the looks of that train.

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: The place where I come from is a small town. They think so small, they use small words.
  • 1,141 posts
Posted by twcenterprises on Thursday, January 5, 2012 7:19 PM

Crescent for me too.  A Pacific or an E unit, either one would suit me fine.

Brad

EMD - Every Model Different

ALCO - Always Leaking Coolant and Oil

CSX - Coal Spilling eXperts

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,763 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Thursday, January 5, 2012 8:49 PM

I'd love the Capitol Limited.  I'd put it on the shelf next to my Superliner Capitol Limited.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Kentucky
  • 10,660 posts
Posted by Heartland Division CB&Q on Thursday, January 5, 2012 9:30 PM

Regarding the suggestion for the North Coast Limited........ Yes! I would like that.

Walthers is part way there with cars they have offered. Needed to complete the train are the Budd dome/sleeper and the observation car.

If Walthers does not intend to produce the NCL, I would like to see the GN observation painted and lettered for the NCL.

 

My next choice would be the Twin City Zephyr or the Denver Zephyr.

 

GARRY

HEARTLAND DIVISION, CB&Q RR

EVERYWHERE LOST; WE HUSTLE OUR CABOOSE FOR YOU

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Friday, January 6, 2012 1:10 AM

Steven Otte

 riogrande5761:

SP Daylight: don't we have two versions from MTH and BLI?

 

Not in the diesel era. Modeling a version pulled by E7s would be a way to appeal to those who model later eras, without having to directly compete with MTH's steam-powered versions.

Actually, Alco PA's were more common on the Daylight although it was not unknown to have mixed Alco and E unit consists. Solid E7 consists were rare. Espee only had 18 E7 units (both A and B including the rebuilt E2 unit from the COSF). Including units that came west from the T&NO and Cotton Belt, SP had 66 PA/PB units. Even when the lone E8 ( 6018) and the nine E9's (6046-6054) are added to the EMD total, SP still had only 28 E units, less than half the Alco total.

E7's had weak traction motors compared to the competition which was one of the reasons SP removed them from the Shasta Daylight and substituted PA's. E7's never were assigned to any train over the Sierra,  the Tehachapi's or the Cascades (other than the original assignment to the Shasta Daylight). The 2.2% Cuesta grade north of San Luis Obispo is relatively short and within the limits of the short time rating for E7 traction motors.

There wasn't a whole lot of difference between the 1941 "Daylight" and the train as it appeared in 1955 (after dieselization) other than a few cars built postwar (some of which were originally built for the "Shasta Daylight") which were assigned to the "Daylight" pool.

The "Lark" would be a better train for Walthers than a postwar "Daylight" if they were to do an SP train. Either that, or a "Sunset Limited".

Andre

 

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New York, NY
  • 330 posts
Posted by MerrilyWeRollAlong on Friday, January 6, 2012 2:46 AM

Whatever the train is, it'll most likely follow Walthers' criteria based on past patterns:

1) Hauled by E- or F- units (made by Proto2000)

2) Each train has at least 8 unique passenger cars

3) Each train has a different paint scheme (or at least potentially) beyond the original (includes Amtrak schemes)

4) One of the end points of the train is Chicago.

Considering the fact that the El Capitan is a named train of a railroad that already had one of its trains modeled before (Santa Fe), this could open the door for another railroad getting the same honor.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,763 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Friday, January 6, 2012 6:45 PM

MerrilyWeRollAlong

Whatever the train is, it'll most likely follow Walthers' criteria based on past patterns:

1) Hauled by E- or F- units (made by Proto2000)

2) Each train has at least 8 unique passenger cars

3) Each train has a different paint scheme (or at least potentially) beyond the original (includes Amtrak schemes)

4) One of the end points of the train is Chicago.

Capitol Limited fits Wink

Actually, I think they missed a solid opportunity with the Amtrak 40th to actually put together the anniversary train in one set.  All the pieces are there, but it takes some effort to gather everything.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Friday, January 6, 2012 6:54 PM

andrechapelon

The "Lark" would be a better train for Walthers than a postwar "Daylight" if they were to do an SP train. Either that, or a "Sunset Limited".

Andre

 

Andre:

The "Lark" would be a good train, but I'd also throw in a vote for the SP/UP/C&NW "Overland", especially the post-war version that was a mixture of two-tone gray streamline and heavyweights.   Of course you could kinda/sorta put one together at the present from existing Walther's SP/UP two-tone gray stock, at least for the heavyweight cars, but I'm not sure if any of the streamlined cars exist in that color scheme.

Tom

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Friday, January 6, 2012 7:31 PM

Andre:

The "Lark" would be a good train, but I'd also throw in a vote for the SP/UP/C&NW "Overland", especially the post-war version that was a mixture of two-tone gray streamline and heavyweights.   Of course you could kinda/sorta put one together at the present from existing Walther's SP/UP two-tone gray stock, at least for the heavyweight cars, but I'm not sure if any of the streamlined cars exist in that color scheme.

Tom

Tom,

I actually mentioned the "Overland" in one of my posts on this subject. I think mixed streamline and heavyweight cars makes an attractive passenger train, especially with mixed paint jobs. Another cool train would be Santa Fe's "Grand Canyon"

Andre

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
  • 2,893 posts
Posted by Paul3 on Friday, January 6, 2012 7:58 PM

Hey, it's easy!  All you need to do is pick from one of the following Class I railroads:

Akron, Canton and Youngstown Railroad
Alabama Great Southern Railroad
Alabama, Tennessee and Northern Railroad
Alabama and Vicksburg Railway
Alton Railroad
Amtrak
Ann Arbor Railroad
Arizona Eastern Railroad
Arizona and New Mexico Railway
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway
Atlanta, Birmingham and Atlantic
Atlanta and St. Andrews Bay Railway
Atlanta and West Point Railroad
Atlantic City Railroad
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Atlantic and Danville Railway
Atlantic and St. Lawrence Railroad
Auto-Train Corporation
Baltimore, Chesapeake and Atlantic Railway
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
Bangor and Aroostook Railroad
Beaumont, Sour Lake and Western Railway
Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad
Bingham and Garfield Railway
BNSF
Boston and Maine Railroad
Buffalo, Rochester and Pittsburgh Railway
Buffalo and Susquehanna Railroad
Burlington Northern Railroad
Burlington-Rock Island Railroad
Butte, Anaconda and Pacific Railway
Cambria and Indiana Railroad
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Northern Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
Carolina, Clinchfield and Ohio Railway
Carolina and Northwestern Railway
Central of Georgia Railway
Central New England Railway
Central Railroad of New Jersey
Central Railroad of Pennsylvania
Central Vermont Railway
Charleston and Western Carolina Railway
Chesapeake and Ohio Railway
Chesapeake and Ohio Railway of Indiana
Chicago and Alton Railroad
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad
Chicago, Detroit and Canada Grand Trunk Junction Railroad
Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad
Chicago and Erie Railroad
Chicago Great Western Railroad
Chicago and Illinois Midland Railway
Chicago, Indiana and Southern Railroad
Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway
Chicago, Milwaukee and Puget Sound Railway
Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad
Chicago and North Western Transportation Company
Chicago, Peoria and St. Louis Railroad
Chicago, Rock Island and Gulf Railway
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway
Chicago Southern Railway
Chicago, Terre Haute and Southeastern Railway
Cincinnati, Hamilton and Dayton Railway
Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railroad
Cincinnati, Lebanon and Northern Railway
Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway
Cincinnati Northern Railroad
Cleveland, Akron and Cincinnati Railway
Cleveland, Akron and Columbus Railway
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway
Clinchfield Railroad
Coal and Coke Railway
Colorado Midland Railroad
Colorado and Southern Railway
Colorado and Wyoming Railway
Columbus and Greenville Railroad
Conrail
Copper River and Northwestern Railway
Cripple Creek and Colorado Springs Railroad
Cumberland Valley Railroad
Cumberland Valley and Martinsburg Railroad
Delaware and Hudson Railway
Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad
Denver, Northwestern and Pacific Railway
Denver and Rio Grande Railroad
Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad
Denver and Salt Lake Railroad
Detroit, Grand Haven and Milwaukee Railway
Detroit and Mackinac Railway
Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad
Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad
Duluth and Iron Range Railroad
Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway
Duluth, Missabe and Northern Railway
Duluth, South Shore and Atlantic Railway
Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway
El Paso and Southwestern Company
Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway
Erie Railroad
Erie-Lackawanna Railroad
Evansville, Indianapolis and Terre Haute Railway
Evansville and Terre Haute Railroad
Florence and Cripple Creek Railroad
Florida East Coast Railway
Fonda, Johnstown and Gloversville Railroad
Fort Smith and Western Railroad
Fort Worth and Denver Railway
Fort Worth and Denver City Railway
Galveston, Harrisburg and San Antonio Railway
Georgia Railroad
Georgia and Florida Railroad
Georgia Southern and Florida Railway
Grand Canyon Railway
Grand Rapids and Indiana Railway
Grand Trunk Corporation
Grand Trunk Western Railroad
Great Northern Railway
Green Bay and Western Railroad
Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway
Gulf, Mobile and Northern Railroad
Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad
Gulf and Ship Island Railroad
Hocking Valley Railway
Houston East and West Texas Railway
Houston and Texas Central Railroad
Illinois Central Railroad
Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
Illinois Terminal Railroad
Indianapolis Southern Railroad
International-Great Northern Railroad
International and Great Northern Railroad
International Railway of Maine
Iowa Central Railway
Kanawha and Michigan Railway
Kansas City, Mexico and Orient Railway of Texas
Kansas City Southern Railway*
Kansas, Oklahoma and Gulf Railway
Lake Erie and Western Railroad
Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway
Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad
Lehigh and Hudson River Railway
Lehigh and New England Railroad
Lehigh Valley Railroad
Litchfield and Madison Railway
Long Island Railroad
Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad
Louisiana and Arkansas Railway
Louisiana, Arkansas and Texas Railway
Louisiana Railway and Navigation Company of Texas
Louisiana Western Railroad
Louisville, Henderson and St. Louis Railway
Louisville and Nashville Railroad
Maine Central Railroad
Maryland, Delaware and Virginia Railway
Michigan Central Railroad
Michigan Interstate Railway
Midland Valley Railroad
Mineral Range Railroad
Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway
Minneapolis and St. Louis Railroad
Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad
Minnesota and International Railway
Mississippi Central Railroad
Missouri and Arkansas Railway
Missouri-Illinois Railroad
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad
Missouri and North Arkansas Railroad
Missouri, Oklahoma and Gulf Railway
Missouri Pacific Railroad
Mobile and Ohio Railroad
Monon Railroad
Monongahela Railroad
Montour Railroad
Morgan's Louisiana and Texas Railroad and Steamship Company
Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Nevada Northern Railway
New Jersey and New York Railroad
New Orleans Great Northern Railroad
New Orleans, Mobile and Chicago Railroad
New Orleans and Northeastern Railroad
New Orleans, Texas and Mexico Railroad
New York Central Railroad
New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad
New York Connecting Railroad
New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad
New York, Ontario and Western Railway
New York, Philadelphia and Norfolk Railroad
New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad
Norfolk Southern Railway
Norfolk Southern Railway (1942-1982)
Norfolk and Western Railway
Northern Alabama Railway
Northern Central Railway
Northern Pacific Railway
Northwestern Pacific Railroad
Oahu Railway and Land Company
Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Railway
Oregon Electric Railway
Oregon Railroad and Navigation Company
Oregon Short Line Railroad
Oregon-Washington Railroad and Navigation Company
Pacific Electric Railway
Panhandle and Santa Fe Railway
Pecos and Northern Texas Railway
Penn Central Transportation Company
Pennsylvania Railroad
Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines
Peoria and Eastern Railway
Pere Marquette Railroad
Perkiomen Railroad
Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington Railroad
Philadelphia and Reading Railway
Piedmont and Northern Railway
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad
Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad
Pittsburg and Shawmut Railroad
Pittsburg, Shawmut and Northern Railroad
Pittsburgh and West Virginia Railway
Port Reading Railroad
Quanah, Acme and Pacific Railway
Quincy, Omaha and Kansas City Railroad
Reading Company
Richmond, Fredericksburg and Potomac Railroad
Rutland Railroad
Rutland Railway
Sacramento Northern Railway
St. Joseph and Grand Island Railway
St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Railway
St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway
St. Louis, San Francisco and Texas Railway
St. Louis Southwestern Railway
San Antonio and Aransas Pass Railway
San Antonio, Uvalde and Gulf Railroad
San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railway
San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad
Santa Fe, Prescott and Phoenix Railway
Savannah and Atlanta Railway
Seaboard Air Line Railroad
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad
Seaboard System Railroad
Soo Line Railroad
Southern Indiana Railway
Southern Kansas Railway of Texas
Southern Pacific Company
Southern Railway
Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad
Spokane International Railroad
Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway
Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway
Sunset Railroad
Syracuse, Binghamton and New York Railroad
Tennessee Central Railroad
Texarkana and Fort Smith Railway
Texas Mexican Railway
Texas and New Orleans Railroad
Texas and Northern Railway
Texas and Pacific Railway
Toledo and Ohio Central Railway
Toledo, Peoria and Western Railroad
Toledo, St. Louis and Western Railroad
Trinity and Brazos Valley Railway
Ulster and Delaware Railroad
Union Pacific Railroad
Utah Railway
Vandalia Railroad
Via Rail Canada
Vicksburg, Shreveport and Pacific Railway
Virginia and Southwestern Railway
Virginian Railway
Wabash Railroad
Wabash Pittsburgh Terminal Railway
Washington Southern Railway
West Jersey and Seashore Railroad
Western Railway of Alabama
Western Maryland Railway
Western Pacific Railroad
Wheeling and Lake Erie Railroad
Wichita Falls and Northwestern Railway
Wichita Falls and Southern Railroad
Wichita Valley Railway
Wisconsin Central Railroad
Yazoo and Mississippi Valley Railroad

See?  How hard can that be?  Smile

Paul A. Cutler III

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,133 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, January 7, 2012 4:56 AM

Here is a comprehensive list of famous named passenger trains:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_named_passenger_trains

Lots to choose from.

Rich

Alton Junction

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!