Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

NCE Additional Engineer Cab Cab04

1231 views
7 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 665 posts
Posted by darth9x9 on Monday, August 16, 2004 6:10 PM
John is referring the lag time when using the wireless feature. There is a certain delay for the system to acknowledge each key press. You certainly can't press keys as fast as when the throttle is plugged into the throttle bus. But it only takes a few minutes to 'feel' the time needed between key presses and it is not significant. BTW, I experience the same thing on Digitrax's wireless throttles.

Bill Carl (modeling Chessie and predecessors from 1973-1983)
Member of Four County Society of Model Engineers
NCE DCC Master
Visit the FCSME at www.FCSME.org
Modular railroading at its best!
If it has an X in it, it sucks! And yes, I just had my modeler's license renewed last week!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 16, 2004 3:25 PM
John--I have been using my NCE system for nearly two years now and I have not experienced the lags to which you refer. Do you have your locos programmed for a lot of momentum kind of stuff?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 16, 2004 8:13 AM
John ; could you elaborate a little more on the "timing out issue." I'm not an dcc owner, but looking into it. Thanks.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Monday, August 16, 2004 7:52 AM
All cabs work equally well with any type decoder. It's all a matter of personal preference.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Sunday, August 15, 2004 10:25 AM
I have a small problem...I have learned DCC on the NCE and used both the procab and the handheld in the radio version. I love it and operating with it...BUT! @ things I wish NCE would address: 1- the lag between command and action. 2- the frustrating "timing out" of the handheld. I have been running on the main for a while and come to a yard or other speed restricted area and Whoa...no control! Frantically push horn to get it back before accumulating any more brownies from the dispatcher! Of course because I have altered the position of the throttle before recognising the need to pust horn, I either take off like a jackrabbit or come to a screeching halt! Pleeeze, NCE, come up with some fixes and I will buy your system ASAP. John Colley Port Townsend, WA
jc5729
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 15, 2004 10:04 AM
I personally prefer the Procab units. i think that they are more ergonometric and I like the display info.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Saturday, August 14, 2004 11:08 PM
Its just the difference in the feel of the throttle. Both work equally as well with any type of decoder.
With the pot you have a definite reference to what speed you have set. For a given decoder and a given angle of rotation you get a given speed, every time.
With the encoder its relative to the speed you turn the knob and the amount you turn the knob, but where the knob is doesn't have any relatioinship to the speed directly.
I prefer the pots because it has more resistance to the rotation and "feels" better to me (they are also cheaper!).

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
NCE Additional Engineer Cab Cab04
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, August 14, 2004 10:07 PM
These (large knob type) additional cabs for the NCE DCC system come two ways .......Cab04p with a potentiometer, and Cab04e with a digital encoder.

Am I right about the difference between the two ......the knob with the potentiometer has a definate, limited range of rotation, like maybe 340degress.

Whereas the 04e with encoder has no limted range of rotation (no stops).

If I am correct, the 04e is better for 128 step speed control decoders?

What would the cab with a pot be better for?

Or do I have this all wrong?

Thanks
Jim

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!