Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Track

4473 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Track
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 4, 2004 3:10 PM
I'm trying to decide whether to use kato, atlas, or pico track what do you prefer?

-Matt
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 4, 2004 3:15 PM
Atlas Code 83 Flex Track, the best of the best.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 736 posts
Posted by tomwatkins on Sunday, July 4, 2004 3:34 PM
I use Atlas code 83 flextrack. I really like it.
Tom Watkins
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 4, 2004 3:48 PM
Micro Engineering...the best flex track there is.

and i use Walthers turnouts. i really like them.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
Posted by EL PARRo on Monday, July 5, 2004 1:17 AM
I use Atlas code 83 flextrack with Walthers and Micro Engineering turnouts.
huh?
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: N.W. Ohio
  • 166 posts
Posted by nslakediv on Monday, July 5, 2004 9:29 AM
I use Atlas Code 83 switches & flex, walthers Code 83 switches and now I see Peco is got a new line of switches coming out that look like U.S. track, I am about done with laying track but might try a Peco if I have a situation for it. Once weathered they all look good.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 5, 2004 10:01 AM
I have never used any of the track you have listed in your poll. I am using shinohara code 70 on my new layout. #8 switches
No problems yet

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, July 5, 2004 10:28 AM
I've used Fleischmann, Peco & Atlas Code 100 in the past.

Now I use Micro Engineering track with Walthers/Shinohara Turnouts. more delicate to work with, but oh so much nicer looking.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Monday, July 5, 2004 9:49 PM
I prefer Peco switches for their reliability, high quality and durability. To me, flextrack is pretty much all the same, with the exception of Micro Engineering, which is the best LOOKING track you can buy or build. It's delicate though.

I use ONLY Peco switches (code 75), but I use other track components from Peco, ME, Atlas and Roco, depending on what I need (diamonds, mostly)

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Monday, July 5, 2004 10:03 PM
Atlas code 83 and 100.

Kato unitrack is a joke for use on a serious layout.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Monday, July 5, 2004 10:44 PM
Peco & Atlas flextrack with Peco & old Shinohara switches

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: central Indiana
  • 775 posts
Posted by philnrunt on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 12:39 AM
Well I voted for Atlas, then saw the Flextrak choice, and that is what I use. Now your poll has a disclaimer added-plus or minus 4% of being right or something like that.
I started with Atlas sectional, went to Atlas Flex and never regretted it. It's sturdy, weathers well, easy to solder,and uniformly consistent in quality, which is the most important consideration for me.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Holly, MI
  • 1,269 posts
Posted by ClinchValleySD40 on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 8:07 AM
Hidden track - Atlas Code100 flex and Atlas #6 switches.

Visibile track - Atlas Code83 flex, Walthers #8 switches for mainline, Atlas #6 Super switches everywhere else.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 9:37 AM
For the type of small industrial switching layouts I build I use Atlas flex track along with sectional track and pieces with number 4 switches..I use C83.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: Columbus, OH
  • 492 posts
Posted by dano99a on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 10:25 AM
Atlas code 100 & 83 seems to work out fine for me, but then again, I'm sure most would agree with this statement. "After building what I have done thus far, if I had more money I'd go back and redo at least half of it knowing what I know now."

[:)]

DANO
C&O lives on!!!  
Visit my railfan community site: http://www.crtraincrew.com

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 2:07 PM
Atlas Code 83 nothin better
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 5:53 PM
Ya forgot Model Power, Micro/Model? Engineering and I believe Bachmann makes a product called EZ Track, too.

My personal preference would be Atlas Flex and Peco turnouts, but that's not necessarily what I consider the BEST as cost and other factors play a part in this, too.
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 6:07 PM
Atlas Code 83 flextrack with Shinohara switches (mostly #6).
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,455 posts
Posted by wp8thsub on Tuesday, July 6, 2004 10:01 PM
Micro Engineering codes 83, 70 and 55 flextrack with Shinohara/Walthers or handlaid turnouts. Few manufacturers offer flextrack or turnouts in codes smaller than 83 to represent multiple sizes of rail common on prototype railroads. Atlas code 83 isn't a bad choice but its detail is much coarser than ME or Shinohara; its primary advantages are that it's readily available and can be installed quickly. Judging by the ad in the August MR, the new US prototype code 83 from Peco may also be worth investigating.

Rob Spangler

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 6:42 AM
I use Atlas Code 100 flextrack and Peco turonouts. I have some older deeper flange european models I like to run, so I can not successfully use code 83, otherwise I would.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 2:05 PM
I agree that the Unitrack and E-Z Track, and that LL track...really anything with a plastic base for roadbed plain out stinks for a model RR...UNLESS you are just running trains. For instance, the Air Force was kind enough to send me to England for 4 years, which means I have no room for a layout in my base house. So, I use Kato Unitrack K-1 set just to run a train every now and again. Personally, I handlay my track in N scale code 40. However, I have run trains on many an HO club layout back in the states and I do agree that Atlas flextrack is great. Micro Engineerings flextrack is good, but for some reason, it is a bit stiffer than Atlas, which can make curving it a bit of a pain, but not too bad.

Matt
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Fargo, ND
  • 136 posts
Posted by michealfarley on Wednesday, July 7, 2004 2:37 PM
Must confess that I am still using code 100 everywhere on the layout. I've had a lot of trouble with rail-to-tie "security" with the code 83. Not sure why. Seems like the plastic spikes of the code 83 give a lot easier. I suppose the plastic spikes are also smaller and more scale, which may affect such things. If you paint and weather, it's a tough difference to discern.
Micheal Farley Fargo, ND NCE Powerhouse user Modeling the BN in ND, circa 1970-1980

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!