Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Ball Signal Project in August 2009 MR

5996 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 9:26 PM

Randy,

I totally agree that the MR article on ball signals was too brief on details.  Here's a few links to some online articles that I've found in the past:

Early Railway Signals

Trains and Technology: Bridges and Tunnels; Signals (Anthony J. Bianculli)

Tidal Information by Ball Signal

Not a comprehensive study on ball signals but at least a start in the right direction.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, July 1, 2009 7:58 PM

 I suspect that when there was no tender and/or station operator to clear trains, if you came to the ball signal and it was not set, you could assume a previous train had not yet arrived and proceed at track speed or based on other orders. If the signal was set, you could assume the other train got there first and was no ahead of you, requiring restricted speed. Although how it all gets reset again is a different story - unless only a train coming back the other way could then reset it. Definitely could have used another page to this article explaining these details. One paragraph explaining the indications at Strong was not enough.

 So who wants to write it? ALthough I bet it's already been done - maybe WAY back - if so maybe that story on how ball signals were used could be an online extra.

                                        --Randy

                  


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Chamberlain, ME
  • 5,084 posts
Posted by G Paine on Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:16 PM

tstage
check out the Fall 2003 issue of Classic Trains called "Highball!  Old-Time Signals in Vermont". 

I was going to mention this article as well. The article has photographs of 6 or 8 ball signals, the associated track plan and what trackage rights are meant by the number of balls displayed.

George In Midcoast Maine, 'bout halfway up the Rockland branch 

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, June 29, 2009 8:50 PM

Autobus Prime
what advantage does a manual, train crew-set signal provide over a dark junction governed by train order?  I would imagine, for safety, that all crews would be required to approach a junction with such a signal at a very slow speed, and prepared to stop...

That's a good question, Autobus.  I'm not entirely sure of the answer.  It's possible that in some remote areas - the fact that manual labor was cheap in those days - that it was more cost effective for the RR to have someone man the crossing manually.  Obviously, that depended primarily on how busy a given crossing(s) were at any given point of a 24-hour day.

I wish I could find the photo.  I've seen a picture of a manual crossing gate at a junction where it was an either/or situation.  If a train approached a crossing and the gate was down across that line: The locomotive engineer was required to stop the train, get out, manually move (pivot) the gate 90-degrees so that it now blocked the other line, climb back into the locomotive and continue on.

It was a very simple system.  Whoever didn't have the gate blocking their line had the right-of-way.  For obvious reasons, the approach to that junction would have been slow in order to stop the train in time.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, June 29, 2009 8:25 PM

Ahhhhh....That takes all the fun out of it, Jay! Smile  It is a nice very model though.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: New Hampshire
  • 660 posts
Posted by sparkyjay31 on Monday, June 29, 2009 6:48 PM
For those not wanting to go thru the trouble of scratch building, try going to BEST Train. Brian has a Whitefield station ready to go. http://www.besttrains.com/products_1034.html
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Monday, June 29, 2009 5:44 PM

tstage

Autobus Prime
In that case, what advantage does the signal provide?

Autobus,

One advantage might be that a ball/light combination signal would have is a built in fail-safe.  If two balls/two lights operating meant for you to proceed but only one light was lit, you would know that the other line would still correctly interpret the signal (because of the second ball being visible) and stop to allow you the right-of-way.

Tom

t:

That's definitely true, especially since the old-style lamps wouldn't be all that visible in daylight, but what I meant was: what advantage does a manual, train crew-set signal provide over a dark junction governed by train order?  I would imagine, for safety, that all crews would be required to approach a junction with such a signal at a very slow speed, and prepared to stop...

 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, June 29, 2009 10:20 AM

Autobus Prime
In that case, what advantage does the signal provide?

Autobus,

One advantage might be that a ball/light combination signal would have is a built in fail-safe.  If two balls/two lights operating meant for you to proceed but only one light was lit, you would know that the other line would still correctly interpret the signal (because of the second ball being visible) and stop to allow you the right-of-way.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Monday, June 29, 2009 9:30 AM

dti406

MR can't come up with a new article/construction project.  This signal was covered in the 1965 MR, 1980 RMC and 2004 MM!

How about a little creativity instead of rehashing old articles?

dti:

This hobby operates on a 20-year memory cycle, so everything old is new again.  At least it was a fun project to read about!

I think they just asked Lou Sassi to write up a little something about his signal. 

That said, a few things could have been added.  If you look at the prototype photo, there's a pair of steel drums for the lanterns to hide in, at the base of the mast, and a pair of counterweights to balance the balls, so the signal doesn't drop the ball, you might say. 

Some more specific use info would be good.  I've always wondered what the rules were for using these.  When there was no full-time tender, where did this signal's authority come from? I'm assuming permission was given by orders or radio, and then the crew set it as instructed, so the ball signal is just a distant "We are using the junction so please don't hit us" warning...something like the smashboard gates some roads used.  Would all crews approach the signal at restricted speed, prepared to stop?  In that case, what advantage does the signal provide?

As for pulleys, I think a pair of dress-snap pieces, back to back, might look acceptable. 

 

 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:52 PM

rrinker
I thought someone here posted a how-to on making a ball signal - might have been Tom (tstage) actually.

                        --Randy

 

Randy, you have a good memory.  It was me. Smile

Mike, I've scratch-built the following ball signals:

Simple design (based on Whitefield, NH signal)

Complex design (based on signals in VT)

I also had problems locating HO pulleys for my project.  So, I ended up fabricating mine out of N-scale plastic wheels.  They're passable for the "3-foot rule" but I'd like to come up with a more realistic design for the next ones.

And, although I never finished the step-by-step "how to" for them on my web site, I did create a diagram for the Complex ball signal:

Diagram for 2-ball/2-light Ball signal

Mike, please feel free to drop me an e-mail or PM and I'd be more than glad to send you a .pdf copy of the Word.doc diagram.

Also, if you are interested in ball signals, Mike, check out the Fall 2003 issue of Classic Trains called "Highball!  Old-Time Signals in Vermont".  It was a fascinating read with lotsa good information and history about ball signals throughout VT.

Hope that helps...

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Bremerton, Wa
  • 540 posts
Posted by jguess733 on Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:11 PM
Whats wrong with reprinting old articles? As a "younger", that is 28 years old, modeler I don't have access to those old articles and I for one welcome them. Keep them coming Model Railroader.

Jason

Modeling the Fort Worth & Denver of the early 1970's in N scale

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:06 PM

Hey, just had a thought. Would RacShack or someplace workign with tiny belt drives have something that could be painted rust enough to work?

 

-Morgan

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:03 PM

 I thought someone here posted a how-to on making a ball signal - might have been Tom (tstage) actually.

                        --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Indiana
  • 3,549 posts
Posted by Flashwave on Sunday, June 28, 2009 4:50 PM

dti406

MR can't come up with a new article/construction project.  This signal was covered in the 1965 MR, 1980 RMC and 2004 MM!

How about a little creativity instead of rehashing old articles?

 

Rick

 

and possibly another RMC or MR, as I've seen this article before and don' have any of the above

-Morgan

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Northfield Center TWP, OH
  • 2,538 posts
Posted by dti406 on Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:45 AM

MR can't come up with a new article/construction project.  This signal was covered in the 1965 MR, 1980 RMC and 2004 MM!

How about a little creativity instead of rehashing old articles?

 

Rick

 

Rule 1: This is my railroad.

Rule 2: I make the rules.

Rule 3: Illuminating discussion of prototype history, equipment and operating practices is always welcome, but in the event of visitor-perceived anacronisms, detail descrepancies or operating errors, consult RULE 1!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Pennsylvania
  • 709 posts
Posted by nedthomas on Sunday, June 28, 2009 10:05 AM

Grant lline makes a 43" pulley. Is that close enough? Walthers Part # 300-5122

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Langley AFB, VA
  • 390 posts
Ball Signal Project in August 2009 MR
Posted by Meyblc on Sunday, June 28, 2009 9:53 AM

I just came back from a vacation up to New Hampshire last week and was up in the Whitefield area. Took several pictures of the last operating ball signal in New England there. When I got back to VA where I am stationed I opened my mail and noticed my new copy (August 2009) of MR. I noticed that they did a 2 page write up on how to make a Ball Signal and showed a picture of the ball signal in Whitefield NH on the old MEC / B&M mainline.

looking at the article, the call for 36" (scale inch) pulley wheels. I have been looking all through my Walthers catalog and can't find anything even close to these pulley wheels.

Does anyone know where one could find these things?

Mike

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!