Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Steam Loco I D Help

9913 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:51 PM

C&O Fan

Ok so I'm crazy but i went ahead and bought the thing

I guess cause i'm curious to see it run

next big problem will be converting it to DCC

In reponse to inquiries about DCCing my two-motored duplex, the suggestion/recommendation was to use a separate decoder for each motor.  I haven't pursued the project any further, yet.  Good luck, and let us know how the conversion turns out.

Mark

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Posted by C&O Fan on Thursday, March 26, 2009 1:39 PM

Ok so I'm crazy but i went ahead and bought the thing

I guess cause i'm curious to see it run

next big problem will be converting it to DCC

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Posted by C&O Fan on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 10:04 AM

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 9:30 AM

rrinker

tomikawaTT

 I wonder about having the rear engine exhaust through the cistern.

 Pre-heater! Big Smile

Actually, the rear low-pressure steam exhaust of the Erie Triplex's rear set of drivers passed through a feedwater heater in the tender before exiting via a 20" diameter vertical pipe at the rear of the tender.

Unlike normal compound locomotives (which used steam twice), the low-pressure cylinders on the first and last driver set were the same diameter (rather than larger) as the high-pressure middle driver set.

Mark 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:18 AM

Someone was having some fun, and they did a nice workmanlike job of it.  the nitpickers would probably point out that the cylinders for the booster seem rather small for exhaust cylinders.

Rich Weyand took the familiar N&W Y6b in N scale, basically a Rivarossi model, and powered the tenders with an Alco diesel drive.  Actually I seem to recall he had special tender castings that were slightly longer than prototype to do this, so that his Y6bs could haul trains up his steep grades and helix.  You can read about his layout here:

http://users.rcn.com/weyand/pocadiv/pocahontas.htm

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 8:13 AM

Here's a pic of a real IHB 0-8-0. You can spot the tender booster on the front tender truck by the fact that it has siderods.

http://www.dhke.com/ihbarchive/stmpix.html

Stix
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 6:44 AM

tomikawaTT

Looks like someone misunderstood the term Tender Booster.  As noted, the prototype IHB 0-8-0 had a Franklin tender booster - recognizable by the siderods on what was otherwise a normal-looking tender truck.

Nice job of assembly, though, although I wonder about having the rear engine exhaust through the cistern.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

 Pre-heater! Big Smile

               --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:09 PM

tomikawaTT

I wonder about having the rear engine exhaust through the cistern.

Undoubtedly, the steam exhaust pipe from the tender's cylinders passed completely through the tank so steam never entered it, but I'd think having the stack at the back end of the tender would be simpler and more practical than having it pierce the tank.  This required that the tender frame extend beyond the tank, creating a little platform so there would be space for the coupler.

Mark

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:47 PM

C&O Fan

I saw this on ebay and was intrigued

I've seen the regular Indiana Harbor Belt 0-8-0 from Rivarossi

But never one with a Triplex type tender

That looks like someone's homemade model of a duplex.  Below is a model of a 2-8-2+2-8-0 (the large picture) and the prototype (the small picture).  The railroad added the drivers, lead wheels, and frame from a Consolidation and placed it under the tender of the Mikado.  Interestingly, the tender's drivers are smaller than the cab/boiler drivers.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • 4,368 posts
Posted by Darth Santa Fe on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:55 PM

It's definitely a custom tender. They lowered the coal bunker to about 1/4 its original height, and stuck the whole thing on an 0-6-0 chassis with a trailing truck. I have a Rivarossi 0-6-0, so I'd recognize that chassis anywhere. The two engines have different gear ratios, so unless the owner did some gear modifications, they wouldn't run well together.

_________________________________________________________________

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Central Illinois
  • 806 posts
Posted by ICRR1964 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:58 PM

 The engine appears to be an AHM/Riva, These came with 3 different motor configurations. First was the tender mounted motor, then the cab mounted. This type had a small gear box attatched to the motor, then followed through to a worm on the gear of the wheel. The third is a vertical motor with a worm.

Who ever built this wanted allot of extra pulling power, it is a neat peice of work, never seen anything like that before. 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 1:27 PM

Looks like someone misunderstood the term Tender Booster.  As noted, the prototype IHB 0-8-0 had a Franklin tender booster - recognizable by the siderods on what was otherwise a normal-looking tender truck.

Nice job of assembly, though, although I wonder about having the rear engine exhaust through the cistern.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 3,150 posts
Posted by CNJ831 on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:37 AM

wjstix

The pics appear to be of a standard Rivarossi IHB 0-8-0 that someone kitbashed (or "foobie-ized"?) by putting the tender body over the chassis of another steam engine...possibly a Rivarossi 0-6-0 with an added trailing truck. I know of no prototype for the engine, and in the Rivarossi catalogues I have going back to the early 80's I've never seen an engine they made with the driving wheels under the tender like this.

I concur. Nothing like this ever existed in the real world (although the Rivarossi 0-8-0 was at one time issued with "booster" unit on the tender's lead truck), nor has been available as such a unit in HO.

Neither does the tender shown by the OP resemble the actual tenders of either the Erie or Viginian triplexes.

As wjstix suggests, this appears to most likely be the mechanism of an 0-6-0, or part of a 2-6-2 less the pilot and lead truck, stuffed under someone's tender.

CNJ831 

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:50 AM

The pics appear to be of a standard Rivarossi IHB 0-8-0 that someone kitbashed (or "foobie-ized"?) by putting the tender body over the chassis of another steam engine...possibly a Rivarossi 0-6-0 with an added trailing truck. I know of no prototype for the engine, and in the Rivarossi catalogues I have going back to the early 80's I've never seen an engine they made with the driving wheels under the tender like this.

Stix
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: ohio
  • 1,371 posts
Posted by rs2mike on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:25 AM

Yeah that is what I am working on right now. I have 2 that do not run, one has a split wheel the other one not sure yet.  I bought the second on to fix the first one but the gears are different in the second one so now it is off to fix them both.

Mike

alco's forever!!!!! Majoring in HO scale Minorig in O scale:)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Posted by C&O Fan on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:57 AM

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: ohio
  • 1,371 posts
Posted by rs2mike on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:32 AM

I saw this at a train show last weekend and It was in a riv box.  I assume it is rivarossi along with the engine.  It was listed at the show for around $90.00?  Looks like this one was upgraded with kadee couplers.

Mike

alco's forever!!!!! Majoring in HO scale Minorig in O scale:)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Steam Loco I D Help
Posted by C&O Fan on Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:07 AM

I saw this on ebay and was intrigued

I've seen the regular Indiana Harbor Belt 0-8-0 from Rivarossi

But never one with a Triplex type tender

Does any one know who makes this tender

 
 

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!