Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Hybrid Steam Engines never seen before.

2259 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,236 posts
Hybrid Steam Engines never seen before.
Posted by Fergmiester on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 6:41 AM
Have you ever considered building your own hybrid, never seen nor heard of before engine?

I have an old Rivarossi Big Boy, which is destined for the scrap yard. And though crossed my mind "why not turn it into a 4-8-6" I could do anything with it including Elesco Feedwater heater, Enclosed CN cab, etc....

Any thoughts?[:D]

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:47 AM
There was a proposed 4-8-6 which was based on an enlarged C&O 4-8-4 class L-2. It is illustrated with a diagram in the Lima history from Hundman publications.

You would probably have to shorten the boiler, and use an 80" wheel 4-8-4 chassis.

Not using the original Rivarossi drive would probably help!

Peter
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,428 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:05 AM
Rivarossi parts can bring $$$ so I'd be a bit cautious before cutting up your scrap model
Maybe experiment first with the Monogram plastic unpowered Big Boy? I have seen them at swap meets for $5.
Dave Nelson
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:17 AM
Fergmiestro! Haven't you been paying attention to the fidelity to scale folks? You risk ostrafacation of a magnitude not seen before on this venue! Freelancing is dead and is an abomination of the high model railroading principles set forth by our fondling fore fathers!

You will be captured by the "Model Railroad Brain Cops" and tortured to within an inch and a quarter of your life!

My god, just communicating with you about this on this forum has put me a grave risk! I must disavow ever having known you!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,236 posts
Posted by Fergmiester on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:44 AM
MY LIFE IS A TORTURE CHAMBER
&
WELCOME TO MY BOILER ROOM!!

And besides if the "Amateur Railway Society of Elitists" wants piece of my caboose then bring it on! John Armstrong, a man who's articles I enjoyed and respected, built hybrids of things to be but never became.

A lot of small RR's rebuilt one of a kind engines.

Remeber the MESS is mythical and with it comes mythical engines. Big Drivers no! I'll stick to the original stubbies. I'm in dyer need of something with a short wheel base, lots of weight and incredible hauling capacity. Speed need not apply.

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:03 AM
that proposed 4-8-6 had 1,783,916 rivets, so better make sure it is absolutely perfect because it will be under the microscope and watchful eye of the National Rivet Counter & Privates Busters of North America. Why not make it a cab-forward while you're at it? How about a cab-forward, camelback, 4-8-6 gas turbine? Paint it yellow! Go for it, it's your railraod. You should see the snow plow I made out of an Athearn Hustler chassis, MDC slope-back tender, and a bunch of junk. Kitbashing is some fun and so non-prototypically perfect-share the results here if you would. . .
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 7:27 PM
I've thought about turning a Proto Y3 into my own special Cabforward. Not a Southern Pacific one, but somewhat similar. A thick 2-8-8-2 reverse runner with the tender converted to carry oil. The existing cab being extensively rebuilt with a new flat-face.

SP did have some 2-8-8-2 cabforwards, but they were slow and skinny. My theoratic one would be capable of higher speeds and have nearly twice the tractive effort.

It would be called, the Cabforward that never was......

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:02 PM
Why not start with a 4-8-4 body?
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Milwaukee & Toronto
  • 929 posts
Posted by METRO on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:12 PM
I have never hybrid a steamer before, although I have done several diesels, in sort of "what if" scenarios, like "What if Amtrak took PA1s along with the E8s and F7s"
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,398 posts
Posted by fiatfan on Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:41 PM
Fergie,

What if you make it a camelback, equip it with two slope back tenders (one on each end) and use it as a yard switcher. You shouldn't have any problems with grade transitions (unless you have a hump yard). Best of luck!

Tom

Life is simple - eat, drink, play with trains!

Go Big Red!

PA&ERR "If you think you are doing something stupid, you're probably right!"

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Thursday, April 15, 2004 4:10 AM
Currently on my list of "to-do's" is a pair of narrow-gauge steam locomotives for my as-yet unbuilt Northcoast logging railroad layout. It was not uncommon for local shops to cobble together weird little locomotives out of whatever was at hand, modifying parts from old steam omnibuses and donkey engines. These were commonly known as "gypsy engines" and no two were alike--thus, as long as I'm freelancing, the prototype be damned!

I'm starting out with that favorite of HOn30 enthusiasts, the Bachmann 0-4-0 Docksider. I've only got one with complete valve gear right now--the other broke off, but I'm using that to create an HOn30 diesel "critter" for an industrial plant in Sacramento that featured 2-foot narrow-gauge track for some, currently unknown, purpose...
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,428 posts
Posted by dknelson on Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:05 AM
Forgetting hybrids for the moment -- a Big Boy boiler might be pretty close in size to the huge Q class duplexes that the PRR had in the 1940s -- rigid framed 4-4-6-4 and 4-6-4-4 if memory serves. At one time somebody made a frame that could be altered to make these engines using parts from Bowser's T class 4-4-4-4. Those PRR Qs were rigid framed! Now that would be an engine -- minimum radius of., oh, maybe 50 inches? Tenders bigger than an apartment house!
Dave Nelson
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,236 posts
Posted by Fergmiester on Thursday, April 15, 2004 12:47 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dknelson

Forgetting hybrids for the moment -- a Big Boy boiler might be pretty close in size to the huge Q class duplexes that the PRR had in the 1940s -- rigid framed 4-4-6-4 and 4-6-4-4 if memory serves. At one time somebody made a frame that could be altered to make these engines using parts from Bowser's T class 4-4-4-4. Those PRR Qs were rigid framed! Now that would be an engine -- minimum radius of., oh, maybe 50 inches? Tenders bigger than an apartment house!
Dave Nelson


Oh Please No! your teasing me[V]
Just kidding[:D] Kinda lets the mind go wild

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Bottom Left Corner, USA
  • 3,420 posts
Posted by dharmon on Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Fergmiester

QUOTE: Originally posted by dknelson

Forgetting hybrids for the moment -- a Big Boy boiler might be pretty close in size to the huge Q class duplexes that the PRR had in the 1940s -- rigid framed 4-4-6-4 and 4-6-4-4 if memory serves. At one time somebody made a frame that could be altered to make these engines using parts from Bowser's T class 4-4-4-4. Those PRR Qs were rigid framed! Now that would be an engine -- minimum radius of., oh, maybe 50 inches? Tenders bigger than an apartment house!
Dave Nelson


Oh Please No! your teasing me[V]
Just kidding[:D] Kinda lets the mind go wild



I say make it a 4-8-8-4 B unit. No cab ...make it a dummy to MU with another. Have it run tender first with an aux tender between it and the 'A" unit.

Or a cab forward with a Canadian Safety Cab...........and ditchlights......
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Thursday, April 15, 2004 5:18 PM
I would make a 4-10-10-6 Highlander from two 2-10-4s and a Allegheny . Or i would make a Highlander Garratt 2-10-4+4-10-2. It would be made from two 2-10-4s with a scratchbuilt tender and water tank.

ML

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Out on the Briny Ocean Tossed
  • 4,236 posts
Posted by Fergmiester on Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by GDRMCo

I would make a 4-10-10-6 Highlander from two 2-10-4s and a Allegheny . Or i would make a Highlander Garratt 2-10-4+4-10-2. It would be made from two 2-10-4s with a scratchbuilt tender and water tank.


Gentlemen! I give you the Hog back, very distant relative to the camelback, except with all that weight we notice an inverse hump.

http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959

If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007  

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Friday, April 16, 2004 1:20 AM
Here is a drawing of the Highlander Garratt and Highlander

ML

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,428 posts
Posted by dknelson on Friday, April 16, 2004 7:59 AM
Maybe make it the world's largest Beyer-Garrett with the boiler suspended between two tenders, with the drive wheels under the tenders.
Dave Nelson

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!