QUOTE: Originally posted by Roadtrp So how can I be a strong supporter of free enterprise and still push for a livable minimum wage? Because I feel that the current minimum wage does not accurately value the labor provided and is only possible because people without advanced education or skills have no other choice. As long as all employers pay the same minimum for that type of work, the workers have to either accept the wage or not work at all. Where I live there are not many people available for minimum wage type jobs. About 85% of the local High School grads continue their education, and relatively few of the High School kids hold jobs. There just isn’t the usual supply of people looking for entry level jobs. Because of this local stores, fast food restaurants, etc. offer starting pay of about $8.00 per hour. Contrary to the usual arguments, we don’t have stores and restaurants closing in droves because they have to pay so much for labor. If fact our city has some of the most profitable retail in the metro area. I believe this shows that the true value of entry level work is considerably higher than the existing minimum wage. It also shows that companies CAN pay higher level wages and still be profitable. [:)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by deschane Roadtrp, I don't think anyone can confuse you for being liberal! You may just not be conservative enough from dharmon's point of view!
QUOTE: Originally posted by IRONROOSTER QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon "[i] Labor, like anything else is a commodity, ... Unfortunately that is the attitude of too many companies. Labor is people - it is us. It's sad when people are treated the same as a lump of coal by the corporations of America. That's why there has to be government oversight and intervention. It's not always pleasant nor is it cheap, but it is necessary. Enjoy Paul
QUOTE: Originally posted by dharmon "[i] Labor, like anything else is a commodity, ...
QUOTE: Originally posted by deschane The clincher for me is I would hate to ever need to work at a Walmart as I would not be able to make a living wage there.
QUOTE: Originally posted by deschane How can you possibly assert; "If Walmark sucks, capitalism sucks"? You are making a statement about what capitalism is, based on one companies method of conducting business. I don't worry about the farmer, either! However, I don't worry about him because with only 100 chickens, this farmer was never in the chicken business, anyway!
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by Roadtrp I was a Wal-Mart hater until I discovered the only one I was hurting was myself. Face it -- they have darned good products at darned low prices. If Wal-Mart sucks, capitalism sucks. When you go buy your factory-farm produced Gold'N Plump chicken at the grocery store, do you sit around and worry about some family farmer with a 100 chickens in his coop being put out of business? No. Me neither. Things change. You can lead, follow, or get out of the way, but you can't stand still.
QUOTE: Originally posted by areibel Second, it never fails, I always get stuck behind the 300 pound woman in dirty pink stretch pants that takes half an hour at the check out, she has to separate the items she can use her food stamps on from the cigarettes, Diet Coke and National Enquirer.