Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Why the figurines would want to take the trains

1650 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:44 PM
Mine don't...Amtrak runs one train over the WRS; the Montrealer, but it has been temporarally discontinued due to a motive power shortage...(i.e. I still need to buy a new loco for it!Whistling [:-^])
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:34 PM

The figurines which will eventually populate my layout will take the train for several reasons, the main one being that no one in his right mind would subject self and vehicle to the goat-trail 'roads' away from the one main highway - unless the vehicle was a bicycle.

One idea I've been kicking around has to do with having a rotating platform where my MU cars terminate.  As the train pulls in, there will be a row of folks waiting for it to stop.  When it pulls out, the platform will be empty, only to refill, a few figurines at a time, shortly before the next train arrives.  120 degrees of rotation should do it...

There WILL be bicycle racks at the station, along with one, lonely, taxicab.

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: New Brighton, MN
  • 4,393 posts
Posted by ARTHILL on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:25 PM

I remember 19 cent gas.  I hope to live to see 10 dollar gas and I assume I will find a way to pay for it. I remember ajusting to 89 cent gas when the ecconomists said that would be the breaking point.

I am glad I do not have to fill one of those big BNSF diesels.

If you think you have it right, your standards are too low. my photos http://s12.photobucket.com/albums/a235/ARTHILL/ Art
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 12:19 PM

I was going to say that the citizens of Moose Bay have to take the train because the car doors don't open, but, well, the train doors don't open either.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:57 AM
 twhite wrote:

Well, to get kind of back to the subject, my figurines take the trains because on my Yuba River Sub it's WWII, there's gas rationing and trains still kinda/sorta go where you want them to even if people are asked by the government to curtail unneccesary travel due to military priority.  So far, I've populated 2 of my passenger trains, the "Prospector" and the "Royal Gorge" with plenty of those neat Preiser passengers.  Next, I'm starting work on the "Yuba River Express" and the "Scenic Limited."  And I've got plenty of passengers waiting at places like Deer Creek, Wagon Wheel Gap and Sierra City to board the next passenger that whizzes by.  

Tom  Tongue [:P]

Dont forget the black market tire sales behind the gas station....Wink [;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:43 AM

Well, to get kind of back to the subject, my figurines take the trains because on my Yuba River Sub it's WWII, there's gas rationing and trains still kinda/sorta go where you want them to even if people are asked by the government to curtail unneccesary travel due to military priority.  So far, I've populated 2 of my passenger trains, the "Prospector" and the "Royal Gorge" with plenty of those neat Preiser passengers.  Next, I'm starting work on the "Yuba River Express" and the "Scenic Limited."  And I've got plenty of passengers waiting at places like Deer Creek, Wagon Wheel Gap and Sierra City to board the next passenger that whizzes by.  

Tom  Tongue [:P]

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:16 AM

Back to trains..

This morning I saw a NS train go by with 15 or 16 brand new ethanol tankers.Makes me want to buy some more Athearn ethanol tankers.Thumbs Up [tup]

Maybe I should make a motion during the club's monthly business meeting for adding a ethanol plant?

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Amish country Tenn.
  • 10,027 posts
Posted by loathar on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:49 AM

 frankodragon wrote:
With the price of gas, I've decided to add a worse-case scenario to my HO layout-the only gas station in town is selling gas at $10 a gallon! Here's the picture:


< a href>http://frankodragon.deviantart.com/art/Train-Set-Pic-F-87129887

Just think! You'll be able to look at that picture in 20 years and say-"I remember when gas was only $10/gallon!"

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:34 AM
Gas on my layout is at the exorbanant rate of .40 cents a gallon, which is 25% higher than in the closest big city, of course the fact that it has to brought in by train in barrels, unloaded by hand and then pumped by hand into the lone gas pump at that small dusty General Goods store never enters the consumers mind....They think it should be free! It is the 1950's afterall! Not the 19th century, next thing you know they'll be wanting license plates on the Buckboards!Wink [;)]

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BC, CANADA
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Pathfinder on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:26 AM

Lets make the link user friendly Cool [8D]

http://frankodragon.deviantart.com/art/Train-Set-Pic-F-87129887

Guzzler Gas, love it   Big Smile [:D]

Keep on Trucking, By Train! Where I Live: BC Hobbies: Model Railroading (HO): CP in the 70's in BC and logging in BC
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Indy
  • 997 posts
Posted by mononguy63 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:20 AM
Here's an irony: The poor polymer figures being overcharged for gas on his layout are oil-based!

"I am lapidary but not eristic when I use big words." - William F. Buckley

I haven't been sleeping. I'm afraid I'll dream I'm in a coma and then wake up unconscious.  -Stephen Wright

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:46 AM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:
It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we use oil to produce most of our electricity.


PV:

We don't, though. Here's the breakdown for 2007:


Coal: 2,020,572 GWh
Nuclear: 806,487 GWh
Gas: 893,211 GWh
Hydro: 241,319 GWh
Fuel Oil: 65,708 GWh
Other renewables (geothermal, non-wood waste, wind, and solar): 102,988 GWh
Other: 29,230 GWh


Do people really think we usually burn oil to generate power? Drive along the Ohio river and it's pretty clear where the juice comes from! But you have a good point too - "find remedies, not blame", as Henry Ford said. (Hope I'm not drifting too far OT here)


Gee, lookit all those gigawatts. We could be charging up so many flux capacitors.

Frankodragon - Subjecting your poor polymer people to gas inflation! You nasty man! Smile [:)] Of course, most of us send drivers off the edge of the table...$10 gas probably saves them lots of fatal injuries.
 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 7:37 AM

I'm sorry.  I tend to be offended by people who are easily lead with bumper stickers.  If the post had said "people who have placed a higher priority on environmental concerns than supply concerns" instead of "tree huggers", I probably wouldn't reacted so strongly.  Childish name calling is offensive, and seems to be common in people whose political leanings are right of my own.

My point was similar to yours, that it is a multi facetted problem requiring a multi facetted response.  We need to stop pointing politically polarized fingers at each other and work on a solution.

Now ... back to model railroading.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,237 posts
Posted by tstage on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 7:27 AM

Gentlemen,

The forum policy clearly states the following:

- No political discussions or signature messages. We know, railroads are sometimes affected by politics. However, we've found that political discussions almost always turn into arguments. We have a common thread of being interested in railroads. Don't let that common bond be destroyed by political differences.

Please refrain from the political comments when posting on the forum.  Thanks for your consideration.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NYC
  • 551 posts
Posted by corsair7 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 7:21 AM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:

Ah yes.  It's the "tree huggers".

It has absolutely nothing to do with the virtual elimination of supply from one of the largest oil producers in the middle east.

It has absolutely nothing to do with a dollar value falling like a beveled brick.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 75% of the people in America have traded their cars for giant SUVs.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we have greatly reduced our use of metal, glass, and paper and replaced those products with plastic, which is made from oil.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we use oil to produce most of our electricity.

Yep;  It's the "tree huggers".

What we NEED to do, is stop INCREASING our use of oil and start DECREASING our use of oil.

It's not all the tree-huggers. But they have made it impossible to exploit all of the oil resources we have right here in the US. Sure, none of us want to see the environment damaged but I sometimes think we are giving up too much in an effort to avoid even the slightest possibility of environmental damage.

I don't have an SUV. I don't see any reason to have one for most of us. But don't tel that to the marketers for the car companies. After all they might see the reality of the situation where all of us would rather use our cars than public transportation when its available. But even there public transportation either doesn't go far enough or you need to spend a hour taking trip which shouldn't take more than 15 minutes.

As for the railroads, well they don't do short hauls any more. But maybe the time for that has come back. It's at least worth looking at. Trucks have more flexibility but we need a transportation scheme that makes sense where the trucks do the short distance hauling from the docks in a harbor or from a railhead less than 200 miles from the destination of the package. Trucks travelling more than 200 miles are probably a waste of fuel.

Irv

 

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:55 AM

Ah yes.  It's the "tree huggers".

It has absolutely nothing to do with the virtual elimination of supply from one of the largest oil producers in the middle east.

It has absolutely nothing to do with a dollar value falling like a beveled brick.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that 75% of the people in America have traded their cars for giant SUVs.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we have greatly reduced our use of metal, glass, and paper and replaced those products with plastic, which is made from oil.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we use oil to produce most of our electricity.

Yep;  It's the "tree huggers".

What we NEED to do, is stop INCREASING our use of oil and start DECREASING our use of oil.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Prescott, AZ
  • 1,736 posts
Posted by Midnight Railroader on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:49 AM
 corsair7 wrote:

 frankodragon wrote:
With the price of gas, I've decided to add a worse-case scenario to my HO layout-the only gas station in town is selling gas at $10 a gallon! Here's the picture:


< a href>http://frankodragon.deviantart.com/art/Train-Set-Pic-F-87129887

I think that $10.00 a gallon would shut down most businesses because people couldn't afford to drive much less take public transit, including trains. Someone has to pay for the fuel and inevitably the cost would be passed on to the consumer in no uncertain terms.

On the other hand, it might just provide th eincentive to remove the hands of the tree huggers from the throat of the country by forcing the development of both alternative fuels and those areas where there are known deposits of petroleum but development hs been prohibited by law.

Irv

Is it possible for a thread on this model railroading board to go without political commentary?

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:43 AM

The silver lining is that real-world railroads are doing well.  They are actually running pretty close to capacity right now, with bottlenecks at places like Chicago because we've got more trains running than tracks to put them on.  (Hmmm, sounds familiar.)  Mass transit is getting more crowded, too.

We seem to finally have reached the "pain point" where the price of fuel is forcing us to change our behavior.  Of course, this has happened before, and in all likelihood the change won't be permanent this time, either.

Burning these fuels and global warming go hand in hand.  We've had an almost-free ride for a long time, but the situation has changed.  In the long run, we can all be better off when we start to exploit more energy-efficient options like trains.

Raise your solar panels to the sun, and raise your pantographs to the catenary.  Maybe it's time to bring back the GG-1.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NYC
  • 551 posts
Posted by corsair7 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 5:23 AM

 frankodragon wrote:
With the price of gas, I've decided to add a worse-case scenario to my HO layout-the only gas station in town is selling gas at $10 a gallon! Here's the picture:


< a href>http://frankodragon.deviantart.com/art/Train-Set-Pic-F-87129887

I think that $10.00 a gallon would shut down most businesses because people couldn't afford to drive much less take public transit, including trains. Someone has to pay for the fuel and inevitably the cost would be passed on to the consumer in no uncertain terms.

On the other hand, it might just provide th eincentive to remove the hands of the tree huggers from the throat of the country by forcing the development of both alternative fuels and those areas where there are known deposits of petroleum but development hs been prohibited by law.

One of the issues of this upcoming election shuld be energy policy and it is obvious that neither party wants to be the one to tell the truth about what those 538 idiots who we elected to office has been doing over the last 30 years to hurt our econmy in favor of other countries and at our expense. It isn't for nothing that people say we have the best Coingress that money can buy.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 5:03 AM
At that rate it would me over $200 to fill cars tank! Much cheaper to take the train. Where can I hop the next freight?

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 30 posts
Why the figurines would want to take the trains
Posted by frankodragon on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 1:45 AM
With the price of gas, I've decided to add a worse-case scenario to my HO layout-the only gas station in town is selling gas at $10 a gallon! Here's the picture:


http://frankodragon.deviantart.com/art/Train-Set-Pic-F-87129887

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!