Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

AHM E8 vs Proto E8

6340 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Friday, January 18, 2008 12:32 PM
 my05hammer wrote:
If the locomotives are NOT EVER coupled together, and they are running independently from one another, on separate trains, they will not effect each other. 
yup I agree.  I just totally misread the original note to say they WOULD be coupled together.  Ha now silly the eyes can be.

First off, the E8/9 that I had as a kid was NOT an AHM.   It had a very large can motor, with a large flywheel on the back of the motor, and both trucks driven via drive shafts.  Anyone know what brand it might have been?  Maybe a Model Power?
Yup again that would be a Model Power.  They also have a hole in the top of the body (vent weather box) for a screw to hold the shell on.

To really reduce the noise on those, I replace the u-joints and drive shafts with a piece of flexible tubing.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 150 posts
Posted by my05hammer on Friday, January 18, 2008 11:35 AM
 Pathfinder wrote:

Here is my Model Power.  I replaced the motor with a NWSL but other than that it is stock on the drive side; a few CP details to the shell.

 

And here is the rear truck, beside an SD40-2 one (the picture was taken for another post but shows the large fly wheel):

 

 

 

Yup, mine was a Model Power.  

It had issues and would bairly run when I first got it.  In fact that is why the guy sold it to me.  It ran real jerky (if it would even run), and lots of the time it just sat there and hummed. 

Turned out that there is a sip-joint in the drive line to one of the trucks (front I believe?) that was a flat blade that fit into a slot.  If the alignment was off (and it always was) it would bind.  So I went to radio shack and bought a can type project motor (for $6.00) that was almost the same dimentions as the Model Power motor, had the same shaft dia, and almost the same length.  I also replaced the slip joint in the drive line with an Athearn knuckle setup.  It was quiet as a whisper and supper reliable with supper slow crawling speeds after the mods.   

 

Love all Worship One
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BC, CANADA
  • 1,279 posts
Posted by Pathfinder on Friday, January 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Here is my Model Power.  I replaced the motor with a NWSL but other than that it is stock on the drive side; a few CP details to the shell.

 

And here is the rear truck, beside an SD40-2 one (the picture was taken for another post but shows the large fly wheel):

 

Keep on Trucking, By Train! Where I Live: BC Hobbies: Model Railroading (HO): CP in the 70's in BC and logging in BC
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Joizey
  • 1,983 posts
Posted by SteamFreak on Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:50 PM

The E8 you had as a kid was a Model Power, made by Roco in Austria. They had heavy diecast chassis and the largest can motors in HO. They were very nice engines for the time.

 my05hammer wrote:
Secondly,  the Proto IS a far superior loco to the AHM. 

But my boy loves the AHM so it was still worth the 36 and change.  ;)

It's a good thing you got both brands. You wouldn't want him handling the Protos with all of that fine detail.

 

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 150 posts
Posted by my05hammer on Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:13 PM
 Texas Zepher wrote:

Oh yes it is. 

 

 

No its not. 

If the locomotives are NOT EVER coupled together, and they are running independently from one another, on separate trains, they will not effect each other.  

I recieved the AHM today and one of the Proto's. 

I stand corrected on 2 issues;

First off, the E8/9 that I had as a kid was NOT an AHM.  I thought it was, but after looking at the AHM that I recieved today, my E8/9 I had back in the 80's was another brand.  I wish I knew what it was now.  It had a very large can motor, with a large flywheel on the back of the motor, and both trucks driven via drive shafts.  Anyone know what brand it might have been?  Maybe a Model Power?

Secondly,  the Proto IS a far superior loco to the AHM. 

But my boy loves the AHM so it was still worth the 36 and change.  ;)
 

 

Love all Worship One
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:41 PM

If you view my video closely and see the yellow/red fuel tank details.. those are the pins that secure the entire body.

Always lift the unit by the fuel tank.

I'll take a shot at Kalmbach and say that they should video tape the new units on thier layout when they are offered by the manufactors. I understand that there might be issues with editing, bandwidth and time. One prospective buyer should be able to look up the video for any locomotive on the market eventually.

At the present time, sites like youtube and others make that task easy.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:05 PM

Hello Hammer,

I have one AHM E8 that was made in the 80s. I also have a small fleet of Proto E units.  The difference is incredible!  You won't be disappointed with the P2K E unit.  Beautifully detailed, smooth solid puller, and  "heavy as a brick!"  (don't drop one on your foot Wink [;)] )

Word of caution:  Be very carefull when handling.  Those pretty lift rings on the roof, unfortunately, break easily.  I've broken a number on several e-units and am going to replace them with metal rings that I bought at my LHS.  I now make sure that the palm of my hand does not touch the roof whenever I carry one of these units.  

Last I checked, the individual body shells are not availabe, however, you can call Walthers on their toll free number and ask a customer service rep. 

Check ebay, regularly.  I picked up a P2K E7 body (L&N) in excellent condition for $14! 

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Joizey
  • 1,983 posts
Posted by SteamFreak on Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:25 PM
Believe me, they won't be speed matched. The Rivarossi E8 has such high speed gearing that it could probably give that Tyco Turbotrain a run for it's money. About the only thing I can say in favor of the Rossi is that it runs smooth. Once you get a Proto 2K, you won't look back. Detail, weight, power, flywheels, prototypical speeds, and let's not forget 12-wheel drive. You might be able to recoup what you paid on the Rivarossi if you decide to sell it on eBay, but I'm really not sure what they're going for now.
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:09 PM

 my05hammer wrote:
These locos will not be coupled together so difference in speed is not an issue.
Oh yes it is.  If the locomotives aren't matched then they will be putting stress on one another instead of pulling the train.  One can easily strip a motor gear, crack an axle gear, and prematurely wear out drive shaft couplings and even motors. Some of the wheels might also be spinning (this would actually be better than the above) and therefore scratching up and wearing down the rails and the wheels themselves.   I believe the Proto E units have been produced in several different gear ratios.

Do you mean you are going to run the protos together or the protos with the AHM?  It might be better to just pull the motor off the one truck of the AHM and use it as a dummy.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 150 posts
Posted by my05hammer on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 10:36 PM
 Don Gibson wrote:

Different Manufacturers generally means dfferent drives & different speeds - and probably different couplers, as well. Never mind, you got a 'deal', right?.

 

These locos will not be coupled together so difference in speed is not an issue.  Couplers will all be Kadee. 

I did make a mistake on the price of the AHM, I paid $36.40 total for it.  I think it was a deal.

 

Love all Worship One
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:01 PM

That is comparing a 1971 Ford V8 that breathes to a fuel injected and charged engine today.

Both can run. But getting one that runs well is the journey.

Here are my Proto E7's under DCS200 DCC and equippted with QSI.

 http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/377/waltherse7unitsqv3.flv

 

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Pacific Northwest
  • 3,864 posts
Posted by Don Gibson on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:28 PM

Different Manufacturers generally means dfferent drives & different speeds - and probably different couplers, as well. Never mind, you got a 'deal', right?.

Just keep telling yourself that, over and over - how about 20 years from now?

Meanwhile you are in an excellent position to compare 'Apples' and 'Oranges' - after you "tweak" the AHM 'Orange'.

Don Gibson .............. ________ _______ I I__()____||__| ||||| I / I ((|__|----------| | |||||||||| I ______ I // o--O O O O-----o o OO-------OO ###########################
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 7:02 PM

I have an AHM e8, when it ran I was pleased, but its been out of action for years. needs new motor, etc, I wont be ressurecting it. I have an AHM BL2, pulls like crazy and runs sweet.

Trying to remember if NWSL had a regear for it or not.

Its a good model, pre-today's stuff. Often the model magazines reviews had been good on the Rivarrossi models except for the deep flanges, with reasonable details. But consider... I have Athearn's RDC's, rubber band drive...onoooos. Ernst had their gearing kit. Well, there are newer RDC's out there, so I plan to sell off my RDC's, when I am ready for RDC's again, I'll get the newer ones, I think Bachman or LL had them 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Central Illinois
  • 806 posts
Posted by ICRR1964 on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:13 PM
The newer P2K's you have coming, you will be very happy with them. the AHM?RIVA's where good in the day, but they will not shine like the P2K's.
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sweden
  • 1,808 posts
Posted by Lillen on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:05 PM

I love my P2K's E8's I got three of them and they are all wonderful engines. The only thing to say about is that you should be careful when handling them due to their fine details, especially the grab irons. But that is not a bad thing, just be careful.

 

Magnus

Unless otherwise mentioned it's HO and about the 50's. Magnus
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Michigan
  • 1,550 posts
Posted by rolleiman on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:04 PM
I'm sure your son will enjoy the AHM.. Make sure no trains are in the way when you need to suddenly stop the p2k e-8 because on level track they have a coast distance of about 3 feet. Maybe exagerated a Little but those large flywheels really make for a smooth run.
Modeling the Wabash from Detroit to Montpelier Jeff
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Utica, OH
  • 4,000 posts
Posted by jecorbett on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:53 PM

I have two of each. I've had the Rivarossi's (AHM) for about 20 years. A good mid price range performed. The P2K is simply in a different class. It is top of the line if you don't count brass. Outstanding performer, excellent detail, and sound. I got both of mine when Walthers had them on sale for about a hundred bucks. They were a steal.

Unfortunately, all Walthers offered in the NYC paint scheme was the A units. I would like to get a B unit with compatible paint scheme but I don't see one currently offered. I might try hunting down one of those old Rivarossi dummy B units in NYC livery.  

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Oregon
  • 509 posts
Posted by Mr. SP on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:51 PM
The P2K is the way to go. I have some of them and the Alco PA as well. All are star performers and will out pull the AHM's by 10 to 1.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Orig: Tyler Texas. Lived in seven countries, now live in Sundown, Louisiana
  • 25,640 posts
Posted by jeffrey-wimberly on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:30 AM
If you're impressed with the way your AHM E8 runs then the Proto 2000 E8 will blow you away. I have 7 Proto E's (5 E6's and 2 E7's) and I'm very happy with them.

Running Bear, Sundown, Louisiana
          Joined June, 2004

Dr. Frankendiesel aka Scott Running Bear
Space Mouse for president!
15 year veteran fire fighter
Collector of Apple //e's
Running Bear Enterprises
History Channel Club life member.
beatus homo qui invenit sapientiam


  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:24 AM

Proto = 2008 Mercedes.

AHM = 1988 Yugo.

Big Smile [:D]

Stix
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 6:11 AM
For the shells, you'll have to contact www.walthers.com as they now own the LifeLike Proto line. I have matched up the old Rivarossi shells to the Proto E-8 drives without much trouble. 

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • 150 posts
AHM E8 vs Proto E8
Posted by my05hammer on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 11:12 PM

OK... I have been out of the hobby for a long time so bear with this question.  When I was a kid in high school back in the 80's it was taboo to even think of buying a Bachmann or Life Like Loco.  With that said... I just bought an old AHM E8 and two LifeLike/Proto E8's on ebay. 

 

Now with a couple of tricks I discovered how to get an AHM E8 to run smooth as glass back when I bought my first one in 1986 and the detail on the shell was good enough for me.  So I am thinking.... What are the Proto E8's going to be like compaired to the old AHM?  I have never seen the Proto's in person.  I just got the old AHM new in box (NOS) for $41.00, I paid $70.90 for a Proto E8 L&N and $60.39 for another Proto E8 B&O.  I hope they are worth the 131.00 bucks.  

 

I plan on fixing the drive on the AHM and giving it to my son if the proto's are what everyone says they are.  I would also like to get two undecorated shells for the Proto E8's.  Is this possible? Does Proto sell undecked shells for the E8's?

Love all Worship One

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!