Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Which Steam Engine

2297 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Canada
  • 21 posts
Posted by milkman on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 2:01 PM
  Just a little note ont the spectrum 2-8-0,, it is the first steam that I have puchased so far and I am totally satisfied  with its perfoprmance and details  , I cant say anything  about the Kato as I hope to get one soon as I have heard nothing but good news about them.  I also want to get a Con-Cor Hudson In the near future but have not heard much about them,, maybe they are good runners too?  Maybe someone who has one could give you a little more info,  Yours in railroading   STEVE,   TH&B still lives here
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 11:36 AM

If-it-absolutely-positively-has-to-be-there-overnight and your (current) plans are for only one steam loke I would run myself down a Kato Mike with one of their traction packages underneath. This loke itself will negotiate - AND LOOK GOOD - on 13 inch radius curves.

I might add this: if you are planning on 24 inch shelves for your platform you can go with 18 inch radius curves and that Mike will handle just about any length car you might wish to put behind it.

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:26 PM
 dad1218 wrote:

  What size steam engine would look right on a around the wall layout in a small bedroom, about a 10 x 14. In N scale. I wasn't sure if a light mountain or a mike would be too big for the layout.

                Gary

Ain't nothing purtier than a balloon stack 4-4-0 with 3-4 open platform passenger cars behind her.  Especially on a nice-sized N layout with some fine scenery.  Well, maybe a Shay with a string of disconnected log buggies could be its equal.

The Atlas Shay apparently runs pretty well.  The Bachmann 4-4-0s are probably going to need a little tuning to run like you would want one to.  However, the Roundhouse 2-6-0 could be a good substitute.

Unfortunately, you insist on modeling the wrong era.  Smile [:)]  Step up to modeling the golden age, where the dreams were huge, but the locomotives and cars were small.

Fred W

....modeling foggy coastal Oregon, where it's always 1900.... 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NC Piedmont
  • 154 posts
Posted by dad1218 on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 5:01 PM

 Actually, I wish the Con-Cor 2-10-2 came in Southern green.

              Gary

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Monday, December 17, 2007 9:27 PM

The Bachmann 4-8-2 light mountain in N scale is a decent engine.  A decoder install is a piece of cake too.  I wouldn't pay hard earned money for an install this easy, but thats just me.  You can view install instructions about halfway down this page: http://www.trainweb.org/nrmrc/dcc/conversions.html

The light mountain does have one fault though.  It's not a great puller out of the box.  It's easy to fix though.  Pull the axle with the traction tire out of the frame and rotate the axle blocks 90 degrees and reinstall.  Now it'll pull decent.  Just make sure you drop the axle on the same tooth of the gear it came from so you don't mess up the timing and knock it out of quarter.  It's not s hard as it sounds if you take your time with it.

Other then that, great loco!  I have four of them!

Philip
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NC Piedmont
  • 154 posts
Posted by dad1218 on Monday, December 17, 2007 8:37 PM

 That is what I was kind of leaning toward. Planning on going to the Winston-Salem,NC show in Jan. to see what I can get there before I order one.

  Anyone has any experience with Tony's Trains locos and decoder installs? I bought my Powercab and a few other things there, if I found something I was considering sending it up there. Wondering mostly about backlog time.

               Gary

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Kentucky
  • 10,660 posts
Posted by Heartland Division CB&Q on Monday, December 17, 2007 3:48 PM

I'm no expert on N scale, but I did search Walthers and see a Southern 4-8-2 (Mountain Type) by Bachmann Spectrum. That may be a good dual purpose engine and it may be close to looking real. Southern did not have four wheel trailing trucks under the cab from what I recall.

Hopefully some Southern fans will respond. An also some N scalers. My HO Bachmann 4-8-2 is a very good engine in my opinion.

GARRY

HEARTLAND DIVISION, CB&Q RR

EVERYWHERE LOST; WE HUSTLE OUR CABOOSE FOR YOU

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NC Piedmont
  • 154 posts
Posted by dad1218 on Monday, December 17, 2007 3:12 PM

  The road is Southern, loose transitional period(not too worried about a certain year). Use will be mainline with some siding switching. Mostly freight, might be some passenger. Have thought about getting the Con-Cor 4-6-4(class J I guess) and making it a dual purpose. Still in planning and seeing what is available. Also will be DCC.

        Gary

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Kentucky
  • 10,660 posts
Posted by Heartland Division CB&Q on Sunday, December 16, 2007 9:36 PM

Do you have a preferance of a certain railroad?  Passenger, freight, or both? Era? Location?

Yard service or main line?

 

 

GARRY

HEARTLAND DIVISION, CB&Q RR

EVERYWHERE LOST; WE HUSTLE OUR CABOOSE FOR YOU

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Ohio
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by Virginian on Sunday, December 16, 2007 9:20 PM

That is not a small N scale layout in my eyes.  If you are only going to have one steam locomotive, I would make it a VERY good one.  An N&W J, NYC Niagara, SP Daylight, C&O Greenbrier, Milwaukee F7 Baltic, UP 800 Class, SF 2900 would all fill the bill, and a Van Sweringen Berk, a Challenger, an Allegheny, or N&W Class A would not really be that out of place.  Are you looking to simulate a visiting road/consist, an excursion, or just want to run one every now and then?

One of the crack steam era passenger consists, or the same recreated in an excursion simulation, is a rather impressive deviation from the norm in current day railroading I think.

What could have happened.... did.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Sunday, December 16, 2007 8:59 PM
 dad1218 wrote:

  What size steam engine would look right on a around the wall layout in a small bedroom, about a 10 x 14. In N scale. I wasn't sure if a light mountain or a mike would be too big for the layout.

                Gary

Speaking only of wheel arrangements and designs, a lot would be determined by what prototype you follow.  Steam locomotives, unlike diesels, were custom designed for a single railroad, a single division or even a single operating situation.  (The PRR, which sprawled all over the Rust Belt, owned steamers which never left the Madison Grade!)

That said, the last survivors on more than a few roads were USRA or similar 2-8-2s.  IIRC, only the IC was big into 4-8-2s at the end, and their appearance was (to put it mildly) distinctive.

An 0-8-0 is an unlikely choice for 'only steam locomotive.'  Switching assignments were among the first to be dieselized on most railroads.  (Chessie sold 30 gently-used USRA design 0-8-0s to N&W - the only locos N&W acquired after WWII that weren't Roanoke built.  Then Roanoke built 45 more to the same design.  But there were still lots of other steam locos on the N&W roster at the time.)

In N scale, I'd say go with the Kato Mikado - but, I'm biased.  I own a fair stable of 2-8-2's [JNR D50 and D51 class, in twice-N scale (1:80, aka HOj.)]

Chuck (modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: In the State of insanity!
  • 7,982 posts
Posted by pcarrell on Sunday, December 16, 2007 7:10 PM
Honestly, if this is to be your only steam engine, I'd go with the Kato Mikado with the traction tire upgrade.  It's really the gold standard for N steam.  If I didn't go that way I'd probably go for the Bachmann Spectrum 2-8-0.  It's close in quality.  Since you're only having one (or maybe a couple in the future), why not get the best and forget the rest?
Philip
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,255 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, December 16, 2007 5:48 PM

Gary, 

If you are going to stick with N-scale, how about a Proto 2000 2-8-4 Berkshire?

Click picture to enlarge

Now THAT would look nice going around anyone's layout.  It should come in Nickle Plate (NKP), Pere Marquette, and Chessepeake & Ohio (C&O) road names.

Their 0-8-0 switcher would be another sweetie and look good in a yard somewhere:

Click picture to enlarge

There's a number of road names for this one.  Check the Walthers web site for details.

Tom 

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NC Piedmont
  • 154 posts
Posted by dad1218 on Sunday, December 16, 2007 5:32 PM

   Thanks for the answers so quick. I don't know if I want an articulated, this will probably be my only steam engine. I was planning on a small engine facility, not a roundhouse and a turntable is still in the air.

   I was hoping for at least 1 penisula, as there will be other things in the room like the computer desk.

           Gary

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,475 posts
Posted by New Haven I-5 on Sunday, December 16, 2007 12:55 PM
 The new Bachmann Berkshire(2-8-4) could work. It only costs $160.00 with dcc. It also has a dual mode decoder so it will work on dc. I would buy two of them because their not the strongest pullers.Very nice locomotive. That's what I suggest.

- Luke

Modeling the Southern Pacific in the 1960's-1980's

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Louis
  • 516 posts
Posted by mls1621 on Sunday, December 16, 2007 11:43 AM

Either of those would look good.  With that much space, you could go bigger, an articulated with a fair string of cars in trail, and still look good.

My layout is an L, meassuring 10' X 14' X 3', and My head end power is mid 60's turbines with 40 plus cars in the train.

I'm assuming you're talking about a shelf layout.  What you're suggesting would be appropriate with room for more.

 

Mike St Louis N Scale UP in the 60's Turbines are so cool
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: NC Piedmont
  • 154 posts
Which Steam Engine
Posted by dad1218 on Sunday, December 16, 2007 11:28 AM

  What size steam engine would look right on a around the wall layout in a small bedroom, about a 10 x 14. In N scale. I wasn't sure if a light mountain or a mike would be too big for the layout.

                Gary

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!