Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

What era do you model?

4033 views
38 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
What era do you model?
Posted by EL PARRo on Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:13 PM
I model 1940-1949, specifically UP during WWII. How about you?
huh?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:19 PM
As I progress with my layout I continue to think transitional era. The problem is that I also like modern equipment, too...so I'm thinking that my layout will be more free-lanced/fantasy than anything. I want to have equipment from the 30's to the present. It may not be realistic but it sure will be a lot of fun for me.[:D]
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Saturday, January 10, 2004 2:12 PM
My layout will vary between the mid-1940's to early 60's--I selected 1940-1949 because that will be the eventual focus of the layout, once I get the trolley poles working.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 2:22 PM
Actually, my era spans the 1930's to the late 1950's, although I don't use the road switchers that came as replacements for the E- and F- series diesels.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:11 PM
Well, my era is 1940 through 1960. I want to do this so I can have more F units. That way I can run F7's next to 2-8-0's. Oh yeah, the RR is UP.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Whitby, ON
  • 2,594 posts
Posted by CP5415 on Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:56 PM
I have the same feelings as Super Chief.
I model whatever pulls my trains. Either steam or diesel.
If my 4-6-2 ends up pulling my stack train & my AC4400 pulls my heavyweight passenger cars, so be it.
The trains have to get through.

Gordon

Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!

 K1a - all the way

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:20 PM
Now, specifically mid 1940s through late 1950s.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:20 PM
I model modern times, but in a weird way I guess. I have a mainline so I can run my modern locos and a shortline so I can run older diesels.


Thanks,
Jeremy

GO PACKERS!!!![:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:44 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by CP5415

I have the same feelings as Super Chief.
I model whatever pulls my trains. Either steam or diesel.
If my 4-6-2 ends up pulling my stack train & my AC4400 pulls my heavyweight passenger cars, so be it.
The trains have to get through.

Gordon

Glad I'm not alone here. D*mn the repercussions, full speed ahead![(-D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:54 PM
My layout depicts a fictional museum line, so it's modern day but with lots of older paint schemes and stock. Where else could you see a couple of FM C-Liners in NYC livery waiting in the servicing track, while a CSX Dash 9 switches a few ACF Centre-flow hoppers? (CSX has track rights over the line, a handy excuse to run big modern locos and stock). Sometimes the museum's locos haul freights on behalf of CSX - an Erie-built on double-stack cars? It looks pretty good!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:01 PM
My layout, the Allentown Scranton & Northern, is based in the modern era.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:10 PM
you mean there are trains after 1900?[:D]

Jay
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:30 PM
70 to 80
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:05 PM
Actually, I model from around 1935-1958, NYC and NH, two great Giants of the Northeast.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by SuperChiefFan

As I progress with my layout I continue to think transitional era. The problem is that I also like modern equipment, too...so I'm thinking that my layout will be more free-lanced/fantasy than anything. I want to have equipment from the 30's to the present. It may not be realistic but it sure will be a lot of fun for me.[:D]


Why not plug and play! most pictures of country settings haven't changed in the past 40 to 60 years except changes to local small town industries. If you your industries can be lifted and placed and you have two sets of vehicles two sets of industries and two sets of engines and rolling stock you can operate one night in the 50's and another in the 90's

Have the best of two worlds and get more longevity out of your RR[8D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:48 PM
I model the AT&SF in the early 50's to the mid 60's on my HO layout. I the Garden Railroad I range from the 30's to present day but mostly the 30's to the 50'. My future N scale layout will depict the modern day UP.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 342 posts
Posted by randybc2003 on Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:48 PM
I model an eclectic combo. 1880-1925
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:36 PM
N&W 1950 to 1955.

In 1952 the cheater hot rodded EMD F7 ABBA set from EMD came and demonstrated that the N&W A was considerably faster with the same load, though the EMD could pull more, in the flat lands. In the mountains, the EMD set was equivalent to a Y6b.

Around the same time Jawn Henry showed up.

And in 1955, the smelly oil burners made there beach head in the form of 8 Alco RS3 (phIII) and 8 EMD GP9 (phII).
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Southern Minnesota now
  • 956 posts
Posted by Hawks05 on Saturday, January 10, 2004 9:06 PM
Since i'm modeling BN that would put me in a specific era and since i have Rock Island and CB&Q and GN stuff that would to but i'm just modeling what i feel like modeling. no specific era for me.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 10:46 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Hawks05

Since i'm modeling BN that would put me in a specific era and since i have Rock Island and CB&Q and GN stuff that would to but i'm just modeling what i feel like modeling. no specific era for me.

I should do likewise, Hawks. After all, it is my railroad. Fergus had a great idea, too. [^]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:19 AM
I voted 1990 to present. Its a great time period, as mergers allow for so much color. I am modeling the Twin Cities, and can use almost anything. BNSF, UP, CP and all the railroads that went into them give me a lot to choose from. I'm also going to try to keep my scenery date neutral for even more flexibility.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:38 AM
I model eras. But to many to list. If you want it check my profile
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:40 AM
I voted 60-69 but my theme is actually from 1964-73 which justifies EMD -2s and GE U33/36 locomotives. I will be running passenger trains, but not Amtrak.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:06 AM
I'm modeling the 50s, but plan to add a roster of 1900-1910 equipment and switch back and forth.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: the Netherlands
  • 1,883 posts
Posted by lupo on Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:27 AM
UP 1950 - 1960 steam and diesel together
L [censored] O
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:41 AM
RhB 1970 - 75
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: the Netherlands
  • 1,883 posts
Posted by lupo on Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:21 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by RhB_HJ

RhB 1970 - 75


Switserland? gives me an idea for a new topic!
L [censored] O
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Coldstream, BC Canada
  • 969 posts
Posted by RhB_HJ on Sunday, January 11, 2004 11:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by lupo

QUOTE: Originally posted by RhB_HJ

RhB 1970 - 75


Switserland? gives me an idea for a new topic!


Hey Lupo,

I know that the Dutch spell it "Zwitzerland", so all you need do is drop the leading "Z" for an "S" and you're done.

Otherwise we have to refer to CH as "Upperland" (in a satirical fashion, of course) in contrast to NL as "Nederland".[;)][}:)][:D][:D]
Cheers HJ http://www.rhb-grischun.ca/ http://www.easternmountainmodels.com
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Sunday, January 11, 2004 11:32 AM
The Borracho RR is situated post WWII, sometime between 1947 and the mid 50's.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: the Netherlands
  • 1,883 posts
Posted by lupo on Monday, January 12, 2004 2:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by RhB_HJ

QUOTE: Originally posted by lupo

QUOTE: Originally posted by RhB_HJ

RhB 1970 - 75


Switserland? gives me an idea for a new topic!


Hey Lupo,

I know that the Dutch spell it "Zwitzerland", so all you need do is drop the leading "Z" for an "S" and you're done.

Otherwise we have to refer to CH as "Upperland" (in a satirical fashion, of course) in contrast to NL as "Nederland".[;)][}:)][:D][:D]


CH = Upperland and NL= Netherland ?
Sure we dutch get all their water they don't want through the Rhine and if we didn't have so many dikes[:I] we would be called Underwaterland ( I live about 15 feet below sea-level )[}:)]
L [censored] O

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!