Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Railroad Company for new layout.

1565 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Monday, January 12, 2004 3:09 PM



i really wanted to just come up with my own railroad and run with that but then i realized i can't do all the painting by myself so i decided/am deciding to go with the Burlington Northern and Rock Island. i have CB&Q and GN as well because they merged and formed the Burlington Northern. and i just like the Rock Island so i decided to have some of their stuff as well.



Josh,

Don't forget that NP also was part of the merger which created BN, and a few years later, the Frisco was merged into BN as well.

I am modeling a section of the CB&Q out in the boonies "somewhere" between Chicago and Galesburg, Illinois and coincidentally, will be including the Rock as well. Originally it was going to be a live interchange track coming in from a hidden staging area. However, recently I have started toying with the idea of a part of the layout being double deck. If I end up doing this, most of the lower deck in that area WON'T be Burlington, it will be Rock Island. Sort of a mini-Rock Island layout and useable, non-hidden staging area which will tie into the 'Q at an interchange point.
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Sunday, January 11, 2004 7:42 PM
What excatly do you mean by "Bridge" the two. Sounds interesting bu tneed more info.

ShaunCN
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 11, 2004 6:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ShaunCN

I model Canadian National but the area is not prototypical. I also want to model Chessie System but have not figured out how to incorporate the two.

ShaunCN


Correct me if I'm wrong butyou could "bridge" the two at Buffalo, Detroit or somewhere in Vermont.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:54 PM
I model Canadian National but the area is not prototypical. I also want to model Chessie System but have not figured out how to incorporate the two.

ShaunCN
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:50 PM
By the way, I'm sorry that I didn't mention this before, but I was thinking frieght and not passenger.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:37 PM
Thanks for you suggestions. Someone said that a lot of people would know some lines that used to run through my area. So, I'm fron Nothern New Jersey. I am sure there were some, but I'm not usre which ones exactly.

By the way, Golfgar4, no problem. It is no big deal. I'm new too and I don't mind. I'm not the kind of erson to take stuff like that personally.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:48 PM
Union Pacific most definently! But there's also Amtrak, BNSF, NS, CSX, KCS, Conrail (even though it's gone), or the AT&SF and BN before they merged.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs
  • 728 posts
Posted by FThunder11 on Saturday, January 10, 2004 2:57 PM
AMTRAK... AMTRAK... AMTRAK
Kevin Farlow Colorado Springs
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 2:43 PM
QUOTE:

what part of Wisconsin are you from?



I'm from south central Wisconsin, around the Janesville area.

I want to apologize to Yarolax, the original poster. I don't want to take away from his original questions, but as I'm new to the forum, I haven't quite figured out how to post private messages. I tried sending you a private reply so that a private discussion didn't interfere with this thread, but either your profile is not set up to accept private messages, or I just haven't figured out how to do it yet (probably the case!)[:I]

Looking forward to participating in the discussions. I had to dismantle my layout some time ago, but I'm planning on resurrecting it in the future. I saved as many of the structures, track, landscaping materials, etc. that I could, because I knew I'd want to re-build in the future.[;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:08 AM
You can do any railroad you want! I would model a CSX mainline not because I like it but because they lease many engines so you can run engines from almost any railroad you want! Good luck.

P.S. I model a prototype-freelance regional railroad in Eastern Pennsylvania and western New York.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Friday, January 9, 2004 11:46 PM
Just keep in mind that there are and were plenty of real short lines out there, and the process of research and discovery can be as much fun as making it up yourself...
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Ozark Mountains
  • 1,167 posts
Posted by dragenrider on Friday, January 9, 2004 10:08 PM
I vote for with the short line lovers! Pick a neat town name and add a direction (north, east, etc,) and bingo: Danbury and Southern or whatever! Run what you want and how you want. You can be the captain [4:-)] of your fate!

The Cedar Branch & Western--The Hillbilly Line!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 9, 2004 8:52 PM
My approach was to model a fictional shortline railroad, which means that it is small enough for me to completely fictionalize the whole thing, from the moment of its inception in the 19th century, up until its final demise as it was merged. Then, I chose a larger prototype railroad (in this case the Norfolk & Western) which was the one who gobbled up the smaller line, in much the same way that NW raked in the Akron Canton & Youngstown in 1964. This way, I model a real line with specific references to the NW motive power that was running in the Shenandoah Valley in the 1970's, while at the same time being free to invent whatever I want for my WP&P (now the Winchester Branch of the Shenandoah Division).

Actually, my short line was supposedly birthed by two major parents, the Baltimore and Ohio, and the N&W, neither of which was on its own ready to invest in the region but who each became major shareholders in the road, which ultimately formed an east-west bridge route between Front Royal and Grafton. This backstory lets me exhibit influences from both roads in my fictional paint schemes and practices, while permitting diversions wherever I really just feel like it. Nobody can tell me that my top-heavy WPP fleet of Alco RSD-15's (with NW style high noses) is wrong! Had I painted them in NW blue and yellow, though, I'd know through and through that it was incorrect, and live a life without joy because of it. ;-)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, January 9, 2004 6:04 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by up9899

go with the UNION PACIFIC they merged with S.P. amd RIO, ect..... get alot of cool raods and color schemes and big diesels and flag units are the best!!!!


If you do, don't forget to pay Uncle Pete his copyright fees[:D]

CN in the Rockies would be a challenge.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Friday, January 9, 2004 3:51 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by yarolax

Im in the brainstorming process for a new layout. I have quite a lot of room and I want a railroad that will be interesting to build and historically accurate. Any suggesions? Southern Pacific? Santa Fe? I am looking for modern railroads that would offer me an opportunity to really have a good time both running and building the layout. I hope that there are some suggestions.


One thing you might look into is short lines in your area. Since the elimination of the Interstate Commerce Commission, small short-line railroads are once again economically feasible. These roads tend to be smaller than giant railroads (but can still be big enough to fill the biggest layout room) and use a mixture of older rehabbed equipment and newer rolling stock (they mostly serve to carry cars from larger railroads' mainlines to industries that aren't accessible by the big lines' tracks.)

If you're interested in historical accuracy, look into what railroads ran near where you live. If you passed along your general geographic area (city/state) lots of folks on here can tell you what railroads are in your vicinity, or were. Look into local railroad or historical societies for a load of neat research information. Don't over-research, but you might find that research is a lot of fun in itself...
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Greenwood, DE - USA
  • 170 posts
Posted by swknox on Thursday, January 8, 2004 10:05 PM
I have to give my vote for Norfolk Southern too! But I also understand what everybody means by doing your own thing. My next layout is going to be non-prototypicial. I'll come up with my own name and my own paint scheme. The only grip I have about being pototypicial is that someone is quick to point out a mistake or to say "I never saw that on the NS." I live in a formal Conrail served area and most of the geeps are still in conrail paint with some NS mixed in. The only big difference is I run some high nose locos with low nose geeps and there are no high nose locos where I live but everybody is quick to point this out on my model railroad. Some people didn't even know they have locos with high noses like that. See what I mean... Just do it your own way, say a small shortline like no one has heard of that mixes it up with the class 1 railroads.
Cool site to visit http://www.trainweb.org/peninsularailfan/index.html - local site, very cool http://crcyc.railfan.net/ - Conrail site, also cool http://www.thedieselshop.us/MPR.html
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Southern Minnesota now
  • 956 posts
Posted by Hawks05 on Thursday, January 8, 2004 10:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Golfgar4

When I created my railroad, I wanted to be able to model anything that I wanted, so I didn't go prototypical. I decided the kinds of things I wanted my railroad to be involved in, such as logging, hauling ore, and hauling freight. I also wanted my motive power to be diesel, and located in an area I was somewhat familiar with. So, since I'm from Wisconsin, and I wanted to be able to model alot of forests, I placed my railroad in northern Wisconsin and Minnesota. I named my railroad the Amnicon & Brule, after 2 actual rivers that flow through this region. The names of the rivers are the only thing that are taken from reality.[:)]


what part of Wisconsin are you from?

i really wanted to just come up with my own railroad and run with that but then i realized i can't do all the painting by myself so i decided/am deciding to go with the Burlington Northern and Rock Island. i have CB&Q and GN as well because they merged and formed the Burlington Northern. and i just like the Rock Island so i decided to have some of their stuff as well.

i'm also working on my own railroad right now. well i'm just painting a caboose to see if i like it and if i want to stick with it. its Baldwin Rail Service.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 8, 2004 9:44 PM
When I created my railroad, I wanted to be able to model anything that I wanted, so I didn't go prototypical. I decided the kinds of things I wanted my railroad to be involved in, such as logging, hauling ore, and hauling freight. I also wanted my motive power to be diesel, and located in an area I was somewhat familiar with. So, since I'm from Wisconsin, and I wanted to be able to model alot of forests, I placed my railroad in northern Wisconsin and Minnesota. I named my railroad the Amnicon & Brule, after 2 actual rivers that flow through this region. The names of the rivers are the only thing that are taken from reality.[:)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 8, 2004 9:12 PM
go with the UNION PACIFIC they merged with S.P. amd RIO, ect..... get alot of cool raods and color schemes and big diesels and flag units are the best!!!!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 8, 2004 9:09 PM
Why not just invent a country and call your railroad anything you want. Believe me, it's a lot of fun.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: San Jose, California
  • 3,154 posts
Posted by nfmisso on Thursday, January 8, 2004 9:02 PM
Norfolk Southern, the Thoroughbred....
see: www.nscorp.com
Nigel N&W in HO scale, 1950 - 1955 (..and some a bit newer too) Now in San Jose, California
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Railroad Company for new layout.
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 8, 2004 8:23 PM
Im in the brainstorming process for a new layout. I have quite a lot of room and I want a railroad that will be interesting to build and historically accurate. Any suggesions? Southern Pacific? Santa Fe? I am looking for modern railroads that would offer me an opportunity to really have a good time both running and building the layout. I hope that there are some suggestions.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!