Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

If you could model another scale......

3556 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
If you could model another scale......
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 3, 2004 12:01 PM
For me it would be 3 rail O (preferably Lionel) or N.[^]
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: the Netherlands
  • 1,883 posts
Posted by lupo on Saturday, January 3, 2004 12:32 PM
don't know the scale but I saw a 15' model of a BigBoy somewhere on the net
L [censored] O
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: California
  • 263 posts
Posted by EL PARRo on Saturday, January 3, 2004 1:42 PM
I would model N scale for the simple reason that I could cram a lot more trains into the same amount of space.
huh?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 3, 2004 1:43 PM
I have is a HO right now, think some day would like to get a O running around overhead on walls.. around in room.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Southern Minnesota now
  • 956 posts
Posted by Hawks05 on Saturday, January 3, 2004 2:48 PM
probably N as i don't have any room for the bigger stuff like O in the room i have now.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 3, 2004 3:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by EL PARRo

I would model N scale for the simple reason that I could cram a lot more trains into the same amount of space.


Works for me. I love long Freight trains, deep canyons, long bridges and big freight yards and Engine facilities.

On3 to me would make an ideal garden scale as opposed to G[oX)]
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Saturday, January 3, 2004 3:18 PM
I have to say n scale. what fun I could have operating long trains in a small space!!!!!!! :)

Right ow I am modeling in ho scale.

ShaunCN
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Sarnia, Ontario
  • 534 posts
Posted by ShaunCN on Saturday, January 3, 2004 3:19 PM
I have to say n scale. what fun I could have operating long trains in a small space!!!!!!! :)

Right now I am modeling in ho scale.

ShaunCN
derailment? what derailment? All reports of derailments are lies. Their are no derailments within a hundreed miles of here.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Midtown Sacramento
  • 3,340 posts
Posted by Jetrock on Saturday, January 3, 2004 3:20 PM
Considering my obsession with railroading in small spaces N would be a logical choice--if I were to try to model, say, the Southern Pacific shops and yards in Sacramento I'd probably go N to allow me to have room for articulated cab-forwards and other heavy-duty things.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,199 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Saturday, January 3, 2004 4:14 PM
I picked G because that is significantly different from S. N could be an interesting choice also, same reason. For me the point would be doing a different kind of modeling - might do it anyway once i retire and have some time.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 3, 2004 4:32 PM
I clicked other. Not sure if 1:1 scale counts as modelling, but it is another scale that I'd love to get involved with... It's one of my "if I won the lottery" ideas, to buy a disused station, lay a bit of track, buy a diesel railcar or two...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,522 posts
Posted by AltonFan on Saturday, January 3, 2004 4:35 PM
Not merely O, but Proto:48. With lots of steam, and full-length passenger cars in full-length passenger trains.

Dan

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Saturday, January 3, 2004 8:35 PM
N scale. Cause there are so many great steam locomotives out, and more one the way. And you cram much more layout in a given space.

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Pittsburgh, PA
  • 208 posts
Posted by preceng on Saturday, January 3, 2004 8:41 PM
N definately. Just to be able to run a unit coal train
Allan B.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, January 4, 2004 8:20 AM
I would go with On30 or 2 rail O scale..No Lionel for me please.[:0][:D]

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 4, 2004 8:30 AM
G or N or Z, I would also choose O scale but MTH and Lionel seem to be competing for the most unrealistic models. I like N and because of the fact I can run longer trains. I chose G because it seems very fun running trains through your back (or front) yard.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 4, 2004 8:40 AM
well if I could model more scales, I'd have to have a very very large and deep layout, put some N's in the far back, HO's in the middle and probably some O's on the front and blend them to look good.

Then I'd take and build a big elaborate overhead mid-room system in G scale that had plenty of turnouts, sidings, ect and could be seen fully from a balcony.

And on the far end of this great room would be a 1:2 train that went out a set of doors, around my inaginary 200 acre land, and returned back to the big room.

Ok, there's me dreaming for the day.

Jay
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 437 posts
Posted by BNSFNUT on Sunday, January 4, 2004 9:36 AM
I checked of G scale. I will most likely stay with HO but my 55yrs+ hands and eyes make the larger scales look good.

There is no such thing as a bad day of railfanning. So many trains, so little time.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 4, 2004 11:15 AM
N definitely. I have limited space and so will need a smaller scale.
Reed
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 4, 2004 3:15 PM
S scale would be interesting, especially if I had significant room. I barely have enough space for my HO layout. I like N scale somewhat, but the size is a bit hard on the eyes. Can't wait to move into a new house with a basement, regardless of scale![:)]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Sunday, January 4, 2004 8:09 PM
Well I have my old N-gauge stuff and a hollow door slab I picked up cheap years ago, so I was hoping I could put something different on it than the main HO layout in the basement. I haven't been able to come up with a spot for it, though.

If price weren't a consideration, I would like like to have a really large building (on a really large lot!) where I could set up a really large O gauge, scale layout. It would probably take something a bit smaller that a gymnasium to satisfy me, though. Realistically, I may try someday to fit in an O gauge or possibly even an O-narrow gauge shelf layout someplace.
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: France
  • 240 posts
Posted by ddechamp71 on Monday, January 5, 2004 5:22 AM
As I'm modelling Z, I chose the opposite: G, as I have a 7000 square meter garden, and I think I'll do it when my Z scale empire is completed, so in 20 years! It should be D&RGW narrow gauge (as I falled in love with K27 - K28 - K36 - steam locomotives).
Cheers
Dominique
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Smoggy L.A.
  • 10,743 posts
Posted by vsmith on Monday, January 5, 2004 9:57 AM
Doing G scale indoors but if I started another layout I would chose On30.

   Have fun with your trains

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 5, 2004 4:10 PM
For me it would be the 1 1/2 inch 7 3/4 gauge ridable scale intstead of watching your trains, your actually riding it along the track with your ride along brakie actually getting off to toss switches, talk ya back to a joint, wave ya ahead for the drop off ,or do a walk along pretrip inspection and anything else you can think of to do that for me is the real hands on experience trouble is the COST!!! i am talkin bout $4000 dollars for a small electric loco and $5000 to $7000 for a gas engine or the same size!![:O] one day i hope to be able to have one of these but not in the near future [sigh] i can wish cant i?

Regards

Larry
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: San Francisco Bay Area
  • 1,090 posts
Posted by on30francisco on Monday, September 27, 2004 4:48 PM
I would like to build an indoor G scale narrow gauge layout. I currently model in On30 and HO.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 9:32 AM
No to be rude but I would never model nothing else than HO Scale,Why?
Because N scale is too small and one size larger than HO is too big for me!
HO is perfect,in other words........
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:15 AM
I would prefer One to One scale.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 11:31 AM
I voted N. I run HO now but if I had to pick a second, N would be the one.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,633 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:06 PM
I guess I'm the "oddball" here. Even if I could I don't think now that I would model an additional scale or change over.

I currently model HO. There has been an "explosion" of items, details, gadgets, etc, that have been targeted at the HO market since the mid 90s. N Scale is neat but my eyes aren't that great, and for a satisfactory O Scale layout (or larger) I would want a LOT of space as I like running lonnnnnng freight trains and 12 car passenger trains with 85ft. long streamlined cars.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 28, 2004 2:54 PM
I currently am in N scale, and I have no desire to change scales either. But if I HAD to, I would go to HO, probably Proto:87.

---jps

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!