Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

4X8 or 3X11

2383 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Thursday, July 26, 2007 6:54 AM

I suggest building a linear industrial switching layout and forget the 4x8 unless you want continuous operation of course..

As a word to the wise a switching layout can become boring as can  loop running on a 4x8.

If you decide to build a ISL then I urge you to plan it well and avoid the time saver design.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vail, AZ
  • 1,943 posts
Posted by Vail and Southwestern RR on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:36 PM

I think you need to think outside the box, or at least the rectangle.  As was stated, the scale and size of space would be very useful to know.  You might have room for the classic 'waterwings', or some variation, and be able to get the best of both worlds to a degree.  To get a pretty good idea of what will fit into a certain size and shope, you might want to seriously consider John Armstrong's book "Track Planning for Realistic Operation".  It can really help you through the beginning 'back of the envelope' part of the process, and help to clarify in your own mind what you envision at the end of the process.

 

Jeff But it's a dry heat!

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Mankato MN
  • 1,358 posts
Posted by secondhandmodeler on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 11:13 PM
 R. T. POTEET wrote:
 venckman wrote:

This'll seem like a strange question, but I have space enough in a storage room in our basement for either a 4X8 layout or a 3X11.  I've been reading a lot that looks like most pro's recommend the longer narrower designs especially for a branch line with switching that I'll be modelling.  What do you guys think?Mike 



You would probably have been better served if you had posted the size of this storage room and ask for advice from the readership on considerations for using that space.  You should also have specified what scale you are anticipating modeling in!

You can turn HO Scale around on a four foot wide space using eighteen inch radius curves; you cannot turn HO Scale around on a three foot wide space and you, therefore, are restricting yourself to some sort of switchback operation.

And what's a 'pro'?

Now that was a helpfull response.Disapprove [V]
Corey
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: THE FAR, FAR REACHES OF THE WILD, WILD WEST!
  • 3,672 posts
Posted by R. T. POTEET on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:41 PM
 venckman wrote:

This'll seem like a strange question, but I have space enough in a storage room in our basement for either a 4X8 layout or a 3X11.  I've been reading a lot that looks like most pro's recommend the longer narrower designs especially for a branch line with switching that I'll be modelling.  What do you guys think?Mike 



You would probably have been better served if you had posted the size of this storage room and ask for advice from the readership on considerations for using that space.  You should also have specified what scale you are anticipating modeling in!

You can turn HO Scale around on a four foot wide space using eighteen inch radius curves; you cannot turn HO Scale around on a three foot wide space and you, therefore, are restricting yourself to some sort of switchback operation.

And what's a 'pro'?

From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:45 PM

I would do a switchback by enlarging the Vandalia Short Line shown on this page http://www.nmra.org/beginner/vandalia.html - plan near the bottom.  It's 1.5 x 10 ft but could really benefit from some more depth.  The extra foot of length would help also.  

Enjoy

Paul 

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Midwest
  • 135 posts
Posted by kansaspacific1 on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:14 PM

As everyone says, go with the extra length for that type of layout.  One suggestion relative to Spacemouse's caution on 30" depth.  Don't put any track deeper than that, but you might consider use of the extra 6" behind that to provide more realism to your scenery, especially if your scene is in an urban setting.  I'm planning an area which I may take close to 4 foot deep, just to come as close a possible to the prototype scene.  I'm making matboard mockups to see just what it will look like before I decide.  My planned area for this is about 14 foot long, and I need about 24 to 30 inches of depth to duplicate the prototype track arrangement.  (This is in HO)

Chuck

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:57 PM

I think the longer, narrower space will work better for what you have in mind. I did a similar HO layout in slightly more length and less width.

You can click here to read more about this layout, modeled after the real-life Hoboken Shore RR.

Byron

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:19 PM
 venckman wrote:

... either a 4X8 layout or a 3X11.  ...for a branch line with switching that I'll be modelling.  What do you guys think?

 

Mike 

I think that you should avoid the 4X8 since it will not give you the advantage of a nice yard length, plus it will be difficult to access it unless you have access on all four sides.   If you had been thinking of placing it in a corner, or just one side against a wall, you will have reach problems.  Not so with the narrower and longer setup that will still provide you with some scenery, several parallel yard tracks, and one or two industrial sites.....all within reach.

You can add a peninsula in another home or another room.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:44 AM

If it is a point to point, then go longer. If it is against the wall, then only go 30" wide.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:32 AM
It'll be HO scale and it'll be straight line with sidings, basically a freight yard at one end and a servicing terminal at the other. 
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Midwest
  • 135 posts
Posted by kansaspacific1 on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:31 AM

It would help to know:

. the scale of the layout.

. basic track arrangement - ie:  straight line with sidings, an oval?

Chuck 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
4X8 or 3X11
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:24 AM

This'll seem like a strange question, but I have space enough in a storage room in our basement for either a 4X8 layout or a 3X11.  I've been reading a lot that looks like most pro's recommend the longer narrower designs especially for a branch line with switching that I'll be modelling.  What do you guys think?

 

Mike 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!