Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

How about a plastic 2-6-6-2 (USRA or H-6)?

2597 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
How about a plastic 2-6-6-2 (USRA or H-6)?
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:36 PM
I have really liked the looks of the new big steam, especially the 2-6-6-6 and 2-8-8-2, but they are too big for my layout.
My thoughts are something that would look good on 24" to 26" radius. The C&O H-6 or the USRA 2-6-6-2 are what I have in mind.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
How about a plastic 2-6-6-2 (USRA or H-6)?
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:36 PM
I have really liked the looks of the new big steam, especially the 2-6-6-6 and 2-8-8-2, but they are too big for my layout.
My thoughts are something that would look good on 24" to 26" radius. The C&O H-6 or the USRA 2-6-6-2 are what I have in mind.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 3, 2003 6:32 PM
You are in luck, Bachmann is comming out with a USRA 2-6-6-2. This engine was used by the C&O and W&LE. The Nickel Plate later acquired these engines from the W&LE. These engine were H-5's on the C&O. I believe Bachmann is introducing a regular and weathered version of this engine for all three road names.
Eric
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 3, 2003 6:32 PM
You are in luck, Bachmann is comming out with a USRA 2-6-6-2. This engine was used by the C&O and W&LE. The Nickel Plate later acquired these engines from the W&LE. These engine were H-5's on the C&O. I believe Bachmann is introducing a regular and weathered version of this engine for all three road names.
Eric
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 18 posts
Posted by JimYoung on Friday, August 15, 2003 1:59 PM
I wonder if the Bachman 2-6-6-2 could be converted to a passable B&O class KK-4 (nee BR&P class LL). These engines (50 in all) were not USRA but they were pretty close appearance-wise.[8)]
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 18 posts
Posted by JimYoung on Friday, August 15, 2003 1:59 PM
I wonder if the Bachman 2-6-6-2 could be converted to a passable B&O class KK-4 (nee BR&P class LL). These engines (50 in all) were not USRA but they were pretty close appearance-wise.[8)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 15, 2003 3:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by eric1173
I believe Bachmann is introducing a regular and weathered version of this engine for all three road names.


They've finally followed what their British arm is doing, producing weathered editions.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 15, 2003 3:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by eric1173
I believe Bachmann is introducing a regular and weathered version of this engine for all three road names.


They've finally followed what their British arm is doing, producing weathered editions.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 12:34 PM
I have read somewhere that the H5 wasn’t that appreciated on the C&O. The H5’s overall look is the same as their preferred H4s and H6s but the USRA cab is different. As a result fans can regret Bachmann’s 2-6-6-2 hasn’t the real C&O look but “c’est la vie”. I’ll buy one anyway.

Andre
Brussels, Belgium

“C&O the way to go”
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 12:34 PM
I have read somewhere that the H5 wasn’t that appreciated on the C&O. The H5’s overall look is the same as their preferred H4s and H6s but the USRA cab is different. As a result fans can regret Bachmann’s 2-6-6-2 hasn’t the real C&O look but “c’est la vie”. I’ll buy one anyway.

Andre
Brussels, Belgium

“C&O the way to go”
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 3:07 PM
Hmmm a 2-6-6-2 sounds like someting i would look into buying.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 3:07 PM
Hmmm a 2-6-6-2 sounds like someting i would look into buying.
  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Thursday, January 8, 2004 11:48 PM
I just saw an Undec Spectrum USRA 2-6-6-2 in my LHS today. [:D] Awsome, totally awsome. Looks like it has the most detailing of any Spectrum steamer. Even more so than the Russian Decapod. I didn't get to see it run, but it appears super-fine. [^]

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

  • Member since
    July 2002
  • From: California
  • 3,722 posts
Posted by AggroJones on Thursday, January 8, 2004 11:48 PM
I just saw an Undec Spectrum USRA 2-6-6-2 in my LHS today. [:D] Awsome, totally awsome. Looks like it has the most detailing of any Spectrum steamer. Even more so than the Russian Decapod. I didn't get to see it run, but it appears super-fine. [^]

"Being misunderstood is the fate of all true geniuses"

EXPERIMENTATION TO BRING INNOVATION

http://community.webshots.com/album/288541251nntnEK?start=588

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!