Ray Breyer
Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy Neither is "better", as they each have their own applications. However, I much prefer foam, since when used properly, construction is faster, cheaper, and easier than when using traditional construction methods. My construction techniques differ from Bill's only slightly, in that I'm using metal shelf brackets instead of wood, use wood glue instead of Liquid Nails, and have an underlayment of 1/4" Lauan plywood under the 2" base of foam, which helps deaden the foam's drum effect even more than using caulk adhesive. One thing to keep in mind: you don't need Homabed between the track and foam base when handlaying. Bill handlays lots of his own track (the rest is mostly Micro Engineering), and he lays it directly onto the ties glued to the cork/foam roadbed. Give it a try; construction will be MUCH faster and cheaper, and you won't have to worry about the homasote warping in humid conditions.
http://www.trainboard.com/railimages/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5959
If one could roll back the hands of time... They would be waiting for the next train into the future. A. H. Francey 1921-2007
Brought to you by the letters C.P.R. as well as D&H!
K1a - all the way