Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

UNION PACIFIC VS ATHEARN

1628 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
UNION PACIFIC VS ATHEARN
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 6:37 PM
I am glad to see Athearn settle the dispute with UP. I will not have any UP rolling stock on my pike.I may not hurt them very much in there bottom line but I am trying.[}:)]
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 8:32 PM
I know that this has been a hot issue.

My attitude has always been that I like and admire the UP of the past (1940s - 1980s). Where innovations, inventions and good PR were the norm. This is why I still would like to have a couple of SD40-2s as UP was one of the roads that made the units famous.

UPs current management group will eventually fade in time. Hopefully the next generation of leaders, while profit oriented, will be more "PR" concious. Seems now that inspite of record profits, the current leadership has been doing a deplorable job with many customers as well.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Ridgeville,South Carolina
  • 1,294 posts
Posted by willy6 on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 9:10 PM
After having this agenda discussed many times, I feel it's done, over with and let the sleeping dog..............................................................sleep!
Being old is when you didn't loose it, it's that you just can't remember where you put it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 5, 2004 9:16 PM
Amen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Midwest
  • 718 posts
Posted by railman on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 2:01 AM
yes...we've taken this issue inside out and back again...amen!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 8:03 AM
This is the Fox in the henhouse issue that will bite the whole hobby community. An underperforming railroad is wasting corporate resources to extort money from the most pro railroad sector of the public. UP needs us and I for one will not be there. Besides, Staggers has been a disaster. Today's railroad industry is barely able to keep up with normal demand, what would happen if widespread flooding damaged large parts on the national system. the "lean-and-mean system would take weeks to recover and would drag down the whole economy with it. Those short lines that operate so much of today's system would be put right out of business. Today's class 1 executives don't know what's good for them.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 8:50 AM
For those that say they will no longer buy UP engines or cars you are only hurting the manufacturers.Plus there are those that will continue to buy UP items.No my friends How about CSX and its falling flags? Then when BNSF,NS,KCS,CP CN and the short lines join the licensing parade then what? Are you going to stop buying everything?
Get a grip on life you been paying licensing fees for a long time..You have Ford or Chevy' on your layout? They're license product.Got a Kenworth truck on your layout? Yup its license..Nothing new here.Its best to move on to bigger and better things..
And no there is no railroads that needs us..After all to them we are just trespassing train buffs that should get a life.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 9:17 AM
I have no problem with UP licensing their logos etc. I do think that licensing the "fallen flags" is different though. UP's argument of protecting its image doesn't hold water with respect to DRGW and SP.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, October 6, 2004 9:29 AM
Brake, once a trademark has been left unprotected by its owner and is used for free, the owner loses the right to protect that trademark in that context. For instance, Otis Elevator made a form of moving staircase it called an Escalator. Other companies starting calling their moving staircases escalators and Otis did not protect their trademark. Result-- Otis lost when they subsequently tried to protect their trademark.
Union Pacific's claim is even weaker, because the use that they are trying to restrict is unrelated to their primary business which is providing transportation of bulk commodities by rail in the western United States. Union Pacific's position in this matter is morally unjustifiable, but the same old apologists for big business still crawl out of the woodwork to defend the indefensible. I make this prediction, If railroads aren't partially reregulated, they will be in as bad a shape sometime within the next 25 years as they were 25 years ago.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Thursday, October 7, 2004 3:58 PM
John,I am wondering about cars still lettered for C&NW,SP,MP and CHTT without the UP sheild.These are active UP fallen flag cars.Of course TP and C&EI (MP) cars hasn't been around for years.There seems to be a loop hole as long as some fallen flag cars remain in service.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 7, 2004 4:20 PM
It just doesn't stop, does it? Let's get back to modeling. Licensing trademarks is nothing new. Enough.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 665 posts
Posted by darth9x9 on Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:33 AM
We'll see how much of a price difference there will be between UP equipment and others. Or will Athearn spread the cost across all models? Time will tell.

BC

Bill Carl (modeling Chessie and predecessors from 1973-1983)
Member of Four County Society of Model Engineers
NCE DCC Master
Visit the FCSME at www.FCSME.org
Modular railroading at its best!
If it has an X in it, it sucks! And yes, I just had my modeler's license renewed last week!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!