Login
or
Register
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Home
»
Model Railroader
»
Forums
»
General Discussion (Model Railroader)
»
UNION PACIFIC VS ATHEARN
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
Brake, once a trademark has been left unprotected by its owner and is used for free, the owner loses the right to protect that trademark in that context. For instance, Otis Elevator made a form of moving staircase it called an Escalator. Other companies starting calling their moving staircases escalators and Otis did not protect their trademark. Result-- Otis lost when they subsequently tried to protect their trademark. <br />Union Pacific's claim is even weaker, because the use that they are trying to restrict is unrelated to their primary business which is providing transportation of bulk commodities by rail in the western United States. Union Pacific's position in this matter is morally unjustifiable, but the same old apologists for big business still crawl out of the woodwork to defend the indefensible. I make this prediction, If railroads aren't partially reregulated, they will be in as bad a shape sometime within the next 25 years as they were 25 years ago.
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Subscriber & Member Login
Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!
Login
Register
Users Online
There are no community member online
Search the Community
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter
See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter
and get model railroad news in your inbox!
Sign up