Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Loco (Snow plow) shorting at incline transition

1269 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2016
  • 172 posts
Loco (Snow plow) shorting at incline transition
Posted by Lonnie Utah on Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:36 AM

Need a little advice. Long story short (no pun intended) we have 1 locomotive who's snow plow is contacting the rails at the start of a 3% incline. Of course the snow plow is made of metal coated with plastic, which has since been scraped off. It's only an issue at slow speed. 

 

So if it were you, how would you proceed?  The simplest solution I can think of is to coat or paint the area with a clear or same color insulating material. The most complex is to rip up that section of track and see if I can rework the transition. There is also replacing the metal snow plow with a pure plastic one (This is a ES44AC by tower 55).

 

Thanks in advance.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:53 AM

Having gone through the same problems at a transition I decided to do it right and fix the transition.  What I thought was a well made transition wasn’t.  Moving the transition a few inches and some thin shims made everything much better.
 
Somewhere or sometime down the road it will getcha again if you don’t fix it.
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    November 2016
  • 172 posts
Posted by Lonnie Utah on Saturday, August 26, 2017 10:50 AM

Mel,

As much as I dread it, I'm inclined to agree with you.  So with that being said, how would you go about that process?  The transition is basically just 2 9" straight tracks.  To the Mk1 mod 0 eyeball it looks like it needs to only come up a few mm.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, August 26, 2017 11:04 AM

It probably does only need a slight tweak. That it's 2 pieces of track is probably your problem, it probably has a vertical kink at the joint.

                                          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Saturday, August 26, 2017 11:48 AM

Transition in track laying lingo does not been the same thing as an abrupt change between 0 degree flat track and 3%

Cuyama in this thread uses one car length per percent of grade. 

http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/11/t/220453.aspx

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,682 posts
Posted by Lone Wolf and Santa Fe on Saturday, August 26, 2017 1:19 PM

I’ve had the same problem before. One solution is to raise the snowplow slightly or file off some of the bottom. But as stated above, you are best off fixing the transition. If you start the grade a little earlier you can make it 1.5% and then another 1.5% so it’s not just a sudden change. If you just stretch it out over another 9 inches you should be ok. It’s just too sharp at one point.

Modeling a fictional version of California set in the 1990s Lone Wolf and Santa Fe Railroad
  • Member since
    November 2016
  • 172 posts
Posted by Lonnie Utah on Saturday, August 26, 2017 1:59 PM

rrinker
That it's 2 pieces of track is probably your problem, it probably has a vertical kink at the joint.

 

That's exactly the problem Randy. 

 

So how do you delicately removed glued and balleted track. lol.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, August 26, 2017 3:59 PM

I use a 1½” wide putty/mud knife to slide under the ties.  I sharpen the edge with a file then gradually work it under the ties.  Unless you have some pretty strong ballast glue it should give way to the blade and allow the track to be raised.  It shouldn’t take much shimming to improve the transition.  Use a straight edge (steel rulers work) until you get a smaller smooth gap in the transition, no abrupt kinks.
 
I use either thin cardstock or .02” Styrene sheet for shims.  
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Saturday, August 26, 2017 6:15 PM

I agree with Mel.  Soften any caulking or glue with water if that will work, then shove an old kitchen knife or something like a slim jim under the ties and slice back and forth to free about six inches on either side of where you first shoved the knife.  Shim on either side of the midpoint, and force some ballast grains under there.  Start with the stuff already in place...you can pour more over top the area once you know you have the lifted tracks firmly supported with the older groomed ballast grains that you have attempted to force below and under the lifted ties.  Then, re-groom some newer ballast grains, pour some thinned ballast adhesive into it, let it harden, and you should have a better experience.

Don't forget to wipe off the rails in that area after gluing the ballast.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Saturday, August 26, 2017 6:58 PM

A lot of the problem can be pointed to the 9" pieces of snap track - they don't flex vertically. The only "transition" is right at the rail joint. I'd toss the snap track in the transition area and relace it with a pieces of flex track that will also flex vertically giving a much smoother transition into the actual grade.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, August 26, 2017 7:19 PM

Mark makes a good point, working with short sections of track at a transition will be very difficult.  It will be much easier with a longer section of flex track.
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    November 2016
  • 172 posts
Posted by Lonnie Utah on Saturday, August 26, 2017 9:49 PM

Thanks everyone. It doesn't seem as daunting as when I first thought about it. 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!