Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Removing Engine Weights for DCC conversion

1604 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Removing Engine Weights for DCC conversion
Posted by BigDaddy on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 1:52 PM

I was watching a Youtube video where the author just took out the from weight of an RS to make room for the sound card and speaker.  How detrimental is that to the pulling ability of the loco?  

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 2:18 PM

I’m like Tim Taylor on Home Improvement, More Power Argh, Argh.
 
I add weight I don’t remove it.  #8 birdshot works pretty good for adding weight in tiny areas.  I use CA to keep it in place.
 
A stock Rivarossi Cab Forward has 2.6 oz drawbar, I remoter them with can motors and add up to 10 ounces of birdshot.  The drawbar goes up dramatically, several of my Rivarossi articulateds have over 6 ounces of drawbar pull.   
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:23 PM

Weigh your loco before

Weigh your loco after

if it's 80% of it's original weight, then you'll have roughly 80% of the pulling power

That said, I don't think it's that big a loss.  Speaker magnets replace some of the weight.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 4:13 PM

My weight replacement project. Done around six or so years ago. The metal melts a the boiling point of water.

I have also used birdshot in HO tender drive DCC locos.

A HO Bachmann 70 ton with DCC on board. Removed upper weight and decoder. Weighed the weight with digital scale.

Poured two new weights. Installed both weights, LokSound Micro plus 16mm x 35 mm oval speaker.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: Shenandoah Valley
  • 9,094 posts
Posted by BigDaddy on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:01 PM

I don't see how adding weight is going to make room for a sound card and speaker, unless I find some depleted uranium at the show this weekend.

Rich, are those orange lego things your mold?  Was this Wood's metal?  I never knew that alloys could melt far below the temps of their components.  Fascinating, worth the price of starting the thread.

Henry

COB Potomac & Northern

Shenandoah Valley

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:11 PM

Lego blocks. Work very well. At one time a few LHS sold a metal that melts at the boiling point of water. I bought the metal online from McMaster-Carr Supply.

When I retired back in 2006 as a mechanic, I ordered a lot from this company and they did well with small orders like mine. Loads of all kinds of small hardware for model railroaders.

No doubt there are different ways of making weights with this type of metal. I won't say it was cost effective but I got what I wanted.

Probably can be poured thin and folded over when set.

I know some buy thin lead sheets.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Philly area
  • 174 posts
Posted by SS Express on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:26 PM

Surprisingly enough I was able to remove both front and rear weight from an old atlas yellow box RS-3 to make room for a small decoder and a botched up front and rear light install. The loco runs very well and it has no issues pulling cars up a grade. I really thought taking out the weight would hurt the loco but it didn't.

Rich

Building the RDG, PRR, CNJ, LV railroads on the Huntington Valley Basement Lines.......
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:55 PM

This issue comes under the heading of, Your Mileage will vary.

Model Railroading is a lot of experimenting.

Not everything is plug and play.

Rich

 

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 8:21 PM

Even before I started installing sound, I used to REMOVE weight from my engines ! I figured a single four axle engine should be able to pull ten cars on my ruling grade and should be just heavy enough to do so. Any more cars and it couldn't .... so a second engine would be added for up to twenty cars.

I could have left the weights in and probably pulled 30 cars with a single engine - but I didn't want it to .... for real.

Any more than twenty cars would require the crew to add a third unit or send out for a helper to assist in pushing the train over the steepest part of the layout. Just my way of "forcing" operators to pay attention to the make up of their train.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Canada, eh?
  • 13,375 posts
Posted by doctorwayne on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 10:54 PM

Without traction tires, about the most pulling power you'll get from a loco is approximately 25% of its weight, but many locos are considerably less.  For steam, the weight should be balanced at the centrepoint of the drivers' wheelbase - otherwise the equation is meaningless.
I add weight to all of my locos, but that's one of the advantages of running DC. Smile, Wink & Grin

Wayne

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: SE. WI.
  • 8,253 posts
Posted by mbinsewi on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 11:15 PM

Also consider that the author wanted sound, and was willing to give up the weight (space) to acheive it.  Maybe the RS is just for switching, maybe his layout is flat, and,  just maybe, there are other places where the author figured he could add weight, if needed.  For my switching locos, I like adding weight, as I have many turn outs to slowly crawl over, but, I do not have sound.

Mike.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:24 AM

The metal is a cesium alloy metal.  The same kind used in water sprinklers. http://csalloys.com/

When the heat gets to high, the plug on the sprinkler melts causing the plug to be pushed out.  The ensuing pipe pressure change causes the other sprinkler heads to start raining at the same time.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!