MRC Advanced Squared System

[Srwill2]

I very much appreciate the feedback.  I am looking for simple and am beginning to think maybe MRC is my best choice.  Great help!

[arbe1948]

MRC DCC since 2004 for me,  Affordable, reliable, easy to use.  A couple times, programming a loco didn't seem to "take.'  Another try and and it worked each time.  Likely something I overlooked the first time.  I enjoy the feel and use of the hand-held.  I've heard of the power switch issue, I guess the idea of using a master shut off to avoid this is good.

[LIRRs]

Hi.

I have been using my MRC A2 now for 5 years and have the MRC booster as well.  The control of locomotives and accessories is very intuitive with a display that is easily legible.  CV's are easily programmed on the Main and on the Programming track.  Consisting is also easily achieved with only a few steps.  The only issue I have is the on/off switch on the main console does not function anymore (it is now in permanent on); I have the console connected to a power strip.  I recommend the system.

All the best.

Reinhard 

[RR_Mel]

Welcome to the forum!

 

I’m like you, I grew up using MRC power packs and never has a single problem with any of them for close to 50 years.

 

I went with Prodigy Advance Squared over ten years ago an I’m quite satisfied!  I find it very easy to use and program.  I have 4 non sound MRC decoders and 4 MRC sound decoders that run very good and the sound is great.  I only use sound decoders in my steam locomotives, the motor and gearing in my diesels work for me.  My fleet is fairly well balanced between steam and diesel.  The only reason I went DCC is to have sound in my steam locomotives.

 

 

Because I’m an SP Cab Forward freak I went with Soundtraxx decoders for their true Cab Forward sound.  I also use non sound Digitrax decoders in several special locomotives for their 6 function operation.  I have two E7A diesel dummies with video cameras and a snowblower with a rotating blade that are controlled by DCC functions.

 

I haven’t run into anything that the MRC DCC system won’t do and do very well.  I’m not a rivet counter but I am a perfectionist and everything must work correctly or I’m not a happy camper.

 

I’m not totally sold on DCC (nothing the do with my MRC System) so I run dual mode.  I have over 80 locomotives and there’s no way I’m going to equip all of them with decoders!  $$$$  I prefer running in DC mode but I have to have sound coming from my steam locomotives when they are pulling my 3½% grades. 

 

 

Mel

 

Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951

 

My Model Railroad   

http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/

 

Bakersfield, California

 

I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

[redram58]

Been using since 2005 simple easy to use.Wireless even better.

[Srwill2]

I am about ready to convert to DCC, and for the past year have been doing a LOT of research, which has included talking to lots of DCC users, reading forums and websites on DCC  AND actually reading the manuals from each manufacturer (good info).  My 2 finalists are the zephyr and advanced squared.  Digitrax is most common in my area, but A2 seems to be the simplest to use and I am looking for simple, won't be running turnout motors, routing, etc, just train operations.

With that said, MRC seems to get a fair amount of bad press, but since I have been using their DC products for 30 yrs, i don't have any bad to say.  

I would really like to hear from A2 users on what they like and dislike and if they are happy with their decision.  

My huge HO railroad is 13 x 13 and is usually a 1 or 2 person affair, so I don't need the capacity of a lot of operators.  

Thanks for your input.