Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

New update from Bluerail

5089 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,217 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, November 7, 2015 7:22 AM

By contrast, most of the folks that I know who use DCC love it and the ones who don't either aren't interested in it (and that's fine), or base their impressions from someone else's layout who struggled with it.  Like Randy, I hardly ever needed to clean my track.  And my locomotives - sound and non-sound - ran flawlessly, with only a mild hick-up on rare occasions.

Room environment "quality", use of metal wheels, how your track is wired are all factors to how well your layout will operate on DCC.  If you give special care to these factors as you build your layout, you'll eliminate the frustrations.  A badly-wired layout will make DC or DCC an "annoying" experience.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Friday, November 6, 2015 11:14 PM

Not to get into a rant but most that I know who use it are annoyed with it, they love the features but it is highly sensitive to dirty track (especily sound). Even in DC, problems arise like I guess I created more dust than I thought when I did this or that, or today I found out I forgot to hook up power to a new siding I built, dropped the wires and everything, just didn't hook them up to the buss.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 257 posts
Posted by RR Baron on Friday, November 6, 2015 6:15 PM

rrinker

 The biggest problem msot people have with DCC is with getting the decoder installed without frying it or blowing up the light bulbs. That isn't going to change - notice already one question on here about it. BR will have the exact same issues - first one being there is no real meaning to the term "DCC Ready" so just because the BR receivers will have the same 9 pin connections as a DCC decoder  doesn't mean the installs will be any easier. The same issues will pop up - is the motor properly isolated? Are resistors provided for LED headlights? Etc.

                 --Randy

 

 

After more than 10 years helping individuals with DCC determine why things are not as exspected
--- the problem most have with DCC is ASSUME.
 
RR Baron

 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 6, 2015 1:37 PM

 The biggest problem msot people have with DCC is with getting the decoder installed without frying it or blowing up the light bulbs. That isn't going to change - notice already one question on here about it. BR will have the exact same issues - first one being there is no real meaning to the term "DCC Ready" so just because the BR receivers will have the same 9 pin connections as a DCC decoder  doesn't mean the installs will be any easier. The same issues will pop up - is the motor properly isolated? Are resistors provided for LED headlights? Etc.

                 --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Friday, November 6, 2015 11:56 AM

The stuff these companys do has always worked, it has just been that it was too hard to get everything working together, even now in the DCC world with their bosters and CV's and even though it is all supposed to be compatable, there is always problems, even at the clubs with knolegable people, sometimes they just forget something. For this to take off, it needs to be dummy proof!

  • Member since
    September 2015
  • From: NW Maryland
  • 69 posts
Posted by RRR_BethBr on Friday, November 6, 2015 11:09 AM

Really excited to see if this meets the claims BlueRail have been making with their demos and marketing material.

The potential of BT command over a standard based on 30+ year old computer tech requiring substantial hardware infrastructure is clear. Whether any particular implementation (and specifically, this one from BlueRail/Bachmann) actually acheives that potential has yet to be proven.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Thursday, November 5, 2015 1:20 PM

I must be doing something wrong. I like to run my stuff at a crawl and I have a full ceiling, so not much dust. I can run stuff on the main real slow, 1/2 hour to go about 100'. The more I run stuff the better it gets but since I don't have the final SPST for the frogs in, I just use jumpers for a temp connection. I mainly run Proto 2000 steam 0-6-0 and 0-8-0 and Kato NW2's for the diesels, all can go down to 18" radius but those are mainly on the hidden track and a few sidings.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, November 5, 2015 12:38 PM

rrebell

Code 100 is less sensitive than code 70. Also, what do you run, I run small engines.

 

 I use code 83. Most of my locos are first gen diesels, GP7's and RS-3's. Since I never did finish the cement plan penninsula where the 44 tonner was supposed to live as a plant switcher, I occasionally ran it all over the layout as somethign different. On the layotu before that, the one in the unfinished basement, other equipment besides mine ran, in some cases older brass MU cars and steam locos that only picked up power on a couple of wheels on each side. No stalling problems. The one slightly less commonly done thing I do is that I have power feeds at every rail joiner. I solder sections of flex track for curves, but most of the rest is left unsoldered. Both the soldered and unsoldered joints all have power feeds. Turnouts, since they were also Atlas, had 3 sets of power feeds, one on each leg. I never did the full "gleaming" treatment (never applied any sort of metal polish to my rails) but I was for a long time using the metal handle of my heavy duty wire cutters to burnish the top of the rail somewhat. That could be the real trick, closing up the microscratches that allow dirt to accumulate and break contact.

               --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Thursday, November 5, 2015 12:08 PM

Steven S
They say they're using Bluetooth Smart, which according to the spec chart at its Wiki page has a theoretical maximum distance of 100 meters (300').

If the phones and tablets don't use the same technology, they will be the limiting factor, I think.

I'll bow out of this conversation now. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Thursday, November 5, 2015 11:14 AM

They got videos on u-tube close to that range but they only say 100' do to the fact, things get in the way. Should be no problem for my 30' layout.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Thursday, November 5, 2015 7:40 AM

cuyama
I don’t see anything from Bluerail about the class of Bluetooth they are using

 

They say they're using Bluetooth Smart, which according to the spec chart at its Wiki page has a theoretical maximum distance of 100 meters (300').

 

Steve S

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Wednesday, November 4, 2015 8:25 PM

Code 100 is less sensitive than code 70. Also, what do you run, I run small engines.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, November 4, 2015 4:24 PM

 I guess I am one of the odd ones, I never clean my track - except after ballasting and painting. Once cleaned, it has stayed clean, even on sidings. I installed wires to every switch frog to power them, but never hooked them up because even my 44 tonner could crawl through and not stall.

 No one smokes in the house, although that was not true a couple of layouts ago. My last one was in a carpeted and finished bedroom, but the one before was in a basement with bare cement walls and floors, and open joists above - no drop ceiling. After an initial track cleaning once the sides fo the rails were all painted, I never again used the Brite Boy. Occasionally used the vac to suck up construction dust but that was it. Very reliable operation. All the "horror stories" make me wonder if I should worry about using other than Atlas nickel silver track - whichw as all I have used on those layouts. All rolling stock has metal wheels, I do not run anything with plastic wheels.

                            --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:03 AM

Last the real reason to go battery is the flustraiting experience I just had. Went to run engine in newly done yard, worked fine on area I just finished ballasting, then relized reason was I had not cleaned the track in the bad area, did that, still problems, switches this time as the contact wasn't as good as before and I hadn't yet installed the live frog wiring (Shinohara turnouts). Now these are easily fixable problems but with battery, they would be a non issue (also being coat weather now, very bulky, the cleaning was akward around the buildings etc., knocked down a few trees).

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:30 PM

jasperofzeal

Is this the new DC vs DCC argument? In this case it's DCC vs BT.  Seems that when any new system is announced, it ruffles some people's feathers.  I recall seeing the same discussions taking place when Ring Engineering came out with their railpro system.  I'd be willing to wager a donut that in the future, the same arguments will happen when some other system comes out.  Bottom line, if you find that any new system is not for you, state your point (if you must) and leave it at that.

 

Not really, there are some coming out that use DCC as part of their system.  Trouble with Crest and Ring is their stuff is expencive to get into. What we realy have here is the begining of what DCC went though at first only in this case we have a company backing the idea that is known for changing the game, Bachmann. I remember when the Spectrum line first came out, what a difference. Then they brought out their On30 stuff, yes it had been done before but it was a very minor scale, On3 being the gauge of choice in O narrow with the largest following.  So I beleive that with Bachmann behind them, they will become quite viable. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Austin, Texas
  • 875 posts
Posted by jasperofzeal on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:49 PM

Is this the new DC vs DCC argument? In this case it's DCC vs BT.  Seems that when any new system is announced, it ruffles some people's feathers.  I recall seeing the same discussions taking place when Ring Engineering came out with their railpro system.  I'd be willing to wager a donut that in the future, the same arguments will happen when some other system comes out.  Bottom line, if you find that any new system is not for you, state your point (if you must) and leave it at that.

TONY

"If we never take the time, how can we ever have the time." - Merovingian (Matrix Reloaded)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 7:49 PM

I am talking about the Train Engineer onboard receiver set up, no, no batteries yet, it runs on DC turned up or DCC. Adding batterys is the next step but now that this new system is comming out, already equiped for conversion to battery, it is much cheaper and a no brainer for battery conversion, remember that the batteries we are talking about will not be in common use for a few years to the average person. But our trains (if built right, lubed tuned properly) will accually run on a common 9volt battery, it has been done.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 5:31 PM

rrebell
What I like about the new stuff is it is less than half the size and much more easy to convert to dead rail too.

So you haven't actually done any battery conversions yet yourself, is that correct?

rrebell
The relistic range of the new system is 100' though I have seen tests of over 250'.

What system are you talking about? That can't be Bluerail (the topic of this thread). Testing any wireless system unobstructed outdoors with one controller and one receiver is much different from use in an indoor large layout environment with many bodies moving around, multiple controllers, multiple decoders, etc..

I think it might be helpful to be clear about the system being discussed rather than posting random unrelated statements.

rrebell
The biggest club I have been part of was less than 100'.

As I noted in my post, the issue isn't only raw distance, but also the effects of obstructions, attenuation, and antenna orientation.

An advantage of most DCC wireless systems is that the actual wireless transceiver (and/or repeaters) may be positioned on the ceiling, creating better signal strength to the controllers than would be true with Bluetooth on a hand-held phone. This also mitigates some of the RF propagation challenges of other humans in the aisles.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 5:12 PM

I see your concerns, the radio system I currently have is limited to 99 locos, more than I have. What I like about the new stuff is it is less than half the size and much more easy to convert to dead rail too. Don't expect many DCC people to go over but those that are DC might. The relistic range of the new system is 100' though I have seen tests of over 250'. The biggest club I have been part of was less than 100'.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 4:20 PM

rrebell
With batteries, no cleaning. ... When I add up all the money I spent on a DC setup, I could do many an engine.

How much were the batteries? Can you share some photos of your wireless battery installations in HO models? How many engines have you converted so far?

rrebell
As far as DCC, I know people who have spent around $800 or more for their systems and that dose not count what they spent on decoders.

One can buy wireless DCC starter sets and a number of decoders for much less than that at street price. Apples-to-apples comparisons are important.

One of the challenges with using Bluetooth to control model railroads in real situations relates to the propagation characteristics of that RF technology. Bluetooth actually comes in 3 classes and ranges vary substantially:
Class 3 radios – have a range of up to 1 meter or 3 feet
Class 2 radios – most commonly found in mobile devices – have a range of 10 meters or 33 feet
Class 1 radios – used primarily in industrial use cases – have a range of 100 meters or 330 feet

I don’t see anything from Bluerail about the class of Bluetooth they are using in their own devices, but some, if not all, of the devices they suggest using for control are Class 2 (and possibly Class 3). So the effective range may be an issue.

Compounding this, humans are bags of water. (Yes, even though some seem like bags of hot gas).

Water is a severe attenuator of RF signals, especially when antennas are small and not oriented optimally (as would be the case in a decoder moving around in an engine on a layout). In a larger model railroad environment, with human bodies moving around in the aisles and the small antenna in the locomotive occasionally shielded by multiple humans from low-power transmitters, performance may be a concern.

In addition, the process of "pairing" Bluetooth devices in situations with a large number of locomotives and controlling devices could prove problematic. This is simple in DCC, as any decoder (or multi-unit consist) may be easily acquired by any controller. That was part of the design from the beginning and works well.

In contrast, Bluetooth technology (in general) is not really optimized for a number of different devices being controlled at various times by a number of different users (as might happen with an engine used on one train early in a session by one operator, then by another operator on a separate train later).

Bluerail does not seem to have explained how their technology will work in larger home or club layouts with many locos and operators, nor how multi-unit consists may be supported. They may have a plan in mind, but what's been described (so far, in fairness) seems more like a solution for one-loco trainsets.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 11:01 AM

If you really operate your trains, then cleaning all the sidings esspecially in yards can be a real pain. With batteries, no cleaning. No sound interuptions (keep alives can only do so much). No wiring of track, no need for powered frogs. When I add up all the money I spent on a DC setup, I could do many an engine. You save money on wire (it was becoming a major expence untill the bottom fell out of the copper market), no transformers, I use 3 and just to $65 each at the cheapest place I know $100 retail, want walkaround, original retail on my system was around $300. Add the track cleaning cars (a couple hundred for me) and the supplys to go with. You see where I am going. I will not even go into all the fun of making everything work right or the problems of shorts, if there is a problem, you know instantly where the problem is.

  • Member since
    August 2015
  • 371 posts
Posted by fieryturbo on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:02 AM

Yeah, I'm sorry, but trains running on batteries *really* sucks.  I mentioned this to a friend who's also neck deep in tech, and he said "Then what, the battery runs out and you have to charge it? Lame."

Where is there going to be anywhere large enough to run a train, and no power? I don't understand the dead rail argument.  It solves a problem nobody has.

I think the bluetooth control is neat, but that is separate from the uselessness of dead rail.

Julian

Modeling Pre-WP merger UP (1974-81)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:44 AM

Remember you can run this at the same time you run DCC but the promise of easy deadrail is what all the clamor is about. Before this you had to buy lots of separate parts and follow someones instructions to put it all together and hopefully you had the skills to do it right. Even for wireless plug and play alone, this is an upgrade. As far as the phone for the throttle, I expect stand alone throttles or some add to phone devise of which there are already some out there for other peoples stuff. The real problem with DCC is the sqeaky clean rails you need, even with keep alive's this can be an issue. With dead rail all you need is track, even rusty old track, or wood in the shape of track, plastic ? Also no more souldering to rails, as a hobby you might be able at some point to get rid of souldering altogether.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Monday, November 2, 2015 7:00 PM

rrebell
$75 for stand alone decoder

 

Surprise Yikes!  If you've only got one or two locos it would be cost effective.  But much more than that and you might as well go DCC.  Hopefully some more players will join the competition and drive prices down.

 

Steve S

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Monday, November 2, 2015 6:19 PM

$75 for stand alone decoder, but the big selling point is the dead rail connections and it is DCC ready compatable. It can run on any layout too (DC layout has to be put at full throttle). Basicly it is the same idea as one put out by Crest many moons ago, but theirs was radio controled and the decoder was much larger and also it was way more expencive. At least their first endevor has all the bells and whistles or the built in connections for them. As far as DCC, I know people who have spent around $800 or more for their systems and that dose not count what they spent on decoders.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 743 posts
Posted by Steven S on Monday, November 2, 2015 5:07 PM

gregc
i'm having a hard time understanding the market for this.

 

Someone who doesn't want to plunk down three or four hundred dollars for a Digitrax base unit.  Just get a cheap 12V power source, buy a decoder board for your loco, and use your cell phone (or buy a cheap Android one to use as a dedicated throttle.)  It would be good for someone who is just starting out and doesn't want the hassles of DC or the expense of DCC. 

 

Someone else mentioned the price has to come down.  I don't see anything at their website about price.

 

Steve S

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,660 posts
Posted by gregc on Monday, November 2, 2015 4:16 PM

i'm having a hard time understanding the market for this.   (i'm not a gadget guy.  I'm surrounded by enought tech at my job).

New stuff is usually either less expensive or does more.   Does bluerail do anything more than a DCC decoder does?   Does it work where DCC doesn't (e.g. really small space)?

If you already have DCC, would you want to convert your layout to bluerail?

if you have a DC layout, could you convert some of your locos to bluerail.

if you're starting a new layout and choose bluerail, you need some sort of power supply to the rails.   I'm guessing you could use on old DC controller or you could use a wall wart.  Is this the best situation for using blue rail.

is the main advantage the use of your phone to control your layout?   What happens if you need to use the phone?

while it's pretty slick to have a bluetooth interface to your loco, i doubt that anything could be much simpler and inexpensive than the communication interface to a DCC decoder by inverting polarity of power.

for larger layouts, isn't the most expensive part of the system the decoders in each and every locomotive?

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    August 2015
  • 371 posts
Posted by fieryturbo on Monday, November 2, 2015 3:33 PM

rrebell

A Bachmann set?

 

 

Roco.  I control it with Rocrail on my Mac and iThrottle on my iPhone & iPad.

Julian

Modeling Pre-WP merger UP (1974-81)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: west coast
  • 7,633 posts
Posted by rrebell on Monday, November 2, 2015 2:52 PM

A Bachmann set?

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!