Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Experience With Decoder Defect Rates?

4141 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,878 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, November 21, 2014 5:18 PM

JOHN BRUCE III
My estimate of the defect situation, having read and reflected on the posts here, is that social media (such as a forum) tends to exaggerate the success of participants -- people don't want to set themselves up to seem like losers in any context. Thus I tend to take estimates of less than 1% defect rate here with a grain of salt.

It seems to me that it is far more likely that someone who has had a failure will post on these forums.  Your original post is a prime example.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Friday, November 21, 2014 3:53 PM

JOHN BRUCE III

 

 
rrinker

 I this case it kind of is, since he's installing decoders in bulk for customers. The shop is buying them and selling them to customers. If they are bad, they are bad, if not, they're not. That's different from customers just buying decoders and then going off to install themselves. In that case, there may not be accurate if the customer sends it right back to the manufacturer.

             --Randy

 

 

 

I'm not sure which case you're talking about -- if it's Mark R above, he says he's doing shipping and repairs, and he speaks of looking at a soldering error by a customer. I don't think he's saying he does bulk installs, at least if this is Mark R's post you're referring to. I still think decoder manufacturers prefer the decoder be returned to them for warranty, and a retailer isn't going to see all the returns (if any, in fact).

 

IF Randy IS referring to my post, I'm referring to factory installed decoders that are coming back in defective.

I also have my own business where I install decoders. I use TCS for non-sound and Loksound for sound decoders and have never had a single one returned defective.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Friday, November 21, 2014 2:42 PM

rrinker

 I this case it kind of is, since he's installing decoders in bulk for customers. The shop is buying them and selling them to customers. If they are bad, they are bad, if not, they're not. That's different from customers just buying decoders and then going off to install themselves. In that case, there may not be accurate if the customer sends it right back to the manufacturer.

             --Randy

 

I'm not sure which case you're talking about -- if it's Mark R above, he says he's doing shipping and repairs, and he speaks of looking at a soldering error by a customer. I don't think he's saying he does bulk installs, at least if this is Mark R's post you're referring to. I still think decoder manufacturers prefer the decoder be returned to them for warranty, and a retailer isn't going to see all the returns (if any, in fact).

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 21, 2014 2:30 PM

 I this case it kind of is, since he's installing decoders in bulk for customers. The shop is buying them and selling them to customers. If they are bad, they are bad, if not, they're not. That's different from customers just buying decoders and then going off to install themselves. In that case, there may not be accurate if the customer sends it right back to the manufacturer.

             --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Friday, November 21, 2014 1:48 PM

In looking at the Digitrax form for warranty repair concerning the DH126 I had trouble with the other day, Digitrax specifically instructs users NOT to return the decoder to the retailer, but to return directly to them. So I have a feeling that a retail store isn't going to get a good picture of all returns, as the normal decoder suppliers seem to be set up with various goofproof, no worries, or whatever warranty protection.

My estimate of the defect situation, having read and reflected on the posts here, is that social media (such as a forum) tends to exaggerate the success of participants -- people don't want to set themselves up to seem like losers in any context. Thus I tend to take estimates of less than 1% defect rate here with a grain of salt.

I would estimate I've installed maybe 30 decoders, leaving aside factory-ready sound locos. Of those, I believe I've had what appear to be verifiable product defects in at least 5. Not solder errors, not squashing the decoder, but what appear pretty plainly to be function output failures.

What seems to be solid opinion here suggests NCE DA-SRs are the biggest problem, and this may be where my numbers are exaggerated. But DA-SRs aren't the only problem, and correspondence with Digitrax suggests that, whatever the cause, their repair and warranty support guy is busy.

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:46 PM

I started working at my local hobby shop part time a number of months ago, mostly doing shipping, repairs, etc.

In the time I have been there, the factory installed Tsunami decoders are hands down the most returned decoders as defective. Aside from those, there has been two TCS decoders and one Loksound. Judging by the burnt component on the Loksound, the user inadvertantly touched the two speaker wires together as the audio amp was burnt.

In a positive light, all decoders have been replaced by the manufacturer as warrantee replacements free of charge.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 10:00 AM

My programming track is separate. It's just simpler. And safer.

The issue with a programming track connected to the rest of the layout is that you need more than just the one set of gaps to be safe. You really need a double set of gaps, with the track in between dead when the programming track is being used. That way, if you forget that you MUST not bridge the gap to full power rail, you end up on dead rail, instead it being live. Tends to keep the smoke inside better that way.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:49 AM

 The Auto-SW I mentioned takes the thought out of it, as the program track is dosconnected from the system until you enter a program mode other than program on the main. With the 'standard' wiring of the Auto-SW, the program track is either dead, or in program mode, it never sees full track power. The manual and some supplemental information on the NCE site shows a way to use it for a drive on/drive off program track, but now you are back to the program track having full track power at some times.

 I don;t use NCE, but I haven't had a live program track on any of my layouts since switching to DCC. Usually it's a spare section of flex track connected to the program outputs. or in the past 4-5 years, I have a dedicated program unit with track, a PR3, and a Lokprogrammer so decoders being programmed aren't even on the layout in any way. As a bonus this program track has coupler height gauges as well as markings for car weights based on length. If I could build the scale right into the whole works I would.

                 --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 25 posts
Posted by Iansa on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:39 PM

I do not own or op NCE powercab but I do know full programing mode can be used.

There is, of course, no separate programing track as such but I know a separate programing track can be isolated from main layout/track.

DPDT centre of switch is installed between system and layout.

Two wires from system go to the 2 centre terminals on DPDT switch.

Two wires go from 2 terminals at one end of switch to main layout.

Two wires from 2 other end terminals on switch go to separate programing track.

Switch one way puts power to main layout and program track is isolated, switch other way connects system to program track and main layout is isolated.

To test, program, or read CVs put switch so only program track is connected to system and main layout/track is isolated IE no power to it.

Before putting loco on program track put system into program mode which will make sure no power is on P/track.

Now put loco on P/track and read address and or some CVs.

You can put switch to centre off so no power is going to either main track or program track then put loco on P/track.

Put system in program mode then switch to program position.

I emphasise that system must be put in program mode before connecting program track to system

If short or problem is shown do not give decoder full power as disaster will most likely happen.

I know a few NCE powercab user have their system set up this way and works very well for them.

Some even have the programing track incorporated in their layout as a dead end siding or spur line so thay can drive the loco on to main track when all is OK and programed the way they want.

The above does take a little thought before doing any programing etc.

Cheers

Ian

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 4:30 PM

CV 8 = 8 is the universal reset to factory default on all Digitrax mobile decoders.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:58 PM

Rich,

Sounds like a specific CV for the reset you quoted. Others vary, so depending on what's going in, checking the docs are always a good thing. I think NCE is CV 30 to 2, for instance.

I agree about the decoder not having a preset long address. The only one in there is usually the short address 3. I think that could well be a bad one that got recycled to a customer somehow from the sounds of it.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:41 PM

Setting CV08 to a value of 08 will reset the decoder to factory defaults.  

I assume that you have tried that.

A new decoder out of the box should not have a long address pre-set.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Tuesday, November 18, 2014 3:24 PM

Funny experience: I just got a new Digitrax DH126D that I ordered with a new loco from a well-known on line supplier. I installed it -- not much way to screw it up, the 9-pin plug can only go in one way, the socket is a factory item. On the first test run, the headlight blinked on and off intermittently, couldn't turn it on full on F0, couldn't turn it off full. I tried to program it, it was a presumably new decoder, but it already had a long address programmed.

I happened to have another DH126 on hand, swapped this one out, and the loco worked as specified, programmed with no long address in the default. No soldering for me to screw up.

I doubt if the well known retailer played any games with it -- looks like this somehow came bad from Digitrax for whatever reason.

Given some of the explanations here, this sounds like it has a bad output function, and I've e-mailed Digitrax. I am wondering if an already-returned bad decoder was somehow mistakenly recycled there, since it already had a long address.

However, in the context of this thread, I am having a hard time thinking that the less than 1% defect rate some guys have mentioned here is usual.

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Monday, November 17, 2014 11:19 AM

Yeah, a Tsunami was my only decoder I thought failed from the box. I sent it back. It was my very first brass install and went fine up to the end, where it suddenly quit because I'd just redone so much along the way to get that Short Detected message to disappear. Thought I'd let the smoke out in a moment of carelessness. They found that I had pulled a wire lose with all my tugging around (it was hidden under the shrink), the decoder itself was fine. They resoldered and sent it back N/C.Big Smile

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Monday, November 17, 2014 6:54 AM

I've only had one failure out of the box.  It was a Soundtraxx.  I carefully documented the failure, contacted them and they replaced it.  They wanted it back, though, and they tested it to see what had gone wrong.

I, too, heartily recommend testing your installation on the program track before letting it roll on the main.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 17, 2014 6:20 AM

I am a big fan of NCE.  My layout is powered by the 5 amp PH-Pro wireless system, two NCE boosters, a Mini Panel, a Switch-It and a Switch-8.

Most of my non-sound decoders are NCE.  Out of the box, I cannot recall a single failure, at least not initially.  But, a few did experience subsequent failure.

Most of the NCE decoders, including the D13, D14, and D15 series, and the P2K-SR, are 8-pin and 9-pin decoders.  As long as the board is isolated from the metal frame, success is virtually assured.  And, those four decoder series make up the bulk of the NCE HO scale decoders.  

That leaves the DA-SR as one of the few, if not the only, NCE decoder that needs to be hard wired, requiring that the wires need to be soldered to the tabs, excpet for those foolish enough to secure the wires with the plastic holder clips.  In the absence of extreme care, the DA-SR can easily be shorted out.  So, I have fried a few, early on, due to my inexperience and unintended carelessness.

But, I have had a couple of DA-SR decoders fail once in service on the layout.  I blame those failures on poor design.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Monday, November 17, 2014 5:39 AM

Hi,

I've installed about 20 decoders, and have another 20 or so that were factory installed.  Never has one failed.  All the ones I installed were NCE, but I have no reason to say they are better than others.

The thing is, these are delicate, unforgiving electronic components.  A crossed wire or inadvertant connection and "poof", it is gone.  So if you have a high incidence of failure, I would review the installation process first.

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Sunday, November 16, 2014 9:01 PM

JOHN BRUCE III
So, unless there's a feature I don't understand, the only way I can check to see if the loco will move and the lights will work under DCC is to put it on the track on full DCC power, with a PowerCab.

No, that's just wrong. The PowerCab will definitely test at reduced power and stay there UNTIL you step out of the Program Track mode. Yes, if there was a short detected, you do need to remove the loco/decoder first before stepping back to full power. The menu is a little funny like that. I'd prefer that it did not go back to full power directly after short detection, but it does give you the message that it's going to do so. Before you go to that next screen, take the loco off the track if you get the short detected warning. Otherwise, yeah, a short onboard will then fry. You wouldn't take a loco that had a message like that on the programming track and take it over to full power on the layout, expecting the short to magiclly disappear along the way. Well, that's essentially what you're doing when you step out of Programming Mode after you get the short detected message.

Instead, remove the loco from the programming track, while stepping the  PowerCab back to full power, then call up Progrmaming Track mode again. Take the loco to the workbench and tend to the short in order to correct it. Then when you go back to the Programming Track, it's already in low power mode and ready to go back to porgramming in case you forget. When you do installs in brass, you do this a lot until things get right, but you must do it or suffer the consequences.

As for decoder experience with bad outta the package, I've had none in something like 75 installs. Most are NCE, with a few Tsunamis. Lots of DA-SR. I'll agree you need to check your work carefully with these, they aren't the only ones with this close spacing. It's tight in there, folks, and it really is necessary in certain installs.

Where I've run into problems with a couple of DA-SR is in Genesis F units. The side terminals sit very close to the chassis casting/weight, so are subject to shorting until insulated and/or prevented from touching the metal that's close by. I will say that every decoder that has turned out to have an issue I've been able to trace back to my own error, one way or the other.

That's not to say you couldn't have gotten a bad batch. That happens with any manufactured product. NCE is good about followup, so call them and sort things out. It amy even be the case here that it may be partly you, partly the decoders. However, I will say that a failure rate that high is very unusual and you need to get to the bottom of the problem.

 

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Sunday, November 16, 2014 1:43 PM

Then here's a related question with the PowerCab programming track. Normally I test a loco on DC before I do a decoder install, just to be sure the basic parts are working. Then I do the decoder install. The only thing a PowerCab programming track will do is program all the decoder features or go straight to a CV. There's no way to put it on the track at reduced voltage to see if the decoder will work on address 3. (Or is there?)

So, unless there's a feature I don't understand, the only way I can check to see if the loco will move and the lights will work under DCC is to put it on the track on full DCC power, with a PowerCab. Basically the Auto Switch simply protects you from mistakenly selecting use program track on your Power Cab without disabling the other blocks on your layout that may have locos on them -- as far as I can see, it does not in itself provide a way to test a new install at reduced voltage.

Do more conventional program tracks allow you to operate a loco on DCC at reduced voltage? And even then, what's the advantage? My new decoder works fine at reduced voltage, but when I put it on the main, it blows its function output anyhow!

 

Or is there a way around this?

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, November 16, 2014 10:25 AM

 The program track power on the PowerCab should be limited, doesn;t matter which mode (except programming on main - that's write-only programming with full track power active). A very useful accessory for PowerCab users (and those with the Digitrax Empire Builder/DB150) is the auto-switch that NCE sells. Basically, the track connections from the powerCab panel connect to the input of this device, and it has 2 sets of outputs. One goes to your normal rest of the layout, the other goes to an isolated section of track that becomes your program track. Whenever you go into one of the program mode, it turns off power to the main track and activates the program track - so you don't accidently program all locos sitting on the main.

 The issue of the lights being on and not being able to turn them off is a pretty sure sign of a blown function output.

 Try the TCS A-series - they have BEMF like the Digitrax ones but it's a better BEMF, works smoother and no fooling around with CVs to configure it. Also have a goof-proof warranty so even if you make a mistake wiring it, you're covered for a replacement.

                   --Randy 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Sunday, November 16, 2014 10:08 AM

richhotrain

One time, I complained about DA-SR on the NCE-DCC forum and got shouted down, LOL, but later it was conceded that NCE had a bad production batch.  There were some unexplained failures, especially earlier on, with that decoder.

Rich

 

 

Seems like just another day on the World Wide Web.

 

I'm using an NCE Power Cab, which doesn't use a separate dedicated program track. The options for "use program track" on prog/esc are 1 - std 2 - cv 3- reg, which I now discover means "register". The problem is that any use of options 1 and 2 puts you back onto a regular dcc controlled track at full voltage when you're done. I don't know enough about "register" to know if this will let you set up a program track with reduced voltage for testing.

Also, thinking this over, one problem (if we're looking at the bad batch possibility, since almost all my problems have been with DA-SRs, although a bad Athearn light/decoder board in an RTR loco has also led to some disgruntlement) could be that a decoder will in fact work briefly when tested either with a tester or a decoder track, but if the board is part of a bad batch, any application of normal voltage will cause problems.

 

I appreciate the advice. I've returned a bunch of DA-SRs to NCE and will see if they have any input -- but I haven't had the same issues with Digitrax, and I like their design better.

Part of the learning curve of DCC, I suppose.

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, November 16, 2014 9:57 AM

 I don;t know about it being a design flaw - the TCS A-series looks to have exactly the same spacing. Since these are board replacement decoders made to fit a specific form factor,t he maximum width of the entire board is contrained by this, and the spacing of the tabs is such that they are wide enough to re-use those plastic caps for a true plug and play installation (but we all know those plastic caps are hopeless, and soldering it in is MUCH better). Actually, I think it's easier to mess up using the caps, as a stray wire strand can easily be pushed into contact with a neighboring tab when the cap is pushed into place. 

                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 16, 2014 6:17 AM

My guess is that the leading cause of decoder failures is the user's fault, lack of sufficient caution when installing, inexperience, etc.  In the case of my DA-SR decoders, that was the likely problem on some of them.  Soldering iron tips that were too big, too hot, stray wires, lack of an Optivisor to spot problems.

The next leading cause, IMHO, is the decoder design.  I blame some of the DA-SR decoder faults on tabs being too close together, no room for error.

Another cause is sensitivity to voltage.  It doesn't seem to take much to fry a function output, usually the lighting.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, November 15, 2014 7:12 PM

 I've installed several dozen decoders in my locos and others. I have yet to have a decoder that was bad out of the box, and none of the ones I've installed has ever failed. Among these were a 10 pack of NCE D13SJRs, a couple of early TCS T1 and A4's, a whole bunch of newer TCS T1s (the old ones, pre BEMF, the new ones, with the auto adjust BEMF), a couple of Digitrax board replacement decoders, an aftermarket QSI Iinstalled for someone, a Loksound Select, an old Soundtraxx DSD, and a couple of others

 One thing that is useful to have - a system with a low current dedicated program track (generally, any of those that offer readback on the program track). The current here is too low to fry the decoder. So you test on the program track, and if you can read and write the decoder, you can be reasonably sure that at least the track to decoder and decoder to motor wiring is correct and there are no shorts. Only then should you try the loco on the full power main track.

                  --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Ontario Canada
  • 3,574 posts
Posted by Mark R. on Saturday, November 15, 2014 7:03 PM

Something I have found to be a huge contributor to decoder failure is excessively high track voltages. DCC track voltage should be around 14.5 volts. I've seen some as high as 18, and even approaching 20 volts ! While the decoders ARE designed to handle these higher voltages, it's no different than 12 volt bulbs .... a 12 volt bulb will last a lot longer if you don't run it at or near its maximum rated voltage. Same goes for any electronics.

There are always voltage spikes present in a DCC buss. The higher the main voltage is, the higher those spikes are going to be, and that is what wears on and can ultimately damage a decoder.

It's surprising how many people have no idea what their track voltages are.

Mark.

¡ uʍop ǝpısdn sı ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ 'dlǝɥ

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, November 15, 2014 5:34 PM

One of the problems with the DA-SR is that the function output tabs are too close together.  So, one small stray piece of stranded wire from an adjacent tab can short the function output or the motor tab or the power pick up tab.

One time, I complained about DA-SR on the NCE-DCC forum and got shouted down, LOL, but later it was conceded that NCE had a bad production batch.  There were some unexplained failures, especially earlier on, with that decoder.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:32 PM

JOHN BRUCE III

I don't have problems with Digitrax. However, the one I use mostly is the 5% you give.

 

My NCE breakdown (no pun intended) is 6 DA-SR; 2 N14IP; 2 SW9SR and 1 D13SRJ1... None have given me any troubles.

My DA-SRs are all installed in Athearn Genesis F-3s and F-7s but that shouldn't matter.

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Mount Vernon WA
  • 968 posts
Posted by skagitrailbird on Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:23 PM

Ditto

Roger Johnson
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:20 PM

I've used 10 or so DA-SR and have no failures.  Your soldering iron could be the source of a lot of failures, especially if it's one of the really cheap Radio Shack pencil irons -- sometimes they are not properly grounded and introduce voltage into the decoder that can destroy a microchip.  I use a Xytec controlled-temperature soldering staiton with a very fine tip.

 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!