Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Consisting Problems

2652 views
12 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 1, 2014 3:22 PM

Sorry, havent gotten around to it.  Other things have taken a priorty, but its on the short "to do" list rather than the long one.  Have to get 4 new modules operable for the Amherst show in Springfield, MA.  I hope to have this resolved before then as well. 

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,874 posts
Posted by maxman on Monday, December 1, 2014 12:49 PM

So, was this problem solved, did it just go away, or haven't you got a round to-it?

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,874 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, November 28, 2014 12:13 PM

BMMECNYC

But its not moving at all in consist.  The FT is wide open the GP just sits there.  This is the problem Im trying to solve.

 
It sounds to me that the GP doesn't recognize that it is in a consist.
 
I suggest that you clear out the consist from the command station.  Then address each loco separately, access CV 19, and set that CV to a value of zero.  Then check to see that the GP runs at whatever loco address you had assigned to it.  If it runs at that point, then you can try re-consisting.  If it does not run, then take the loco and put it on the programming track.  Read the value of CV 19.  If it has the proper consist address then let us know that.  If it still has a value of zero, then the decoder is not accepting the consisting command, or you are doing something incorrectly during the programming process.  Let us know.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2014 11:38 AM

But its not moving at all in consist.  The FT is wide open the GP just sits there.  This is the problem Im trying to solve.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 28, 2014 11:02 AM

Whichever one runs slower on step 1, you will have to raise cv2 so it moves as fast as the faster one.

ive had NCE decoders in Proto locks and they did not need the kick start maxed out to move. You might want to back that off and use cv2 to get it to start on step 1. I now use TCS decoders for everything not sound, and their automatic bemf seems to get along fine with Tsunami and Loksound bemf.

 

        --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2014 10:57 AM

No they do not. The Proto 2000 GP-7 is using continuous full strength kick to get it to move (CV 116 and 117, hence the original post question).  The Intermountain FT is using factory default settings.  I was attempting to run them uncoupled on parallel tracks to speed match them.  Also the FT is using whatever decoder that Intermountain puts in their DCC/sound locomotives.  The Proto 2000 is using a P2KSR from NCE.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, November 28, 2014 10:48 AM

Do they run anywhere near the same speed on step 1 when not consisted? I am not aware of any difference in the NCE decoder if in consists vs running alone like the bemf setting in Digitrax decoders.

      --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2014 9:41 AM

Its not that they are fighting one another.  The GP-7 is acting like someone cut one side of the power pick up wires.  No lights in either direction and no hint of motor turning.  When it is deleted out of consist it responds to commands and operates normally.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, November 3, 2014 9:41 AM

 People say that if you consist locos with BEMF enabled they will fight each other. After running the same set of locos, all with BEMF, at numerous club shows for hours at a time - I say hogwash.

The "issue' I think comes from using Digitrax decoders on a non-Digitrax system. Digitrax BEMF settings have 2 values - one for runnign solo and oen for running in consist - ADVANCED consist, using CV19. Digitrax systems typically do not use CV19 consisting, so the locos runt he same as they do solo. But if you use the same loco on a system that does use CV19, the BEMF settings likely are not the same when in consist, so the loco doesn't start like it did solo, or runs at slightly different speeds, or maybe had too much BEMF, which would make it jerk around.

 Prime mover sounds should run all all locos using Digitrax consisting. Each loco gets a throttle up command as you move. However, hitting F2 should only sound the horn on the TOP loco since the F2 on/off only gets sent to the top loco although if you dial the address of any of the consisted locos on the left knob of a DT40x throttle, you can control functions on that unit independent of the top loco.

                    --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Westchester NY
  • 1,747 posts
Posted by retsignalmtr on Monday, November 3, 2014 4:39 AM

I regularly MU locos from Atlas, Life Like Proto 2000, and Athearn. All are speed matched to each other. All have sound. They work fine together. But the sound of the prime mover only revs up on the TOP loco in the consist while the other two have the prime mover sound remain at idle no matter which loco is the TOP loco. I use the Universal consist mode with Digitrax. I have heard something about problems with back emf when consisting.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:44 PM

I attempted to consist an Intermountain FT DCC Sound with a Proto 2000 GP-7 (P2KSR decoder installed).  The Proto 2K GP-7 was being dragged by the FT at speed step 1.  I did not have both units perfectly speed matched, but the GP-7 moves on its own on step 1.  When consisted it doesnt run at all. 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:34 PM

 Yes, but some decoders have additional CVs for use when consisted.

                  --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Consisting Problems
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:27 PM

Do CV 2, 5, 6, 116, and 117 hold their values on each individual locomotive when they are placed in a consist?

Edit: Advanced Consist

EDIT: see my second post for second question.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!