Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Wiring Layout for both DC & DCC

16207 views
25 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Wiring Layout for both DC & DCC
Posted by Arto on Tuesday, January 7, 2014 11:29 AM

Hi Folks. New to the Forum. Here's the first of what will probably be a series of dumb questions.

I have an exisitng double mainline layout built 30 years ago which is undergoing complete renovation - new track & turnouts, smoothing roadbeds, readjusting grades, repairing some sagging overpasses, upgrading wiring, etc. A couple years ago I replaced the power packs with MTH DCS Commander and their 100 watt power supply, one for each track.

 

Since everything is essentially already in place for DC (like the control panel), I plan on running two power districts for DCC - one for each mainline. I typically run rather long trains (or two trains on one tracks). Because of the length, grades and curves I've found I get better performance using four to six powered locomotives on most trains. There will also be a double revering loop added on the inside mailine track and three or four additional sidings (there's one existing short passing track).

I guess my first "dumb" question is, should I use a single or separate (2) common (-) buss wires, one for each track (or more for each siding), or can the (-) feeders just be tied to one common buss but use a different (separate) buss for the + side of the connections of each mainline?

I don't intend to run both DC and DCC simultaneously, however I suspect that I probably could run DC on one mailine and DCC on ther mainline at the same time since all the old fashioned cab control blocks will still be in place.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Tuesday, January 7, 2014 11:19 PM

Arto
Since everything is essentially already in place for DC (like the control panel),

So this is a cab control system where each controller can control each track, or is one control dedicated to one part of the layout?

I guess my first "dumb" question is, should I use a single or separate (2) common (-) buss wires, one for each track (or more for each siding), or can the (-) feeders just be tied to one common buss but use a different (separate) buss for the + side of the connections of each mainline?

Common wire schemes are asking for trouble.  I recommend insulating both rails.  Run a two wire bus for each block.    Of course if you were going straight DCC a single bus could service both tracks, and save a bunch of wire.

I don't intend to run both DC and DCC simultaneously, however I suspect that I probably could run DC on one mailine and DCC on ther mainline at the same time since all the old fashioned cab control blocks will still be in place.

In theory yes.  In practice if the two "main lines" cross over to each other and a train accidentially takes that crossover so that it bridges the gap between the two systems it could fry the loco, the DCC controller, the DC controller, or all three.  Basically that is a bad idea.

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Chi-Town
  • 7,712 posts
Posted by zstripe on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:01 AM

The only way to safely operate a DC/DCC layout is to have one or the other operate at one time, not both at once. That is accomplished with a DPDT center off switch back at the beginning of your power sources to the track, or layout wiring, only one power source can be on at one time, eliminating the possiblity of a problem of messing up something.  The Safest Way! Your crossovers, should of been both rails insulated at the crossovers to begin with, unless you used common rail,which I personally detest. Atlas came out with that years ago to try to simplify wiring with the products they had on the market, not the best as far as relliability goes.  My opinon only.

Frank

 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:00 AM

For safety, you should never try to run both DC and DCC at the same time unless there is absolutely no connection anywhere between lines that a locomotive could inadvertently cross.  Depending how how high the DC throttle is set, your DCC command station can be destroyed.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:44 AM

Yes, they're right.  Don't do it.

You didn't say how big your layout was, but if you've already got the 2 main lines which are already electrically isolated it would be best to keep them that way.  For most home layouts, you won't need a booster to add DCC power, although with the number of engines you run, you might.  Having the main lines isolated will make it easier to install a booster.  If not, you should consider using separate circuit breakers to break the layout into districts.  This will help operationally, and will make troubleshooting easier as well.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 9:58 AM
Yes, this was originally wired as a cab control system where each controller (power pack) is typically dedicated to one mainline. There are 6 isolated blocks on each mainline and one isolated passing siding. Each block has a DPDT center off toggle switch that controls which power pack can be used on any block on either mainline.
 
Originally I wired each block with its own +/- pair. There was no buss. These wires are not a heavy enough gauge to tolerate the current used in DCC. Indeed, over the years I came to realize that I was getting severe voltage drop at the farthest ends of the layout. There are only one pair of wires to each block.
 
A few years ago I installed a stranded 10 gauge common buss for the minus side of the DC power and four 18 gauge feeders from the common buss to each block on both mainlines on one rail only. This was enough to improve voltage regulation dramatically. I also assumed that this would begin to prepare the layout for DCC but now I’m not so sure this is a good approach.
 

 

Several years ago I visited the Elmhurst Model Railroad club and they said they could run both DC and DCC. I figured eventually I would do the same but it’s sounding more and more like this a bad idea with one operator running multiple trains on multiple tracks which could set the stage for a potentially very expensive accident especially since there is a stretch of track with double crossovers so trains can switch from one mainline to the other.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:15 AM
What I was hoping to do until I get enough of my DC locomotives converted to DCC was to be able to run one mainline on DC and the other DCC. The control panel has a DPDT center off toggle switch for each block so I figured if I keep the toggles thrown all one way for one mainline and thrown the other way for the second mainline (which is how it is operated now in DC with two transformers) I could use the MTH Commander controller which has a DCC pass-through switch to use DCC on one of the mainlines. However, as mentioned above, I currently use one 10 gauge buss for one side of power supply to all tracks and this hasn’t seemed to create any problems so I’m wondering if can continue with this sort of single buss common when adding DCC with the intention of at least temporarily using DCC on one mainline and DCC on the other. From the responses so far it appears the answer is no.
 

 

The other thing is I figured I could basically split the layout into two power districts, one for each mainline by simply switching the toggles on one track one way and the other way for the second power district on the other mainline.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:36 AM
The layout was 6’ x 18’, double mainline double loop, so about 90’ of track/mainline. I typically run one long (50+ cars) on one track and a long full length passenger train on the other, sometimes with a second shorter freight or passenger on the same track.
 
I decided it would be better to just do a complete renovation instead trying to piecemeal fix a number of problems and in the process expand and upgrade the whole layout.
 

 

I'd like to post some pictures but haven't figured out how to upload an image yet.
  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 157 posts
Posted by Redvdub1 on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:00 PM

Separate returns lines are almost a necessity due primarily to the need to diagnose shorts.  Your reversing loops will require a rewiring for DCC.  Several manufacturer's (MRC, Digitrax, Circuitron, etc.) make reversing modules for DCC application.  Circuitron also makes a DC reversing module but you cannot run DC through a DCC reversing module.  These DCC reversing modules make it impossible to run DC mode.  You can run DC engines on the Digitrax stretch zero mode which assigns engine ID=zero and runs the DC engine using DCC control.  This method is controversial and has the potential to damage motors...especially coreless motors.  I use it all the time w/0 any problems but you cannot leave a DC engine on a powered track for any extended period of time as the motor may get too hot.  You have to kill the power or remove the engine. 

George T. Galyon

Olde Newburgh Model RR Club-Walden, NY

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 3:32 PM

Not to complicate things, but obviously I have to choose a DCC system to use. I've read/heard all the "Ford vs. Chevy" arguments. But yesterday while speaking with a Lenz dealer he mentioned the Roco Z21.

I recently added a laptop PC to my audio system to use as a digital media center for playing high resolution audio files and now use a tablet as a remote control for the laptop/media software/music albums/tracks to play. So this Roco Z21 really piqued my curiosity since it can use a tablet as a graphic control interface instead of the hardware based handheld DCC type devices. The Z21/tablet combination apparently has many capabilities simply not available with other DCC systems.

Anyone have any experience with the Z21 or know someone who does?? Opinions?

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:00 PM

You can wire a reverse loop through a DPDT toggle switch and it can be used for both DC and DCC operation, but your train has to stop within the loop as the toggle switch is thrown.

A DC throttle has to also be set to go in the opposite direction after the toggle switch is thrown so the train doesn't back up.

With DCC the train will continue to go forward after the toggle switch is thrown without having to change the throttle direction setting.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 5:40 PM

When I started building my layout, I thought I would build it with the option to run DC or DCC, since I had some DC engines already.  But, when I installed a decoder and ran my first DCC engine back and forth along about 6 feet of track, I took the DC powerpack off the layout and put it under the table, never to run DC again.  (The powerpack now runs my turntable and some LEDs.)

This may be your experience, too.  DCC added a lot to running trains for me.

Similarly, once I got my first couple of sound engines, all my non-sound engines spent their days in the roundhouse until they were upgraded.  It's just the way it worked out.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:12 PM

Our club was built in the early 1980's with common rail, fourteen blocks, one reversing loop, HO scale. When we went to DCC about seven or so years ago using a NCE 5 amp Power Pro, we tried running a block or two in DCC and a couple others in DC. One time we were gabbing and a loco crossed a block gap. Fried the booster. No one was watching the control panel. From then on, no DC operations anymore.

 Do what you want.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:29 PM

Yes Beasley, I suspect you are very right.

To be honest I have so many locomotives its not funny. And I'm pretty sure virtually everything I've bought in the last 5-7 or more is DCC ready, and there's a lot of those. Lots of Athearn Genesis, Proto 2000 that just need the board swapped out & some Broadway Limited. The truely DC only stuff hasn't been run in years. I'm probably fooling myself to believe that I'll have the time to convert any significant number of these to DCC in the near future.

Since I'm putting in all new track and turnouts it sounds like it's still a good idea to put the "original" insulated blocks in place with discrete busses for each block if for nothing else than trouble shooting and just start installing DCC chips in my newer locomotives. And that way I can also use the two MTH power supplies and split the two mainlines into separate power districts. The old control panel still in place and all I have to modify is to get rid of the single common return and run separate busses to each block.

Sound like a plan?

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Wednesday, January 8, 2014 6:55 PM

richg1998

One time we were gabbing and a loco crossed a block gap. Fried the booster. No one was watching the control panel. From then on, no DC operations anymore.

 Do what you want.

Rich

 

 

 
Last year I totally rewired our large HO scale club layout that had originally been built for DC block control operation, since no one seemed to be running DC locomotives.
 
I eliminated six control panels containing a total of around 200 block toggle switches and at least two miles of wire, perhaps more.
 
Our layout is now 100% DCC operation using NCE ProCab Radio throttles.
 
If someone brings in a new or used locomotive and wants to test run it, we have a piece of flex track and MRC power pack that can be used for that purpose.  Then they invariably want a decoder installed unless they intend to run it on a home layout that is DC only.
 
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Thursday, January 9, 2014 1:48 PM

Arto
To be honest I have so many locomotives its not funny. And I'm pretty sure virtually everything I've bought in the last 5-7 or more is DCC ready, and there's a lot of those. Lots of Athearn Genesis, Proto 2000 that just need the board swapped out & some Broadway Limited. The truely DC only stuff hasn't been run in years. I'm probably fooling myself to believe that I'll have the time to convert any significant number of these to DCC in the near future.

Sounds like you are in the same boat as me, but I never intended to convert all my locos.  As it turns out converting them as I need/want them has been a great solution.  I am guessing my fleet will never be "all" converted.  I've still got a sizable roster of CTC-16 and Railcommand equipped locos.

Since I'm putting in all new track and turnouts it sounds like it's still a good idea to put the "original" insulated blocks in place with discrete busses for each block if for nothing else than trouble shooting

I don't know. That totally depends on the track plan.   The only reasons you want insluated blocks in a DCC system are: 1. to prevent short circuits from things like hot frog turnouts and reversing loops.  2.  Separate the layout into smaller power districts because a single booster can't handle it.  3.  Isolated short circuits to one section of the layout.   Our club isolated the main yard from the main so that the often shorting yard wouldn't stop the trains on the main.  And finally 4.  Signalling.

  And that way I can also use the two MTH power supplies and split the two mainlines into separate power districts.

I would physically block any crossovers between the two mainlines so a loco could not accidentally cross the electrical boundary.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Friday, January 10, 2014 10:50 AM

Zephyr, you're comments are well taken. I think I could drill a couple of holes in the roadbed at the crossovers where I could insert a couple of plastic dowels, kind of like concrete filled steel ballard posts we see protecting building corners and signs in tight parking lots/driveways. Of course the train would crash into these if something was accidentally switched wrong but it's better than letting the locomotive pass through and destroying who knows what else. I tend to run my trains at lower speeds. To me it looks more realistic on my layout so the dowel barriers should easily sustain the impact.

The other thing I should mention is that the MTH DCS Commanders I use (two - one for each mainline) are DCC compatible. It has selectable control mode configurations for analog DC, DCC and DCS. For the most part I always have all the control panel toggles for one mailine switched to use one DCS Commander & power supply and the other mainline control panel toggles thrown the other way to use the second DCS Commander & its power supply. Both tracks (and all blocks) are electrically isolated and there will no common rail as in the past. I'm going to rewire all the blocks discretely with their own buss & feeders. Both rails isolated between all blocks.

If something can go wrong it will. Zzz Oops - Sign Wilted Flower Super Angry

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Saturday, January 11, 2014 6:33 AM

Arto

Anyone have any experience with the Z21 or know someone who does?? Opinions?

 
Roco, made in Austria, is not very well known or supported in the U.S., so I would be rather cautious about purchasing their DCC system.
 
Digitrax, NCE, and CVP systems are made in the U.S., and service and support are readily available in the U.S.  Not so with some of the products made in Europe or China.
 
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 5,449 posts
Posted by mobilman44 on Sunday, January 12, 2014 6:32 AM

Hi!

Just some observations from a guy who has played with trains since the early 1950s............

- Often, redoing a layout is more trouble (now and later) than tearing it down and starting over.  Sounds like you are well on your way so I wish you luck.

- While its possible to mix DC and DCC, I would urge you to go one way or the other.  I did make the switch to DCC in 2008, and have been very happy with it.

- If you do go with DCC, go with NCE or Digitrax or even CVP.  Your support from the factory and this Forum will be much more substantial, parts/supplies are much more readily available, and these systems all work great.

- It sounds like you know this, but I'll say it anyway.......  make your wiring bulletproof.   Put in lots of feeders, perhaps every 4 feet and on every siding, etc.  This especially applies to DCC, but is a good thing for DC as well.

- Make yourself a work plan.  With a sizeable layout, its easy to jump into the deep end of the pool............

- ENJOY !

ENJOY  !

 

Mobilman44

 

Living in southeast Texas, formerly modeling the "postwar" Santa Fe and Illinois Central 

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • 8 posts
Posted by ansley on Tuesday, January 5, 2016 6:49 PM

Arto

... So this Roco Z21 really piqued my curiosity since it can use a tablet as a graphic control interface instead of the hardware based handheld DCC type devices. The Z21/tablet combination apparently has many capabilities simply not available with other DCC systems.  .......

I know this is an older discussion, but I feel a little more research might be necessary, you are incorrect about the tablet control.  First, I'm VERY budget minded and I've set up DCC very inexpensiviely, that runs on G scale, and I've also simply hooked the same system to HO and N, and at one time at the same time!  

Let me tell you about my setup.  First, I bought a almost new NCE Power Cab, yes the basic starter set, for very little $$. However, it is VERY expandable.  The power cab comes with a panel that lets you expand, you can expand to as many as you'd like. You can also use the Power Cab as a Pro Cab on an other NCE system!  Next, I bought a couple of boosters, don't limit yourself to the brand you have, no need for that, you can wire just about any booster to the other brands.  I bought two slightly older 8 AMP MRC boosters, now problem wiring up with my Power Cab.  Also, since I've moved a lot, and setup temp layouts (mostly G scale!, yes indoors), I've gotten good at doing this.  Third, I bought a Bachmann 5 Amp booster, got REAL bargarins on the boosters, look around you can find them.  The Bachmann works great on my temp layouts, is easy, fan cooled, and I don't need the 8 Amps right now or mulitple districts ATT. I mounted my NCE panel in a little plastic box.   

Finally, I purchased the NCE USB panel, it plugs into the other port on my panel then plugs into the laptop via USB cable.  However, the BEST part is the software is free, I use the JMRI software (see here:  http://jmri.sourceforge.net/help/en/html/hardware/nce/NCE.shtml  )

It also has tablet suuport, there is an WiFI throttle Android app that communicates with the laptop wirelessly,  and works great on any cheap Android tablet.  You can also use IOS WifI throttle softwire Also, I can add other NCE throttles if I so choose and I don't need the NCE Power Pro setup.  My total dollar outoput was VERY inexpensive, and I have enough power and expandability for most home needs.  

My suggestion is look around A LOT, I spent a lot of time researching systems that would fit in my budget, and this system pretty much does everything and was not near as expensive as full blown systems from the major manufacturers.  It has been reliable. There are wireless options for the NCE throttles too.  But I just use the tablet.  I also needed a firmware upgrade for my Power Cab, but it was easy to get from a reputable dealer, shipped on chip, for about $9.  With an unlimited budget I do like some of the other systems as well, but I try to keep my train budget under control.  Also, Ebay is your friend. 

 

Ted

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • 7 posts
Posted by nittany4 on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:40 PM

Just got a Z21 for Christmas (after asking for it for at least 3 years) and I love it. I will be either packing away my NCE Power Cab as a back up, or selling it. It's literally like going from a 1977 Texas Instruments Calculator to an iPad. Not sure why it isn't more popular here, probably the price, but since vitually everyoine owns a smartphone, it's really not much more than other wirelss systems.

I model N scale, so no "kameraloks" are available for the cab-view option, but give it a few years and that may change. I joined a Yahoo users group where worldwide users exchange info.

I know I deserted a trusted pioneer of USA DCC for bells and whistles, but my 5 year old son's eyes light up when he runs trains now. That's priceless.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:31 PM

 That's great the video game controller is workign for you, but when we do club shows, we will often let youngsters run the trains (we even have a junior engineer certificate we give out) and even though it's a simple knob throttle with buttons (and no display at all - simple engineer throttles from Digitrax), these kids always really get into it, watching for signal indications and blowing the horn at road crossings, etc. Never saw one that wasn't excited to be given control of the train (under the watchful eye of a club member of course) and not a fancy color display with pictures in sight.

 It's like I said before, it's gimicky and flashy for the sake of being flashy, it doesn;t do anythign to improve the ease of use or general usability. I DO occasionally use a touchscreen throttle on my phone, can do that with any DCC system and JMRI. No, it doesn;t have a little picture of my locos - but I still don;t get how this is an easier way to select locos than just keying in the number printed right on the side of the loco. The touch control for speed is ok, but nowhere near as fine as the encoder wheel knob on a Digitrax or NCE throttle. I can use the volume rocker as a speed control, but there's just something clunky about increment and decrement buttons - if I wanted that I would have gotten a Lenz DCC system. Its an option on Digitrax and NCE throttles, the buttons are there - but I never use them for the purpose of speed control.

                --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,311 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:23 PM

Hello All,

DO NOT DO IT!!!

See this thread: http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/744/t/252559.aspx

Hope this helps.

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:36 PM

Merry Christmas to you regarding the Z21.

Unfortunately, your positive feedback on the Z21 is about two weeks too late. I just bought a Digitrax Super Chief Xtra Duplex. My original post is 2 years old. I couldn't find much interest or feedback from this side of the pond so I went with Digitrax (for a number of reasons). Of course, I'm coming into it from the DC world so this has still opened a whole new world of possibilities for me. And as I've mentioned in some other posts, my oldest DC locos actually run smoother and quieter with Digitrax DCC than they did on DC. With concurrent support for running DC & DCC locos simultaneously (even if it's only one DC loco or multi-loco DC set on one or the other mainline), that's all I need to make the transition slowly, although I already suspect (as Digitrax points out in the manual) I'll probably make this transition much faster than planned.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 6:45 PM

jjdamnit

Hello All,

DO NOT DO IT!!!

See this thread: http://cs.trains.com/mrr/f/744/t/252559.aspx

Hope this helps.

 

The irony in all this is my worries about running DC & DCC at the same time (as on separate but paralell mainlines) was unfounded. I wasn't aware that some (all?) modern DCC systems will support DC locos and car lights etc, at least to some extent, enough for what I want to occasionally do.

FWIW, The Elmhurst Model Railroad Club runs both DC & DCC (Digitrax) concurrently albeit via some kind of custom made circuitry and still requires operators to flip the toggle switches as the train moves through the blocks.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, January 13, 2016 8:34 AM

 It's NOT unsafe if you do it RIGHT. Do not mix by block, either the whole layout is DC or the whole layout is DCC, a setup like that is completely safe.

 Take a look at pearhen's thread on the P2K Loksound install, if you click his pictures link, one fo the ones that shows in the album shows his test track with a big knife switch. If the cetner goes to teh track, and the left goes to the DCC system and the right goes to a DC power pack, this is a completely safe way to have both options for one layout. There's no way the two can mix, which means no chance of damaging the DCC system, the power pack, or a loco. A decent size DPDT center off toggle can accomplish the same thing if the idea of a big knife switch on your control panel is not appealing.

 Truth is though, once you start usign DCC you'll not want o switch back, unless you have some locos not worth converting but want to run them for nostalgia reasons.

        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!