Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Digitrax AR-1

11768 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 156 posts
Posted by owen w in california on Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:29 PM

Randy et al: Thanks guys. Last saturday we methodically went through the different combinations of AR-1 and PM 42 speed setting, trying to determine which setting resulted in the shortest stall. ( The AR-1 is downstream from the PM 42.)

The best result was the PM 42 set slow and the AR-1 set fastest. This produced NO stall when traversing the gap at SLOW loco speeds (yard speed). However, there is some delay at "road" speed, which is fine, as slow speed would be most appropriate anyway.

Thanks again! Happy Railroading.

Joel aka Owen W in CA

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, May 20, 2011 3:16 PM

 I just know with all Digitrax parts it works. A friend's layout has DCS100 - PM42 - AR1 on a reverse loop and it's dead nuts reliable, even on low current draw N scale locos (his layout is N scale).

 Of course he has an old BD16 block detector, supposedly they don't work with an decoder that have high frequency or supersonic drive withotu giving false indications - he has an utomated trolley loop that depends on those block detections to keep the trains from runnign into one another and it too is completely reliable - and all his decoders have high frequency drive.

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Friday, May 20, 2011 11:04 AM

When you get conflicting advise, I would always start with Randy's.  He's the apparent Digitrax expert in here.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 156 posts
Posted by owen w in california on Friday, May 20, 2011 10:56 AM

Thanks guys. You've all given me some ideas for approaching this. Tomorrow's a railroad workday, so I'll let you know if the problem is solved and how.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, May 20, 2011 6:24 AM

 If the AR-1 is downstream of a PM42 section you may have to adjust that PM42 section to trip at a slower speed so the AR-1 has time to do its thing. The default speed of each section is 'standard' which should be fine, if you changed them to 'faster' or 'fastest' this could be a problem with an AR-1.

                     --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Friday, May 20, 2011 5:40 AM

The PM42 is also capable of auto reversing.  I suspect that might be the problem.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, May 20, 2011 5:16 AM

owen w in california

Richhotrain: I'm using the AR-1 on a WYE. I finally got it set to trip only once, ran trains, all good.  A few days later I came back to run trains and now the AR-1 is multi-tripping (constant) when power is on. I recently read something about having to adjust the PM-42 district when using the AR-1.

Any thoughts on why the AR-1 is multi-tripping? Is it related to needing to adjust the PM-42

Thanks.

The only time that I experience constant tripping of one my four AR-1's is when something is bridging the gap, confusing the AR-1 between normal polarity and reverse polarity.

I suppose that the PM42 could be the problem.  Are you using the PM42 to control more than one AR-1 unit?  You might try disconnecting the PM42 or rewiring the AR-1 without the connection to the PM42 to determine if the PM42 is involved in your problem.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 156 posts
Posted by owen w in california on Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:21 PM

Richhotrain: I'm using the AR-1 on a WYE. I finally got it set to trip only once, ran trains, all good.  A few days later I came back to run trains and now the AR-1 is multi-tripping (constant) when power is on. I recently read something about having to adjust the PM-42 district when using the AR-1.

Any thoughts on why the AR-1 is multi-tripping? Is it related to needing to adjust the PM-42

Thanks.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: 4610 Metre's North of the Fortyninth on the left coast of Canada
  • 9,352 posts
Posted by BATMAN on Sunday, May 1, 2011 11:32 PM

I have been following with interest. I have the Pro-Cab-R, so I guess I am OK.Cowboy

Thanks everyone.

 

                                                             Brent

Brent

"All of the world's problems are the result of the difference between how we think and how the world works."

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Sunday, May 1, 2011 11:05 PM

The Power Cab is a different animal than the Pro- Cab set ups.

Thanks for letting me know.

I was just letting the OP to watch out for reverse loops if using a PC.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, May 1, 2011 6:56 PM

I have four AR-1's on my layout which I operate in DCC with an NCE PH-Pro 5 amp system.  All four units work just fine.

I do not own any Power Cabs.  As much of a fan of NCE as I am, I continually wonder about the merits of the Power Cab to operate anything but a small DCC layout.

I have heard of a lot of problems with the use of PSX-AR units with the Power Cab, and I wonder if the same is true with the Digitrax AR-1.  It just seems to me that the Power Cab isn't powerful enough to handle things like reversing units, at least not multiple reversing units.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Sunday, May 1, 2011 4:11 PM

Are you using a Power Cab system?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 8:13 PM

I was hoping to see someone other than myself that had tried this AR-1 with the Power Cab.

All Power  Cabs behave the same way. They are so quick,  the AR-1 never has time to toggle. It is a time factor,  not  AMPS. So I am told.

I  upgraded my Power Cab with the SB3a booster because I had one reverse loop that I could not ever make work. The Smart Booster fixed that.

NCE was working  on a reverser that would work with the Power Cab, but it has never apeared?

I was told that almost a year ago.

You are saying that you have 2 of the AR-1 's and had no problem.

Are you using a Power Cab?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:55 PM

That was my understanding, The Power Cab shuts down before the AR-1 will toggle .

Any one using the AR-1 with at Power Cab? And does it work? 

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 156 posts
Posted by owen w in california on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:07 AM

Hey Rich:

Right you are. The instructions are there. One nuance is that they say to set the TTC with a lashup of the most locos you will use. I didn't catch that at first, and couldn't get the AR1 set low enough not to trip the booster with only one loco.

Finally, with  3 (F3A, B, B) it worked fine, but with only 1 (NW3) - N Scale - it still trips the booster - momentarily -  and it's set all the way down.

Any thoughts?

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Tuesday, April 26, 2011 6:34 AM

yankee flyer

I had to return my AR1 because my  2AMP (1.7a ?) Power Cab would trip before the AR1. Never could get to work. Thats just my experience.

Lee, if I recall correctly this was a major issue with the Power Cab when it first came out and in particular with the original smart booster.  The short protection in these devices was so fast that they would not work with any brand of auto-reverser.   In fact I had a friend that ended up getting rid of a PowerCab and replacing it with a different brand because he could never get an auto reverse section working. 

To the OP, I installed 2 of AR-1 last night on a pair of wye's and they worked flawlessly so far without any adjustment.

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, April 26, 2011 6:04 AM

owen w in california

On the issue of adjusting the AR-1. The literature says you can adjust it up or down, but doesn't explain why you might want to do that. It doesn't explain how changing the setting affects the operation of the unit/loco. Why would I want a higher trip level and why would I want a lower one?

 

Well, actually it does explain why.

The instructions read as follows:

Place a locomotive on the mainline and operate it into the reversing section.  It will trip 1 time at the beginning of the loop or at the end of the loop. It should not trip more than once while the train is in the loop.  If the AR1 trips more than once, the trip current is set too low. Turn the TTC clockwise slightly to increase the current trip point. Repeat the test until the AR1 trips once while the train goes through the reversing section.  If the AR1 does not trip and the booster shuts down, the trip current is set too high. Remove the train from the reversing section and allow the booster to reset. Turn the TTC counterclockwise slightly and repeat the test until the train trips the AR1 once without shutting down the booster.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 156 posts
Posted by owen w in california on Monday, April 25, 2011 7:15 PM

Hi Randy: On the issue of adjusting the AR-1. The literature says you can adjust it up or down, but doesn't explain why you might want to do that. It doesn't explain how changing the setting affects the operation of the unit/loco. Why would I want a higher trip level and why would I want a lower one?

 

Thanks Joel

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • 88 posts
Posted by TexasSP on Monday, April 11, 2011 9:12 AM

I have used the AR-1 with great success as well.  Simple, effective, adjustable, and reasonably priced.  Like others have said, with trains running I can't hear the relay at all.  Even in silence you probably can't really hear it from more than a few feet away.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Gateway City
  • 1,593 posts
Posted by yankee flyer on Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:38 PM

Yes, There is the "adjustment" I spent a great deal of time adjusting, Maybe it was defective.

Just my  experience.

Lee

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, April 10, 2011 6:01 PM

 The AR-1 is one that works on nearly any system BECAUSE you can adjust it down that low. Other autoreversers have their lowest trip current settign above that of many starter systems.

                     --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:01 PM

The AR1 has an adjustment potentiometer that can go down to a quarter of an amp. It's probably why it didn't work. You have to adjust it for your layout.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Gateway City
  • 1,593 posts
Posted by yankee flyer on Sunday, April 10, 2011 4:49 PM

I had to return my AR1 because my  2AMP (1.7a ?) Power Cab would trip before the AR1. Never could get to work. Thats just my experience.

Good luck.

Lee

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: O'Fallon, MO
  • 292 posts
Posted by Lateral-G on Saturday, April 9, 2011 10:42 AM

Stevert

The two common complaints about the AR1 are that since they use a relay, they are slow and noisy.

 

 

Mine are very quite, in fact your really have to listen to even hear them switch over,

They are very fast too, Never had a problem with them being slow.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Springboro, Ohio
  • 201 posts
Posted by ripvanwnkl on Saturday, April 9, 2011 7:50 AM

I've been using an AR-1 for  five years with MRC DCC system.  No problems. 

Dave

USAF (Retired)

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Friday, April 8, 2011 8:49 PM

I have four AR-1 units on my layout, and they all work fine.

They are quick and virtually silent.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Friday, April 8, 2011 2:26 PM

The AR-1 will work fine. We use them at the club and have no problems. Also any relay click will easily be drowned out by the trains running, even if it was audible.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,932 posts
Posted by Stevert on Friday, April 8, 2011 1:40 PM

MisterBeasley
When you have a balloon track, you don't have to worry about the problem of having the loco on one end of the loop while the caboose is on the other.  That's when a solid-state system has an advantage with the fast switching time.

Depending on just where you put the gaps on that balloon, and how long your train is, you sure can have the loco on one set of gaps and the caboose on the other set!

But along that line of thought, one of my AR-1 powered reversing sections has an even bigger "problem":  It consists of a section of the mainline and a passing siding, with the gaps just past the turnouts.  In other words, the reversing section includes the turnouts and the passing siding. 

So not only can I have a long train hit the gaps at both ends at the same time, I can have two shorter trains going in the same direction hit the gaps at the same time, or even trains moving in opposite directions hit both sets of gaps at the same time.

But I don't know how many times I may have hit one of those situations, because if I have, the AR-1 has never flinched.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, April 8, 2011 12:26 PM

It should be fine.  When you have a balloon track, you don't have to worry about the problem of having the loco on one end of the loop while the caboose is on the other.  That's when a solid-state system has an advantage with the fast switching time.

The AR-1 lists for $30, and the $25 price is slightly more than the Tony's Trains price, but you'll save on shipping.  I'd go for it.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!