Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

metal wheels and DCC

13671 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2014
  • 169 posts
Posted by TheWizard on Sunday, July 22, 2018 10:02 AM

I have all metal wheels on my layout. The only issue I've ever had was when one of the wheels - out of the box - wasn't insulated, and putting it on the track would trip the DCC system.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Sunday, July 22, 2018 9:20 AM

Very simple for me.  The metal wheelsets have much less rolling resistance, so the same engine can pull more cars.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:18 AM

Bob, your Code 100 rail may well be the difference. All my track is Code 83, and I have occasionally encountered shorts on the converging rails of certain turnouts.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • 79 posts
Posted by B. Bryce on Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:46 AM

richhotrain

 B. Bryce

There is power there, but I have never had a time where my wheels made contact between both of the main rails, unless it was derailed.  The flanges are on the wrong sides to cause a short  

It is not the flange that makes contact with the opposite rail that causes the short, it is the tread. This happens not only with Peco but also with Walthers Shinohara. I have Walthers Shinohara 3-way turnouts with the same problem.

 Scroll down this link to "Electrical Issues".

https://dccwiki.com/Peco_Insulfrog

Rich

 

 

Thanks, great explaination.  I know the treads are the limiting factor, I only mentioned the flanges because they are on the opposite side of the rail and cannot come into play unless the car is derailed. 

I can see what the others are talking about now.  I have never had this happen but from the photos I can see how it may, especially with code 70 or 83 track, and I will watch out for this.  I use all Code 100 track which may be hepling my situations.  When I checked my turnouts, I don't have any wheels with treads wide enough for this to even remotely happen, but if I ever get a short at the turnout, I will check for it.

Thanks.

-Bob

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, July 19, 2018 7:08 AM

B. Bryce

There is power there, but I have never had a time where my wheels made contact between both of the main rails, unless it was derailed.  The flanges are on the wrong sides to cause a short  

It is not the flange that makes contact with the opposite rail that causes the short, it is the tread. This happens not only with Peco but also with Walthers Shinohara. I have Walthers Shinohara 3-way turnouts with the same problem.

Scroll down this link to "Electrical Issues".

https://dccwiki.com/Peco_Insulfrog

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:57 AM

Luck, or maybe differences in Peco's manufactureing across the different lines- there are Code 100 and Code 76 in the more British style track line and the Code 83 ones which follow North American practice (and a new Code 70 North American line coming, but those will supposedly be their new "Unifrog" design which are insulated but can be powered). The size of that plastic bit between the frog rails may vary, some smaller than others and more prone to allowing a wheel to bridge the rails. Standard HO wheels are .110" wide, unless you are using semi scale or fine scale width wheels (fine scale likely would not reliably pass Peco or any other mass produced turnouts, the allowable tolerance in the NMRA regular (not fine scale) standards are greater than the fine scale wheels can tolerate). I don;t have any Insulfrogs to measure the distance between the two frog rails at their closest, but if at any point it's less than .110" then it is possible for a perfectly correct wheel to short there.

                                --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • 79 posts
Posted by B. Bryce on Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:55 AM

There is power there, but I have never had a time where my wheels made contact between both of the main rails, unless it was derailed.  The flanges are on the wrong sides to cause a short and the plastic, although not that large, is more than enough to prevent a normal metal wheel from making contact with both rails.  Are there wheelsets with metal faces that large?  Maybe I am just really lucky (I'm usually not!). Smile

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:29 AM

B. Bryce

Thank you for the reply, but I am still somewhat confused with your explaination.  I use all Peco Insulfrog turnouts on my layout and I agree there are two small sections of rail, acting as guardrails, beside the plastic that, if the wheels touched them at the same time they touched the main rails, would cause a short.  The only issue is, I tested my turnouts, and these small pieces of metal track are not powered.  

Randy is referring to the convergence of powered rails of opposite polarity as illustrated in this photo from dccwiki.com.

Rich

 Peco_Insulfrog.jpg

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • 79 posts
Posted by B. Bryce on Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:42 AM

Thank you for the reply, but I am still somewhat confused with your explaination.  I use all Peco Insulfrog turnouts on my layout and I agree there are two small sections of rail, acting as guardrails, beside the plastic that, if the wheels touched them at the same time they touched the main rails, would cause a short.  The only issue is, I tested my turnouts, and these small pieces of metal track are not powered.  The main problem with the Insulfrog is if you are using a small (short) locomotive like a 0-4-0  or an 0-6-0 steam locomotive, they will stall when they try and transit the turnout because there is no power there.  The larger locomotives with multiple powered trucks do not have this issue.  My Bachmann 0-4-0 does have an issue with this (stalling, which is why I only use it as a scenery locomotive, well, one of  the reasons I only use it as a scenery locomotive!), but none of my other locos neither stall or cause a short.  If you are having this problem, I think it is something else.  Are your turnouts modified?

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:55 PM

 The insulating bit in an Insulfrog is a TINY piece of plastic where the frog rails come together. The insulated frog in eg an Atlas Snap-Track turnout is a rather alrge bit of plastic that makes up the entire frog. The frog in an Electrofrog is a large bit of metal encompassing the frog as well at the converging and diverging rails which int he default configuration get set to the proper polarity based on the point position (and you need insualting joiners on the diverging frog rails)

Since the two rails of opposite polarity come so close together in an Insulfrog, with only that tiny thing piece of plastic insulating them from one another, it's not too difficult for a wheel tread to bridge that gap. They should have made it just a few mm longer, it wouldn't have compromised operation by being too large a dead section, but it would prevent any shorting issues. Me, I'll stick with Electrofrog and power them so there are never any dead spots. It's not difficult.

 There's no place for anything to bridge two rails of opposite polarity on an Electrofrog. Look closely at an Insulfrog - it's a very thin piece of plastic.

                                          --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2012
  • 79 posts
Posted by B. Bryce on Wednesday, July 18, 2018 6:41 AM

I'm a bit confused.  How does an Insulfrog create shorts while the Electrofrog does not.  I am under the understanding the metal wheels couching both the main rail and the Electrofrog at the same time caused the shorts.  The Insulfrogs are plastic and non-conductive.  Not saying they don't, just do not understand how.

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 91 posts
Posted by cadman11 on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 11:09 AM

Hi Randy,

All my joints are soldered and have no turnouts just three tracks running around a shelf 7' up the walls, I do have two differnt cleaning cars one being a CMX but have to admit don't use them much. When cleaning manually I use a bit of alcohol on a clean cloth but could be this wonderful windy, desert climate in southern Ca. But will use your recommendation and run the cleaning car.

thanks - cadman1

Thom Owen
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 8:06 AM

 Beats me, 100% metal wheels, all rolling stock is Proto 2000 wheels unless they came with metal wheels already - like Atlas and a few others. No Athearn sintered wheels - all locos have solid or plated nickle silver wheels. Atlas Code 83 track throughout - I WAS going to handlay turnouts but even those would have been built using Atlas rail stripped from flextrack. And no smoking - no one smokes in this household anyway but if they did, no smoking in the train room.

 ANd when you do clean the track, like after painting, no abrasives and nothign that leaves a residue. The whole idea of applying a thin layer of goo-gone or anything is IMO foolish. Any sort of residue, even if it's not sticky, will attact the dust from the air. We don;t have much trouble with our modular show layout either - it does need a cleaning for every setup since most of the time when not set up the modules live in a non-climate controlled area and get transported in trailers that aren;t hermetically sealed. We run a cleaning train with a CMX car and a couple of Centerline cars, using laquer thinner in the CMX and a pair of dry pads on the Centerlien cars after setup and that's usualyl good for a coupel of days of running - in a wide open area like a mall. Most contact issues are with the need for more feeders on several older modules, not with dirty track.

 But back to my home layout. If I rub my fingers oint he track, I get a coupel of dirty streaks - but the trains will run at crawl speed and not so much as flicker the headlight. It's not super dirty, liek big black streaks on your fingers, but it would certainyl fail a white glove test. It never gets any worse.

 I also have feeders at every rail joint - a lot of what might get attributed to dirty track could be lack of power. ANd by every joint I mean every joint. Every rail joiner has a feeder soldered to it. A turnout then ends up with THREE sets of feeders. The only place I solder any rail joints is for curves, I solder two pieces of flex track together and attach feeders to the joint before installing a curve. Everythign else is free - I don;t reuse joiners, I take then fresh fromt he pack, attach feeders,a dn then installt he track. I've painted them quite thoroughly to hide any shiny edges so if paint's goign to seep in and distrupt the electrical continuity it already has. I don;t think it does though, not with as tight as fresh joiners are. The end result is that the only pale I have seen headlight flickers is when I missed a spot of paint on the railhead of freshly painted track. I use nothing more abrasive than a fingernail to scrape the errant dab of paint off, and no more problem. I catch most of them as I paint the track and just wipe th still wet paint off with my finger, but sometimes I miss a goof and don't catch it until I run trains next.

                           --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 91 posts
Posted by cadman11 on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 12:57 AM

Hi Randy,
Noticed your post of never having to clean rails on your DCC layout. What is the secret? After about 4 hours of running my rails are black and locos start shutting down. All rolling stock has metal wheels. Seems some locos cause more buildup than others. I've got power feeds to 8 connectons on a total of 80' KATO Unitrack with 4 - 4 section 22.5 radius  curves.

Thanks

Thom Owen
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Sunday, April 10, 2011 7:16 PM

Most of my stock has metal wheels and I have no problem with my  Digitrax Super Chief.

You engines have metal wheels, why would metal wheels on your cars be any different?

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

EDZ
  • Member since
    January 2011
  • From: Salisbury, MA
  • 158 posts
Posted by EDZ on Sunday, April 10, 2011 5:37 PM

modelmaker51

60% of my 400+ cars still have their plastic wheels and I have no intention of changing them. These are mostly BBs but some others too. It is a myth that plastic wheels create and leave black gunk on the rails. The black gunk is the oxidation of the NS rails and from the arcing caused by metal wheels on locos. I use CRC 2-26 to clean my track 1-2 times a year and I run (DCC) a lot. I have modified all the turnouts that caused shorting. The CRC 2-26 seems to prevent any dirt buildup on any of the wheels. The layout is 20 years old and a lot of the cars are nearing that age as well..

I can't confirm one way or the other whether Kadee wheels are sintered or not, however the black gunk they leave behind is from the blackening agent KD uses on their wheel. A lot of running will eventually wear that stuff off, I have also use a Dremel with a wire wheel to polish the KD treads and they don't seem to pickup or leave any more dirt than any of the other wheels I have. There is a similar issue with the older Proto engines, The blackening use on them also wears off and is left on the rails, I pulled all the Proto wheels and polished the treads with a steel wire wheel and they no longer cause any problems.

It is important that any Athearn locos (BBs) have their sintered iron wheels changed out for NS as these are the worst culprits for creating and leaving dirt on the track.

Great info.  CRC makes some great products.

"We are what we repeatedly do.  Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit."  -Aristotle

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Sunday, April 10, 2011 1:51 PM

60% of my 400+ cars still have their plastic wheels and I have no intention of changing them. These are mostly BBs but some others too. It is a myth that plastic wheels create and leave black gunk on the rails. The black gunk is the oxidation of the NS rails and from the arcing caused by metal wheels on locos. I use CRC 2-26 to clean my track 1-2 times a year and I run (DCC) a lot. I have modified all the turnouts that caused shorting. The CRC 2-26 seems to prevent any dirt buildup on any of the wheels. The layout is 20 years old and a lot of the cars are nearing that age as well..

I can't confirm one way or the other whether Kadee wheels are sintered or not, however the black gunk they leave behind is from the blackening agent KD uses on their wheel. A lot of running will eventually wear that stuff off, I have also use a Dremel with a wire wheel to polish the KD treads and they don't seem to pickup or leave any more dirt than any of the other wheels I have. There is a similar issue with the older Proto engines, The blackening use on them also wears off and is left on the rails, I pulled all the Proto wheels and polished the treads with a steel wire wheel and they no longer cause any problems.

It is important that any Athearn locos (BBs) have their sintered iron wheels changed out for NS as these are the worst culprits for creating and leaving dirt on the track.

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: From Golden, CO living in Puyallup (Seattle), WA
  • 751 posts
Posted by Renegade1c on Sunday, April 3, 2011 10:30 PM

I am in the process of switching to all metal wheels on my cars. This is because I have a full block detection system and each car will have a resistor wheel set so that it can be detected. I am currently running cars on the layout that have plastic wheel sets but eventually all the cars on the layout will have metal wheels. I have currently fitted at least 50 cars so far with resistor wheel sets. I just placed an order for two 100 packs of inter mountain 33" wheels to convert the rest of the cars on the layout. Only two axles need to have resistors on them so I plan to make 100 resistor wheel sets and leave the others blank.

All newly added rolling stock will be fitted with metal wheels and resistor wheel sets before it is allowed on the layout.


Colorado Front Range Railroad: 
http://www.coloradofrontrangerr.com/

flag

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, April 3, 2011 11:16 AM

 Could be that the smaller size means it doesn;t make much difference, but even higher quality N scale rolling stock still comes with palstic wheels and often, truck mounted couplers. A lot of the RTR HO stock now comes with metal wheels, and I haven't seen a truck mounted coupler outside of train sets and IHC passenger cars in ages.

                        --Randy


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, April 3, 2011 9:07 AM

jwils1

Metal wheels are obviously favored but is there any reason why this would not be true for N scale?

The same should hold true for N scale as far as clean track. The plastic wheels on N do seem to run as smooth but I had converted mine over when I was running them.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Thornton, CO
  • 763 posts
Posted by jwils1 on Sunday, April 3, 2011 8:03 AM

Metal wheels are obviously favored but is there any reason why this would not be true for N scale?

Jerry

Rio Grande vs. Santa Fe.....the battle is over but the glory remains!

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, April 3, 2011 5:24 AM

I use nothing but Intermountain metal wheels on all of my cars.  They operate much more smootly than plastic.  They also run clean on the rails whereas the plastic wheels leave a dark black gunk on the rails that interferes with the electrical contact.  If the installation of the metal wheels reveals shorts, then fix the shorts.  The one downside to metal wheels though is that derailments can cause shorts if the wheels bridge both rails.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Saturday, April 2, 2011 9:30 PM

I use all metal as does the club.  It's true that the metal wheels will find any problems with your layout including turnouts but once you fix them you'll have cleaner track and much smoother operation.  I also like the sound and look.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Colorful Colorado
  • 8,639 posts
Posted by Texas Zepher on Saturday, April 2, 2011 9:04 PM

Ron51777
on a DCC layout would it be better to use plastic wheels on rolling stuck, then metal wheels because of shorts.

  When our club switched to metal wheels the incidence of short circuits went through the roof.  As another poster pointed out we traced the problem to the wide treads and Peco Insulfrog turnouts.  Likewise we temporarily fixed the problem with clear nail polish.  For a long term solution we tightened up our tread width standard and switched to Electrofrog turnouts.  End of problem.   

I found the bigger annoyance to me was the additional noise caused by the metal wheels.  Still haven't figured out a solution for that one.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, April 2, 2011 11:49 AM

 I replace all my wheels with metal when building or preparing a car for the track. No problems with DCC. In fact,t he only time I have to clean my track is after painting the rail to get off any that gets on the rail head. I don't even own any track cleaner or even a bright boy currently.

                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Western, MA
  • 8,571 posts
Posted by richg1998 on Saturday, April 2, 2011 10:56 AM

Make sure you use the machined metal wheels, not the sintered metal wheels like Kadee sells. Those wheels can be considered porous and pick up dirt.

Rich

If you ever fall over in public, pick yourself up and say “sorry it’s been a while since I inhabited a body.” And just walk away.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Metro East St. Louis
  • 5,743 posts
Posted by simon1966 on Saturday, April 2, 2011 10:41 AM

jrbernier

 Most folks apply a little clear nail polish remover

Jim you are getting confused with the things around your makeup mirror!

Simon Modelling CB&Q and Wabash See my slowly evolving layout on my picturetrail site http://www.picturetrail.com/simontrains and our videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/MrCrispybake?feature=mhum

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: SE Minnesota
  • 6,847 posts
Posted by jrbernier on Saturday, April 2, 2011 10:35 AM

  I have metal wheels on ALL of my rolling stock, and have no problems on my Digitrax DCC powered layout.  I suspect someone mentioned a problem with Peco 'Insulfrog' turnouts.  If the wheel tread is too wide, it can short the rails at the 'V' of the frog.  Most folks apply a little clear nail polish remover to the point area to remove the problem.  This was not so prevalent on a DC powered layout as only the train in the immediate block would be affected.  With DCC, the entire layout can be affects by the momemtary 'short' and a fast acting DCC system will shut down the power.

Jim

Modeling BNSF  and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Saturday, April 2, 2011 10:22 AM

I think the benefits of metal wheels overcome any electrical problems they may occasionally cause on a DCC layout.

I am 100% metal wheels and will not revert to plastic.

Jack W.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!