Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Round 1 a failure with MRC

11996 views
58 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Round 1 a failure with MRC
Posted by gatrhumpy on Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:32 PM

Bought an N scale MRC sound DCC decoder from a Hobby Shop in Ocala, FL. When I went to go put the decoder in the Kato engine after I had properly isolated the two halves, nothing. No response from the decoder, no lights, nothing.

 

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

I live too far away to return it to the shop by hand, so I will return it by mail. If the second decoder doesn't work, then I'm getting out of DCC permanently without ever having to try it.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Eastern Shore Virginia
  • 3,290 posts
Posted by gandydancer19 on Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:46 PM

MRC decoders don't seem to be the best choice for some modelers.  Many modelers have had bad experiences with them including me.  They may not be necessarily inferior, but if I have a problem with something, I move away from the brand, and I have moved away from MRC.

Also, decoder installation is very fussy in such a small scale.  I know it is done and I have done it, but you have to be very particular that you are doing everything right.  One thing out of wack and you have fried it.  Some things you can 'wing it' and get by with, but not with decoder installations.  If you don't check your motor isolation with a meter, you are asking for trouble.

Elmer.

The above is my opinion, from an active and experienced Model Railroader in N scale and HO since 1961.

(Modeling Freelance, Eastern US, HO scale, in 1962, with NCE DCC for locomotive control and a stand alone LocoNet for block detection and signals.) http://waynes-trains.com/ at home, and N scale at the Club.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:49 PM

gatrhumpy,

As I mentioned in the other thread, MRC decoders have not had a very good track record as far as DCC is concerned.  I've heard more misses than hits in regards to their reliability.  So, you should NOT gauge your DCC experience solely on them along.

I take it by your closing statement that you haven't received your Power Cab yet?  If not, why don't you test the decoder out with the Power Cab first before mailing the decoder back to the store.

Also, do you know for sure whether the MRC decoder is a dual-decoder?  It would need to be in order for you to test it out on DC.  Elmer's statement about the importance of careful installation is also very wise council.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Sunday, January 23, 2011 5:55 PM

Well I would not move away from DCC just because of one failure.

Try a straight DCC install (NO SOUND) and stay away from MRC for decoders.

The MRC units seem to have a high failure rate and a lot of DOA units for some reason.

Doing DCC installs in N scale is not that hard to do but it is very demanding in that you know where some problems are.     

A single wire touching one of the frame halves will cause a decoder to go South.

Is this you first install ? 

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, January 23, 2011 6:10 PM

 Don;t get out of DCC, stop using some of the WORST decoders ever put on the market. Try some quality decoders from TCS, NCE, or Digitrax before you scrape the idea of DCC - it's not DCC causing your problems, it's JUNK like MRC. They are as bad as the cheap train sets of the 70's for turning people off to this hobby or a segment of it. I use mostly TCS decoders, with a few NCE and Digitrax, and I have NEVER EVER had a bad one out of the box.

                           --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, January 23, 2011 6:19 PM

Stop holding hold back, Randy!  Speak your mind! Laugh

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, January 23, 2011 6:25 PM

 I was on a roll after the Genset thread - I hit this one afterwards and see someone wanting to scrap the whole idea of DCC because of an MRC failure, well, I keep on. I continued the roll in the thread about Tsunami startup sounds, too. Guess I'm on an anti-annoyign kick tonight.

                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, January 23, 2011 6:35 PM

rrinker

 Don;t get out of DCC, stop using some of the WORST decoders ever put on the market. Try some quality decoders from TCS, NCE, or Digitrax before you scrape the idea of DCC - it's not DCC causing your problems, it's JUNK like MRC. They are as bad as the cheap train sets of the 70's for turning people off to this hobby or a segment of it. I use mostly TCS decoders, with a few NCE and Digitrax, and I have NEVER EVER had a bad one out of the box.

                           --Randy

 

Randy,

I am considering buying an MRC decoder for my 1970's Tyco loco.  Are you saying that the MRC decoder is a good choice?

Rich

Laugh   Laugh   Laugh

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Sunday, January 23, 2011 7:21 PM

richhotrain

I am considering buying an MRC decoder for my 1970's Tyco loco.  Are you saying that the MRC decoder is a good choice?

Rich

The two are about equal, technologically speaking. 

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Sunday, January 23, 2011 8:42 PM

How would I check the decoder for consistency?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Sunday, January 23, 2011 8:44 PM

Tom, I did get my Powercab, which is why I drove 2.5 hours on a Saturday to get a drop-in decoder for my N scale Kato SD40-2. I was excited about it working.

I got home, applied the tape to the engine as I should to isolate the two halves, and.....nothing.

I did not check for motor isolation yet. How would I do that using a mutlimeter?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Sunday, January 23, 2011 8:46 PM

Well, I applied tape to the frame of the Kato as instructed in the MRCs directions. It's a drop in decoder, so I assume that if the tape is applied correctly in the locations shown, that the decoder would work.

Yes, it was my first installation.

The whole reason why I got into DCC was for the onboard sound aspect.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Trois-Rivieres Quebec Canada
  • 1,063 posts
Posted by jalajoie on Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:02 PM

gatrhumpy

How would I check the decoder for consistency?

NCE sells a nice little gadget to test decoders. Cost is approximately $20.00 street price. I have one and it came handy on some occasions.

Here is a link to Tony Trains Xchange: http://www.tonystrains.com/products/nce_other.htm

 

Jack W.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • From: Mt Pleasant, Utah
  • 93 posts
Posted by Dave Merrill on Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:17 PM

gatrhumpy

I did not check for motor isolation yet. How would I do that using a mutlimeter?

Gatrhumpy

Set the meter to read the lowest numerical scale on ohms and measure between the chassis and each motor wire.  Should be infinite resistance.

Dave

From Mt Pleasant, Utah, the home of the Hill Valley and Thistle Railroad where the Buffalo still roam and a Droid runs the trains

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:19 PM

It's been pretty much covered.  MRC exists so you have something to compare to.  MRC is the Anchor of the industry IMO.

Springfield PA

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:22 PM

gatrhumpy,

When you say the MRC decoder is a "drop-in" decoder, do you mean that all you had to do was to plug the decoder into the 8-pin (2 x 4-pin) NMRA socket?  Also, after you installed the decoder, did you first test the locomotive on your programming track in programming mode, or in regular operating mode?

FYI: It's always best to test a DCC-equipped locomotive on your programming track in programming mode first BEFORE you operate in regular mode.  This is because a decoder on the programming track receives less than full power; since your primary purpose for having it there is to 1) verify that your DCC system can read the decoder, and 2) program the decoder to a short and long address.  If a decoder is somehow wired incorrectly or is faulty, you're less likely to fry it in programming mode.

gatrhumpy, I did a little poking around for N-scale MRC decoders.  Does the drop-in decoder you have resemble the one in this F3?

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, January 23, 2011 9:28 PM

 Notice that none of the top tier sound decoder makers, like Soundtraxx, QSI and ESU, have any specific N scale sound decoders? Why is this? Because they haven't been able to cram it all in there AND meet their high standards. MRC just slaps them together and hope they work, at least until the warranty runs out.

 N scale sound is still iffy at best, particularly for narrow hood diesels. Your best bet is to put the sound in a dummy unit where you can fit a better quality but slightly larger decoder - also a larger speaker - and consist it to a powered unit using a plain motor decoder - choices from several brands depending on the exact loco. There's some overlap, but each manufacturer also has a few specific models tha tthe other guys don't. With the limited space in N, you are best off using a decoder specifically made for your loco. In HO since there is more room I usually recommend inexpensive generic decoders and soldering the wires directly, vs a more expensive board repalcement. But there's plenty of room, not many HO locos use a split frame design, and not many HO locos have the entire space under the shell filled with a metal chassis for traction. It is way easier in N scale to use a specific board replacement. Even then, manufacturers make changes from run to run, or the tolerances are off - the most likely thing happenign is NOT that the motor isn't isolated, but rather the deoceder isn't making good contact with the frame halves to pick up power. This happens with other brands of decoders from time to time as well, and in some cases requires adding a blob of solder to each of the points that is supposed to touch the frame.

                                      --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 5:50 AM

Dave - thanks for the reply. So I put the dial on the multimeter to 'ohms,' on the lowest setting, and place one probe on the metal chassis, and the other probe on the motos wire on the same side? What should the multimeter read?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:01 AM

Tom, when I say drop-in decoder, I mean that I take out the old printed circuit board (PCB) light board, insulate the top of the chassis to prevent electrical contact, and then replace with the new DCC decoder.

This is the decoder I got:

http://www.trainz.com/p-209868-mrc-1806-n-scale-dcc-decoder-wsound-for-kato-sd40-2.aspx

I basically covered the entire top and sides of the chassis that does not need electrical connections.

And I did try to program it on the programming track. On the NCE system I got, I pressed "Prog/ESC" four times, pressed 1 for "STD," and it said wait. After ten seconds, it said, "Can not read back CV."

I checked all my layout wiring, and it's intact. I have several feeder wires (more than necessary for my small 2.5 x 4 ft layout). I even placed a coin across the track to ensure the circuit breaker trips, and it does.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:12 AM

Also, these are the sheets that I used for reference when I installed the MRC decoder.

http://www3.telus.net/HarrisFamily/SD40_2

http://www.tcsdcc.com/public_html/Customer_Content/Installation_Pictures/N_Scale/Kato/SD40%20-2/N_Kato_SD40-2mid_K1D4-NC.html

The second link only isolates the chassis in the spot directly above the motor and between the flywheels. The directions that came with the MRC decoder have me isolating the chassis halves in six (6) separate places.

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:24 AM

Also, in the directions, specifically, the second link (and in more detail in the following link, even though it is foran SD-45), I noticed that the motor contact wires are not there.

http://www.tcsdcc.com/public_html/Customer_Content/Installation_Pictures/N_Scale/Kato/EMD%20SD45/EMD_SD45.html

What I mean is that I don't see a think copper strip under the broader, wider copper strips, from the motor, in between the flywheels. Should these copper strips be cut? How does the board get power?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:43 AM

And finally, this is the manual and instructions I used to install the thing.

http://www.modelrectifier.com/resources/trainsound/0001806.pdf

 

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,249 posts
Posted by tstage on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:45 AM

gatrhumpy
Dave - thanks for the reply. So I put the dial on the multimeter to 'ohms,' on the lowest setting, and place one probe on the metal chassis, and the other probe on the motos wire on the same side? What should the multimeter read?

gatrhumpy,

You should only read infinite ohms (or "OL") on your multimeter, if it's isolated properly.  Anything else means it's not isolated.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 6:55 AM

So is my procedure correct?

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Johannesburg, RSA
  • 36 posts
Posted by daveb on Monday, January 24, 2011 7:04 AM

gatrhumpy,

Your meter should not read anything i.e. infinite resistance for isolation. If an analog meter the needle should be to the righthand end of the scale, if digital it will indicate overload "OL" or something similar.

Dave B 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Monday, January 24, 2011 9:19 AM

The reading obtained on a digital meter varies according to the quality of the meter -- the cheap ($1.99) digital meter from Harbor Freight reads '1' when set on the lowest resistance range of 200 Ohms and the probes touching nothing, to '1.0' with the probes touching each other.

Nearly every analog meter will have the infinity symbol or INF at the far right.

It would not surprise me to learn that the OP's MRC decoder was dead on arrival -- I had two Sounder decoders that were.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Monday, January 24, 2011 10:01 AM

If your Power Cab read back "can not read CV" it is more than likely that the decoder is not making contact with the frames - NO power getting to the decoder. Like Randy said in a post some were, sometimes you have to put a small drop of solder on the board at each contact point . Now when I say a drop - just tin the surfaces of the contacts pads on the board- trial fit, you can add more solder if needed. DON''T glob a large bunch of solder on the pads or you will not be able to get the board to fit into the small slots. BTW some MRC decoder will not support reading back CV's.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 11:04 AM

Well, "Trains of Ocala" will officially never be getting my business again. I asked about a return, even though I followed all the directions contained in the package. The guy literally laughed at me. We then got into a discussion about engineering, mutlimeters, etc.

I'm out of DCC. This is not worth the ****ing hassle.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Jacksonville, FL
  • 913 posts
Posted by gatrhumpy on Monday, January 24, 2011 11:13 AM

I used gorilla tape as an electrical isolating tape on the KATO engine. That is more than three times thicker than electrical tape. I used a microscope to verify that the four contact points were in fact making contact with the decoder board.

If the guy won't take the motor board back, I'm filing a charge with my bank.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Phoenix, AZ
  • 693 posts
Posted by woodone on Monday, January 24, 2011 11:25 AM

Well I can understand your frustration.

You may not have a bad decoder- might be a contact issue- If it is a bad decoder, send it back to the manufacture. MRC's warranty is very good. The decoders are not that well thought of but I know they do support there product. Forget the retailer, He can't help you too much.

I think that you would love the DCC and once you get over this hump you would be happy.

I will make you a deal- send me your loco and the decoder-(with a proof of purchase). I will install- and test- if I find the decoder to be bad, I will send it to MRC for replacement- that is why I would need the proof of purchase.

The only thing that I would ask of you is to pay for the freight (shipping cost)

I feel this strong about DCC! I will invest my time to save you and have you a DCC fan.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!