Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Soldering the buss and taping

4416 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Chicago IL.
  • 28 posts
Soldering the buss and taping
Posted by Steel Man on Tuesday, June 1, 2010 3:22 PM
I have soldered all of my 12 GA buss to my 20 GA feeder wires. Is it necessary to tape the connection after it is soldered? The wires are not necessarily that close to each other so I am not worried about a short but I don't know if they can get dirty over time and this will cause a problem with the connection. If I do need to tape all of the joints, is it advisable to use liquid tape. Thanks Gary
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Tuesday, June 1, 2010 3:55 PM

 There's no reason to tape them off unless you have anything that can short.  My buss wires don't even have a jacket on them

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Tuesday, June 1, 2010 6:03 PM

 Someone's been pressing up against the wood with the soldering iron Big Smile

I keep my connections offset, so there should be no issue with shorting. I do usually go back and paint each connection with liquid electrical tape though, just to be sure. Make sure you have a window open, the stuff is kind of stinky.

                                        --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Tuesday, June 1, 2010 6:10 PM

 I have to be a contortionist to work under the layout so I press away Smile.  Nice thing about bare copper is it's cheap and it doesn't have to be stripped every time I add a feeder.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • 2,751 posts
Posted by Allegheny2-6-6-6 on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 12:03 PM

 I solder and tape all of my connections why, it's just the way I was taught. With my luck I would have that one lone screw or piece of metal fall through the layout and come to rest on my unprotected buss wire.

I use that soft flexible electrical tape that used to mark wires, it comes in various colors so of course I use the corresponding colors on the buss connections to match the drops red/white That liquid electrical tape also is very handy to have around or that stuff used to coat tool handles insulating them. I use that when I need to isolate a motor when converting to dcc

 

Just my 2 cents worth, I spent the rest on trains. If you choked a Smurf what color would he turn?
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 2:49 PM

 A screw or any other object wouldn't hurt anything when the bare conductors have enough separation. But if they're jacketed like romex or any other paired wire. they should be taped or protected another way.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,342 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Thursday, June 3, 2010 9:41 AM

When you're just putting down the trackwork, the underside of a layout looks pretty clean and orderly.  But, years later when you've got the turnouts wired, you've installed signals and you've put lights in your structures and installed streetlamps, then the upside-down landscape gets more and more complicated.

You can only get away with un-insulated connections and bare wires for so long.  Eventually, it will bite you.  I burned out a power supply a couple of weeks ago when two wires below my layout touched.  (That circuit is now fused for protection, but that was done in hindsight.)

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Hilliard, Ohio
  • 1,137 posts
Posted by chatanuga on Thursday, June 3, 2010 11:44 AM

When I soldered my wiring, I used Micromark's liquid electrical tape on my connections.  Came out neater than regular electrical tape, which I've seen come loose in the past.

Kevin

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, June 3, 2010 1:12 PM

chatanuga

When I soldered my wiring, I used Micromark's liquid electrical tape on my connections.  Came out neater than regular electrical tape, which I've seen come loose in the past.

Kevin

I bought the equivalent at Home Despot for a few pennies - 2?oz. can with a brush in the cover.  Takes all of five seconds to dab a bare-wire solder connection - less if you are doing several at a time.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,676 posts
Posted by maxman on Thursday, June 3, 2010 2:07 PM

MisterBeasley
You can only get away with un-insulated connections and bare wires for so long.  Eventually, it will bite you. 

 

I agree with you on this.  There's just something about having those bus wires bare that makes me uncomfortable.  If that works for someone, okay, but I don't think it should be recommended as a general practice.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Thursday, June 3, 2010 3:12 PM

 Case in point, the part of my layout that I started first. There will be THREE bus lines in the area. One for the power district that run the staging yard, one ofr the power district that runs that half of the main, and one for the power district that runs the yard and cement plant. Actually the 4th bus line for the other half of the main will ALSO run in this area since it is underneath this section I am putting my DCC shelf.

 I'll stick with ordinary insulated wire, my trusty Ideal wire strippers for no hassle middle fo the wire striping, and my trusty Weller 150 watt soldering gun to make the connection. My layout it high enough that I can sit under it on a short stool (I'm a little too tall to do it sitting on a regular chair) without having to contort my neck. And just liekw ith my previous layout, despite having feeders to every section of track, for now the two parallel 12 feet sections fo track I have work just fine with one set of feeders each. I do a little bit of everythign each time I work ont he layout - so next time, more of the feeders will get connected, and since I finished that staging yard I will be able to terminate the bus wire at the terminal strip and truly finish it off.

                                    --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Thursday, June 3, 2010 3:19 PM

 I'm more than comfortable keeping the buss bare. Of course I probably wouldn't be if I hadn't been in electronics for 33 years.  I see it as being like high voltage wires on phone poles.  They run bare and not far from lower voltage wiring.  It's not a problem as long as only qualified people handle the wiring.  I do agree if you're uncomfortable with it you shouldn't do it.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 299 posts
Posted by JSperan on Thursday, June 3, 2010 6:30 PM

Hamltnblue
It's not a problem as long as only qualified people handle the wiring.


 The problem is many model railroaders are novices with electrical/electronics so to publicly advocate using bare conductors may not be entirely prudent when the knowledge/skill level of the reader is unknown.

Hamltnblue
 I'm more than comfortable keeping the buss bare. Of course I probably wouldn't be if I hadn't been in electronics for 33 years.

 

Oddly, it's my 30+ years of experience with electrical wiring and electronics that make me want to insulate conductors all the time.  In my experience the unexpected can and will happen so I like to cover all my bases by insulating conductors.

Of course, opinions vary and to each his own.

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Thursday, June 3, 2010 6:54 PM

 I can see how some can be concerned but if separated enough most are more than safe.  I guess I picked it up replacing old knob and tube wiring in my first house.  A lot of the conductors were bare from age but since they had separation a single nail or screw could never short the conductors which actually made it safer.  I had left it in place for ceiling lighting at the recommendation of an old timer electrician.  Many times as a technician I found shorts caused by nails or screws in paired jacketed wires.  I would trust 2 single conductors spaced by 4 or more inches over a pair of 12 gauge jacketed wires any day.  Take a handful of nails and try to short each one by driving them through the  board above. The single wires will survive every time. Then take a drill bit and drill random holes as a modeler does with building lighting around the feeders and you'll have similar results. The single conductors will never short but a hit to the twin conductors, not so lucky.   It doesn't sound good on the surface but if you think about it, not bad IMO.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 299 posts
Posted by JSperan on Friday, June 4, 2010 2:44 AM

Interesting.  I have never seen Knob and tube wiring that I myself would consider SAFER than ROMEX NMD-90 but I have removed plenty of knob and tube that showed signs of being a potential fire hazard.  If electrical wiring is installed correctly the incidents of a standard length drywall screw shorting a cable are not all that common.  Now if a homeowner hangs pictures with 3 inch deck screws anything can happen!

In any event on the layout I wouldn't use a cable with two or more conductors in a jacket.  That just seems inconvenient for stripping and soldering.  I would use single conductor insulated wire and space them adequately for easy access and convenience.  I'm with Randy and his Ideal wire strippers.

I'm not saying what you do is wrong, for you, just not ideal for the masses perhaps.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 1,517 posts
Posted by trainnut1250 on Friday, June 4, 2010 3:24 AM

FWIW:  This evening I had to track down a short on the railroad.  I have been doing hardshell work for the last six months and when I fired it up tonight, dead short.  Took twenty minutes to find the crossed bare wire feeders.  Ironically they were insurance feeders I put in before the hardshell buried the track.,  They weren't hooked up to the buss and were hanging there, crossed.

 In general I dont cover or insulate connections unless they are leading up to the switch panels where movement of accessing the panels might cause contact.  I do use insulated (but not romex) buss wires and stagger the feeder connections ala Randy and others.  I am also careful to use point to point wiring with no splices to cut down on extraneous places to short.  With 500 feet of track, 70+ switch machines and tons of other electrical, I would still be taping if I insulated every connection.  

Guy

see stuff at: the Willoughby Line Site

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, June 4, 2010 10:33 AM

The vast majority of my electrical connections are uninsulated - but they fall into two distinct categories:

  1. Wires soldered to solder lugs on various components.
  2. Wires secured to stud-and-nut terminals on terminal blocks, several per stud with washers between.

All of the wire connecting the usual 1 - 2 - 2 - 1 circuit are insulated full-length and unspliced.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 406 posts
Posted by donhalshanks on Friday, June 4, 2010 12:59 PM

I used the liquid insulation stuff painting on each connection after checking out the circuits and testing.  Doesn't take very long to go down the buss and paint each soldered joint.  Just makes sense to me to not leave bare.

Hal

  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Friday, June 4, 2010 3:08 PM

 I guess one way to look at it is the buss wire is uninsulated and only a little more than a half inch apart. (It's called the track). It's even closer at turnouts. So an uninsulated buss that has 4 inches of separation is almost 7-8 times the separation.

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Saturday, June 5, 2010 11:14 PM

JSperan

Interesting.  I have never seen Knob and tube wiring that I myself would consider SAFER than ROMEX NMD-90 but I have removed plenty of knob and tube that showed signs of being a potential fire hazard.  If electrical wiring is installed correctly the incidents of a standard length drywall screw shorting a cable are not all that common.  Now if a homeowner hangs pictures with 3 inch deck screws anything can happen!

In any event on the layout I wouldn't use a cable with two or more conductors in a jacket.  That just seems inconvenient for stripping and soldering.  I would use single conductor insulated wire and space them adequately for easy access and convenience.  I'm with Randy and his Ideal wire strippers.

I'm not saying what you do is wrong, for you, just not ideal for the masses perhaps.

I agree wholeheartedly. I wouldn't be so worried about something touching the two bare wires and creating a short, but rather an overload/short (or even a lightning strike-have you got a surge protector?) somewhere else in the line and the close proximity of the bare wire to the wood benchwork, the wire could overheat and ignite the wood, which has most often been the cause of house fires with the old knob and tube wiring.

This may not be much of an issue with a DC layout, except with the aforementioned lightning strike*, but with DCC it's another story; DCC has a potential of 2-5 amps or more going thru those wires, any overload/short could be a danger with the bare wire. 5 amps can easily create enough heat to weld, let alone burn wood. One thing Knob and Tube had, was standoffs to prevent direct contact with wood. I do think what you are doing is wrong from a safety point of view and would never recommend it.

If and when I have to use tape to insulate a join, I also use a cable tie so the tape won't unravle over time.

 

* I have had occaision to repair a couple of layouts that were hit by lightning (not just the layouts were hit of course!) I had to replace as much as 15% of the wiring, it got hot enough to melt and scorch the insulation(14-12 gauge),vaporize the 22 gauge drops and melt the electroncs, so I highly recommend to all to add a good surge protector to protect your layout and electronics. Safety Matters.

 

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • 74 posts
Posted by gjvjr50 on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 2:45 AM
The real problem with 'knob and tube' wiring is that it was not installed to handle modern day loads.  We have added a lot of devices to our homes compared to the days of 'knob and tube', but the design could save money/wire over romex 
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Fruita, CO
  • 540 posts
Posted by slammin on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 8:11 AM

In basements and other exposed areas knob and tube was too easy for amateur electricians to splice and add outlets and other runs, not so attractive with romex. Many early 20th century homes had the exposed wiring replaced but the wiring in the walls was still knob and tube.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada
  • 578 posts
Posted by Blue Flamer on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 10:13 AM

Hamltnblue

 I can see how some can be concerned but if separated enough most are more than safe.  I guess I picked it up replacing old knob and tube wiring in my first house.  A lot of the conductors were bare from age but since they had separation a single nail or screw could never short the conductors which actually made it safer.  I had left it in place for ceiling lighting at the recommendation of an old timer electrician.  Many times as a technician I found shorts caused by nails or screws in paired jacketed wires.  I would trust 2 single conductors spaced by 4 or more inches over a pair of 12 gauge jacketed wires any day.  Take a handful of nails and try to short each one by driving them through the  board above. The single wires will survive every time. Then take a drill bit and drill random holes as a modeler does with building lighting around the feeders and you'll have similar results. The single conductors will never short but a hit to the twin conductors, not so lucky.   It doesn't sound good on the surface but if you think about it, not bad IMO.

 

Hamltnblue.

I normally do not disagree with posters on these Forums, but in this case I do. I spent 41+ years as a HVAC Serviceman & Service Supervisor with the Gas Company. As such, I had a number of occasions back in the mid '50's through the late '90's to be involved with the Fire Department investigating the causes of fires where the gas appliances, piping and/or meters were involved or damaged during the course of a fire. In several cases, it was determined that the initial cause of the fire was faulty Knob and Tube wiring. Whoever the electrician was that advised you that it was OK to leave the Knob & Tube in place and use it for your lights did you a dis-service as the insulators may break over time and the insulation DEFINITELY will deteriorate and fall apart. (Personal knowledge.)

As for insulating wiring, I worked on everything from Millivolts (1/2 to 3/4 volts DC on self generating residential heating systems) to 550 volts feeding large Industrial units to 15,000Volt ignition transformers. On the Millivolt systems, if the 18 gauge thermostat wiring was deteriorating due to the heat at the furnace, I would cut the bad wiring back to the ceiling and splice in a new section and rewire the furnace valve and controls. At the splice I would scrape the wires shiny, twist them together with pliers and cut a bit off the tip to squash the wire together and then insulate them with Marrette Connectors, (wire nuts to some of you) bend them in opposite directions and then wrap the whole thing with plastic tape. It may have been a bit of overkill, but it only took me a minute or two to complete and when I left the job, I was sure that it was as safe as I could possibly make it.

One thing that you NEVER do is splice together house wiring between receptacles or junction boxes. It is much safer to run a new piece of wire back to the nearest junction box and tie in with wire nuts or other approved method.

Blue Flamer.

"There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness"." Dave Barry, Syndicated Columnist. "There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes." Doctor Who.
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by Hamltnblue on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 6:19 PM

 The problem with knob and tube was overheating due to modern appliances being added to circuits that were never intended to be used on them. Fires happen just as often when romex or any other wire is over heated. There's plenty of old style cloth romex falling apart that I see quite often that is vastly more dangerous than knob and tube.  As far as safety I agree the more precaution you take the better.  But once again if you or anyone thinks that bare single conductors 4 inches apart on a DCC is dangerous they better insulate their rails in a hurry. 

Springfield PA

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 299 posts
Posted by JSperan on Wednesday, June 9, 2010 12:41 PM

Hamltnblue
There's plenty of old style cloth romex falling apart that I see quite often that is vastly more dangerous than knob and tube.

 

The cloth covered cable you describe is not Romex, and I do agree it is more dangerous than knob & tube because the insulation becomes brittle over time.  However, it is not just appliances that pose an overloading problem with knob & tube wiring.  Modern light fixtures often draw many more watts than the single porcelain keyless or pullchain fixture with a 40 or 60 watt bulb that was the norm when knob & Tube wiring was installed.  Also neutrals were/are often unbalanced and often were overloaded in knob & Tube wiring systems.

Pretending knob & tube is better than modern wiring materials and practices, and advocating it's use is just plain old bad advice regardless of where you got the idea.

 

Hamltnblue
But once again if you or anyone thinks that bare single conductors 4 inches apart on a DCC is dangerous they better insulate their rails in a hurry. 

I don't think anyone suggested it was all that dangerous to use bare conductors for buss and feeders on a DCC system, just that it is unwise to do so.  I think using household knob and tube wiring as an example to justify your DCC wiring practices confused the issue somewhat.

All that matters is that the OP and others know that using insulated conductors and insulating splices and taps is good wiring practice on the layout and furthermore, that when advice on household wiring is needed, talk to a qualified electrician in person before taking advice from anyone on a MRR forum.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!